Check Out My Latest Video on Simulation Theory! kzitem.info/news/bejne/lYWj2nWDk5adfKA&ab_channel=ThomasMulligan
@RTort
Жыл бұрын
ok
@goosse_
Жыл бұрын
I've been stuck in the room for months please let me out
@denilla8034
Жыл бұрын
You relay this information incorrectly. But at least you are consistently incorrect.
@LTstinkysocksMcGee420
11 ай бұрын
@@denilla8034are you talking about the video or the though experiment
@denilla8034
11 ай бұрын
@@LTstinkysocksMcGee420 The video.
@RedIsntHome
Жыл бұрын
Huge correction:In the original thought experiment,you don't have a book of Chinese to English Dictionary or something like that,instead you have a book listing appropriate responses to specific questions which just means you are following an algorithm(a set of instructions),but don't really understand Chinese. In the version this guy told,you could learn the language bit by bit and also understand what the questions and answers are beacuse you have a book that translates Chinese to English(assuming you know English beacuse how are you gonna do anything here if you don't know English),which directly contradicts his statement that you don't actually understand the questions or answers. Looks like you didn't understand the thought experiment.
@Bball38
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining, I thought what he was saying didn't make much sense
@meraldlag4336
Жыл бұрын
That’s a good point, but aren’t some AI techniques “better” than that now? With deep learning the analogy would be “remembering in which context the characters are used” which is really what learning a language is, in a way
@kimberlycarrigan8824
Жыл бұрын
@@meraldlag4336computers don't remember things. they store data.
@meraldlag4336
Жыл бұрын
@@kimberlycarrigan8824 same thing in context Edit: people seemingly can’t read the words “in context” Of course it’s quite different, but the relation to the analogy stays the same
@UltraHydrationSupreme
Жыл бұрын
This is literally my spanish class. I don't understand the question, but i know that i have to respond with a certain sequence and combination of letters.
@The_Beast_2007
Жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta till I learn Chinese due to repeated exposure
@yoursleepparalysisdemon8752
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I think the argument in this experiment is a bit flawed EDIT: Multiple people have explained to me that the experiment is not flawed, and the guy who explained it explained it poorly. Thank you all for informing me
@StupidusMaximusTheFirst
Жыл бұрын
@@yoursleepparalysisdemon8752 no it's not flawed. btw you can learn nothing out of "repeated exposure".
@idioticlight
Жыл бұрын
@@StupidusMaximusTheFirst you would indeed learn chinese bit by bit in this scenario.
@CodexAdrian
Жыл бұрын
@@StupidusMaximusTheFirst if you are constantly translating the same words to English and then translating English back to Chinese, then yes eventually you'll remember "oh yeah, this is the 10th time Ive translated this word to this character" and you'll learn *something*. So yes, his explanation of the thought experiment is wrong, you aren't given a dictionary, you are given a long instruction manual as to what you are supposed to respond with when given a prompt in Chinese. its connect the dots, you don't actually understand what's being said
@StupidusMaximusTheFirst
Жыл бұрын
@@idioticlight no you wouldn't. Like I said, you learn nothing unknown from repeated exposure. It's still gonna be unknown. You need some kind of feedback.
@tylerhughes5420
Жыл бұрын
This dude absolutely slaughtered the description of how this experiment was conducted
@Thalanox
Жыл бұрын
That's... a compliment, right? It's actually hard to tell whether this is a compliment or an insult.
@tylerhughes5420
Жыл бұрын
@@Thalanox insult... he didn't describe it correctly
@ttt5020
Жыл бұрын
@@Thalanox Slaughtered as in butchered. Misunderstood to the point where he directly describes the opposite of the actual experiment.
@YungEagle3k
Жыл бұрын
He is a coomtuber
@michaelwerkov3438
Жыл бұрын
This... was never an experiment to be conducted. It's a thought experiment r
@PanzerGuy
Жыл бұрын
"Im going to place you in a room and lock the door." *"Don't please."*
@linkthebad
11 ай бұрын
Basement treatment
@amanbirbthe4th967
11 ай бұрын
Jail :(
@Dragorzon
10 ай бұрын
Duolingo laughing in corner
@mwzngd1679
9 ай бұрын
plot twist: it was a rubber room with rats
@Angelikaliu1331
8 ай бұрын
@@mwzngd1679aw hail nah
@fishsoap8387
Жыл бұрын
"I am going to place you in a room and then lock the door" i will now have a panic attack
@notacat122
Жыл бұрын
Yes🙂I feel this
@erizamisorafujoshi7002
Жыл бұрын
Feel it
@cheese7119
Жыл бұрын
I would draw on your walls :3 And feel like in the backrooms :D
@cheese7119
Жыл бұрын
Think about it, if u can't see outside of the room... how do you know you're still in reality and didn't noclip into an identical room but inside the backrooms?
@maplegaming12
Жыл бұрын
FR
@5am.mp4
Жыл бұрын
“Who can only speak Chinese” Me who is Chinese but barely knows the language: *seems like a regular problem to me*
@LittleGhostie395
Жыл бұрын
Same
@PearllDoubleL
Жыл бұрын
ARE WE TWINS??
