I read this as Ray Gun Romano the first three times
@defmoon900
25 күн бұрын
Didnt age well..
@richardgordon-davis707
8 ай бұрын
It's not always the penetration that we are looking for, but rather the energy dump and projectile cavity as the round with the greater "plasmic shock" will win everytime.
@AutitsicDysexlia
7 ай бұрын
...aka, "the motion in the ocean." 😂
@iroekyjHD
6 ай бұрын
Yea 7.62 acts like a pistol caliber in the way that it just punches a clean hole, meanwhile 5.56 will tumble or even explode
@anjanieko702
5 ай бұрын
@@iroekyjHDyou’re clueless
@damiion666
4 ай бұрын
@@iroekyjHD5.56 doesn’t always “tumble or explode”…especially at close range. 7.62 performs better closer range. That’s why you can get away with a short barrel AK vs a shorty AR
@VraelFreorhe
4 ай бұрын
Agreed
@ThoughtCriminal867
5 ай бұрын
The 7.62 won against concrete, and probably against sand too. You need smaller boxes of sand to differentiate the performance of rounds, maybe 4", 5", 6" and 8" cubes filled with sand would all be useful depending on the rounds you're comparing.
@GunsBlazingRanch
10 ай бұрын
You're answering the important questions here. Awesome.
@robison87
10 ай бұрын
When shooting cinder blocks with 5.56 and 7.62x39 it was about a 3 to 1 ratio to do equivalent damage.
@derekheuring2984
9 ай бұрын
I thoroughly enjoy these near real world testing of the penetrating ability of peer rounds but it would have been more interesting to test the 5.45X39 against the 5.56 NATO.
@joerne.9632
8 ай бұрын
I would find a comparison of the new ammunition, the 6 mm ARC (Advanced Rifle Cartridge) and the 6.8 mm SPC (Special Purpose Cartridge) from Sig Sauer, both cartridges developed for modern self-loading rifles, interesting.
@jwedgest67
9 ай бұрын
I like your channel, BUT the major flaw on your channel is not letting us know who makes the ammo you are shooting for all we know you could possibly be putting quality ammo up against some cheap brand, and that my friend matters. Let us know what you are shooting, not just the caliber.
@daanwessels4781
9 ай бұрын
By the looks of it miltary ammo. All military ammo are loaded to pretty much the same specifications. 7.62x39 looks like it could be Russian and the 5.56x45 probably American. Manufacturers try to keep it pretty much standard in order to get the same results with military weapons across the board. I have personally found that 7.62x51 and 5.56x45 performed to witin moa grouping regardless of source in my 7.62 Musgrave riifle as well as the Sako .223 Win. Both bolt action rifles. In the Denel manufactured R4 and R5 (5.56x 45 caibre Galil clones of the AK action) as well as the Mini14 in .223 Win. calibre I found the same results. With South African and Finnish mil. ammo the groupings were fractionally tighter than with Portugeuse ammo but on the whole quite constant enough for hunting and military application. Maybe not quite good enough for competition shooting though. IMHO close enough results for all practical purposes.
@jwedgest67
9 ай бұрын
@daanwessels4781 All good points, but letting us know the manufacturers doesn't hurt at all.
@M.Y.1234
9 ай бұрын
@@daanwessels4781Нет, это не военные боеприпасы. Я стрелял военным патроном 7.62×39 по металлической плите 16мм, с расстояния 60м. Пробивает очень легко...
@dylanandmolly3739
9 ай бұрын
Calibre
@FilipAnelkovic-tx1ji
9 ай бұрын
@@dylanandmolly3739 yeah it should be calibre or caliber, but interestingly, a tool for measuring the diameter of drilled oil wells is called "caliper", which obviously related
@timrobinson6573
10 ай бұрын
Pretty wild that the 7.62x39 didn't make it through the sand but the 300 Black Out made it through in the previous video. Seems like we need a 30 cal showdown.
@coltonpayne70
10 ай бұрын
Agreed
@Paralyzed-rm6vc
10 ай бұрын
The 300 didn't though. It launched the sand upwards which didn't count the second he retested it didn't go through
@timrobinson6573
10 ай бұрын
@@Paralyzed-rm6vcI was referring to 5.56 vs 300 video, you're talking about the 7.62 vs 300 video. In the 5.56 vs 300 video the 300 blackout went through the sand with the top sealed so their was no sand launching. He actually tested the 300 twice through sand in that video and it went through twice.
