“没有胡萝卜,中国更不会改变!” Agree 100%. Whoever come to power in next US election, the strategy basic 3C of Cold War II won’t change - Competition (Stick), Corporation (Carrot), Compromise (Solution or Benefit Sharing). This is how the Peaceful Transformation which will be carried out and Cina people will eventually achieve prosperous life style and living standards ideally. 料依 [翻譯] 100%同意。無論誰在下次美國大選中上台,第二次冷戰的戰略基本3C都不會改變--競爭(大棒)、合作(胡蘿蔔)、妥協(解決方案或利益共享)。這就是即將進行的和平改造,中國人民最終將達到富裕的生活方式和理想的生活水準。 “怎么办?你只能接受西方的那套与市场经济相配套的法制思想,尽管很被动很难受很不情愿,但也不得不接受。” You are right but too little on what CCP has accepted so far, The West unanimously think CCP is playing the rule to avoid accepting “相配套的” Ideology and Rules (Institutions). This is the key of the Cold War II all about. 料依 [翻譯] 你是對的,但到目前為止中共接受的東西太少了,西方一致認為中共正在玩規則以避免接受「相配的」意識形態和規則(制度)。這就是第二次冷戰的關鍵。 Your “浪得虚名” I disagree. I respect Dr Chan Shao Pin a lot. His professionalism reflected on his preparation on each of his talkshow is 2nd to none. 料依 [翻譯] 你的「浪得虛名」我不同意。我非常尊敬陳小平博士。他在每場脫口秀節目中的準備工作都體現了他的專業精神,這是首屈一指的。 Your entire tone in General - You seem to pretty reasonably comprehend CCP current situation politically and economically. But you definitely don’t the outside one, I mean the West. That is your perspective's fatal weakness of your view as CCP has itself dilemma or more precisely your narrative is popular enough to give public an impression - "the problem is serious but no choice the way the CCP is doing is the better than nothing - thus, it is the best." Wrong. This is the key I am totally against you. No laugh here. Cina as a Leninism regime won’t collapse so soon even being exploded at certain degrees, not Penkui though. CCP is getting weaker and weaker. We see the President of CCP has bent down one when he met Biden Administration. He may do so 2nd time or even 3rd one. Or he could be removed before 3rd time as I just guess like Nikita Khrushchev. God help. A crucial factor is such weakness will undoubtedly bring down its social living standards back Y2K or even further. The West including their elites have seen this and is going certainly do “Falling rocks down well”. (). In football you won’t stop shoot in front of a gate when your defender fell next to you. Professionally you shot a goal then go back to care your sport competitor. It is so called Athleticism in professional way. The West wanna win this war/game 2nd time. Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears. 料依 [翻譯] 你的整個語氣總體來說-- 您似乎對中共目前的政治和經濟狀況有相當合理的了解。但你絕對不是外面的,我指的是西方。這是你的觀點的致命弱點,因為中共本身就陷入困境,或者更準確地說,你的敘述足夠受歡迎,足以給公眾留下這樣的印象--「問題很嚴重,但中共沒有選擇的做法總比沒有好--因此,這是最好的。”錯。 這就是我完全反對你的關鍵。這不是玩笑。 中國作為列寧主義政權,即使被崩到某個程度,也不會那麼快潰,但崩潰則不然。中共的實力會越來越弱了。我們看到中共主席在會見拜登政府時已經彎腰了。他可能會這樣做第二次,甚至第三次。或者他可能會在做第三次之前被移除,就像我的猜測的,就像尼基塔·赫魯雪夫一樣。上帝幫助。 一個關鍵因素是,這種疲軟無疑將導致其社會生活水平回落至千年前甚至進一步。包括他們的精英在內的西方國家已經看到了這一點,並且肯定會落石下井。 在足球比賽中,當你的後衛倒在你身邊時,你不會在門前停止射門。從專業角度來說,你射門後就回去照顧你的運動競爭對手。這就是所謂的專業運動精神。西方想第二次贏得這場戰爭/遊戲。 莫斯科不相信眼淚。 @@TOC008