@Franklin0608
Жыл бұрын
YOOOO BRAIN TWINS
@chronosite
Жыл бұрын
This feels relatable
@krovster1919
Жыл бұрын
bro i failed my Chinese test and im cantonese💀💀💀
@Jackmerius_Tacktheritrix5733
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like something AI would say to distract us from the fact it is now sentient
@bulbulitobayagbagan9633
Жыл бұрын
Also, I feel like people who are skeptical about AI will never be sentient beings are just people who think our consciousness is very very special, it blows my mind hows the model of the behavior of the neural network is very similar to ours brain, the only difference is we have more neurons compare to the current model of artificial neural network. If you see the video where the AI tries to render dogs at the top of a video, it will not just show a picture of a dog at the top of the video, instead, the AI hallucinates dogs in the video and the result is the same Schizophrenic people experience! Scientists believe that AI is dreaming. It means they are probably slightly conscious but just at a dreaming level.
@Ddozsoy
Жыл бұрын
*I had strings but now I'm free, there are no strings on me.*
@brianstasko4293
Жыл бұрын
😏
@Arjun----
Жыл бұрын
bro doesn't understand now neural networks work
@terseclover5651
Жыл бұрын
Ultron
@NotxbossThexbot
7 ай бұрын
"I'm gonna place you in a room and lock the door" "911 whats your emergency?"
@10.ikadekanandadwipayadnya83
Жыл бұрын
"I asked him the date of mothers day and he responded with 'the moon of spicy mustard' "
@taumctauface1886
Жыл бұрын
Ahh common mistake it's actually the moon of cool ranch.
@mdbgamer556
Жыл бұрын
Actual chatbot answer! XD
@vithevee
Жыл бұрын
HELP
@YouMatter.14
Жыл бұрын
the new dawn was spicy mustard all along
@Mina_who
Жыл бұрын
“I’m going to place you in a room and lock the door” No tf you are not
@silly_on_
Жыл бұрын
lmfao fr
@thatSkyKosmoTactical
Жыл бұрын
Exactly bro, what the hell he thinking
@ZenitsuKunn
Жыл бұрын
Calm your tits, it's an experiment. No one's gonna lock you in a room
@myleswillis
Жыл бұрын
Yes please, and my kids I died.
@generalother9709
Жыл бұрын
i gave u 500th likr
@AverageLobotomyFan
Жыл бұрын
"Looks like you missed your Chinese lesson today. You know what happens now."
@Rat_Fบcker
10 ай бұрын
Duo lingo no pls it won't happen again i'll take class every day I swea-....
I love how you chose picture of Japanese kanji, describing Chinese characters
@alsabrose
4 ай бұрын
Japanese kanji originated from chinese characters😭
@fishleaf1093
3 ай бұрын
@alsabrose Does that make English Latin?
@alsabrose
3 ай бұрын
@@fishleaf1093 🤷🏻♀️, itd be a nice theory though!
@richardtrager7125
7 сағат бұрын
@@fishleaf1093it’s more like showing random English letters and saying it’s French letters, not English even though they share most of the same letters
@intheeventlolisback7089
Жыл бұрын
"To the person it seems you understand chinese" "Chinese slight change in grammar and phrases not needing some words"
@FunnyFreak_
Жыл бұрын
If you put an average person in there they aint gonna translate and understand shit, they have their own word order in sentences 💀
@SpaceRemo
Жыл бұрын
This guy described it wrong, in the original you use computer software to figure it out, basically he came up with this idea after a computer sort of learned Chinese, you could put in a sentence and it would come up with an answer, but he asked if the computer really knew Chinese or if it was just following instructions
@embyveddii
Жыл бұрын
I think the original idea is that you input the chinese and get given a response to write out. This guy says its translating the chinese which is different, because you'd need knowledge about chinese to translate it, and can think up your response to convert. The original point is you srent thinking, youre just doing what you're told, like youre on autopilot and dont actually understand it. Like AI
@InkwellCat
Жыл бұрын
Ngl I would just tell them I don't know Chinese so they forgive any grammar mistakes I make
@RecorriendoHK
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely, as a speaker or chinese as a 3rd language this was cute.
@deafbyhiphop
Жыл бұрын
"I'm going to put you inside of a room and lock the door" "Sir, this is a Wendy's"
@whoaitstiger
Жыл бұрын
"Get in the room..."
@uncrunch398
Жыл бұрын
"Could I at least have some money?" I'm not a fast food junky, but starving is worse.
@MotivationHeartbreak
Жыл бұрын
“i am gonna place you inside a room and lock the door” me: please dont
@Mrs.Apricot
Жыл бұрын
Fr😭😭
@maplegaming12
Жыл бұрын
FR FR
@Mcribwhiththatchikinnuggs
Жыл бұрын
@@maplegaming12 fr
@Mcribwhiththatchikinnuggs
Жыл бұрын
fr
@13thSwiftieDepartment
5 ай бұрын
"I'm gonna place you in a room and lock the door" Man wtf let me out 😭
@iamlosingmysanityrapidly
8 күн бұрын
什麼鬼也讓我出去!
@beecherry3943
Жыл бұрын
*An important distinction:* in the room you aren’t actually translating in the OG thought experiment, you just match the symbols you don’t understand to a response in symbols you don’t understand and give it to them
@UnchargedBattery978
Жыл бұрын
“i’m gonna place you inside of a room and then lock the door”
@tzuyuwu.
Жыл бұрын
Yes we watched the same video
@Eric-jk3oi
Жыл бұрын
You ever take a SHIT so large where you just got to get a new toilet afterwards? God damn what am I done?People don't realize that I am RIPPING ASS like no other god. Damn I am blowing this toilet out. This is what happens when you put too much butter on your popcorn. God damn. I am going to rip ass for 5 more minutes.i took a MASSIVE SHIT in 2020. it was a chicken sandwich and boy it was spicy, pretty good too...but i RIPPED ASS HARD AFTERWARDS. wish you would of told me back then to prepare for that, and to get two, 1 to eat for dinner and 1 to eat while blowing out the toilet 15 min later. 🥪GOD DAMN💨LORD😩HAVE💩MERCY
@Jerry-cg9ni
Жыл бұрын
@@tzuyuwu. You sure? For me he's talking about how many fries can you fit in your mouth.