@Иванпонимаете-г4ш
10 ай бұрын
@timrobinson6573 due to bullet shape. Also 7.63x39 has more energy than 300 blackout but it's actually slightly bigger than 30 Caliber. It's more like 31. But that can Make all the difference. 300 blackout is a better design. Just wish it had a little more energy
@poowg2657
10 ай бұрын
I've got some surplus Tula 7.62x39 tungsten core that might do a wee better on penetration. Be neat to see a contest between armor piercing 5.56 and 7.62.
@zoltanszilvassy8715
9 ай бұрын
In the Cdn. Forces we did this kind of firing often but using NATO 7.62 and NATO 5.56. The Nato rounds out of the FNC1 rifle would heavily spall the 1/2" steel plates but the 5.56 would leave barely a noticeable dimple and powder mark, often even unable to make a standing plate fall over at 100metres. Our combat engagements for training are typically between 100 and 300 metres. The FN would penetrate sandbags and concrete cinder blocks. Rarely would sandbags be double layered depth. The move away from 7.62 was due to better magazine capacity not effectiveness of rounds. It was always re-assuring to know you could fire out to 800m accurately with an FNC1 but had to rely on your section MG weapons to do that after the C7 was the issue rifle. We did not like that at all. Now the movement back toward heavier barrelled C7 variants running 7.62 finally makes more sense. 41C
@djnone8137
4 ай бұрын
Let me know how far you can hump 600 rounds plus 80lbs of gear. Thats why. 556... 16 pounds or so
@frankdardano3182
29 күн бұрын
Finally, someone just did what he said he would do in a easy non technically oriented video.Thank you for making it as simple,fast and effective information that you articulated.We are all tired of clickbait,but ALMOST getting used to it.Good test,got my answers,THANKS,LOADS.
@jamesregan6678
10 ай бұрын
Thank you for these types of comparisons. Very informative
@erikschall620
9 ай бұрын
According to FBI Ballistics the 7.62x39 leaves a 2.8 times larger wound channel than 5.56 !!
@eddybear771
10 ай бұрын
One of the 7.62x39 was dead center in line with the heart wood. That part of the tree is generally more dense. That makes it appear a little more impressive.
@grayamdelaney7044
8 ай бұрын
Nit picking
@ClickPopBoom
8 ай бұрын
not only that but it wasn't key-holing on its way out the back like the 5.56 was, so if it were up to me I'd have given it the points for that round. Based on my own experience putting holes in random broken junk 7.62x39 always seemed to do more damage when shooting from anywhere from 50 to 150 yards but once you take it out to longer ranges I find it's much easier to get hits on target with 5.56 than 7.62. comes down to use and preference, and for me I'm gonna prefer the ar-15 over the ak most days of the week.
@a564-c3q
7 ай бұрын
The 5.56x41 would have made it through the center as well, easily. Both would have made it through even thicker lumber. These tests are kinda poorly picked, resulting in lots of less meaningful draws. The easier objects are too easy and the harder objects too hard. Like that big block of sand. That's either close to or actual sandbag thickness, of course no common small arms round will go through there.
@martinigasolini4062
Ай бұрын
Max Cope
@OneShadow7
Ай бұрын
The 7.62x39 is 124 grain with speed around 2 400 fps, and 5.56x45 is 60 grain with some 3200 fps. I always wondered if they dropped the weight of 7.62x39 to a 90 or 100 grain, it would probably make round go some 3000 fps similar to 5.56 but it would still have 50% or more weight. It would probably be an excellent round surpassing both previous rounds.
@donwyoming1936
10 ай бұрын
Rifling twist has a surprising influence on penetration. The faster the rifling twist, the further the projectile will penetrate. FN found both the SS109 & M193 penetrated much further with the 1-7 twist than the 1-10 & 1-12 twists. Of course, their testing was mostly on FRG helmets. The US Marines required any new 5.56 round penetrate the helmet further than 7.62 Ball. FN achieved this by using the 1-7 twist while the rest of NATO went 1-10. 🤠
@timothybayliss6680
10 ай бұрын
That's part of what can make bullet impart more energy. An over stabilized projectile has a tendency to just drive strait when it hits something. A bullet that is just stabilized will yaw and and usually flip backwards.
