Truly gorgeous people, with a rich history, too bad Greece doesn't recognize minorites and claims they're "latinized greeks", thanks to that they're gonna get more and more assimilated until extinction, same with Instro-romanians
@robertscheidbauer5677
7 күн бұрын
Salutare fratilor 🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴
@ionbrad6753
8 күн бұрын
Cum ti cljiamă? (Aromanian) / Cum te cheamă? (Romanian, almost identical pronounciation) Come ti chiami? (Italian) How - are you - called? (a word-for-word translation)
@SeamanX-qh9bw
8 күн бұрын
Aromanians came from Albania-Northern Macedonia into Greece . Earlier they where Vlachs descending from the Romanized population of north Balkans . Nonetheless , the Greeks exterminated them as much as they could - the ones that refused to become "greeks" and tried to keep their identity . This lasted till the 1970s .
@andin3720
2 күн бұрын
Greece does a “great” job at completely erasing their minorities.
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
🧔🏽🏴 🏴 🇷🇴 🇬🇷 The bagpipe comes from Dacia. Thrace, Dacia, Scandinavia, Denmark, Holland, Ireland and Scotland are colonies of the Dacians and Sarmatians, those who were from the tribe of Dan before Christ. The Slavic lands are colonies of the Slavonian Sarmatians from the 7th century AD. The Dacians had dresses/skirts and opinci, just like the Romanian peasants and like the Greek and Aromanian folk costumes. The Scots have the same, and they carried the bagpipe tradition further. The long beard and long hair of the Dacians and Vlachs in general comes from the tribe of Dan, as descendants of Samson who was not allowed to cut his beard and hair. Barbarian comes from bearded, meaning bearded fighters. The flag of the Dacians, Dacian Draco is a snake 🐍 with a wolf's head on a stick. It comes from the serpent on Moses' staff. Numbers 21.4-9. Moesia is the land of the descendants of Moses. Dan-ube, or the Danube is Dan's river. Moesel is the river of Moses. It shows where the Dacians and Sarmatians who are from the tribe of Dan have spread. Zal-Moxis is Chief Moses, the Moses God. The tribe of Dan had the cult of idolizing Moses and Dan. ZALLIG in Dutch means Holiness. Zal could mean Holy. Sarmale comes from the Sarmatians, that is, from the Samaritans. If the Romanians take a DNA test through 23andme, many will see that they have DNA fragments from Great Britain, Sardinia, Italy in general, Greece, Macedonia, Scandinavia, Ukraine. This shows that we are from Dacia and where they spread. The Dutch are called Dutch and read Daci. 4th century Denmark was called Dacia. Scandinavia in the 4th century was called the Province of Dacia. The Russians have a house in the country and they call it Dacia. The Romanian language is not derived from Latin, but was a Romance language of the Dacians. As evidence is the language of the Aromanians, the Istrio-Romanians and other Vlach variants of the Romanian language found among the descendants of the different Dacian tribes that have not had contact with each other for 2000 years. They speak the same words as in Romanian, not only words found in Latin but other words. The way they speak is identical. A Latinezed language derived from Greek or Slavic could not develop exactly the same thousands of kilometers apart from different tribes. The fact that Aromanian and Istroromanian are so similar prove the fact that they all started with exactly the same Romance language in Thrace and it was not Latinized Greek, Slavic or Dacian. The rest of the Romance languages also development individually and not by Latinization such as Portuguese, Spanish, French, Rumantsch etc. All Romance languages developed individually from a Proto-Romance language and not from Latin. It is a language called LaDin in the Alps mountains in the Dolomites, which has exactly the same numeral as in the Romanian language, and not at all from Latin. Even the Greek language developed from a proto-Romanian language called Romeika. There have been Israeli Jews in Greece for 2000 years who are called Romanians and their territory is called Romania. History was falsified by world powers for certain interests. It is certain that the Romanian language is not formed from Latin. The Romans occupied only 1/4 of Dacia and only for 150 years. Not at all long in order to change the identity and language of a nation. The Dacians were transhuman shepherds, just like the Aromanians, the Vlachs in general, all the villages in the mountains of Italy, Switzerland, Corsica, Sardinia. They are all Vlachs. The same in Scotland. That's why there are so many sheep in Scotland. Tradition from Dacia. How do you think that the Dacians, some shepherds, learned Latin, and even more, the language of the cotropitors? More than that. The Dacians are proud people, with a strong national feeling that does not allow themselves to be defeated. They wouldn't have adapted the Latin even out of pride. Developing a new language in 150 years is impossible, because they didn't even have schools where they could learn it and they were scattered through the mountains with little contact with other tribes. They kept their traditions and were keen on their culture. The Romans had no power over the Dacian culture and folklore. The Dacians had no contact with the Romans either, as the Dacians lived in the mountains. A large part of Dacian fled Dacia nowadays România, as soon as the Romans arrived and took control of part of the Dacian territory. The fled Dacians went to the mountains of Scandinavia and from there to Denmark, the Faroe Islands and the British Isles. Besides is it possible that 3/4 of the territory of Dacia that was not under Roman occupation still