7:00 古董之所以有價值 不是因為preception, 係因為之罕有性. Bitcoin can be replaced by other cryptocurrency at anytime. Just like Altavista can be replaced by Yahoo, and Yahoo replaced by Google. ICQ replaced by MSN, MSN then replaced by Facebook, wechat. number of Bitcoin is limited, but number of Cryptocurrency isnt.
同意蕭生講,value 係based on perception, 但係perception並非arbitrary。鑽石黃金字畫,皆有它們獨特之處,appeal to 人類的perception。而人類的perception,幫助人類作選擇,乃是幫助人類生存讓人更開心的工具,所以人類不會以狗屎為有價值。bitcoin 的價值是完全虛擬出來的,本身並沒有任何美感或獨特之處,好像蕭生痾的屎一樣,我們一眾粉絲當然覺得價值連城,可是想想百年之後,蕭生的名氣消逝,他的屎還能有什麼價值?
@kayin5025
3 жыл бұрын
Good analysis on bitcoin's value based on supply and demand. However, we should also understand that the energy consumption of mining bitcoin is equivalent to the electricity usage of the whole of Switzerland. The mining and transactions use up huge amount of energy which creates a serious carbon footprint problem. My husband, a high-tech professional, did not invest in bitcoin when at its early stage because he thought it is an unethical product, though not fraudulent. More details, see this recent BBC post www.bbc.com/news/technology-48853230
錯哂,bitcoin價值其中一部份在於去中心化機制,可以為人類創造一種有公眾認受性但不受政權操縱既價值交換方式,同埋即使政府禁得到中心化交易所,但都禁唔到defi,公眾一樣有方法交易bitcoin。所以bitcoin受到監管受到官方認可對於佢既價值只係錦上添花,冇左政府既認受佢都唔會收皮,只會跌一輪然後重新炒返上黎。同埋bitcoin響眾多大戶手中(強調係N個大戶,唔係單一)夾埋都只係持有11%,其餘都係散戶持有、世界各地礦工持有、普通機構投資者持有、交易所流通既幣、永遠失蹤既幣等等,真正你所講既programmers超級巨鯨佢地連0.5%既持有份額都冇,而全球頭100大address當中有最耐歷史(2010-2011年產生)既address只得16個,而去到第100名既address,持有量已經只有0.04872%。再者,鏈上數據有完全透明既miners to exchange inflow數據,你所講既可能同假設真係very unlikely。從古至今一樣野有冇價值本質上只係源於有幾多人對果樣資產有價值共識從而轉化成購買行為所決定,黃金係唔會單純因為佢難開採難提鍊但冇人買而值咁多錢,最後都係要有人肯買先至決定到個價值,因為果啲開採者提鍊者都係因為有人買黃金、佢地有錢賺,所以先去開採同提鍊。
Пікірлер: 151