@tullo5564
10 ай бұрын
Too much rifling twist causes wear a lot faster, reducing overall barrel life. Everything has an advantage and a shortcoming
@off6848
5 ай бұрын
@@tullo5564it also causes barrels to get hotter under automatic fire A low twist long barrel with a bigger bullet is good in a machine gun
@Maddad_39
10 ай бұрын
Only judging depth and not width or energy might be misleading, both rounds made it through similar barriers, but the 7.62 made a bigger hole plus more damage.
@kevinbietry7527
10 ай бұрын
More damage?
@dwayne7356
10 ай бұрын
@@kevinbietry7527 if that was a wound cavity, the diameter would have been larger, maybe causing more bleeding, which is the goal.
@vegapower454
10 ай бұрын
LOL
@kevinbietry7527
10 ай бұрын
@@dwayne7356 Yes but a slightly larger hole is all you’d get in terms of a difference both rounds will require specific velocity to do anything else and if the velocity is lower it will just pass strait though 5.56 is over 1,000 fps faster at the muzzle
@dunerinaz
10 ай бұрын
@@kevinbietry7527 No, it's not over 1000 fps faster unless your comparing cheap Russian ammo vs hand loaded 5.56. Get off the AR high horse and except the fact that there are other cartridges that are just as capable as your beloved 5.56. I'm a fan of both, but if I'm choosing stopping power at typical ranges, the 7.62 is my choice. I also hand load both and get much better speed out of the 7.62 than Russian steel case ammo.
@traillesstravelled7901
10 ай бұрын
These little tests are great. Seeing how mass vs.velocity go through stuff is interesting.
@nickma71
10 ай бұрын
Mass x velocity is momentum, and that is what hits the target. The kinetic energy formula doesn't tell the full story. Of penetration of a hard barrier is different than a soft barrier, adding another angle.
@frooskys22
10 ай бұрын
@@nickma71no, the density of the material isnt the important thing here, the thing here is the girth of the target, a larger sandbox will be defeated by a bullet of higher linear momentum and wont be defeated by one of less linear momentum, because the one with more momentum decelerates at a slower speed, but it is not the density of the material, only the time that the bullet is decelerated. But it depends on linear momentum, not in mass, the thing is that usually mass difference is bigger than velocity difference, so the heavier bullet normally has the greater momentum. But the lighter bullet usually tends to have more energy because even though the mass difference is bigger than the velocity, in the formula the velocity is squared
@frooskys22
10 ай бұрын
@@nickma71yes, the kinetic energy formula tells the full story, the proyectile with greater kinetic energy will have greater energy regardless of the target density, if you make a thin sand target, the bullet with more kinetic energy will also do it better than the one with more linear momentum. But it is decelerated more with time, thats why bullets with higher muzzle velocities are slower at very long distances than otherones slower at muzzle.
@nickma71
10 ай бұрын
@@frooskys22 If only you knew what you typed. .45 auto is great against a soft target (flesh) and terrible against armor. The opposite of a faster moving and slower 9mm. But carry on.
@johnpoole8321
10 ай бұрын
Green tips would be interesting to match up with the 30 cal bullets.
@machfly5
10 ай бұрын
Green M855 vs M43
@CosmopolitanFools
9 ай бұрын
Incredible experiment/competition between bullets, with me being wrong on the expected winner. The 5.56 gave the 7.62 a run for its money. Many thanks for the scientific approach of setting up variables to measure velocity & impact - Consider me Subscribed + 'Thumbs' up.
@josiahlavan-wilson4969
9 ай бұрын
7.62 won the first round because although both made it through the plywood only one didn’t tumble. Also I think shot placement made the difference on the last one
@toddparsons2980
10 ай бұрын
Very interesting results. These comparisons are awesome. Thanks
@joshuamoore24_7
10 ай бұрын
You should make a steel core showdown between these two types of cartridges.
@joaquinspandex7870
6 ай бұрын
Man I love KZitem sometimes. Having just bought my first AK I wondered which round would win, and PRESTO an answer. It was close though, which tells me that whichever gun I can grab the soonest is the winner. Nice video baritone voice man!
@FarmAlarm
10 ай бұрын
Congratulations on the 50k subscribers. It's a fun feeling!
@paulkemp4559
8 ай бұрын
Just viewed… I worked with MOD Police who for some time used the Heckler & Koch MP7 which used a steel tip armour piercing round to defeat body armour but tumbled in soft tissue thus preventing collateral damage by round pass through in an urban policing environment
@americandad5764
10 ай бұрын
Looking forward to the testing on Green Tip 5.56?
