I really like how you explain your thinking process expecially because clear and organized with right sistem to breakdown the hand. Plus conceptual notes "how To" instead following blindly gto. I will continue to wach your video they are very educative.
@ArnoldPLO
9 ай бұрын
I am glad that you liked it. Not a lot of people found my channel so far, unfortunately. 😅 And if you have something to add to or to critizize about my thought process in any video, please add a comment and do not hold anything back. 😁
@juliank4833
9 ай бұрын
very nice described :) ty vm Arnold!
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
One extra tip what you should do against a 1/4 pot size lead on the turn in a large SPR pot: Never raise this bet. Just call your flushes, sets, all high flush blockers and some straights.
@VeranlagungNet
10 ай бұрын
Is it really necessary to have such low equity bluffs in the range here, vs. 3 opponents? I don't think we lose much, if we have only high equity bluffs in this spot, like Nutflushdraw+a Blocker.
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
Necessary - if you want to play somewhat balanced, Yes. But if your opponents are bad and call bad flush draws or 2P without extra equity on this flop, you should exploitatively not bluff. I make an immediate profit if all villains fold 33% of the time (which I think works out for me). And as always, if you only have value bets and the obvious high equity semibluff in your range, you: .) do not have any bluffs left when the draw hits. .) Moreover, you do not have any bet/folds on the flop. Because of these reasons and to remain balanced on later streets with value and bluffs, the solver likes to have some low equity bluffs with strong blockers here.
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
And 3 opponents means that everyone should have a higher threshold to continue. So, I should not get any calls with bare 2P or bad FDs. When I additionally got my sizing right (1/3 pot) I only needed my opponents to fold out 25% of the time. Plus, then they are probably concerned that I have a multi-component hand (nuts+redraw), so I can easily continue bluffing on later streets.
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
And NFD+Blocker type of hands do not really want to bet (1/2 pot)/fold. They are all in the range that calling vs a shove is +/- 0 EV. (Therefore I recommend potting those hands with 2 SPR left) This is exactly what we want to avoid (solver approved): Having a decision against aggression where our hand is "indifferent": .) When we fold we fold a huge amount of equity .) When we call it is only barely +EV. So, when you bet, you should always have a clear plan whether you want to continue vs aggression or fold vs aggression.
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
At 07:55 I meant you should bet almost nothing, not "almost anything". Sorry, I am not an English native speaker - such errors will happen from time to time. 😅
@TheMonetist
10 ай бұрын
Sammy burning 360€ 2:15. Why does he think calling makes sense?
@jurgenmeyer7602
10 ай бұрын
In a high SPR situation I think calling can be an acceptable play, because you don't hit very many flops with this hand, but with arnold only having a 33BB stack it's an easy 4bet.
@TheMonetist
10 ай бұрын
I see, thx@@jurgenmeyer7602 So he was most likely not paying attention to his stack
@ArnoldPLO
10 ай бұрын
@@jurgenmeyer7602 Yes, this is true (solver approved) Moreover, he probably wants to have the possibility to 4bet large against a squeeze. Or he thinks he has a big postflop edge and wants to play a relatively small pot IP (the hand selection to do so is terrible though).
Пікірлер