speak Romanian? The Romanians were under the Turks for 500 years but how come they don't speak Turkish? The Romanians were under the Germans and Austro-Hungarians for 300 years, and don't speak German or Hungarian. Let's be serious. The Romanian language is directly from the language of the Geto-Thracians. In the 7th century came the second wave of Sarmatians (Israelites from Samaria) with a new language, the Slavic language, and they settled in Yugo-Slavia and in the rest of the regions around Dacia. This is how the contact between the Dacian tribes spread from Thrace to Scythia, i.e. from Greece to Ukraine, was interrupted. They spoke another language that came to be called Slavonic. Slavs mean slaves, meaning the Jewish people in captivity. Slavonic is the language of slaves. All of Europe is actually Semitic formed in various waves of migrations. See The Hebrew Origin of Serbs, by Stevan Tomovich Ph.D. Published by CNS See The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The lost tribe of Dan. The history of Europe must be rewritten with the Dacians and the Sarmatians, implicitly the tribe of Dan in a central role. Btw Gypsies are from the tribe of Simeon. Maybe they are also 2 camps. Roma Gypsies who stick to the Dacians Sinti Gypsies who belong to the Scythians, that is, the Sarmatians, the Slavs. What's in the name? 🤔
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
Some ideas from my findings. The contemporary Dacians are the Dutch (Daci) who correspond phenotypically and as a character to the Dacians of ancient Romania. They were tall, blonde or red-haired, white-skinned, hairless on the body, blue-eyed, very intelligent, but also troublesome. They were warriors. They did not sit in one place. Their bodies were tattooed. They consumed drugs such as Cannabis and mushrooms. It's very interesting that The Dutch of today are exactly the same. Dacians from Romania went and colonized Scandinavia, Denmark, Holland, Ireland and Scotland. It is not surprising that many similarities can be seen in these peoples. The bagpipe comes from Thracia - Dacia. Thrace, Dacia, Scandinavia, Denmark, Holland, Ireland and Scotland are colonies of the Dacians and Sarmatians, those who were from the tribe of Dan, before Christ. The Slavic lands are colonies of the Slavonian Sarmatians from the 7th century AD. The Dacians had dresses/skirts and opinci, just like the Romanian peasants and like the Greek and Aromanian folk costumes. The Scots have the same, and they carried the bagpipe tradition further. The long beard and long hair of the Dacians and Vlachs in general comes from the tribe of Dan, as descendants of Samson who was not allowed to cut his beard and hair. Barbarian comes from bearded, meaning bearded fighters. The flag of the Dacians, Dacian Draco is a snake 🐍 with a wolf's head on a pole. It comes from the serpent on Moses' staff. Numbers 21.4-9. Moesia is the land of the descendants of Moses. Dan-ube, or the Danube is Dan's river. Moesel is the river of Moses. It shows where the Dacians and Sarmatians, who are from the tribe of Dan, have spread. Zal-Moxis is Chief Moses, the Moses God. The tribe of Dan had the cult of idolizing Moses and Dan. Sarmale comes from the Sarmatians, that is, from the Samaritans. If the Romanians take a DNA test through 23andme, many will see that they have DNA fragments from Great Britain, Sardinia, Italy in general, Greece, Macedonia, Scandinavia, Ukraine. This shows that we are from Dacia and where they spread. The Dutch, people of the Netherlands, are called Dutch and read Daci. 4th century Denmark was called Dacia. Scandinavia in the 4th century was called the Province of Dacia. The Russians have a house at the country side and they call it Dacia. The Romanian language is not derived from Latin, but was a Romance language of the Dacians. As evidence is the language of the Aromanians, the Istrio-Romanians and other Vlach variants of the Romanian language found among the descendants of the different Dacian tribes that have not had contact with each other for 2000 years. All Romance languages developed individually from a Proto-Romance language and not from Latin. It is a language called LaDin in the Alps mountains in the Dolomites, which has exactly the same numeral as in the Romanian language, and not at all from Latin. Even the Greek language developed from a proto-Romanian language called Romeika. There have been Israeli Jews in Greece for 2000 years who are called Romanians and their territory is called Romania. History was falsified by world powers for certain interests. It is certain that the Romanian language is not formed from Latin. The Romans occupied only 1/4 of Dacia and only for 150 years. The Dacians were transhuman shepherds, just like the Aromanians, the Vlachs in general, all the villages in the mountains of Italy, Switzerland, Corsica, Sardinia. They are all Vlachs. The same in Scotland. That's why there are so many sheep in Scotland. Tradition from Dacia. How do you think that the Dacians, some shepherds, learned Latin, and even more, the language of the cotropitors? More than that. The Dacians are proud people, with a strong national feeling that does not allow themselves to be defeated. They wouldn't have adapted the Latin language in 150 years, because they didn't even have schools where they could learn it. But they had no contact with the Romans either, as the Dacians lived in the mountains. A large part of them fled as soon as the Romans arrived and controlled a part of the Dacian territory. The Dacians went to the mountains of Scandinavia and from there to Denmark, the Faroe Islands and the British Isles and Netherlands. How is it possible that 