@billybob6784
10 ай бұрын
Sand target - You really should reduce the thickness of the target incrementally till you get a winner.(I don't wanna tell you how to do your job, so I'll let you determine how this will be achieved.) Keep in mind that while the content you provide is free to viewers, the constructive criticism, critiques and insight from viewers like myself is also free.
@billybob6784
10 ай бұрын
Sorry dude. I must be bored and you seem to have a pretty good sense of humor so.... I do hope you took it seriously at first. Obviously I was joking.
@bananaballistics
10 ай бұрын
Yeah, I really didn’t think that 8” was going to be so much of an issue. Already filmed the last several videos but I will look into getting a thinner one
@carlosenriqueulloa
8 ай бұрын
The 7.62 will have more momentum (Mass X Velocity), while the 5.56 will have more energy (1/2 Mass * v2)
@Fish-ub3wn
10 ай бұрын
one of the best shows on the net. love your dry jokes.
@ryanzanow8221
10 ай бұрын
Dude! Absolutely love your vids! Thanks so much for your time and effort!!
@franklewis7100
10 ай бұрын
I always look forward to Banana testing vids!
@jeffhdpd782
10 ай бұрын
Yeah same here. I’ve watched almost all of his veg and they are outstanding. The newer ones are better because the sled he uses is better. You get much better results when that Steele is tighten down and doesn’t move. Very interesting stuff.
@rofferdal
8 ай бұрын
First time on your channel. Interesting results, but there are so many other ways to test. Ballistic gel may be interesting, and I think the keyholing of the smaller caliber in one of the tests where the larger seemed to make a cleaner hole in the plywood somehow warrant more investigation. I think the 7.62 probably would fare better shooting through brush.
@JohnMelland
5 ай бұрын
Paused, then wanted to say the 7.62×39 is my choice of winner, IMHO! Thank you!
@tubingview3251
10 ай бұрын
I would like to see more precise data on the penetration. Maybe stack narrower boxes full of sand? The 'witness' boards could also be improved to show how much energy is left after penetrating the object.. Maybe alternating 1/8 or 1/4" ply and 20g steel sheeting? Space out a few 'witness' surfaces? Thanks!
@mongosafariadventure
10 ай бұрын
I like that idea. I was thinking of a wooden trough with lined up plastic bags of playground dry sand. Easily made with plastic bag- drum liners over a wood form, taped to hold shape, form removed and filled with sand. I'm afraid you only get one shot through each bag before repair and refill. A lot of work....How about multiple small postal flat rate sized boxes of sand?
@stick__shooter
9 ай бұрын
Very interesting. I've read so many places that 5.56 won't penetrate as well as a heavier cartridge and will be less likely to make it through barriers. I understand bullet construction will make a big difference, but I was surprised at the results of this test.
@Yeshayahu.
9 ай бұрын
I think that It's safe to say that in terms of drilling of the first target that is hit the 5.56 win, but in terms of penetration 7.62 takes it, I say that because 7.62 didn't keyhole like 5.56 right here: 2:00
@WesternReloader
10 ай бұрын
It’s a difference of philosophy, and is why I have an AR in 556 and a M1A in 308
@davidsingleton1743
10 ай бұрын
Your channel has really come along! The updated sleds / holders for steel, concrete, and wood blocks that you’ve come up with are fantastic, and the your content is terrific. Very entertaining. Congrats on passing 50,000 subscribers! A friendly suggestion to help gauge relative penetration performance on tests like these that have several non-definitive segments might be to simply add in a few more 1/2” or 3/4” plywood blocks behind the single block you used in this segment, since at some point the bullets will be stopped and a comparison can then be shown. In other words, if you had several of the smaller blocks behind either the large 6x6 block, or the concrete block, then perhaps those segments would have shown one round going deeper than the other. Just a thought . . . Thanks for making such fun-to-watch content. And +1 on the suggestion to see how 8MM Mauser performs. A comparison against 30-06 would be interesting. As would a comparison of 25-06 vs 270, or maybe 6.5x55 Swede vs 6.5CM?
@Kevins-Philippine-Retirement
Ай бұрын
When measuring the damage in the ⅜" steel plate, both the depth as well as diameter of the cavity should be considered. Also in a duct seal or gel target, the shocking/stopping power would be proportional to the total volume of maximum expansion of the medium, easily measurable with duct seal as it is not elastic and stops at maximum deflection.
