Hi great tests on your chanel! One question as i only have a 300mbit fiber net for me more important than speed is the range... are there any test about that? What product would you advise for maxumum range maybe also through 1-2 walls to other rooms or through floors to other floor levels?
@Halon750
2 жыл бұрын
Great Video - However you did not mention what your switch type is. Are you using a 10 gig switch or 2.5 gig switch? It's also interesting that the Ubi6LR speed is more consistent on the 10 meter and 15 meter. The Zyxel seems to loose its punch the further your get from it versus the Ubi6LR.
@NetworkAdvisor
2 жыл бұрын
that's a great point Walter. I thought I had captured the switch info, but maybe not. The switch was a 10gig. And, the cables were cat6 or cat6a. I know technically Cat6 doesn't support 10GB, but as very short distances it will (ie. less than 2 meters).
@henridureau3231
3 жыл бұрын
Great test thank you. One other intersting test could be to test theses two aps with many connexions for an high density pain test. Something like 10x devices running a speed test ?
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Yes Henri. I 100% agree with you. This was a sponsored video and I was given specific tests to run which mainly focused on through-put using only one end point. But you are absolutely right that conducting a test with multiple endpoints would showcase the true value that 802.11ax brings to wifi performance. 😊
@mateuszdrab
2 жыл бұрын
That's the kind of test I need to run as I just got one of those Zyxel APs and if I understand right, 4 spartial streams should allow me to have two laptops (2 spartial streams) to run at full speed simultaneously
@SavannahTL
3 жыл бұрын
did you check the tx power to make sure it was the same power settings? I think the Zyxel are set to Max by default.
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Great point Steve. Yes, had both the Ubiquiti and the Zyxel set to max power and 160Mhz bandwidth
@henridureau3231
3 жыл бұрын
Ubiquity is set max by default too
@Spacefish007
3 жыл бұрын
@@NetworkAdvisor well that´s pretty far from a true usecase.. Normally you would have: - 10+ devices - 40 or 80MHz Bandwidth on 5GHz - 20 or 40MHz on 2.4 GHz - A lot of interference
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
100% agree that in practical, everyday office environment your assertion would be true. But, my tests were laid out for me. If I had more 802.11ax capable client devices, it would be cool to setup that scenario. Thanks for chiming-in. 😊
@devenderkumar3480
Жыл бұрын
Hi could u pl help to confirm Zyxel NWA150AX is good or go with some other brand. We have office of 7500 square feet so we are planning to procure 3 AP's in defferent location link conference room reception area & Sales office
@NetworkAdvisor
Жыл бұрын
IMO, the Zyxel APs are industrial-grade. My vote would be for the NWA210AX because of its higher capacity backhaul bandwidth (2 gig)
@samkinyon6214
3 жыл бұрын
What brand are those patch cables you used between the iperf server and the switch? I’ve seen them a lot and can’t seem to find what brand they are
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Sam, those are cat6 “snagless ethernet” cables by FS.com. I did a review video on those recently. I will get you the link.
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/yJWnrWx_h6ujaY4
@jbdragon3295
2 жыл бұрын
Well, clearly the Zyxel is faster than Ubiquiti. On the other hand, I like the look of Ubiquiti better than the square, boxy look of Zyxel. I think the speed on either is more than fast enough.
