Jarretman, more episodes and don't ever take a break! addicted to your videos..please keep it up.
@reymon1983
4 жыл бұрын
Great content, jarret! At 4min hand against Deano, I think he was laughing at your bet size, because in 3BetPots, you barely have spots in paired flop boards (especially medium cards like 9,T...) in which you are going to overbet the turn. Moreover, after XX flop, you have way less TX than he has, since he always checks flop and, in a K in turn, which is a card that you are supposse to barrel a lot, he can follow the CheckRaise line in the turn very often. i think that 1/2 to 2/3 fits much better this spot in turn. I love your staff, I watch every single video from you. Keep going with your great content!
@Marinate305
2 жыл бұрын
Great thought process and break down with the TT vs KK hand. Great river bet size as well to extract maximum value from that hand.
@rhoz8649
4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jarretman at 22:53 you mention that you expect BB to just triple off with all of his overpairs here. Do you think it makes sense to x/jam with overpairs some of the time or do you think some of these hands like QQ and JJ are too vulnerable to allow IP to possibly see a free river? Maybe checking stuff like AA with a club and TT and barreling KK-JJ before the board changes too much?
@Jarretman
4 жыл бұрын
Yea low frequency checking some overpairs is likely GTO to mix some x/r and x/c but even GTO wise BB mainly just wants to go bet/bet/jam. Also in practice vs real people you might find they ALWAYS go bet/bet/jam with overpairs (whereas a solver will mix some low freq checks)
@coolbeans8682
4 жыл бұрын
Good stuff! I like these session videos a lot! Have you ever thought about recording some piosolver analysis of some cool spots? Cheers
@counterstrike1110
4 жыл бұрын
i could watch these all day
@Jhona99
4 жыл бұрын
hey i just recently start playing poker on a regular with the intentions of becoming pro and your videos have being very helpful, especially when you talk about frequencies and sizes strategies on different boards is really helping me. how long it took for you to get a the level that you are? and how long have you being playing for?
@sneakerworldromania32
Жыл бұрын
What does ROFL mean exactly? i understand it is something to do with ovb being a mistake but i have never seen the shortcut Rofl so please help me sleep well
@maxdefence
4 жыл бұрын
Great content Jarret, always coming back, keep it up bruh
@tobyc8905
4 жыл бұрын
Love the relaxed content
@xxoxoyyoyo5133
4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jarret.. great content and you're doing a good job of explaining your thought process..just a quick question at 5:42 you folded 98s SBv CO open..isnt this like a pure 3bet?
@rhoz8649
4 жыл бұрын
I don't think 98s is a pure 3bet here it's probably pretty low frequency. Being OOP and having lowered the SPR significantly I think you want stuff that will flop stronger pairs/draws like suited broadways and suited Ax.
@209twitch
4 жыл бұрын
in the preflop sims I have 98s is a pure fold, reason being is the CO will flat AKs and AKo a decent % of the time to a SB 3bet, which gives big reverse implied odds on QJT, as well as CO flatting JTs which coolers 98s on 789
@rhoz8649
4 жыл бұрын
@@209twitch yea that makes a lot of sense. That prob influences it a lot more than the reasons I suggested lol. Thanks for pointing that out.
@xxoxoyyoyo5133
4 жыл бұрын
@@209twitch makes a lot of sense!I guess it's decent exploit at lower stakes where ppl don't defend enough vs 3bets and give up a lot post flop
@savanahhh
4 жыл бұрын
Min 10:20 the hand "not gto aproved" with A8 SB vs BB dont you think that as played on the river is better checking with the intention of calling his possible river bet? I think villain is likely to hold a lot of 9x or Tx that bust the draw and are incetivised to bluff pretty often no? Also you mentioned that if you bet river in retrospect you would choose a 1/3 instead a 3/4 but to me I think the latter is better because once you check raise turn you re polarizing a bit your range no?
@Jarretman
4 жыл бұрын
Checking > 1/4 > 1/3 > 3/4 imo
@iconicheight1188
3 жыл бұрын
I don't know why there aren't a hell of a lot more views and likes. It's bullshit really. If I could afford you, you'd be the guy on the top of my list. Great stuff.
@tmkplzv7979
4 жыл бұрын
dont you like aurora engine? great videos, please shoot more micros and your vision of improving as micro to mid player!
@samvalentine4691
4 жыл бұрын
Why do we overbet on a turn Kh vs deano in the BB? wouldnt it make sense to just check behind nut A high here and take our showdown value to the river? Or are we betting it because this board heavily favours us, and we need bluffs for times when we have KK or trapped KT or AA?
@samvalentine4691
4 жыл бұрын
also what is the worst hand we would be overbetting AQo? since most QJ KQ would cbet flop?