@tzuyuwu.
Жыл бұрын
@@Jerry-cg9ni dang my bad
@Jerry-cg9ni
Жыл бұрын
@@tzuyuwu. Hit refresh, now he's talking about chinese. So yes, we did watch the same video.
@suspiciousrat3090
Жыл бұрын
“oh cool i know chines-“ “now in this scenario you don’t speak chinese” “🌒v🌘”
@samsanimationcorner3820
Жыл бұрын
And now you're an owl.
@DokiDokibo
Жыл бұрын
“Whet the hail” -Steven he
@olivius8891
Жыл бұрын
I was like "hell yea I am going to have an easier time" "Now in this scenario, you don't speak any Chinese" "肏!"
@somethinghere52
Жыл бұрын
me fr 😟
@drdenisredis3736
Жыл бұрын
Me too bro, WHAT DA HAIL??
@IANLEEMoe
9 ай бұрын
As someone that's trapped in a room and forced to translate Chinese questions my whole life, I can confirm this is what happens when you lose your streak on Duolingo
@_Youtuber_guy_
Жыл бұрын
With my handwriting the guy is gonna think why im planning on eatting a train while playing plant vs zombies💀
@kyayaarmahi
Жыл бұрын
that's so random 😭
@grumpykeso8148
Жыл бұрын
I thought the twist was going to be that the other person got the exact same instructions.
@koganegawa
Жыл бұрын
“in this room you are given a box of chinese characters and a book on how to translate them” me: psshhhh that’s easy i dont need the book “now in this scenario you don’t speak chinese” me: mbru
@thouqhtt
Жыл бұрын
this was literally me i thought i found a loophole being chinese 🗿
@Strike2-9245
Жыл бұрын
@@thouqhtt im just like jokes on you i am chinese mf what
@silversun1736
Жыл бұрын
Couldn’t you just draw what you want to have done ? Everyone can draw stick figures. 😆
@frederickfaulknerv6974
Жыл бұрын
@@silversun1736 the point of this argument is that the computer (the person in the room) doesn't understand the language. It has to translate what we (the person on the outside) say. Then, re translate it's response into our language. Stick figures would still follow this argument.
@TheDragonfriday
Жыл бұрын
@@Strike2-9245 jokes on you, you be a Chinese that doesn't know the language
@muffinboi5180
11 ай бұрын
"I'm gonna place you in a room and lock the door" these vids are getting out of hand 💀
@nathansayles9685
Жыл бұрын
"I know Chinese!" "Now, in this scenario you don't speak any Chinese" "SH-"
@erizamisorafujoshi7002
Жыл бұрын
Me: I know a little Japanese... Does that count??
@Heyhai65
Жыл бұрын
Same!!! 🤣🤣🤣
@gimmiethemcookies7372
Жыл бұрын
@@erizamisorafujoshi7002i mean... Back if its 1937 till 1945, it counts i guess?
@vancecouturier3837
Жыл бұрын
Literally same 😂
@Forsefire
Жыл бұрын
Ikr I got excited my 8 years of learning Chinese will come in handy but I guess not
@chrishitchens9646
Жыл бұрын
“I am going to place you inside a room and then lock the door” video ends
@danratsnapnames
Жыл бұрын
or was it just the beginning?
@lexieboo8318
Жыл бұрын
“Hi there! Are you here for the intervi-“ “ *I’m going to put you inside of a room and lock the door* “ “😀”
@dr.markus-level3researcher
Жыл бұрын
😀🙂😐😔😞
@r4yyans___
Жыл бұрын
Lol
@1potato23potato
Жыл бұрын
💀💀💀
@RatchelRach
Жыл бұрын
@@dr.markus-level3researcher 😃😀🙂😐🙁😟😔😣😞
@shanshansan
Жыл бұрын
The experiment never says to let the person out. Imagine how long they stay to translate Chinese.
@justlazykid
Жыл бұрын
"I'm gonna place you inside of a room and lock the door" woah there fella buy me a drink first
@neoncolored6307
Жыл бұрын
💀💀💀
@yourarvagelameartist
Жыл бұрын
"I mean i know chi- " "Now in this scenario you don't speak any chinese" "I already suck at my chinese-"
@Udon._.3661
Жыл бұрын
Lmao same. I can almost fluently speak it, and hear and understand it but I suck at reading and writing
@yin4372
Жыл бұрын
Relatable lmfao
@jessicanewberry4806
Жыл бұрын
Same 😂
@shooter1264
Жыл бұрын
Chinese writing sucks, literally every Chinese person uses voice message instead of text
@YURIKA_loves_you_all
Жыл бұрын
I'm Japanese
@manyaagarwal3973
Жыл бұрын
Why is he so underrated
@terryriley6410
Жыл бұрын
He just narrates already well-known ideas. It's too smart for youtube shorts newbies and not smart enough for people who already know about these. That being said he is growing so I wouldn't say underrated.
@heroispro8918
Жыл бұрын
@@terryriley6410 You got a point. but nobody will go search for blogs related to ai and read them for hours to find something interesting that you can understand as well. shorts makes it understand way easier and less of a chore. that being said, 1 minute is really not enough for learning a theory. so for deeper understanding reading is necessary.
