Traurig daa so schlecht über die TU 144 gesprochen wird.
@jorgtungler7348
Ай бұрын
Guten Abend, erinnere mich an den Unfall.
@Domino13334
4 ай бұрын
Ein Freund von meinem Opa, geboren 1898, ist mit der Concorde geflogen.
@houtex90
4 ай бұрын
Gleicher Müll wie die TU44
@leopardHellas
5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much my friend. And for a very long time I was frustrated with the clouds and looking for solutions because I have such low frames. After years you gave me the solution that no one else could. I wish you all the best!!!!!!
@rosisrosarum643
6 ай бұрын
The first TUPOLEV TU-144 which flew on December 31, 1968 was indeed very similar of Concorde. It was a "proof of concept" model which was the TU-144A. The Soviets realized that this aircraft, which flew very well, could in no way be certified for civilian passenger transport because of its very high approach and landing speed. After a few test flights the Soviets came to the conclusion that another very different plane had to be built, the TU-144A was scrapped and they started to build the others, the TU-144B and after the C and D. Models C and D used important parts in titanium in an epoch metallurgy of this metal was unknown in the west reason why Concorde was only made in steel and aluminum (and this was the reason its cruise and maximum speed are limited to mach 2 while the TU144 having its critical parts in titanium could cruise at mach 2.2 with a maximum of mach 2.30) . Double delta wings with strait leading edges would make easier to implement slats. Having engines near the center line close to the cabin it liberates the wing trailing hedge (a wingspan of 28.8 meters and 507 m² of wing area to be compared to 25.6 meters and 358 m² for Concorde) making it possible to have the significantly larger flaps all along the trailing edge that were necessary as having low speed in approach and landing that was the goal. Landing speed of Concorde was 305 km/h (165 kts) to be compared to 270km/h (146 kts) for the Tupolev that was indeed very similar of the Boeing 747 that was at time the fastest commercial plane landing. Another important difference was the width of the cabin more comfortable allowed the TU144 to have five seats up front while the Concorde only had four with seats next to the window being uncomfortable, only for people of below average height. Concorde flew in march 4, 1969 and Westerners (French and English) came to the same conclusions as the first version of soviets, it had a very high approach and landing speed, another plane had to be made. The French agreed to build another aircraft but the British did not. The new labor government led by new prime minister Harold Wilson begun to reorganize (and partly nationalize) the entire British aviation industry in what became later British Aerospace with the cancellation of many ongoing and operational projects. Cancelation of the TSR2 aircraft project (Supersonic Tactical & Reconnaissance Bomber) few weeks after its first flight was a serious blow to the Concorde project as it had the same Olympus 593 Concorde engines and had an early version of electric commands a kind of fly by wire but still of analog technology to be implemented in Concorde among other innovations. For the English a design of a new Concorde plane was not possible, they had to continue with the Concorde as it was in the state it was, with all its faults and problems due to design flaws, or else cancel it as the English wanted. The British government did everything to cancel the project, which was firmly opposed by French President George Pompidou. In February 1973 the Concorde project was virtually dead and in the process of being definitively cancelled. It was then the French president embarked to Azores in prototype number three on what is called the flight of last chance to Concorde for a meeting requested by the US President Richard Nixon. Nixon asked the French President to stop converting into gold each dollar entering in France because the US exits the Brenton Woods agreements and the dollar will no longer be convertible on the fixed price agreed in 1947. For his part, George Pompidou explained to Nixon the problem of the Concorde and the danger of having a more efficient Soviet competitor thanks to the use of new metals such as titanium. It was decided to continue the Concorde project as it was the first prototype, but a special committee was created to adopt a very special (and extremely expensive) approach and landing procedures were adopted especially for supersonic planes (but actually only for the Concorde). On approach it was necessary to create a gap in front of the Concorde, which made it impossible for 4 and sometimes 5 planes to land, which were sent to turn around or to a waiting circuit. In all air control centers, priority had to be given to the Concorde, it often arrived at its destination with just ten minutes of fuel in reserve, which was a safety aberration, all regulations require it to land with at least 45 minutes reserve. The French and British governments would pay enormous compensation, this was the price of prestige. Among other several design flaws one was the very great exposure of the kerosene tanks to projections from the landing gear were even the cause of many incidents but three accidents with significant leakage of kerosene, two in 1979, one in Dakar and the other in Washington/Dulles. In November 1981, the American National transportation Safety Board (NTSB) sent a letter of concern to the French BEA that included safety recommendations for Concorde. This communiqué was the result of the NTSB's investigations of four Air France Concorde incidents during a 20-month period from July 1979 to February 1981. The NTSB described those incidents as "potentially catastrophic," because they were caused by blown tyres during takeoff. During its 27 years in service, Concorde had about 70 tyre- or wheel-related incidents, seven of which caused serious damage to the aircraft or were potentially catastrophic. The most serious accident was in July 2000 in Gonesse (France) that caused 113 deaths and marked the end of the aircraft's prestige. On the TU-144 such an accident would be impossible or would not have had the same consequences, projections from the landing gear were not in line with fuel tanks and these are protected by titanium pieces. IN SHORT Concorde was an immature project mainly due to the British Government financial restrictions (GM).