@MorganaBee
2 ай бұрын
I appreciate your accuracy!
@chrismitchell4622
9 ай бұрын
5.56 NATO has a green tip!!!
@paulfeasal6024
3 ай бұрын
There's a reason they use sand bags in the military. They also help support your rifle while firing.
@kennyg16d
10 ай бұрын
Drinking game: take a shot every time he says “3/4 inch piece of plywood”
@NipunCDG
9 ай бұрын
5.56 lead to few casualties so, when Indian Army changed its Infantry tactics..they moved to SIG Rifles with 7.62 calibre from Insas Rifles with 5.56 calibre
@miru9707
8 ай бұрын
great setup for this test - excellent video 🔝💯
@m39fan
9 ай бұрын
Surprising. We used to shoot holes through thick steel railroad tie plates with the 7.62x39 and it always went through. I don't remember them being magnetic either. Hmmmm
@aukula1062
10 ай бұрын
Love your videos! Thanks.
@jonathansheeder5153
10 ай бұрын
I enjoy these very much! Not too long and monotonous.
@44R0Ndin
6 ай бұрын
Wonder about a UBT match between 5.56 NATO and 5.45x39 (the round the AK-74 uses)? Seems like that would be an interesting match, a more "apples to apples" comparison since the calibers are almost identical and the overall case dimensions are also largely similar.
@airair862
10 ай бұрын
7.62×54r❤ test
@joshuahawkins2743
3 ай бұрын
That's a hell of a round my mosin nagant was a beast just don't like bolt action rifles but that round is a devastating one
@johncee853
10 ай бұрын
I love the thumbs up after you paint the steel. I don't know why...😂
@usbackcountry
9 ай бұрын
A lighter faster bullet is generally going to penetrate deeper than a heavier. And a heavier slower bullet is generally going to have more impact damage affecting a larger area.
@stevenschwarz8871
9 ай бұрын
Wrong. It’s the energy created by bullet weight and velocity. You got it backwards
@DaveProffitt-z3x
8 ай бұрын
bullet performance is largely what it's designed for and what velocity the manufacturer says to load it to. Momentum is what delivers knock down power. Nobody talks about momentum. @@stevenschwarz8871
@IronMan3582
8 ай бұрын
Very very interesting results, mass isn't everything as it would appear to be. Also to whoever your editor is, I appreciate the fast cuts, very snappy, helps keeps thing going. That did not feel like a 10 minute video with how fast everything was
@off6848
5 ай бұрын
Well mass plus velocity is. Milsurp 7.62 is usually loaded pretty conservatively but people have gotten about 2800fps out of 17.5 inch yugo ak barrels I think that would’ve been a clear winner here that extra 350fps
@HeilAmarth
10 ай бұрын
Need other factors as well like how 5.56 changes its direction from bushes, sticks and snow. 7.62 don't give a, just continues to push through.
@albundy7459
10 ай бұрын
I’m about to try reloading 7.62x39 for accuracy. Found out last night making my jam bullet that there isn’t a lot of room to play with seating depth. Should be interesting to see what results I get.
@madride858585
10 ай бұрын
What rifle are you reloading for?
@albundy7459
10 ай бұрын
@@madride858585 ak 103 and yugo m70 underfolder. Doing it mostly for the challenge and to see how accurate it can be. Hopefully it goes well because I estimate $.80 a round.
@morphius747
10 ай бұрын
make sure your barrel size and bullet size are good @@albundy7459
@saskafrass1985
10 ай бұрын
@@albundy7459yikes, that's a bit. Still far cheaper than buying match in that caliber though, if you can find it that is. Good luck on that. I was looking for large rifle primers in my area the other day, starting to think that they are a myth created by the big oil companies to keep me driving around seeking this mythical object.
@albundy7459
10 ай бұрын
@@saskafrass1985 I’m kind of in the same boat. I’ve got a ton of br2 primers that I’m unfortunately going to have to use. If any aren’t available at a brick and mortar place by next year I might have to just bite the bullet and pay the extra $40 in shipping and hazmat and get them online.
@mmgross144
10 ай бұрын
The sand performed exactly as it should as it has always been a barrier in modern warfare, you know, sandbags.
@gsmith4295
10 ай бұрын
And this video just proves why sandbags are an effective barrier for use in combat. not to mention you can make quick and easy cover with just an entrenching tool and some bags.