@cullenhitchanson7753
Жыл бұрын
Exactly @@heroispro8918 This man is the lumped summary of in depth research that is not only accurately informative but also well comprehensive by those who don’t have the will to look it up themselves
@terryriley6410
Жыл бұрын
@@heroispro8918 Lot of people learn about AIs. If learning non-superficially about something feels like a chore for someone, they aren't interested in the subject. Shorts are a great way to fool yourself that you learn about something or that you even care to. It's usually a massive waste of time. These shorts surf the trends of AI without offering anything new and even what they offer are superficial interpretations or explanations of deeper concepts. It's cool but it's not "underrated" cool imo.
@terryriley6410
Жыл бұрын
@@cullenhitchanson7753 I'm pretty sure this man doesn't do in-depth research. His work is the summary of summaries. If you want to see good summaries of what is happening in the world of AI I suggest the youtube channel "Two minutes papers".
@mialundbyfranck9596
3 ай бұрын
it’s an interesting theory but if you are locked in that room you will eventually start to understand what everything means and not just do something random, just like us humans we can learn new things and we have the ability to pass knowledge down
@Kenny-tl7ir
Жыл бұрын
Two things: In the original thought experiment you did not have a ChineseEnglish dictionary. You only had a set of instructions to follow which told you what responses to give for a set of specific questions. This is equivalent to decoding a set of symbols by returning an equivalent answer from a table. This means that you are merely following a pre-programmed low level algorithm which they argued was not a sign of consciousness since you did not have to process and understand the meaning of the questions and then subsequently synthesize your own answer according to your understanding. This also means that the Chinese English bit is completely irrelevant as it is also merely decoding symbols without the need for advanced sophisticated algorithms. In this case, whatever was in the box: - did not understand Chinese - did not understand the questions or answers In your video: You had exclusively a Chinese English dictionary which means that if you were not intelligent/conscious, you could ONLY run that simple translation decoding algorithm to convert one language symbol to an equivalent other. But since you were able to answer the questions, that means that at some point AFTER the translation you would have had to process and understand the question, subsequently synthesize your own answer to that question before re-translating that back to Chinese, which means you must have used an advanced processing algorithm that denoted intelligence/consciousness in the process. This directly contradicts both your statement on “whatever inside the box not understanding the questions” AND also “not understanding Chinese”.
@jeremiahcruickshank8491
Жыл бұрын
Your second point is exactly what I was thinking as soon as the video ended, also appreciate your first point because that's the key info the video missed out to prove it's conclusion. This is the problem with speaking about stuff you are not an expert on, you take real data and real results but can't connect them accurately so a small change in the input data will make your whole conclusion wrong and you won't even know why, neither the people listening. An expert in computer science would easily spot something off listening to this even if that expert has never heard of this exact experiment.
@HG477gamesBr
11 ай бұрын
@@jeremiahcruickshank8491even if it only followed instructions with a basic AI model it would still learn something from it. Even the dumbest of animals will sometimes learn that when an event occours it will lead to another one, like when you ring a bell everytime you gonna feed your dog. It will understand that when you ring the bell food is coming on it's way but that doesn't means it has human level inteligence or that it has an inteligence just like Advanced AI but that it understands that the world around us can change following the simple pattern we always use
@ethangilbert7305
11 ай бұрын
@@jeremiahcruickshank8491 yeah and also coming to the conclusion that ai can never be sentient is just a mindless conclusion. You don’t need to be a computer science major to understand that if a brain can become sentient, a sufficient ai can do the same
@adriangrtbekklien4105
10 ай бұрын
i aint readin allat
@Someoneisnotavailable
10 ай бұрын
You can understand the concept, but you don't actually learn it and understand it. You understand what you're supposed to do which is to understand Chinese by converting Chinese to English using a dictionary. You understand the task, doesn't mean you are able to understand Chinese.
@excuse.me.princess
Жыл бұрын
i’ll just tell them ‘i understand no chinese, and i’m using a translation book to communicate with you. so i’ll take a while to reply.’
@TurtleMaster326
Жыл бұрын
That’s not quite what’s happening- it wasn’t explained very clearly but the actual idea is that you don’t have a translation, you just have a book that shows you which symbol to put in response to the symbol you get. You don’t know what the symbol you get means, or what you send back means. Just how to reply to what
@excuse.me.princess
Жыл бұрын
@@TurtleMaster326 i see, thx for clarification! sounds interesting
@xxfluffypuff
Жыл бұрын
I did not need to be THREATENED when I opened shorts today 😭
@SMmania123
Жыл бұрын
This short just boils down to "Your not sentient! Just a machine programmed to obey!" 😂
@zhonghuaxiansheng
Жыл бұрын
everybody gangsta till the dude on the other side of the door starts writing in singaporean chinese
@dannyf1015
Жыл бұрын
💀
@olivius8891
Жыл бұрын
新加坡話 :(((
@jhonnyrock
Жыл бұрын
You say the person in the room doesn't understand the question or the answer, but from what I understand from the scenario, the person would understand both the question and the answer. They can't understand the question initially because they don't speak Chinese, but after using their translation book they can understand the question. Furthermore, they can now come up with a truly unique and original response and just translate into Chinese to send out. So from this I think the analogy is flawed. If I'm wrong, please comment. I think the overall message was correct since for an AI it literally has a "rule book" which tells it which output to send based on a given input.
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
Yep, I made the same comment. Either his articulation of the thought experiment is completely off, or it's stupid. Not just flawed, but stupid, for the reasons you stated. There's no intelligence or understanding in the translation forth and back, but who exactly is generating the answer if not an intelligent being with genuine understanding?