3/4 of the territory of Dacia that was not under Roman occupation still speaks Romanian? We were under the Turks for 500 years but how come we don't speak Turkish? We were under the Germans and Austro-Hungarians for 300 years, and we don't speak German or Hungarian, either. Let's be clear. The Romanian language is formed directly from the language of the Geto-Thracians. In the 7th century came the second wave of Sarmatians (Israelites from Samaria) with a new language, the Slavic language, and they settled in Yugo-Slavia and in the rest of the regions around Dacia. This is how the contact between the Dacian tribes spread from Thrace to Scythia, i.e. from Greece to Ukraine, was interrupted. They spoke another language that came to be called Slavonic. Slavs mean slaves, meaning the Jewish people in captivity. Slavonic is the language of slaves. All of Europe is actually Semitic formed, in various waves of migrations. See The Hebrew Origin of Serbs, by Stevan Tomovich Ph.D. Published by CNS See The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The lost tribe of Dan. The history of Europe must be rewritten with the Dacians and the Sarmatians, implicitly the tribe of Dan in a central role. BTW Gypsies are from the tribe of Simeon. Maybe they are also 2 camps. Roma Gypsies who stick to the Dacians Sinti-Gypsies belonging to the Scythians, meaning to the Sarmatians, Slavs. What's in the name? 🤔 Today's Romanians, on the other hand, are not from the Dacians, but from the Iranian people. We have genetic and cultural ties with Iranians. If we look at Scandinavia, Denmark and Holland, Ireland and Scotland, they resemble each other phenotypically, and their language is Anglo-Saxon. Old English is a derivative of Frisian and Dutch. Dutch and Danish are a derivative of Swedish and Norwegian. It seems that these languages are derived from the language of the Dacian Celts, the blond ones. The question is who are the dark-haired and dark-skinned Iranian Dacians with a Romance language? 🤔 What's in the name Dutch? Dacia connection I have read the pieces written by Roman and Greek historians and the description of the Dacians is very similar to the Dutch people today. I now better understand the drug use in the Netherlands, their intelligence, handsomeness, that they speak multiple languages, that they are ADHDers and colonists, that they have a cheese culture, that they are tattooed more than other peoples, that they are tall, have white skin, have little physical hair, are blond or red haired, have blue eyes. That they love justice ( the international court is in The Hague) etc etc etc. What's in the name Dutch language, Dutch nationality? Wow. Hidden in plain sight. The Dutch are Daci. (Dacians)
@ionbrad6753
9 күн бұрын
Aberrations : (
@SeamanX-qh9bw
8 күн бұрын
Atata prostie la un loc e greu sa gasesti .
@valevisa8429
6 күн бұрын
If you can't impress people with your intelligence,amaze them with your stupidity,Carteunu.
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
All romance languages developed individually from one another and NOT FROM LATIN but pre-Latin. From LaDin and Romeika. Latin was also created from a Pre-Latin languages. There is a language in Dolomites called LaDin but this is also not the original LaDin. Yet. The numbers in Dolomites LaDin are almost identical with Romanian not with Italian. While Ladin people and Romanians never met. Therefore they came from Asia with a IndoEuropean language of the Dacians that is the nowadays Romanian. There were are romani people including the Gypsies and they called their languages also romani like. Aromanian, Istroromanians and other Vlachs have developed individually away from Romanian. They have the same Romanian words, nothing like Italian. This is an argument against Latinisation of Greek for Aromanians and of Slavic for Istroromanians. The only explanation is that there were tribes immigration from Asia of related people speaking the same language that was already a romani language and that spread through the mountains of Thracia and Dacia, developing individually. Rome occupied Dacia only for 150 years and only 1/4 of the territory. How come all Romania, Moldova, Basarabia and south of UKRAINE speak Romanian? Ottoman empire occupation was 500 years in Romania, yet nobody speaks Turkish unless they are Turks. The same about the 300 years of Germanic occupation. Nobody speaks Hungarian or German unless they are colonists. Your theory is wrong. Pleases read The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. Read also about the Jewish roots of the Serbes. Thracians were Sarmatians and both Sarmatians and Dacians are Semitic. The lost tribes of Israel. Etruscans are Semitic too. They left Egypt by boat to escape slavery their. They are part of the Lost tribes of Israel as well. Whole Europe is SEMITIC. Now see the rest of the information. Aromanian is like archaic Romanian. The tribe of Dan scattered all through Asia Minor and Europe and formed Romance languages. Aromanian and Romanian, as well as all the Romance languages including Latin, were not formed from Latin but from ancient-culture LaDin, a Semitic language that formed also the LaDin in the Dolomites. LaDin the mother of European language including LaTin. Ladin is a Semitic language of the tribe of Dan. The semitic Ladin language, is the basis of Romanian language It could be that the original Ladin is not from Latin but the other way around. Romanians have almost exactly the same numerals and they are formed far away from the Dolomites. Romanian comes from Ladin, Dacian, not Latin. Wow 😮😮😮😮 Why Romanian Isn't Like Other Languages - because it is the closest to Ladin Origin of Romanic languages