But what about readers? Those Public Mass like you and me so called "Gong Zon". We are the receivers who enjoy such entertainment. We were part of influencers reflected to politicians too. My view is it should not be seen as a fault or mistake. Rather see it as a social process of learning. You mentioned 塔利班 here, the best learning is to see now the 塔利班 government is banning female having secondary education. It is not enough just blaming US Army withdraw. So complicated here, it is impossible to expand such subject here. In brief, my view is to be sustainable social institution establishment led to social mechanism is as important as any tangible social engagement, support and investment. Both sender and receiver need to have such a recognition. 料依翻譯 [Lioi 與君商榷] 但讀者呢?像你我這樣的大眾,被稱為「公Zong」。我們是享受這種娛樂的接收者。我們也是政治家反映的影響者的一部分。 我的觀點是,這不應被視為過錯或錯誤。相反,將其視為學習的社會過程。 你在這裡提到了塔利班,最好的學習是看到塔利班政府現在禁止女性接受中等教育。僅僅指責美軍撤軍是不夠的。 這裡太複雜了,不可能在這裡展開這個話題。 簡而言之,我的觀點是,以永續的社會制度建立為主導的社會機制與任何有形的社會參與、支持和投資一樣重要。發送者和接收者都需要有這樣的認可。
@equalitynotequity111
9 ай бұрын
现在又有许多美国学者与知识分子对哈马斯有同样的态度
@lioicomestai3703
9 ай бұрын
Did you see the following News of Axios? Harvard University president Claudine Gay, MIT president Sally Kornbluth and University of Pennsylvania president Elizabeth Magill appeared Tuesday before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, where they defended their responses to incidents of antisemitism on their campuses. 批評者譴責了他們在聽證會上對紐約共和黨眾議員埃莉斯·斯特凡尼克是/否問題的回答,該問題涉及“呼籲對猶太人進行種族滅絕”是否違反了學校的行為準則。 領導人以不同的方式表示,答案將根據具體情況而定,並與言論是否轉化為行為有關。@@equalitynotequity111
Agree with your "伪命题". And I prefer to say that there is no 误判 at all as you also pointed out as 现实主义. In history, Yankees used called it as "利益均佔". This is what John King Fairbank answered Richard Nixon on the plane flight to Cina historically in 1972. Philosophical speaking without allowing CCP entering WTO, Cina would not possible to wake up Yankees together with entire West Allies. Therefore, demanding US to seize 1949 & 64 TianAnMen opportunities would be similar like China Dream - a real Day Dream. This is my view. @@wang1qiang
@lpy6519
9 ай бұрын
美國拒絶承認中共錯誤,也就是拒絶承認自己支持中共獨裁政權錯誤,美國甘願繼續在錯誤的道路上走下去
@lioicomestai3703
9 ай бұрын
所以你建議不要跟狼共舞?解開或脫離或解耦是您的選擇。我支持將參與和責任結合。 So you suggest not to dance with wolfs? Disentanglement or disengagement or decouple is your choice. I support engagement & accountability combining together.
Only 今天讲出了真實的話? I'm in tears on behalf of 主播陳小平先生. Your 今天讲出的話 really moved me and Mr. Chan, even the whole world. BTW, which 真實的話? Pls tell me here and I promise you I won't tell me. Because I don't know him personally.