@NetvoTV
9 ай бұрын
How about Panasonic HC-X1500/X2000/AG-CX10?
@NetvoTV
9 ай бұрын
I see, how about any previous Panasonic and other brands of camcorder you own?
@afterburnersfschannel2210
9 ай бұрын
@@NetvoTV I owned a Canon HV 30 before Panasonic HC-V 770. It was my first HD camcorder. Its stabilizer did not exhibit the problem that the Panasonic camcorder does. On a fair note, the Panasonic stabilizer is a little more effective, but the Canon one had no bugs. I wish manufacturers would allow the user to adjust the strength of stabilization.
@clayton4115
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tip, I took was getting bluriness in my footage using the V770M this reduces it a little.
@barracuda7018
11 ай бұрын
Einige Korrekturen...Doppel so schnell wie ein Gewehrkugel??? Schwachsinn, blödsinn Ein Infantrie Gewehrkugel erreichet eine Mündungsgeschwindigkeit von 1000 meter pro Sekunde..3 fache der Schallgeschwindigkeit Concorde 2.2 . Ausserdem 3 mal schneller als 747 ist ein anderer blöder Vergleich..Richtig wäre 2.2 mal... So viele inkorrekte information ...Die stimmen nicht..Auch fliegen 2 mal höher als 747..Auch nicht richtig...747 flight 12.000 meter hoch. Concorde 18.000. Diese idioten können nicht einmal richtig zählen.
@laibachsdoku-kanal3330
Жыл бұрын
Neulich wollte mir einer einen Flug mit der Concorde schenken, dem hab' ich nur gesagt: Sie wollen mich wohl verkohlen?
@miket3445
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info…….didn’t know about this trick and that you can make changes on the fly so to speak! I’m using v5.3 so will try it out. BTW I’m also interested to know about other P3D users with cloud base. I find setting, say, a 500 foot overcast doesn’t give me 500 foot base but can be up to a thousand or more feet above that selected layer. Do you get that experience? Cheers
@Highland_Moo
Жыл бұрын
Seeing Kissinger makes me want to vomit.
@EEPPULLINGVIDEOS
2 жыл бұрын
I have several 770 cameras we use for filming Truck & Tractor pulling events. We have the barrel movement as well as we do a lot of panning and sometimes its pretty quick movement and we are experiencing focus issues. I keep them clean from dirt with a small hand vac. I also use lens filters which seals out any dirt from entering the lens area and we keep the lens filters wiped and cleaned during the events. We use good tripods as well. I am gonna try turning the stabilizer off and see what happens at the next event. I have asked about it for a couple years now why they just go out of focus but no one can answer that question. Hope this may be the answer. If not, I will be switching camera brands. Thanks for the video! I will put a link to the latest issue that happened 1 week ago. watch the 1st few trucks for blur. After camera change there was no focusing issues with the back up 770. kzitem.info/news/bejne/uJqVvJuMs6SfiGU
@EEPPULLINGVIDEOS
2 жыл бұрын
I have had at least 4 different 750 & 770 Panasonics do this. Sometimes if you shut them off and restart them its fine after that.
@user-fu2fn1ph8n
2 жыл бұрын
So ein wunderschönes Flugzeug!! Wäre gern bei einem start dabei gewesen.