in Ladin, not in Latin. Amazing. Ladin and Ladino is the Semitic language, mother of all European languages. It is not that Spanish influenced this language. It is the other way around. Latin America is in fact Ladino America 🇺🇸. The continent where Ladinos or Jews emigrated. I always thought it has something to do with romance languages from Europe, but it is even prior to Americo Vespucci. Wow. It all makes sense. It comes full circle. Incredible. Ladino, romance language spoken in Israel 🇮🇱 coming from Europe, but basen on ancient-culture LaDin language. The language of the tribe of Dan. We found the connection with the language spoken by the tribe of Dan, the Dacian, back to Israel. Incredible. Ladin is the language Ladino are the people. In Spain they developed another version. Ladino. A Semitic language. Iberia is the country of the Hebreuws. Latin America, could be Ladino America. 70% Jewish genes in Latin America. Either Ashkenazi or of the lost tribes of Israel. A huge revelation for today. Zal-Moxis Dacia Dan Look for the Serpent's Trail If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language? No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci), also Dacians of the tribe of Dan. Dacians of Dacia were of the same tribe with Samson. That is why they had uncut beards 🧔🏽 and hair. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses, the God of the Dacians. Why? Because Moses brought Israel out of Egypt. The Tribe of Dan was in Exile as well and got Moses worship 🛐 to be their protector. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from the Old Testament book of Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Samarina is a colony of the Sarmatian, Samaritans. They were also Dacians Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac sons. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasants were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian language nor the other Romance languages from Iberic Peninsula, France, Wallonia, Italy. It is most likely that all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated to. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon. Sardinia was also colonized by the Tribe of Dan. Romanian language and Sardinian language are similar. This is another hint.
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
🧔🏽🏴 🏴 🇷🇴 🇬🇷 The bagpipe comes from Dacia. Thrace, Dacia, Scandinavia, Denmark, Holland, Ireland and Scotland are colonies of the Dacians and Sarmatians, those who were from the tribe of Dan before Christ. The Slavic lands are colonies of the Slavonian Sarmatians from the 7th century AD. The Dacians had dresses/skirts and opinci, just like the Romanian peasants and like the Greek and Aromanian folk costumes. The Scots have the same, and they carried the bagpipe tradition further. The long beard and long hair of the Dacians and Vlachs in general comes from the tribe of Dan, as descendants of Samson who was not allowed to cut his beard and hair. Barbarian comes from bearded, meaning bearded fighters. The flag of the Dacians, Dacian Draco is a snake 🐍 with a wolf's head on a stick. It comes from the serpent on Moses' staff. Numbers 21.4-9. Moesia is the land of the descendants of Moses. Dan-ube, or the Danube is Dan's river. Moesel is the river of Moses. It shows where the Dacians and Sarmatians who are from the tribe of Dan have spread. Zal-Moxis is Chief Moses, the Moses God. The tribe of Dan had the cult of idolizing Moses and Dan. ZALLIG in Dutch means Holiness. Zal could mean Holy. Sarmale comes from the Sarmatians, that is, from the Samaritans. If the Romanians take a DNA test through 23andme, many will see that they have DNA fragments from Great Britain, Sardinia, Italy in general, Greece, Macedonia, Scandinavia, Ukraine. This shows that we are from Dacia and where they spread. The Dutch are called Dutch and read Daci. 4th century Denmark was called Dacia. Scandinavia in the 4th century was called the Province of Dacia. The Russians have a house in the country and they call it Dacia. The Romanian language is not derived from Latin, but was a Romance language of the Dacians. As evidence is the language of the Aromanians, the Istrio-Romanians and other Vlach variants of the Romanian language found among the descendants of the different Dacian tribes that have not had contact with each other for 2000 years. They speak the same words as in Romanian, not only words found in Latin but other words. The way they speak is identical. A Latinezed language derived from Greek or Slavic could not develop exactly the same thousands of kilometers apart from different tribes. The fact that Aromanian and Istroromanian are so similar prove the fact that they all started with exactly the same Romance language in Thrace and it was not Latinized Greek, Slavic or Dacian. The rest of the Romance languages also development individually and not by Latinization such as Portuguese, Spanish, French, Rumantsch etc. All Romance languages developed individually from a Proto-Romance language and not from Latin. It is a language called LaDin in the Alps mountains in the Dolomites, which has exactly the same numeral as in the Romanian language, and not at all from Latin. Even the Greek language developed from a proto-Romanian language called Romeika. There have been Israeli Jews in Greece for 2000 years who are called Romanians and their territory is called Romania. History was falsified by world powers for certain interests. It is certain that the Romanian language is not formed from Latin. The Romans occupied only 1/4 of Dacia and only for 150 years. Not at all long in order to change the identity and language of a nation. The Dacians were