@alphzx9
4 жыл бұрын
It was HJ vs UTG 3bp
@Marinate305
Жыл бұрын
What you been up to Jarretman?
@keithjackson5531
4 жыл бұрын
Great content in your video again, so many little titbits to take in, thanks again!
@sahajjain3886
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading this types of videos
@ЮрийБутенко-н6м
4 жыл бұрын
By the way, at 4:34, I'm pretty sure the solver would overbet 2x pot the flop. The flop class is just like the one, mentioned on insiderpoker. I'll include imgur screen of the similar solve
@ЮрийБутенко-н6м
4 жыл бұрын
imgur.com/a/givEjro Here's AK2r. It's virtually the same as AQ3r. Positions are different, sure, but the villain still have 2pair+ less then 3% of the time, that's why we can and should attack his range with overbet
@Jarretman
4 жыл бұрын
On AKx AQx you can basically do whatever you want as long as it involves putting a lot of pressure on your opponent. The EV loss of betting small on the rainbow version is less than on the FD version. Betting small allows you to simply to betting 100% of your range (if you want to, very little EV loss) and subjectively I find that it's more difficult to play as the bb vs the small size than the overbet; it's very simple to play versus the overbet with the most complicated thing being mixing some folds with Ax and calling Qx half the time (preferring bdfd always) so versus real people it will usually perform better.
@TempestMindECHO
4 жыл бұрын
@@Jarretman Hi Jarret, Throughout your videos you champion the merits of the 1/3 pot size range bet on boards favouring you. I’m curious at what point, or against what level of opposition does it become too much of a simplification? At lower stakes you can usually count on villains over-folding to 1/3 sizing, and not raising enough, but at your stakes isn’t it worth extracting that extra little bit of EV by going bigger/more polor when you have a nut advantage for example? Put another way, where do you draw the line between optimal and suboptimal strategies against pool? Thanks for the great content! Small side bar: I’m aware what I wrote is in itself an oversimplification of how winning players might formulate their strategies. I’m just wondering how negligible is any long term EV loss.
@Jarretman
4 жыл бұрын
@@TempestMindECHO The game doesn't end on the flop after 1 bet! First, I know the turn/river strategies after bet 33%, call very well. I don't know the turn/river strategies as well for 200%, call. Second, I know the flop/turn/river responses to a flop raise after bet 1/3. In order to capture the extra EV gained from the flop overbet you need to execute the later streets perfectly otherwise you might actually be losing EV. Maybe in future ill consider putting in some additional work for the large overbet flop strategy but for now a simplified strategy that I know very well is definitely going to outperform a complicated strategy I know only decently. This is all assuming opponents will play perfectly vs all sizes.
@TempestMindECHO
4 жыл бұрын
@@Jarretman Thanks, Jarret.
@keirsullivan2578
4 жыл бұрын
25:33 wouldn't KT and AT wanna bet less often because of reverse implied odds for opponent?
@Jarretman
4 жыл бұрын
He has Qx and Jx combos that check as well and he can check T9 JT QT more often than KT AT so theres more value to bet KT AT simply because you beat more of his range
@sneakytucky
4 жыл бұрын
@@Jarretman if he didn't have the K of spades would it be good for villain to barrel that turn and bluff club rivers? how would you play vs that line. great video btw, thankyou
@slidehide6055
4 жыл бұрын
i respect you.
@plauo9913
4 жыл бұрын
Is he playing texas holdem poker ?
@chesscoachgerry4140
4 жыл бұрын
Yes ;-D
@Toogoodxoxo
4 жыл бұрын
No. He's playing Two-card PLO.
@plauo9913
4 жыл бұрын
@@Toogoodxoxo what's the difference ?
@plauo9913
4 жыл бұрын
@Free gift, not a contract! A free gift! ah okay so it just depends on how big the bet is. I just play for fun with my friends the looser pays for the beers
@plauo9913
4 жыл бұрын
@Free gift, not a contract! A free gift! Yes well we like it also the poker game of no limits but its easier in the version we play with only one card each and we put 5 cards all at the same time
@ЮрийБутенко-н6м
4 жыл бұрын
Hey, Jarret, long time fan! You said you'd think about giving away coaching, is it still possible? Also, can I become your student? I would give you big % of all my profits for a period of time even after you're done teaching me Plus, I'm an interesting student to teach, I promise!) Would you be maybe interested?
@Toogoodxoxo
4 жыл бұрын
What's with the RNG?
@UncleBenjs
4 жыл бұрын
For the times you want to be calling a % or raising a %, or calling a % whilst folding a %. maybe you have K7s in SB and want to be 3b 7% in a certain spot, so rng says 94% or up, you 3b, lower its a fold
Пікірлер: 47