@NalimMinecraft
2 жыл бұрын
How do you turn it off? I see the hand icon but I just cannot click on it
@StephaneSOUBIRAN
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@videocreation5206
2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately that's the it is, Panasonic panning has never been very good and tends to be worse on lower frame rate. Also needs plenty of light as the sensor can't cope very well indoors. Still a good camera but not good for panning. I always use my dji action cam for panning. All my Panasonic camcorders suffer with the same issues, my latest model is the hc-vxf990 4k. Have better results when on a tripod with the stabilser turn off. Unfortunately that's the way it is unless you spend loads of money money on a more expensive professional camera. Nowadays I tend to use my osmo pocket 2
@afterburnersfschannel2210
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment! I find the indoor performance of the HC-V770 quite good actually (considering its price). I am surprised by your statement that all of your Panasonic cameras suffer from the panning issue. I didn't expect that... I thought about upgrading to a 4K model at some point (taking the model that you mentioned into consideration) in the hope that the new camera wouldn't have this problem, but in retrospect I am glad that I didn't because the disappointment would have been huge. I can forgive if a $350 camcorder has this issue, but for a model that costs $1000 or more, it is not acceptable. I wonder if we will ever see consumer camcorders that can record at 4K 60fps, since 30fps is too low for scenes with regular panning. Anyway, I have been able to reduce the documented problem by activating the wide lens mode in the menu and by slightly zooming in or out when I finish panning. I know that turning off the stabilizer eliminates this problem completely, but the video becomes too shaky if you film by hand. The stabilizer itself is good - if it wasn't for the occasional blurries on the edges...
@videocreation5206
2 жыл бұрын
@@afterburnersfschannel2210 DJI Pocket Osmo record's at 60fps and it's excellent quality, not many good prosumer camcorders being made now as a lot of manufacturers stopped making them. Higher end models will always be around for some time for people that do more specialised work. Have a Sony ax53 that is very good but limited at 4k 30fps, the 1080p at 60fps is very good. Always use my pocket osmo for 4k 60fps. Still think Panasonic camcorders are good, the autofous is very fast, only downside in the lower end is the panning, NTSC Camcorders are better as they can record at 60fps in 180p and 4k at 30fps, more frame's per second tends to smooth out the panning a little. Other thing I tried that works is to use Adobe premiere octical flow, also resolve studio 17 work's with octical flow, does smooth it out very well. Just love my pocket osmo as its so smooth and the quality is amazing, only downfall no long range zoom
@tgchan
Жыл бұрын
@@videocreation5206 I do not think you know what the problem is... He is not talking about problem with panning not being smooth enough but the sharpness after the panning and zooming out... Obviously there is something wrong with the zooming/stabilising mechanism and I doubt all Panasonic cameras have this... You have obviously misunderstood him/
@tgchan
Жыл бұрын
@@afterburnersfschannel2210 Vide Creation guy clearly did not get what you were trying to show...
@videocreation5206
Жыл бұрын
@@tgchan panasonic consumer camcorders don't pan very well and look out of focus when doing so, unless you have a 60fps at 60hz version, the pal version at 25fps played on most computer monitor's will look a bit choppy and out of focus as most monitor's are at least 60hz at 60fps
@EmirPortraits
2 жыл бұрын
Great video! May I ask you, what sound do you use for the AI?
@afterburnersfschannel2210
2 жыл бұрын
Hi, I am glad to hear that you like this video! I use the standard sounds that come with the AI traffic package (Alpha India and MyTraffic). No other sound files needed.
@anitaschmitt3184
2 жыл бұрын
Es war kein Unfall das war geplant und Mord an geschäfts Leute denn auch in newyork hatte ich mit Luxus schif der auch gesunken ist auch new York turme das alles alle 3 hab ich überlebt und es war terroranschlag. Grüsse von Bayer und ich königin makedonia
@anitaschmitt3184
2 жыл бұрын
Ich lebe mit neine 2 Kinder und mein Mann wir sind nicht geflogen mit diese flugzeig .Ich lebe mich haben sie nicht getötet
@JM_2019
3 жыл бұрын
20:15: „Zur Sicherheit ist der Höhenmesser *im Prototyp* zweimal eingebaut“: würde mich stark wundern, wenn die serienmäßige Concorde als eines der wenigen Flugzeuge nur einen gehabt hätte…
@marcoposlovskaya414
Жыл бұрын
So weit ich mich erinnern kann war es kein technisches versagen der Concord, sondern ein Blech das auf dem Rollfeld überfahren wurde und durch die Reifen in die Delta Flügel geschleudert wurde . Der ausgetretene Treibstoff, hat letztendlich zum Absturz geführt.