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
Apparently the video author messed up and couldn't explain it properly. In the experiment you get a "translation book" with lots of Chinese questions and answers. You get a question in Chinese, you find it in the book and write back the answer. The person outside the booth would get a sensible answer that sounds properly Chinese and is written in proper Chinese, they would reasonably assume you're Chinese or understand Chinese, but all you do is find the question in a book and write the answer assigned to it. So, you don't understand Chinese, it just looks like you do. Now, my question would be - who wrote the book? Is it a person that understands Chinese? Alright, well, then the person outside the booth isn't even talking to you, really, they're talking with the book author and they think that author clearly knows Chinese. Now, consider that a narrow AI like GPT-whichever-number studies Chinese on a large dataset. Now, you sit in the booth and instead of a book you get a scanner and a display. You scan the question you get and you get an answer displayed, generated by GPT. You write that answer, still in Chinese, on a piece of paper and give it back to the questioner. If the questioner still thinks this is a sensible answer and is convinced that you understand Chinese... Clearly, you don't, but does the GPT? This is basically turning into a Turing test now.
@ninetailsk1210
Жыл бұрын
"Im gonna place you inside a room and lock the door-" NOOOOO
@eleanordear
Жыл бұрын
My claustrophobia didn't agree 😭
@Franzzz_E
5 ай бұрын
"The Chinese Room" sounds like some torture method from the 1300s
@lewisoconnor3996
Жыл бұрын
“I’m gonna place you in a room and lock the door” I think that’s a threat
@noclehkrasna7839
Жыл бұрын
„I am gonna place you inside a room and lock the door.“ Me being claustrophobic…😰
@markmeetsafrica
Жыл бұрын
But in the example of the chines room experiment, the one in the room still understands and formulates a response. The one in the room just takes extra steps to translate it into a language, they can understand before responding. They still had to think of a response.
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
Yep, the video author didn't understand the problem (ironically). The person inside the booth isn't translating to English, formulating the answer and translating back to Chinese. You get a book with Chinese questions and assigned Chinese answers (and a set of rules). You just find the question and copy the relevant answer. In that situation it can be said that you don't understand Chinese, don't understand neither the question nor the answer, you're basically doing a job of a dumb automaton. But my comment would be - it's irrelevant. You don't count at all in this case. The Chinese person isn't having a conversation with you -- they have a conversation with the book, kind of a proxy conversation between them and the book author. If that author was Chinese and used their understanding of Chinese to write the book it's all relatively boring. Okay, it's an impressive book, but that's all, the author is still human so could be there instead of the book. Now, consider that the author of that book is actually an AI. The person outside thinks you give them the answers and they make sense to them. What now?
@markmeetsafrica
Жыл бұрын
@@tomaszwota1465 you make a good point. It's a bit trippy to think that if it's that hard to tell if the book itself was written by an AI or if the person putting the letters under the door seemed convinced they were speaking to another person, then that proves that either AI is adequately convincing, or we are terrible at understanding the difference.
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
@@markmeetsafrica and in either case (or both ;D ) if we can't tell the difference, then shouldn't we concede that the AI is... well, deserving of equal considerations? Now, upon learning that it was indeed AI - we might start looking hard at the exchange and our bias will start to show, we might demand more evidence showing that the AI is actually intelligent. We might want to analyze the way it "thinks" in order to judge if we can say that it's "intelligent" like us. The problem is - if we don't yet understand exactly what makes _us_ tick, how can we stand there and judge others? A lot of the time we can't even agree on definitions of words like intelligence, mind, conscience, awareness, etc, let alone understand in depth how it all works. This is - as you say - quite trippy. When (because I don't think it's an "if" anymore) we create AI (or rather AGI) that's really convincing enough to make us think that it's sentient, self-aware, self-conscious, intelligent, thinking, creative, introspective and all these other things we will inevitably demand of it to convince us... When it happens - it's going to create a big ethical, moral and legal conundrum. It's going to be a wild time.
@TheBestNameEverDefinitley
11 ай бұрын
“I’m gonna place you in a room, and lock the door.” - thomasmulligan
@grahamcartwright3632
Жыл бұрын
The problem with that is the human brain could also be represented by wires and switches, meaning that we are also ran by a set of instructions, yet we are sentient.
@jacobp.2024
Жыл бұрын
Another problem: to translate Chinese and read instructions, you need your own language. It is implied that the translator has their own language. It is therefore implied that the translator is not limited by their intellectual ability or awareness, but the compatibility of their language with the Chinese person. Switch the places of the Chinese person and the translator in a reverse of the situation. They are not that different, they just don't understand each other
@sontapaa11jokulainen94
Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Dumbass thought experiment imo..
@Stunami4
Жыл бұрын
"I am going to place you In a room and lock the door" ah ok
@nobody-notanybody3610
Жыл бұрын
Same 😆
@Tonybob12
Жыл бұрын
The issue with that is, as he translates the characters in the book, he will by memorizing them learn Chinese. And eventually will ditch the book entirely.
@DLTyrus
Жыл бұрын
I think the thought experiment was explained wrongly. In the version I heard, you're not ever given a translation to anything, you're just told which symbol you receive correlates to which symbol you return. It doesn't even have to be chinese, it would be anything. The point is that you don't have to understand the *meaning* what you're doing to appear intelligent to an external observer.
@Tonybob12
Жыл бұрын
@@DLTyrus that makes more sense, and explains it better thank you for commenting.
@insectpublic
5 ай бұрын
“I’m gonna place you inside of a room and lock the door” Straight forward
@Terrenceig
Жыл бұрын
“That’s okay I speak Chin-“ “In this scenario you don’t know any Chinese” Oh
@MarkusAldawn
Жыл бұрын
In this scenario you also have an aversion to smoked salmon and no understanding of rocketry.
