our radio is overload with signals (OVR) must use attentuator and select an filter, human must adjusted in other way then an anlouge radio, the signal is the same.
@yo5pdw439
Жыл бұрын
no same freqvencies
@2E0RME
Жыл бұрын
I like both, but for different reasons. They have similar performance and cost, but they are completely different radios to operate. The 7300 has a better UI and it's performance is more balanced - it's good at everything! The DX10 by comparison has more ups and downs, but when set up correctly it can offer a little SSB "magic" that the 7300 cannot match. I prefer the DX10 for SSB, and the 7300 for DATA modes and portable/static mobile.
@diegoscovazzi7957
2 жыл бұрын
It's not correct OVF ligtht up on the 7300, you had to rotate left RF GAIN. In this way the test is non allowable...
@ozer3749
2 жыл бұрын
Before making this comment i have read and whached all videos also comments of other OM. My conclison is, there is no difference in Signal, voice and noice level. So why paying aroun 400 Euro more for FTDX10? Is roofing filter that expencive? most important, the settings menus are confusing and nerve-wracking! this is where all owners or users pretty much come together. it may be that the roofing filter is better with overcrowded frequencies (at contests) because the reception is narrower, but we don't just do contests!
@gradus8373
2 жыл бұрын
Наебываешь людей, 7300 великолепен в телеграфе
@superppp4217
2 жыл бұрын
Ho avuto icon 7300 adesso ho icon 7610 ed ho anche yaesu ftdx3000, nessuno è come yaesu in cw mode. Tono bello,pulito squillante,apf eccezionale. Il keyer interno è molto superiore ad ICOM ...max speed ICOM 40wpm,max speed yaesu 60wpm con iambico a/b.icom non ha iambico a/b solo b.ecc...ecc....dnr yaesu superiore a ne ICOM. Certo il watherfull yaesu è orrendo bruttissimo,inguardabile,inutilizzabile,il menù è complicato ma io in modo morse lo adoro. P.s. Con il filtro opzionale 300hrz è un altra storia. Il6ihm only cw,tank you
@ivankrakov1040
2 жыл бұрын
У 7300 есть лайфхак. На динамик ставится труба для воды 90° (угол). И звук становится фантастическим. Проверено. И ещё функции на 7300 тоже включайте. И советую до конца разобраться с настройками 7300. Даже панорама не настроена, стоковый вариант. А в целом yeasu хорошие аппараты.))
@Radiomusic78
2 жыл бұрын
No differences, only in laboratory. I've got FTdx101d and Icom 7610 and no differences even in very crowded constests. Sound in 7610 is slightly better than 7300 and ftdx101d, with more bass, smooth and clear.
@donr2670
2 жыл бұрын
FTDX10 has better AGC. IC7300 has better++ Scope and User interface. Both good.
@lenny0272
2 жыл бұрын
I have both..The yaesu has a better sound and it hears better but it does cost a bit more....I like your video..
I have both The sound is clearer with IC-7300 Easy to hear and clear The sound of FTDX10 is hard to hear
@GeanitovIDEAS
3 жыл бұрын
Hi, i used them both, its not true as most said that yaesu ft dx 10 hears better than icom 7300. I used them on very weak signals, none hears better, both same sensitivity! Yeasu ft dx 10 has more option as the external monitor which is the most important! Who wants to spent more yaesu ft dx 10 is a better solution. But icom 7300 for 1080euro brand new its a perfect option! If use with external speaker icom sp38
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your appropriate comments. I agree with you. For CW man, it is easy to operate with FTDX10's filter and APF, and low noise flow makes it easy to listen. However, as you can see from the receiver evaluation site, the IC-7300 is actually more sensitive. The IC-7300 has high cost performance in terms of price. I think that the performance of SDR transceivers using FPGAs will be basically the same, so it will be interesting to see the trend of transceivers in the future.
@johnforte3466
3 жыл бұрын
You can either hear the signal or you cant. Which radio can really pull out the weak signal regardless of what filtering or preamps are being used. This test does not do this therefore not a very good demo.
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment. If that's the case, we'll just need a SSG and a proper RF ATT to measure it.
@johnratcliffe6438
3 жыл бұрын
There is no comparison; the FTDX10 is better. So much more capable of dealing with noise as well. The DNR is just straight 🔥
@GeanitovIDEAS
3 жыл бұрын
Hi, i used them both, yaesu ft dx 10 on same signal comparing with icom 7300 the s_metter its 3 s units below icom 7300, same signal, same antena and for this reason gives a false ideea its quiet in receive. I did compare both on a very weak signals multiple times, both hears same,none of them better
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, I also feel that there is no essential difference between the two machines, because the FPGA is almost the same.
