Note 1: Spider & Preacher curl are "Short position" movement, and barbell curl is mid position. CGB and Rope Pushdowns are mid-position movements, overhead DB extension is lenghtened position. Not sure where my head was at there lol. Note 2: Love Sam and how he's inspired many positively, he's just the clearest & most relatable example of the countless I see online as per my point about the form & being super young to be able to tolerate it. Thanks for watching! Anything you are interested in seeing next?
@didokyoraviq5246
8 ай бұрын
Hey man, Jeff Nippard recently published a paper on proper form. Results showed that lengthened partials are actually benefitial, would love to hear your opinion on the paper
@JonathanMango
8 ай бұрын
Hey man! Saw that. It's a narrative review, discussing findings across other actual studies done so far, so there is lots of nuance beyond just "actually beneficial" and for who they are actually beneficial for potentially. I personally incorporate partials at the end of some sets for some specific exercises if I'm doing lower volumes or I just feel like/prefer doing it for that exercise (actually the spider curls shown here is one of those I add partials to at the end of the last set!). Partials could make sense depending on how your training program currently is set up - it's a way to POTENTIALLY generate more stimulus from a given set but keep in mind it will generate more fatigue as well (also keep in mind injury risk is highest at the lengthened end-range of a movement, especially compound lifts, as the tendons are in their most vulnerable position there). So all of that is to say, they are nuanced and can have a place in one's training. However, there is certainly not enough data to state that they are beneficial in all cases compared to full ROm and especially over longer periods of time (as someone moves out of the beginner stage of their gains). I will be making a full video on these soon to break down all of the literature behind it and what it shows as well as more detail as to how and when one might benefit from incorporating them into their training, if at all. Note: I address partials taken to an extreme with poor stability/jerking of the body etc in this video here and how the stimulus to fatigue ratio is pretty poor and injury risk increases as a result for potentially (again, not exactly "proven") no extra gains. Hope this clarifies a little more my understanding & stance on them so far!
@УрошЛукић-н3у
8 ай бұрын
what do you think about doing partials after task failure but not using momemtum, swinging (no shit form). That's usually how i do the leg stuff, for example i would 6 full rom reps of leg extensions, and then after failure, i do 3-4 partials reps (still controled and same form, just less and less rom). I do that mostly on isolation stuff (calves, quad, hamstring, chest...), not on compound exercises. Is that still more dangerous and too fatiquing? (i do 5-8 rep range, lower volume to generate the least fatique possible, but i still love doing partials and wonder how much of a diffrence does it make)
@JonathanMango
8 ай бұрын
I think this makes the most sense as to the use of partials, and do it this way myself for some movements & sets. Just keep in mind when done like this after a set to task failure (for full ROM) then it will still generate more fatigue, but thats okay. Just make sure you recover. There are some movements where you can test doing only long length ROM as well as test it for yourself, such as these isolation exercises for the muscle groups you mentioned 💪🏼
@УрошЛукић-н3у
8 ай бұрын
@@JonathanMango yeah i tried it on some exercises, doing the whole set in lenghtened partials style (for example leg curl not going all the way to the bototm but half range). I find it really hard to standardize so i just go full rom and then do some partials, then next workout try to add full reps or a bit of weight. I do manage to recover because i do low volume. Thanks for answer and all youtube videos man!
Пікірлер: 7