transhuman shepherds, just like the Aromanians, the Vlachs in general, all the villages in the mountains of Italy, Switzerland, Corsica, Sardinia. They are all Vlachs. The same in Scotland. That's why there are so many sheep in Scotland. Tradition from Dacia. How do you think that the Dacians, some shepherds, learned Latin, and even more, the language of the cotropitors? More than that. The Dacians are proud people, with a strong national feeling that does not allow themselves to be defeated. They wouldn't have adapted the Latin even out of pride. Developing a new language in 150 years is impossible, because they didn't even have schools where they could learn it and they were scattered through the mountains with little contact with other tribes. They kept their traditions and were keen on their culture. The Romans had no power over the Dacian culture and folklore. The Dacians had no contact with the Romans either, as the Dacians lived in the mountains. A large part of Dacian fled Dacia nowadays România, as soon as the Romans arrived and took control of part of the Dacian territory. The fled Dacians went to the mountains of Scandinavia and from there to Denmark, the Faroe Islands and the British Isles. Besides is it possible that 3/4 of the territory of Dacia that was not under Roman occupation still speak Romanian? The Romanians were under the Turks for 500 years but how come they don't speak Turkish? The Romanians were under the Germans and Austro-Hungarians for 300 years, and don't speak German or Hungarian. Let's be serious. The Romanian language is directly from the language of the Geto-Thracians. In the 7th century came the second wave of Sarmatians (Israelites from Samaria) with a new language, the Slavic language, and they settled in Yugo-Slavia and in the rest of the regions around Dacia. This is how the contact between the Dacian tribes spread from Thrace to Scythia, i.e. from Greece to Ukraine, was interrupted. They spoke another language that came to be called Slavonic. Slavs mean slaves, meaning the Jewish people in captivity. Slavonic is the language of slaves. All of Europe is actually Semitic formed in various waves of migrations. See The Hebrew Origin of Serbs, by Stevan Tomovich Ph.D. Published by CNS See The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The lost tribe of Dan. The history of Europe must be rewritten with the Dacians and the Sarmatians, implicitly the tribe of Dan in a central role. Btw Gypsies are from the tribe of Simeon. Maybe they are also 2 camps. Roma Gypsies who stick to the Dacians Sinti Gypsies who belong to the Scythians, that is, the Sarmatians, the Slavs. What's in the name? 🤔
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
The language is not derived from Latin. It is an individual romance language spoken bij all Vlachs 2100 years ago that eventually developed individually per Vlach group all through the mountains of Europe. It was the language of the Thracians and Dacians. No language in Europe is latinezed. The languages are developed individually from a Pre-Latin language. Maybe LaDin of all times not of nowadays Dolomites. Greek language is always developed from Romeika.
@tm312th
14 күн бұрын
The truth about Aromanians is as follows: Yes, Romanians and Aromanians have the same origins. They are both descendants of Roman settlers mixed with the native Paleobalkan populations (Thracians and Dacians). However Vlachs are not Romanians. In fact their history has diverged over 1000 years ago. Aromanians originally lived in the southern borders of the so called ‘Latin-influenced’ areas of the Balkan region of the Roman Empire. During the Slavic invasions they moved south for protection and were thus still subjects of Rome (Byzantine Empire), while the northern Latin speaking populations were cut off, and a few centuries later formed the medieval Romanian states, and then modern Romania. Vlachs on the other hand continued to constitute part of the Roman nation, or Romaioi (Ρωμαίοι) aka Byzantine. This was the dominant national consciousness of the Byzantine empire for all orthodox populations in their domains regardless of what language they spoke (although the language of the church and administration was Greek). Fast forward to the early modern period, the medieval national consciousness of Romaios (Ρωμαίος) started to evolve to the Modern Greek national identity. Many non Greek speaking orthodox populations identified with the Greek cause, fought in the Greek revolution and were pioneers in shaping modern Greece. Aromanians in particular have historically held high positions in administration and commerce. That is why the majority of Aromanians today consider themselves Greek and not Romanian. As part Aromanian I would not consider myself anything else other than Greek due to the centuries of belonging to the same state (Byzantine Empire), having the same national consciousness (Roman in the old days, and Greek in the modern period), and of course having the same religion, and also being under the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
@saebica
13 күн бұрын
The truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Greetings from an Aromanian born in Romania! Hariosu s'ti aflu, frati shi haristo multu ca dzasesh luyuriile ashi cum fura di panda!
@zyraxesdac7583
11 күн бұрын
Ok but don t forgot the exaction, loot and crime of anatolian greek agains us
@tm312th
11 күн бұрын
@@zyraxesdac7583 what do you mean against us?
@zyraxesdac7583
10 күн бұрын
@@tm312th ia intreaba l pe papu sa ti povesteasca
@tm312th
10 күн бұрын
@@zyraxesdac7583 my family was never attacked by any fellow Greek. We did however suffer in the hands of Italians and Germans.