@harrimela9266
8 ай бұрын
This is why we here in Finland with thick pine and Spruce trees chose 7.62 cal for our main assault rifle... Nato rounds are known to start tumble for slightest reason and loses accuracy and penetration.
@Brett.1984
6 ай бұрын
Get you a 20in barrel on that ar and it will out preform, round was designed for 20 in barrel. I think the sbr are really stupid in 5.56. Now i can understand it on .300 blk but not 5.56. Pretty good video keep it up dude.
@PickleRick65
8 ай бұрын
Haven't watched yet. But I learned 30 years ago that Ballistically these rounds are almost the same...
@MoparNewport
Ай бұрын
Talk about a massive *gimme* for the 556 fanbois. The 7.62 *plainly* won on the 6x6 - by not keyholing on the plywood - *AND* won on the concrete by doing more damage behind it. Im always amazed by just how many mental gymnastics the 556 fanbois do to put their precious overpriced underperforming round above the most produced round in history.
@sureshot8399
8 ай бұрын
When you add in inconclusive tests to a guy who can't shoot for shit, you get this video.
@jashton8710
8 ай бұрын
For the last test, I think it would have been pertinent to compare the length of each projectile. If the 7.62 is longer by the same difference in the penetration, then it would again be a tie. If they are the same length, then naturally, the 5.56 wins.
@cardboardkiller6883
10 ай бұрын
Ray Romano's tactical Nephew 💯
@Hallonyancat
9 ай бұрын
The 5.56 has armour penetration capability it does not have kinetic stopping power, hence why the 6.8mm was born into existence.
@donski1519
2 ай бұрын
Good video, now can you try 5.56mm Green Tip. I think that would be a big difference.
@marvinparker7872
22 күн бұрын
EVERYBODY LOVES RAY VOICE 😂
@samuelyoung4646
10 ай бұрын
This is like watching a professional powerlifter and a CrossFit expert move the same amount of weight in the same amount of time. One is gonna be heavier and do it all at once, the other is gonna be really fast but take a couple trips, but they both get it done at the same time.
@grayamdelaney7044
8 ай бұрын
One of my younger brothers fun guns was a Mini 14 , with a 30 round mag .Consequently even though we used to roll our own, it was cheaper to buy this Korean military ammo from our local sports store . Some people here may know the stuff . Came in a plain white 25 round box with an orange lable for $5 .Geneva conventions , eh !? . This was a full nickle jacket round with a hole drilled in the tip and from memory were around 70 gr weight . Long story short they would drill a perfect hole in 10 mm boiler plate at 100 meters .
@markchapman2585
10 ай бұрын
Awesome video like the new objects. And the steal of course. Keep up the great work 👍
@MrGsteele
10 ай бұрын
Interesting comparison, but the tie scores - particularly the sand test - don't give a relative score; that is, the score is binary: did/didn't. If it were possible to dig into the sand and measure the depth of penetration of each, it would be somewhat more useful information regarding mass vs. velocity in sand. Also, the fact that the 3/4 ply was penetrated is less information than, say, how many 3/4 ply plates would be penetrated. Another thought is that their performance is shown relative to one another, but not to a reference round such as a .308 or .30-06 (both of which are also military rounds). That would be interesting to observe, as well. Your setup is very versatile for testing different obstacles. Great video.
@jscarnucci2636
8 ай бұрын
I think this guy is having Mishaco take his shots.
@markloubser2433
9 ай бұрын
Which is why nato shifted to 5.56 way back. ... You can also carry more of them. Sent 100's through the R4 in the army days.. Great cartridge.
@peterjones7276
9 ай бұрын
I think that you will find that the NATO 7.62 round is a 7.62x51. The 7.62x39 is a russian round (.30 russian short). The shift to the 5.56 is nothing to do with the baby round test that you are doing here - real men shot the 7.62x51.
@reywind8895
8 ай бұрын
kinetik energy: 5.56 NATO ~1300 kj, 7.62x39 ~1500 kj. The stopping force of the7.62x39 is a lot more, because more kinetik energy and bigger impact. However 7.62 nato is stronger ~2500kj
@0MoTheG
8 ай бұрын
There is a reason why we use packed sand in bags for fortifications. Other than half an inch of steel nothing will stop bullets.
@prestonburton8504
9 ай бұрын
pretty cool presentation - well done!
@GegeDxD
9 ай бұрын
People are tired of forcefully trying to make NATO a big deal, while on the open scene theu are literally a paper tiger army.