@bmwkingoc85
3 жыл бұрын
fire! this is the person you helped fix concorde braking a long time ago :) forgot my name from back 2 or so years ago.
@afterburnersfschannel2210
3 жыл бұрын
FS-Labs is working on the 64 bit Concorde, but there is no information about the release date. They show Concorde in form of easter eggs in some of their Airbus update preview videos. That's all we know at this time.
@xXshinichiconanXx3
3 жыл бұрын
Sie mag ineffizient und Umweltverpestend gewesen sein... Ich verehre auch tatsächlich die Boeing 747 viel mehr, ich weiß nicht warum, aber die Concorde hat eine Schönheit und Anmut, wie kein zweites Flugzeug, einfach wunderschön, eine reine emotionale Herzensangelegenheit. Und auch wenn ich hier vielleicht jetzt den Unmut von Umweltaktivisten auf mich ziehe, aber ich wäre sehr gern mal in ihr geflogen. Dieses Gefühl allein morgens nach New York zu fliegen und abends wieder zurück und quasi noch am selben Tag wieder zuhause zu sein muss einmalig sein. ich hoffe sehr, dass wir in Zukunft wieder, auf Basis von nicht fossilen Brennstoffen oder sogar anderen Antriebsmitteln wieder in diesen Geschwindigkeiten reisen können.
@michaelflaspoehler4152
3 жыл бұрын
Hatten wir alles schon in den 40ger! Die Horten, das Kraftei und den ersten Düsenjäger sowieso! DTdkf.!
@misterff1629
3 жыл бұрын
I've been looking for this documentary for such a long time. Good job with the translation!
@ASTVR.
3 жыл бұрын
Ill be your 400th sub!
@philipmead3575
3 жыл бұрын
It’s probably just me lol but after these settings I can’t turn on the ground 😂
@philipmead3575
3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewjamez I’m sticking with FSX for approach practices, most of the RNAVs in the sim have also disappeared plus it seems to have a magic rudder system that keeps the plane perfectly balanced in mid flight even during a step turn 🤦♂️😂 and yes my settings are on hard with all assistances turned off
@wahidzaki6693
3 жыл бұрын
This is a game changer .. I was struggling with the rudder in crosswinds . Thanks a lot. I suggest you post this in MSFS .
@optionizerss4511
3 жыл бұрын
When I first got MS FS2020 pretty sure I remember when using the rudder for taxiing it would snap back to neutral. I have a Honeycomb yoke but use the default keyboard for rudder controls. If I needed to turn slightly right I tapped the Enter key and it would turn slightly right then snap back to a straight line. Now it continues turning right until I click it to turn back left. I have the rudder assistance turned on. Any idea why this is happening and how do I put it back to the way it was?
@PaulieCav777
3 жыл бұрын
🙋♂️Thanks for the Advice & Follow up in this Video 👍✈️✈️✈️
@williambomball5965
3 жыл бұрын
Much appreciation to the person(s) who succeeded in getting this change made. The controls “feel” more realistic now; not like you’re flying scrunched into a phone booth where you even “look” at the controls and they move.
@amazonman481
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for lowering volume of engine and thanks for taking the time to help us out with sensitivity
@johnkeegan6646
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the analysis. Microsoft listened!
@Swiss.Haze.420
3 жыл бұрын
great thank you !
@capsilver85
3 жыл бұрын
Finally they fixed it, I ended up buying a Yoke XD
@bogdan1608
3 жыл бұрын
Very handy
@louissanson5418
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir. I taught I would never play MSFS 2020 again. Thumbs up and you’ve got a new subscriber. 😕👍👍🏆🥃
@mwendapoleee
3 жыл бұрын
Nicht meins da bleib ich lieber am Boden!Ehren ist menschlich.
Пікірлер