@Kurdedunaysiri
15 күн бұрын
I think people has to stop romantize everything that way. Tsakonian is a modern language which needs to be developed and proserved. It is the only living Doric Hellenic language in the world while other Hellenic language are all Attic. I love how they all sound ❤️
@theman0110
17 күн бұрын
If you want silence at a gym grab a pair of dumbells from the store and work out at a library
@superdawwe007
22 күн бұрын
”How did he know it was us?” *Because he’s a god* 💪
@sorinbalanescu6819
24 күн бұрын
Amazing! Exactly as in Romanian 🇷🇴: “cum te cheamă?”/“kum té kiama?”/“what’s your name?”!
@saebica
21 күн бұрын
Cum ti acljieamã* Cari'i numa a ta* It's not similar to Romanian, but same in all Romance languages
@mariusfilip1847
13 күн бұрын
@@saebica if that is not similarity, then what is similarity? Cum ti acl'eamă is not much different from Romanian Cum te cheamă, with the exception that Aromanian preserved the older cl'i/cl'e whereas Romanian evolved to chi/che and Aromanian places a protethic A in front of the some words (acl'em instead of cl'em). Keep in mind that some Aromanian groups use chi/che instead of cl'i/cl'e and other Aromanian groups do not place protethic A. So, they say Cum ti cheamă, exactly how one may hear in parts of Romania. And you're not right, it's not the same in all Romance languages. French says it differently (Comment t'appelles tu?) and the Spanish have llamar for what Romanians would say chemare and Aromanians acl'limare. The Portuguese have chamar (pronounces shamar), etc.
@ionbrad6753
10 күн бұрын
@@mariusfilip1847 Saebi este foarte determinat să arate că aromânii nu-s români (ok, din punctul meu de vedere fiecare să se definească cum vrea) - și prin urmare subliniază diferențele, cât de mici : )
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
Aromanian language is not derived from Latin. It is an individual romance language spoken bij all Vlachs 2100 years ago that eventually developed individually per Vlach group all through the mountains of Europe. It was the language of the Thracians and Dacians. No language in Europe is latinezed. The languages are developed individually from a Pre-Latin language. Maybe LaDin of all times not of nowadays Dolomites. Greek language is always developed from Romeika
@carteunu467
9 күн бұрын
You are wrong. Look at this evidence. All languages developed individually from one another. From LaDin and Romeika. Latin was also created from a Pre-Latin languages. There is a language in Dolomites called LaDin but this is also not the original LaDin. Yet. The numbers in Dolomites LaDin are almost identical with Romanian not with Italian. While Ladin people and Romanians never met. Therefore they came from Asia with a IndoEuropean language of the Dacians that is the nowadays Romanian. There were are romani people including the Gypsies and they called their languages also romani like. Aromanian, Istroromanians and other Vlachs have developed individually away from Romanian. They have the same Romanian words, nothing like Italian. This is an argument against Latinisation of Greek for Aromanians and of Slavic for Istroromanians. The only explanation is that there were tribes immigration from Asia of related people speaking the same language that was already a romani language and that spread through the mountains of Thracia and Dacia, developing individually. Rome occupied Dacia only for 150 years and only 1/4 of the territory. How come all Romania, Moldova, Basarabia and south of UKRAINE speak Romanian? Ottoman empire occupation was 500 years in Romania, yet nobody speaks Turkish unless they are Turks. The same about the 300 years of Germanic occupation. Nobody speaks Hungarian or German unless they are colonists. Your theory is wrong. Pleases read The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. Read also about the Jewish roots of the Serbes. Thracians were Sarmatians and both Sarmatians and Dacians are Semitic. The lost tribes of Israel. Etruscans are Semitic too. They left Egypt by boat to escape slavery their. They are part of the Lost tribes of Israel as well. Whole Europe is SEMITIC. Now see the rest of the information. Aromanian is like archaic Romanian. The tribe of Dan scattered all through Asia Minor and Europe and formed Romance languages. Aromanian and Romanian, as well as all the Romance languages including Latin, were not formed from Latin but from ancient-culture LaDin, a Semitic language that formed also the LaDin in the Dolomites. LaDin the mother of European language including LaTin. Ladin is a Semitic language of the tribe of Dan. The semitic Ladin language, is the basis of Romanian language It could be that the original Ladin is not from Latin but the other way around. Romanians have almost exactly the same numerals and they are formed far away from the Dolomites. Romanian comes from Ladin, Dacian, not Latin. Wow 😮😮😮😮 Why Romanian Isn't Like Other Languages - because it is the closest to Ladin Origin of Romanic languages in Ladin, not in Latin. Amazing. Ladin and Ladino is the Semitic language, mother of all European languages. It is not that Spanish influenced this language. It is the other way around. Latin America is in fact Ladino America 🇺🇸. The continent where Ladinos or Jews emigrated. I always thought it has something to do with romance languages from Europe, but it is even prior to Americo Vespucci. Wow. It all makes sense. It comes full circle. Incredible. Ladino, romance language spoken in Israel 🇮🇱 coming from Europe, but basen on ancient-culture LaDin language. The language of the tribe of Dan. We found the connection with the language spoken by the tribe of Dan, the Dacian, back to Israel. Incredible. Ladin is the language Ladino are the people. In Spain they developed another version. Ladino. A Semitic language. Iberia is the country of the Hebreuws. Latin America, could be Ladino America. 