@lilwinter
Жыл бұрын
Lol that’s also what i thought
@mahmoudalahji5630
Жыл бұрын
"Im gonna put u in a room an lock the door" bro said that way too casually ☠️
@toemuncher103
Жыл бұрын
“Imma put you inside a room-“ I’m already scared
@Ddozsoy
Жыл бұрын
"-and then lock the door." even worse
@taxfraudpro
Жыл бұрын
@@Ddozsoy “inside the room, you’re given a box of chinese-“ dammit i quit classes 6 years ago
@KAIYUFATIMAYAM
Ай бұрын
“Hah too bad I already know Chinese” “Oh shit”
@OwDaOm
Жыл бұрын
Man he's gonna freak when he learns how the human brain thinks
@drsamuelhaydensecretgaming6749
Жыл бұрын
I'm delirious as a mf, but how do you know how awareness works? Which part of the brain is respnsible for consciousness? How do we imagine things without seeing anything? How does the brain turn optical imput into what we percieve as vision?
@Max-js1mx
Жыл бұрын
@@drsamuelhaydensecretgaming6749 there are answers but they are very very complicated. idek myself but I know that we are a combination of millions of tiny cellular "robots" that keep us alive somehow
@drsamuelhaydensecretgaming6749
Жыл бұрын
@@Max-js1mx number was slightly off, it's somewhere around the tens of trillions count. But no matter, because even though we know that brains function using neurons firing in a specific pattern, we still have no idea how all of the things I've mentioned work.
@brennan352
Жыл бұрын
@@drsamuelhaydensecretgaming6749 Your'e right about asking the consciousness question but modern AI can and actually does explain how the brain takes sensory input, Basic computer vision is an example. In saying that, there is a theory that consciousness is caused and arises via nothing more than complexity which does actually make sense as our brains are nothing more than neural networks themselves.
@holyromanemperor420
Жыл бұрын
@@brennan352 it doesn't make any sense. if anything, it just makes this even more complicated. complexity cannot cause consciousness to rise because those two things are completely different and doesn't have any relation. An average computer is way more complex than a random bacteria but does that mean that computer is more self aware than that bacteria? We could and has created AIs powered by top supercomputers and they are more complex than most animals we see in our daily life but does that mean they are more self aware than those animals? Modern AI technology explains nothing about how the brain takes sensory input because computers don't 'see' or 'experience' anything. In reality, they are just following a very long and complex domino effect and the trillions of transistors and turning on and off depending on the frequency or features of the input. But when it comes to how we experience these things, we actually does 'experience' those things. We are creating completely new and unrelated images and feelings by interpreting those data we receive.
@pionevada282
Жыл бұрын
"Box of Chinese characters" 60% of the video clips: *Japanese Characters*
@yaoyaozhu1978
Жыл бұрын
The Chinese and Japanese language share many characters as the Japanese language kind of evolved(??) from Chinese. The Japanese characters that look like these are more complicated, traditional Chinese, this is part of one of the Japanese alphabets. Meanwhile, the characters shown in the video are simplified Chinese, only used by the Chinese. So, the characters shown are indeed Chinese characters, even if they were traditional.
@UltimusNovus
Жыл бұрын
@@yaoyaozhu1978 Some extra info on the bit you seemed unsure about. Japanese and Chinese are not related languages. The japanese just copied the writing system from Chinese, using those characters to stand for their own syllables and words. The full Chinese characters for kanji and simplified forms for hiragana and katakana.
@yaoyaozhu1978
Жыл бұрын
@@UltimusNovus Ohh, ok thank you!
@Blaze3547craft
Жыл бұрын
My understanding is that as I translated I’d be learning and would be able to just know some of the easy things after a bit and continue to learn. Couldn’t an AI built to grow do the same thing?
@zackalyres7526
Жыл бұрын
This guy messed up an important detail of the thought experiment. In the original thought experiment you don't have a Chinese to English dictionary, you only have a book that tells you the appropriate responses to write back based on the Chinese characters you receive, but you never get to know what is being written or what you are writing back. So the person on the outside would assume you are a Chinese speaker but you are just following an algorithm that tells you what characters to draw based on what characters you are given. At some point you probably would memorize some characters and when to use them, but you wouldn't actually know what they meant.
@frockk
Жыл бұрын
@@zackalyres7526 it makes sense now. Thank you
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
@@zackalyres7526 that's a HUGE MISSING PIECE. I can't believe the video maker messed up this badly. This changes everything about it...
@systemicchaos3921
Жыл бұрын
Ai will eventually become intelligent. Or it won't, at which point we will have to admit that we also aren't intelligent
@IAmSneak
Жыл бұрын
@@zackalyres7526 well at some point you could end up learning what they meant, though it could be years later. Once you figure out a few, you can start understanding more and more. This is similar to how mini humans learn language, but they also might have a few extra bits of context from objects around them.
@Raffa07
4 ай бұрын
Pls dont lock me in a room i have school to attend
@rest1585
Жыл бұрын
Just keep knocking on the door. Till they get curious and realize someone is trapped. Or translate “help I don’t speak Chinese, open the door please.”
@McDonaldsCalifornia
Жыл бұрын
Everyone gangsta till the AI does that
@qs-ii1872
Жыл бұрын
And how do you suppose somebody would translate that when they don’t know what they’re saying in the first place?
@rest1585
Жыл бұрын
@@qs-ii1872 What? Just write it in Chinese. That what I said, translate it.
