The ice of his demeanor at the keyboard was matched by the fire that came off the keys. A pianist for a sophisticated listener
@nodepe
5 жыл бұрын
You found a strikingly precise way to describe it (I wish I have said it first), "pianist for a sophisticated listener." Some come to this level quickly, some slowly (like me), some never...
@julygoly
7 жыл бұрын
who needs two hands?! ;) sooooooo beautiful......
@alfredocorsaro3740
9 жыл бұрын
Stupenda.Una fra le piu' belle esecuzioni.
@lynecaumartin1956
2 жыл бұрын
Magnifique interprétation !
@mariasofiavalcheva3099
4 ай бұрын
Indeed!
@pastparticipant5464
10 жыл бұрын
Love the camera work from 4:16 classic...
@solonka123
12 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for posting. It's beautifully played!
@ernesthoven
11 ай бұрын
Weissenberg máster ❤
@camillebouchard6436
6 жыл бұрын
De toute beauté !
@lt6jam
9 жыл бұрын
Beautiful... Skip all the overanalytical comments, close your eyes, and enjoy.
Can you explain? I certainly heard the notes Scriabin wrote.
@NOSEhow2LIV
11 жыл бұрын
A fine version. Strangely, i usually dislike this pianist intensely, but here there is imagination, strong line, and some of the best filigree decoration, (rather over-the-top at the end, but no matter). Only a slightly bumpy trill to the recap mars the excellence. However, i miss the prélude .... i think they go so well together.
@andream.464
4 жыл бұрын
I also like him very much only in this interpretation! This is the best interpretation I know of this piece!
@NOSEhow2LIV
11 жыл бұрын
Je dirais plutôt que c'est très Scriabinesque! C'est vrai, il ajoute quelques détails, surtout les cadenzas, mais ceci est un morceau qui exige beaucoup d'imagination; joué litérallement il devient un sous-Chopin! Curieusement, d'habitude AW n'est pas mon artiste préferé du tout. Mais ici je trouve qu'il met très bien en valeur le morceau.
@estakass1482
Жыл бұрын
Please, who is the pianist? I tried to play this piece. It’s tough. I think it’s pretty. Agree, don’t be too analytic. Does it please your ear? Sounds good to me and the interpretation is valid.
@herveburzawa656
7 ай бұрын
Une très belle version, moins romantique que celle de Rubinstein, peut-être plus proche de Scriabine pour ma part.
@WildJag4free
11 жыл бұрын
If you look at the score when he's playing it shocking. Scriabin doesn't whote it this way . It's sounds good but it's not scriabin for me. too free. (sorry for my english i'm french and god's know we don't speak very well your language)
@davidmehnert6206
6 жыл бұрын
WildJag4free I performed the piece at a funeral service in Spring 2011, to honor the life of a man married for over 50 years to a woman who survived him, present there with their six children-I agree Weissenberg was less faithful to what’s on paper here than in the recording he made about a decade before, which is probably on KZitem somewhere... that earlier one is a studio take ranking among the most evocative, haunting piano recordings ever made. Weissenberg himself felt this later filmed version lacked the previous issue’s magic. And to think he spent most of the 1950s designing greeting cards in Paris, because he couldn’t make it financially on what gigs he could find as a performer.......
@chad4149
9 жыл бұрын
I find this without any sensitivity and unmoving.well I ve never liked this pianist .
@berlinzerberus
9 жыл бұрын
chad414 Probably you are the only thumb down. I disagree!
@ernstschliephake522
7 жыл бұрын
chad414 ...sure, you can do it better. By the way: who are you?? Please, let us know your version!!
@jsphotos
6 жыл бұрын
He doesn't like you, either.
@andream.464
4 жыл бұрын
I also don't like him, but this interpretation is top!
Пікірлер: 32