@aa15540
3 жыл бұрын
Hi I have A U6-LR and NWA210AX . U6-LR 1 thread: 950Mbps 8 threads : 955Mbps .NWA210AX 1 thread: 701Mbps 8 threads : 1500Mbps. I don't know why they have different speed. I tried different settings but NWA210AX 1 thread work still slowly. Your test is multi threads with iperf3. Is it possible if I ask you to help me test 2APs about 1 thread speed with iperf3? I want to know if every NWA210AX 1 thread is slow. My testing environment(2.5Gbps ) two APs on TP-LINK TL-SH1008 2.5Gbps 8ports WNIC:AX200 AP and WIFI antenna Distance: 10cm
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Wow, those are great speeds on the Unifi! Thanks for sharing! I am exploring the Nebula (Zyxel) management cloud tool now. I hope to have more to share soon. 😊
@aa15540
3 жыл бұрын
@@NetworkAdvisor Unifi only 1 thread speed is win, because its RJ45 is 1Gbps . Zyxel multi threads speed is win, because its RJ45 is 2.5Gbps. But I don't know why Zyxel's 1 thread speed is slow. Can You test 1 thread speed for U6-LR and NWA210AX? Your video is testing their multi threads speed. I hope to know U6-LR and NWA210AX 1 thread speed. my iperf3 test configuration one threads speed ..\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.88.174 -t 30 -i 5 -w 2048KB -P 1 multi threads speed ..\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.88.174 -t 30 -i 5 -w 2048KB -P 8
@ohnodevo
2 жыл бұрын
@@NetworkAdvisor How are you liking Nebula? I have 2 x NWA1123ACv3 at home with Nebula Pro licenses. They run well but range is tough (concrete block house.) Just ordered an NWA210AX to see the performance difference. Was going to get another AP anyways and add to the group (a lot of SSIDs and VLANs on my home net.)
@jaycahow4667
3 жыл бұрын
I have a U6-LR AX and a Netgear R7000 AC setup but I only have AC clients to test with. On the 5ghz band the U6-LR always seems to run about 15% slower on Speedtest. I am hoping the U6-LR will be faster when I get some AX devices to test with.
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for adding to the conversation Jay. One tip I learned from these tests is to use a software controller for the Ubiquiti products to get maximum performance. (You may already know this) 😊
@bjtaudio
2 жыл бұрын
The Ubiquiti is a bit cheaper thou. They are both more than fast enough anyway, the best test is so mesh a few aps and get 50 users to run tests all at same time and move around the building to see the overall performance. This would be a difficult review to do thou.
@NetworkAdvisor
2 жыл бұрын
Agree with your suggested test conditions. 😊
@sumfatt640
3 жыл бұрын
hi,can you or anybody please answer me, what is the internet speed used by that customer, if the whole office internet line speed could not be more than 300 Mbps or even !Gbps, then why the need or the talk about faster speed by WIFI if it is !Gbps or 2,5 Gbps, since it is used for internet after all ?
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Sure, this is a good question as others may be confused about this point too . So, this test never used the internet. Those speeds in the video are all measurements coming from a LOCAL iperf3 server. None of the tests involved the internet. Great question sum fatt. 😊
@uendarkarplips7263
3 жыл бұрын
Local on lan connections, like transferring backups to a NAS, could benefit from faster WiFi. Even if the internet connections are slower
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
You are spot-on correct Uendar. So many people get focused on internet speed they forget that in corporate environments, internet resources are NOT the only thing. For instance SAN servers (as you mentioned). 😊
@isbestlizard
2 жыл бұрын
Pulled the trigger on an NWA210AX, it's clearly superior to anything Ubiquiti can produce, and I can't stand that they're marketing 5Gbps+ with some of their access points with only a single 1gbe port.. so misleading and shady of them
@NetworkAdvisor
2 жыл бұрын
Oh, good for you! Yeah, I never understood that claim of such massive throughput with just a 1gbe Ethernet uplink? 🤔
@darrenloftin8939
3 жыл бұрын
40mhz width for unifi and 80/160 for zyxel. Fix that and run the test again.
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
Darren, wouldn’t 40Mhz be a much thinner bandwidth? 🤔
@georgebolo1043
3 жыл бұрын
@@NetworkAdvisor it's imperative to ensure that all parameters are identical, otherwise the results will not be impartial. However, there is also value in comparing default settings. You just need to separate the two
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
I agree George. Thanks for chiming in. 🙂
@racerx250
3 жыл бұрын
I noticed it in your test. That's how you had it running. Maybe I missed it
@mas921
3 жыл бұрын
wow 1gbps over wifi!
@NetworkAdvisor
3 жыл бұрын
cool, right? I think this will become more normal soon. :-)
@muchada1
3 жыл бұрын
This is a dumb ass test . Your Ethernet ports have different speeds so I would have expected the Zyxel AP to be faster . The Zyxel AP should have been much more faster
Пікірлер: 41