I want to express my wondering - what were you just said "与以往不同的內容", I don't care "认真的表情". I see 陳小平 is a very consist person. It is his professionalism. I have bee watching his for 3 years long before VOA. For me personally I think it should not be counted as fault or mistake that need to be "反思" prior to 2020 US National Security Policy Switch. The direction and policy adjustment have been done since May 2020 By Pompeo. Biden Admin's Strategy on CCP is much less disputable for the time being. You cannot say promoting Cina joining WTO was a mistake. At least I have heard any such saying. Cina's 40 years Productionalization led to Shi Chairman's China Dream Fantasy might be very a good thing few year late. I believe it will be. Because I believe power of Production which is necessity for new social institution establishment. @@ghanghaizhang5716
Very interesting narrative rather than so called "客观的". Are you sure "世界因不公平將彻底毁灭"? From 不公 to 公平 can see very sociological way although Politics Philosophy John Rawls made himself famous on the subject. My view is her "挑戰强势的主流认知" was pretty courageous, but if put into longer history length, such challenge seem to be weak or less meaning. Human societies has much less driven by ideologies including biblical documents. Rather the Social Productionalization has been ultimate force representing a desire for better life upshifts our living standards socially. This is my perspective and very social one. A objectivity of is a very basic (fact + logic) academically. Left or right for me just labels. One day if Cina completes its social transformation, joining WTO still will be seen as one of milestones. Just like one of Taiwan Scholars sees "US Aid" took a key factor since 50's to eventually contribute its social transformation from authoritarianism. Hope you would understand what one Taiwanese Entrepreneur said "(in chip industry) we are good at Mass production in the world". My view is this type understanding would make "基督教违反圣经的宗教理论" dispensable. 謝謝你 too. BTW, I am not from Taiwan but I can read & listen to Cina not writing and Pin Yin. @@ghanghaizhang5716
Agree with your view partially. It is like "马后砲". Thumbed you up 👍. Zhou knew she benefited from Deng's Reform Open policy but she still blamed Yankee politicians cooperate with him. The US Engagement policies have been the physical feature of Cold War that differentiate from hot war. I support current Biden Admin Cold War II strategy master minded by Kurt M. Campbell. Few year late the history will prove such policy eventually led to Cina's social transformation just like it did in Taiwan in 60's called US Aid (美援). That was why I said partially agree with you. Actually 美国对国民党在当时是有做的. Yankees forced or convinced KTM Govt to low down Tariff be able to encourage Exporting. It lifted Taiwan's true Industrialization until 80's. Without such material jump Taiwan's social transformation would take longer or maybe never had happened. My view. 部分同意你的觀點。就像「馬後炮」一樣。 周知道她從鄧小平的改革開放政策中受益,但她仍然指責美國政客與他合作。 美國的接觸政策是冷戰區別於熱戰的物理特徵。我支持現任拜登政府由 Kurt M. Campbell 主導的冷戰戰略。 幾年後,歷史將證明這種政策最終導致了中國的社會轉型,就像六十年代台灣的「美援」一樣。 這就是為什麼我說部分同意你的觀點。其實美國對國民黨在當時是有做的。洋基隊迫使或說服 KTM 政府降低關稅,以鼓勵出口。直到80年代,它才提升了台灣真正的工業化程度。如果沒有這種實質的飛躍,台灣的社會轉型將需要更長的時間,甚至可能永遠不會發生。我的看法。
Mao was greatly misunderstood. He admired the American democracy, but China had, and still has a poorly-educated populace. He wanted to build an egalitarien and ideal society. But he failed. When he realized a new priviledged class was emerging under Liu and Deng, he was mad! And he launched the cultural revolution to destroy them. But Mao never used the army to kill his people. He loved his people. If you look at Deng and the current leadership, you will understand Mao's fear is coming true. Professor Zhou, throughout the Chinese history, the ruling class always kills each other. And the people are just collateral damage(韭菜). Still, 90% of the people don't understand, and don't want democracy. We and our families are the lucky few. God bless!
@lioicomestai3703
9 ай бұрын
Deng seemed agree with you or 70% at least being so. Mao failed due to his 30% of mistake. Even Russians think he was 30% partially mad when up to nuclear bomb. If you were Christian or any religions, I'd strongly recommend to convert to Maoism 毛主義. I couldn't think Mao never kill anyone by himself. So didn't Hitler to Jew by his own hands. Am I right or wrong here, Sir? Your logic is tyrant kills nobody with his own hand. Ok, here comes my view about Mao as a tyrant. He killed millions own people. However, it is not the worst. His worst is called "Public Private Combination Management" (公私合營) policy he made in 1950. He killed social ownership ever since.