@barrykery1175
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, they both hear a strong signal. So what's the point? My Sony short wave receiver could hear the same loud signals. Big Deal . ZZZZZZZZZZ
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
That's good to hear.
@NuclearCowboyTube
3 жыл бұрын
@Barry Kery - Go home internet troll
@GeanitovIDEAS
3 жыл бұрын
Hi, thanks for the video! Please make a video with a comparison on ssb , in 20m band but use same settings and antena and if you can dont use DNR to have a clear view of the signal. 73 we'll hardly wait for a video as many people interested in SSB. 73
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
The majority of my operations are in CW mode, so I am not confident in my hearing in SSB mode. However, I understand that many hams are looking for results in SSB mode. I will try to produce a content on SSB mode (FTDX10 vs IC-7300) in the near future.
@GeanitovIDEAS
3 жыл бұрын
@@73miky thanks you, just use same settings on both radios and same level audio volume
@markhuser5682
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comparison. Nice to see both radios side by side.
@cx5fk
3 жыл бұрын
Good very instructive video. But two things, the icom manual clearly explains the use of OVF, without a doubt it is badly applied. The following I would like that this test was carried out with an S0 signal because with S5 signals it is very easy for any receiver to listen comfortably. IF you perform without ovf saturation and with low signal it would be an imposing test. Anyway it is a good comparison well done. Thanks for the comparison is the only one that does a very good job. 73
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the thought provoking and useful advice and for the good feedback on this content. Hopefully, the IC7300 would have had the OVF auto control function as well as the FTDX10. Tengo mucho respeto por José Alberto Mujica Cordano. Adiós
@andrewevanoff1192
3 жыл бұрын
Sorry but it's not an accurate test. The preamp was on on the 7300. Why do you need it on 20 meters, when signals are strong anyway and there is quite a bit of RF noise at your QTH? It's clearly getting overloaded and it's where all the noise and poor reception comes from. The noise reduction wasn't even used on the 7300. Twin PBT wasn't used either. You can make either radio sound like crap by simply manipulating some parameters and settings.
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your valuable opinion. For used one to make P.AMP1 the same condition. A setting point is a threshold of OVF movement. I'd like to leave evaluation to an audience.
@manuelit9-mok968
3 жыл бұрын
@@73miky hello Miky but isnt same condition.. amp1 yaesu = no amp in ICOM from the factory if you want see same signal in smeter.
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your opinion. Receiver Test Data www.sherweng.com/table.html NoiseFloor(dBm) FTDX10 -135dBm(AMP1),IC-7300 -140.5dBm(AMP-1) Based on the above measurement results, I set AMP1 to ON for both units in order to make the settings almost the same. Of course I know that the dynamic range of the 7300 will be worse with this setting.
@johnratcliffe6438
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, Icom NR is completely useless so whether it was on or off is irrelevant.
@andrewevanoff1192
3 жыл бұрын
@@johnratcliffe6438 No, it's not useless. Actually, Icom's NB filer is signficantly more effective than the same filters on Kenwood and Yeasu. Icom's NR is also very effective. I did a lot of side by side tests with my IC-7300, IC-7610 and my FTDX3000 and FT1000MK5. Icoms did a much better job at removing strong powerline noise than the Yeasus. I've always been a Yaesu fan but I would never say that Icoms NR is useless.
It must be wonderful to have a noise floor so low! Ftdx10 sounds good!
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
My main rig is TS-990S, but FTDX10 isn't so inferior. The cost performance ratio is high, but it doesn't seem that an excessive expectation is held.
@jordanandre3477
3 жыл бұрын
I realize it is kinda randomly asking but does anyone know of a good site to watch new movies online?
@corycade9041
3 жыл бұрын
@Jordan Andre meh lately i have been using flixportal. you can find it by googling :D -cory
@jordanandre3477
3 жыл бұрын
@Cory Cade thank you, signed up and it seems to work :D I appreciate it !!
@corycade9041
3 жыл бұрын
@Jordan Andre You are welcome xD
@Homer19521
3 жыл бұрын
Why OVF on the Icom?? Which wins? Sounds like the Yaesu is better.
@73miky
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your comment. Because OVF lighting up is P.AMP1 on. The basic performance is same mostly, but FTDX10 is more excellent in RMDR,BDR,IMDR. FTDX10 at which APF,300Hz Xtal Filter was offered, advantage is high.
@Homer19521
3 жыл бұрын
I had a 7300/7610 & did not like them. My 7700 is quieter/better. But I am really liking this FTdx-10 and may get one. Thank you for the vid! Thumbs up.
Пікірлер