@416cubes4
10 ай бұрын
762 hits harder. End of discussion
@iroekyjHD
6 ай бұрын
That's what I'd expect a communist to say
@ClimateScepticSceptic-ub2rg
8 ай бұрын
Given the weight of ammo, always a factor in actual warfare, the light NATO round seems to be much better. A complete test would compare the two on typical infantry body armour.
@VaraNiN
6 ай бұрын
First time watching one of your videos and man, you have on of the most radio voicey-est voices I ever heard lol
@Kidobhuan
2 ай бұрын
You should test M392A2 APDS out of a 105mm M68 cannon vs 3BM-8 APDS from a D-10T2S cannon. Same exact test, but add a 2008 nissan altima after the steel plates and then a small building after that.
@TaeussKramme
Ай бұрын
Sounds like fun but hard to take to most ranges! Not to mention the chore of policing up your brass.
@tonyphan7453
7 ай бұрын
I like 5.56 more than 7.62 . I used to use M16 A1 in Vietnam war it was very comfortable for me to move in the jungle,AK 47 is too heavy and one more thing that very important .If you have a 16-inch barrel with a 1:8 twist rate ,the bullet will complete a spin twice before exiting the muzzle.An 18-inch barrel with a 1:6twist rate will cause a bullet to spin three before leaving the gun.The more twists a bullet can complete before leaving the barrel,the more stable the slug will be when it exits the muzzle.
@George-yh3zy
10 ай бұрын
E=MCsquared, the velocity multiplies itself while the mass remains the same. Therefore, increased muzzle velocity is the best way to increase energy, not increased mass.
@dennmark4843
10 ай бұрын
Another great presentation!
@DrRichMahogany
10 ай бұрын
That pun was amazing.
@poppashots994
Ай бұрын
Watching for the jazz music
@szilardgall2095
4 ай бұрын
Try the Eficient Distance Joe
@deaddocreallydeaddoc5244
9 ай бұрын
This is fun for gun nerds, but as the owner of a gun shop in the town where I grew up (in the 60s) used to say when my friend and I would ask him about various calibers, "How dead can you die?"
@charleshuyck6641
10 ай бұрын
Military uses a 62 grain steel rod core in 5.56. To increase the penetration.
@charleshuyck6641
10 ай бұрын
They have a green tip.
@markalexander832
8 ай бұрын
SS109 is the NATO standard projectile -- a 62 gr steel core penetrator -- which is used in the M855 round marked with a green tip. In other words, he tested the same round twice, though maybe from different manufacturers.
@rodneymoore7270
4 ай бұрын
BOTH have been battle tested ESPECIALLY at under 100 yards...
@kkvnglauqer2490
2 ай бұрын
Best gun enthusiast ever
@NormReitzel
7 ай бұрын
Maybe, just Maybe, that's why bunkers are made from SAND bags.
@LeeRenthlei
7 ай бұрын
One thing is for sure, I don't want to get hit by either of them.
@markdavids2511
9 ай бұрын
There’s a reason they use sand bags, it’s the best shot stopper there is, same as regular soil.
@vanhalenman60
3 ай бұрын
dude is this nurd rage? he sounds exactly the same just more excited.
@enoshsubba5875
Ай бұрын
F=ma p=mv You have the equation, you know which will do more damage.
@AntiAres1Antares
8 ай бұрын
in the second ww the americans immediately change his 5.56 machine gun to 7.62 when they had a chance
@BrianBevan-v7h
8 ай бұрын
Would be great if you would show the exact ammo used in your testing. Also maybe barrel twist of each weapon fired. These would definitely help clarify the results better. 🤠
@trkjivdlopmd
10 ай бұрын
5.56x45 definetly pushes above its weight. Not to mention target reacquisition when putting round after round after round
@Jrh-rp7np
9 ай бұрын
It’s the speed of the bullet more then anything,,out of 16 inch an AK is going around what 2300-2350 fps,,, out of a 16 inch AR15 barrel you can get speeds around 3000fps give or take..
@dobridjordje
4 ай бұрын
@@Jrh-rp7np20 inch M16A1 is all you need, puts any rifle besides the FAL to shame.
@pierreb7878
9 ай бұрын
How would you expect a 5.56 and 7.62 (kalasch) to go through 15cm of sand?
@achosenman9376
9 ай бұрын
Agreed. This guy has never seen sandbag’s in action.
Пікірлер: 749