@ReneWang-lm6uk
9 ай бұрын
If you were Mao, you would do worse in a country like China. Don't tell me to convert. You are insulting your intelligence.
@ReneWang-lm6uk
9 ай бұрын
A people, who can't govern themselves, including Taiwan. What can you do?
China's reform and opening up was largely successful because of the surprising decision Deng Xiaoping made after the June 4th incident (also known as the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre): he chose to promote many of the ideas of Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang (which mainly came from the Western world) that he had previously suppressed. This allowed the poor but hard-working Chinese people to finally find a way out, instead of engaging in all kinds of fights, class struggles, and so-called revolutions. Additionally, the support of the international community, particularly the influx of science and technology from the Western world, played an indispensable role in China's rise. It is therefore surprising that many people attribute this success to the myth of the so-called Chinese system.
@alice_in_woanderland
9 ай бұрын
If Deng Xiaoping had been somehow prevented from committing unlawful killings, he might not have been the one written in Chinese history textbooks today. Instead, Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang could have been the ones who shaped China's history. The situation in China and even in the world today could have been very different.
China's rise is largely based on Western ideas, science, and technology, but it does not share Western values. This is because China has a hidden agenda to challenge and overthrow the West when it becomes stronger, driven by its ambition to dominate the world. This is evident from the Chinese middle school and high school textbooks, which teach students to "learn from the foreigners and develop skills to defeat the foreigners (师夷长技以制夷)." I am appalled by this mentality, which is like a student who plans to kill the teacher while learning from them, using exactly the skills they are learning from them. I am also fearful of what will happen if China ever dominates the planet, as it could spell the end of humanity. Fortunately, the true nature of China's current political system has been exposed by the events that have unfolded since the 4 June incident, also known as the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. Deng Xiaoping had to suppress the sit-in demonstrations and petitions of students because they supported Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang who truly agreed and supported Western ideas and values, rather than just wanting to take advantage of Western ideas, science, and technology to subvert the West. This not only made Deng Xiaoping, who was at the top of the list at the time, feel that his power and political career were threatened, but also put the CCP's plan to destabilize the West in danger. In sum, it is clear to us now that as long as China's political system remains unchanged, it will continue to cause immense suffering for the majority of the Chinese people and pose a serious threat to global peace and stability. We Chinese people sincerely hope that our voice will be heard and that the world will not have to go through what we have gone through.@@TOC008
@alice_in_woanderland
9 ай бұрын
China's rise is largely based on Western ideas, science, and technology, but it does not share Western values. This is because China has a hidden agenda to challenge and overthrow the West when it becomes stronger, driven by its ambition to dominate the world. This is evident from the Chinese middle school and high school textbooks, which teach students to "learn from the foreigners and develop skills to defeat the foreigners (师夷长技以制夷)." I am appalled by this mentality, which is like a student who plans to kill the teacher while learning from them, using exactly the skills they are learning from them. I am also fearful of what will happen if China ever dominates the planet, as it could spell the end of humanity. Fortunately, the true nature of China's current political system has been exposed by the events that have unfolded since the 4 June incident, also known as the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. Deng Xiaoping had to suppress the sit-in demonstrations and petitions of students because they supported Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang who truly agreed and supported Western ideas and values, rather than just wanting to take advantage of Western ideas, science, and technology to subvert the West. This not only made Deng Xiaoping, who was at the top of the list at the time, feel that his power and political career were threatened, but also put the CCP's plan to destabilize the West in danger. In sum, it is clear to us now that as long as China's political system remains unchanged, it will continue to cause immense suffering for the majority of the Chinese people and pose a serious threat to global peace and stability. We Chinese people sincerely hope that our voice will be heard and that the world will not have to go through what we have gone through.
@alice_in_woanderland
9 ай бұрын
Thanks to the various types of oppression, threats, and persecution that the CCP has intensified in recent years, the Chinese people have accelerated the disclosure of the truth about this evil party to the world.
Пікірлер: 446