70% Jewish genes in Latin America. Either Ashkenazi or of the lost tribes of Israel. A huge revelation for today. Zal-Moxis Dacia Dan Look for the Serpent's Trail If you consider the other Romanian like languages such as Aromanian, istroromanian and others, that developed away from Dacia, you cannot say that the Dacian language was Latinised. And you cannot say that Aromanian is Latinised Greek. Because the way the latin words are spoken into these languages is close to Romanian and not Latin. How can a Latinised Greek develop 2000 km away from Dacia in the exact way as the Latinised Dacian language? No chance. It is more like Dacian language was a language that gave birth to Latin. Important to know!!!! Dacians and Sarmatians are THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL. Sarmatians are Samaritans. Dacians are the Dan's. The lost tribe of Dan. They colonized first what became Thracia and Dacia and move forward up north when the Romans invaded Dacia and colonized Scandinavia known as Province of Dacia and formed also countries like Olan-da, Dan-mark. The people living in Olanda/Holland/The Netherlands, are called Dutch (pronounced Daci), also Dacians of the tribe of Dan. Dacians of Dacia were of the same tribe with Samson. That is why they had uncut beards 🧔🏽 and hair. Dan-mark was called Dacia in the 4th century. The tribe of Dan, colonized Iberia, France and Wallonia, as well as Irland and Scotland. Zal-Moxis was Chief Moses, the God of the Dacians. Why? Because Moses brought Israel out of Egypt. The Tribe of Dan was in Exile as well and got Moses worship 🛐 to be their protector. The Serpent with wolf 🐺 head on a pole, was the war flag of both Dacians and Sarmatians and it was inspired from the Old Testament book of Numbers 21.4-9. The serpent on the pole of Moeses. Moesia comes from Moses. Is the country of Moses people. Moesel is the river of Moses. Dan-ube is the river of Dan. Samarina is a colony of the Sarmatian, Samaritans. They were also Dacians Many rivers in Europe have the name based on Dan derivative in the first place. Saxons is derived from (I)saac sons. The sons of Isaac. Europe is therefore Semitic. România 🇷🇴 was occupied by many other powers over the centuries. The Ottoman Empire was there for 500 years yet Romanias don't speak Turkish. The Austr-Hungarian Empire was there for 300 years. Yet only the colonized villages in specific regions where Hungarians and Germans emigrated 700 years ago, speak Hungarian and German and are the emigrants. No Românian people ever spoke another language. The Roman occupation was only 150 years at maximum. It is no way the Dacian peasants were Latinised. Therefore Latin was not the language that formed Romanian language nor the other Romance languages from Iberic Peninsula, France, Wallonia, Italy. It is most likely that all these languages developed separately from a Semitic language that became Dacian language that got variations according to the region the segmented parts of the Tribe of Dan emigrated to. It is extraordinary and fascinating at the same time. Look for the article. The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The tribe of Dan. Btw. The Gypsies are Semitic too. They are from the lost tribes of Simeon. Sardinia was also colonized by the Tribe of Dan. Romanian language and Sardinian language are similar. This is another hint.
@tlwmonkey3189
Ай бұрын
Bro I know I’m late, but dam your jacked
@agnostosmitsos20
Ай бұрын
Aromanians are 100 % Greeks . They were a group of Greeks that lived in the region of Romania and simply spoke the widely spread latin languace . They have nothing to do with romanians genetically
@karlgegtastiera6889
Ай бұрын
😂😂😂 trying to rationalise the fact that modern greeks are an artificial nation
@Kapanol97
7 күн бұрын
Ti malakies les :-)) and the sources for this are out of your a$$?
@Peter_1986
Ай бұрын
Why do Americans always yell at each other all the time? The gym trainers here in Sweden generally walk up to the person and then speak in a normal tone, and always remain respectful - I have literally _never_ seen _anyone_ at my public gym make a big scene about anything, and I have gone there since 2014.
@Sofia-0001
Ай бұрын
Dimitri - Cum ti chiamâ? Ghini.. is SAME, not similar, as in Moldovian (East) Romanian. In today's Romanian is 'Cum te cheama? Bine' The main vocabulary of Aromanian, where is not borrowed or replaced with Greek or Slavic terms, is identical with Archaic Romanian, from different regions of Romania, both internationally considered east Romance languages.
@scubasteve6175
Ай бұрын
People that do that bullshit where they scream and drop the weight after 1-3 reps need to lift lighter weights. The full rep is important. This is kinda just showing you don't have control over the weight and need to lighten things. You'll probably make much better progress doing it with more discipline
@triantaf6444
2 ай бұрын
Did you like kavala
@vincegedeon6583
2 ай бұрын
Gyms are so toxic
@_utahraptor
2 ай бұрын
Greetings and love to all Aromanians from Romania ❤💪
@andredubois4601
2 ай бұрын
This is genius-level training. Pure concentric no eccentric. You increase the number of mitochondria in the muscle cells training this way.