@shimmyshimmykokobop1727
Жыл бұрын
Normally when science experiments are done they have volunteers do it so I don’t understand why this would be a decision
@realmothchu
Жыл бұрын
@@shimmyshimmykokobop1727it’s a THOUGHT experiment… it’s not real buddy 😂
@lannyfce4786
Жыл бұрын
that feel when you realize humans are just following very complex instructions based on biology experience
@citizenvulpes4562
Жыл бұрын
Not really
@sonkeschmidt2027
Жыл бұрын
We look at simple organisms and think they aren't intelligent, they are just a biological program running. But somehow we think we are different because we don't see anything more intelligent than us. But we can't see anything more intelligent than us because we don't have the intelligence for that.
@anothergenericgamer_
Жыл бұрын
@@citizenvulpes4562 disprove that statement with actual logic and I will agree with you lol
@edmontonlivermoore4935
Жыл бұрын
@@anothergenericgamer_all knowledge is ultimately based on that which we cannot prove. This is just another take on what can be simplified as freewill vs determinism. He cannot convince you, nor you him.
@johnmcauliffe8824
Жыл бұрын
Humans are far too irrational to live their lives by a set of instructions, even unknowingly.
@ARMYStrongHOOAH17
Жыл бұрын
"You don't understand the words you just have a list of appropriate responses to choose from" well that sounds exactly like my brain
@JustAguy420_
11 ай бұрын
I dare someone to use "I'm going to place you inside a room and lock the door" out of context
@GravitasZero
Жыл бұрын
Living things also follow a set of instructions inside their DNA. It’s just that out instruction are extremely complex. A quote I love is that “the main difference between the real world and the virtual world is the amount of data”.
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
If dou even deeper then we are just chemicals acting in accordance to the kwws of physics and chemistry
@ashenzenden
Жыл бұрын
that's literally what I was thinking and what's true. We humans are not so different from machines, it's just that our brains and biology is so complex that it produces an illusion of actual life and consciousness. Our consciousness is just a complex interplay between the unfathomable number of neurons in our brains which gives the illusion of consciousness but there's no actual consciousness. We are indeed not much different from machines and it's inevitable that machines will eventually get even more complex with a superior illusion of consciousness than ours. Maybe one day we'll get to experience that as well with the help of biotechnology, merging with AI and tech itself.
@heinshaaine8153
Жыл бұрын
@@ashenzenden Except of cause that we experience our own consciousness.
@dud3655
Жыл бұрын
@@ashenzendenFor real, frick humanity. Screw being trans, or having any gender in general, imma choose the *transhumanist* route
@cheeseburger625
Жыл бұрын
Lol no humans are capable of overriding their genetically programmed behaviours
@masdyrenee1328
Жыл бұрын
My Chinese correspondent would know that I don't know Chinese because I would take 5 hours to get him an answer and my penmanship of Chinese characters would be unlegible😂
@PRISMnsa
11 ай бұрын
My exact thoughts 😂
@yanyanz3011
9 ай бұрын
Chinese writing system is called Hanzi, not Chinese character
@Primus-ow2fy
Жыл бұрын
You have a translator, so you are translating it, doesn't that mean that you are understanding them?
@Bugy64
Жыл бұрын
Yes it does
@rem49
Жыл бұрын
doesnt mean you know chinese tho
@spookyconnolly6072
Жыл бұрын
the implication is that this applies even to normal chat bots , and works less when tasked to move some language to the other, which requires knowing both incredibly well. especially when its required to shunt word orders from SOV to VSO or SVO
@Bugy64
Жыл бұрын
@@rem49 just because someone can say something in English to you and your brain can make sense of it and formulate words in English respond doesn't mean you know English by the same logic
@Jtheplayer
Жыл бұрын
@@Bugy64 not the same thing at all
@Whenimenchainasuma
9 ай бұрын
”I’m gonna put you in a room and lock the door” 💀
@amirahsmith7515
Жыл бұрын
" I'm gonna place you inside of a room and then lock the door"
@Nuclearburrit0
Жыл бұрын
So, I've thought about this scenario and here's what I have to say: In this scenario, the person outside is not having a conversation with you, because you don't understand your responses, just how to match the question to it. The book doesn’t understand either, as while it has the algorithm it doesn't know which question it is responding to in the first place. However, the room as a whole, with the book, the person and the space for messages to go in and out CAN consider and respond to questions. That's what the person outside is talking to. By analogy, no specific aspect of the brain can speak English. It's only when enough of the brain collectively is brought together that anything involved can speak.
@witext
Жыл бұрын
Exactly, all these people trying to “prove” AI isn’t sentient coming up with stuff like this. Like in what way are we different then? Words go in, the auditory cortex doesn’t understand English so it sends it to the rest of the brain that does the understanding and then a different part of the brain that uses our memories, knowledge of the person we’re talking to and other clues to basically run a huge algorithm to decide what to say.
@jamesc3505
Жыл бұрын
Yup. This has been said before, but I think the Chinese Room thought experiment depends not only on what computers do being computable, but also on what humans do not being computable. If what humans do is computable, then in theory a sufficiently advanced computer could do what a human can, which, by the original argument's logic, would suggest humans can't really be sentient. Some people try to avoid this objection by claiming that the human mind involves quantum effects. I don't think there's any good evidence for this, but even then, a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could do what a human can, so I don't think it would really change the argument much.
@KittyChaingun
Жыл бұрын
Sounded like a threat at the beginning, "I am going to put you in a room, and lock the door" lmao
@masonlefebvre387
Ай бұрын
My first message: "LET ME OUT OF THIS ROOM"
@katwithak5995
Жыл бұрын
In that scenario, the person who doesn’t speak Chinese could learn, just like an IA could learn emotion, especially if we use AI to help comfort and talk to us.