@markalex2433
2 ай бұрын
I had a similar experience in a smaller gym at my swim team I finished up a set of deadlifts and the head coach walked in and told me “if you do that you’re not allowed in here” So, what? I’m not allowed to get stronger?
@sportschad
2 ай бұрын
5:17 "How did he know he was us?" M'Lord works in mysterious weights.
@ryanpangilinan5803
2 ай бұрын
What a beautiful place ! So cool to see the pride in their language. And love that they showed y’all around after knowing your last name
@nervousnorvus1944
2 ай бұрын
Pushing that sled like he's strolling around with a trolly at the supermarket
@t-nt7101
2 ай бұрын
Oufa amerikanoi
@lifenegotiator2700
2 ай бұрын
Some people forget the concept. Push ... Pull
@AstrapiExtrem
2 ай бұрын
😎
@mstation517
2 ай бұрын
grizzly is using 1% of his true greek power to train with mortals
@tsapi7
2 ай бұрын
Kyrgiakos is an inspiration.
@pinksupremacy6076
2 ай бұрын
Kyriakos is like the bloated Yoda. Love that dude.
@user-me1kt8yf4c
2 ай бұрын
МЕЧТА ДЕТСТВА НОМЕР 456 ПОТРЕНИРОВАТЬСЯ С КИРИЯКИСОМ
@TheTorlass
2 ай бұрын
where did you get the most sore
@GK-my8bl
2 ай бұрын
As a Greek I can easily say that you speak our language like no other tourists I have ever met. Huge respect my guy consider how difficult the Greek language is.
@Eirenband
2 ай бұрын
could do without the ear rape
@DiesesMax
2 ай бұрын
nice bros
@DevInsightsLegends-lh7dn
2 ай бұрын
4:12 Greek grandmas talk like Turkish grandmas lol. As I know there are so many Turks live in Kavala.
@user-rt6zc2pi6y
2 ай бұрын
Not even one...nby the way typical Hellenese grandmother, her name Morfula typical Hellens name... No mongols in Kavala...
@DevInsightsLegends-lh7dn
Ай бұрын
@@user-rt6zc2pi6y half of Greece came from Turkiye
@ruvimsemenyuk8224
2 ай бұрын
Full colab
@user-im6rk1ye5p
2 ай бұрын
The Vlachs are Greeks. In ancient times, there were many Greeks at the supposed borders of the Roman Empire, where they also spoke in Latin. Vlach is a Balkan Latin-derived dialect that has many similarities with the Romanian language. In Albania, there are many Vlachs who are referred to as Greeks, and even the Albanians themselves see them as Greeks. The fact that they speak a different dialect does not mean they are not Greeks. There are Greeks who speak Arvanitic, an Albanian dialect, there are Turkish-speaking Pontic and Cappadocian Greeks, and even those who speak the Griko dialect in Italy are Greeks. Be proud of your heritage, my friend. I am writing this in English for better understanding, but your Greek was very good.
@saebica
2 ай бұрын
We Vlachs have never been Greeks ethnically. We are Latinised and Hellenised Thracians.
@_utahraptor
2 ай бұрын
Straight up lie. Albania recognises the Aromanian minority. They are seen as very different from Greeks
@jurgenkreutzer3706
2 ай бұрын
The trouble is that everyone has an exact explanation but nobody's lived in the past to know how things have played historically. Every nationality/ethnicity history will tell you their favourite story of events. Celebrating diversity, brotherhood , care and respect is the way forward ...
@saebica
2 ай бұрын
@@_utahraptor They recognize them as Romanians.. Which is disgustingly wrong. We're nothing but Aromanians, old Thracians.
@adyaconu
2 ай бұрын
So, what I've learned from this video: Aromanians had sheep. Sometimes, they had goats. Mind blow.
@alexisleon23
2 ай бұрын
AN ANGLO SAXON CANNOT UNDERSTAND.....
@dimitriostsiakoulas1081
Ай бұрын
I’m laughing out loud at this comment (and the response😆)
@rconstructionandsports
3 ай бұрын
Хорошее видео Кириакоса надо было бы больше поснимать, тренировки Димитрий ты молодец 👍
@rconstructionandsports
3 ай бұрын
Димитрий молодец браво 😊👍
@ivo3598
3 ай бұрын
Kyriakos went big this year on Arnold Classic
@ivo3598
3 ай бұрын
Where is video from last visit?
@johnny6448
3 ай бұрын
Video was on my recommended as I follow grizzly, had a look at your videos when I saw your name as I’m Greek and saw the Karen video 😂 remember watching it or watching aKZitemr reacting to it about 4-5 years ago bro damn 😂
@taotekoncha6275
3 ай бұрын
A dream to train with kyriakos, plus I've always liked greece since my childhood was a dream to visit, such a beautiful country full of history in every corner.
@georgetsoukalas1409
3 ай бұрын
12:43 i think he said "τα παιδια ειναι ευλογια" which means "kids are a blessing"
@mrv3167
2 ай бұрын
No brother, he said "Τα παιδιά από την Αμερική ήρθαν τώρα εντάξει" Which means "the guys came from usa "
Пікірлер