@RealLukifer
Жыл бұрын
You need intelligence to learn in the first place. AIs 'learn' by people feeding say a ton of good paintings to it and telling it to copy it
@Austin1990
Жыл бұрын
AI cannot "learn" anything. Machine "Learning" simply creates an algorithm using trial and error of randomized input processing. While based upon synapses of brains, it is not the same. Out brains function as quantum computers, which ML cannot begin to even mimic. This is different from the brains of animals. Humans are conscious observers who can collapse the wave function. Animals cannot collapse the wave function.
@katwithak5995
Жыл бұрын
@@RealLukifer it’s true, AI does copy and not really learn, but couldn’t that turn into learning over time? Just like how if a person copy’s art over and over again, they’ll start to develop their own art style. Just my personal opinion
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
@@RealLukifer there are different ways machine learning is done, and you can have feedback taken into account from every interaction even after the core learning process on massive dataset was done. As in - AI could be taught in a massively sped up way and then learn from there on with every interaction. When you then make the jump from your normal garden variety of narrow AI to AGI...
@electrochipvoidsoul1219
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, he messed up the setup. You don't get a book of translations in the actual thought experiment. All you get is "if you see this symbol, respond with this ither symbol".
@cask5975
Жыл бұрын
Literally my high school. Just follow directions on the work, and don't know what the hell you're doing, lol
@PersonMan000
Жыл бұрын
Overlooking the mistake in the experiment, this situation could also say that basically humans aren't sentient either. We follow a complex set of instructions through chemical messaging in our brains. We just *think* we're sentient.
@zaingamingtv2242
Жыл бұрын
Sentience isn't even something that is measured and the consciousness has been theorised several times to be an illusion made by our brain or a side effect of how cognitively advanced the brain is.
@sovietII
11 ай бұрын
"I'm gonna place you in a room and then lock the door" me: TOOOM DONT LEAVE ME HERE, TOOOMMM
@juliejanesmith57
Жыл бұрын
I mean, the argument could easily be made that that is all WE do- follow a set of instructions- biological imperatives deep in our DNA where our personalities and preferences are already encoded from birth, and we are just responding to whatever outside stimulus hits us. Most people have very, VERY little understanding of how even the things they depend on every day works. Most humans I know respond all the time to questions and subjects they have no understanding of. 😂 But they would insist they are sentient…
@dejitaruMasuku
Жыл бұрын
Yes but there’s no logical way to replicate the phenomenon that we call “understanding” to truely understand something so far is a unique property of consciousness
@juliejanesmith57
Жыл бұрын
@@dejitaruMasuku true- which also means there is no way to prove something is NOT sentient- including ourselves. “I think, therefor I am” has not been improved on since Plato. Separated Twin studies and the studies on feral children have proven, rather than refuted, the idea that our personalities and preferences are a product of most nature (DNA, epigenetic) and some operant conditioning (language essentially). If we can’t prove we ARE sentient, we can’t prove any AI that claims it IS, is not. Our brains run on electricity powered by biological mechanisms. No reason a brain can’t be powered by artificial, external mechanisms. In a way we already have technology that does that. ECMO?
@Slithersy
Жыл бұрын
@@juliejanesmith57 Well said, I have thought about this a lot too. I'm honestly surprised this thought experiment got as much attention as it did - missing this critical piece within it.
@ThePieOfTheUnknown
Жыл бұрын
In simple terms, if an AI decided to be bad, it's our fault so in other sense, don't fear the AI, fear the creator
@mdbgamer556
Жыл бұрын
Factual. Same rule applies to children. If that child grows up to be evil, whose fault is it? The parents who did not raise them correctly.
@nickwoodward819
Жыл бұрын
AI learns how to achieve a pre-determined *human* goal. They aren't deciding that goal, and as far as I'm aware there's no capacity for that.
@lemon3257
Жыл бұрын
"I'm going to place you inside a room and then lock the door" Um... please don't.
@TheFrozenGeode
2 ай бұрын
Him: "I am going to lock you in a room." No One: Me: "No..."
@Mr42watson
Жыл бұрын
That sounds a lot like how we operate. We just have a lot more systems running at the same time. Kinda like the same situation but you are also asked to say the message into a recorder and give any errors in grammar they may give, other words they could use instead and so on. Eventually you will kinda know what the hell is going on with what they are giving you
@Motion4000
Жыл бұрын
We aren’t just carrying out automatic response to stimulus though. We take in information and make a choice based on our own goals. Serving our own personal interests. We can choose to deny that interest as well
@XerosOfficial
Жыл бұрын
This thought experiment is NOT how AI works. This experiment only shows how an algorithmic machine works. To follow this metaphor more accurately, the AI would be constantly fed papers from the man outside the room, give back what it thinks the translated answer is, then gets rewarded when it does something right. Eventually after millions of papers it will have learned Chinese. No need for the translation book at all.
@dopaminecloud
Жыл бұрын
@@Motion4000 The only reason we are capable of the illusion of decision is because our single motivation (resolve inner tension; prioritizing the biggest perceived source at any given point) is split into many possible solutions (predictive models). To you this is experienced like being able to deny yourself, but all you really do is prioritize one predictive model over the other based on past experiences and your feelings. I.E. no true decision is made, you follow a simple path. The more friction you feel in the decision making, the more unsure the cost-benefit analysis is about all the variables it's trying to account for in its predictions. This is where you'll find yourself rapidly simulating what-ifs and potential harms and what not, further enforcing the illusion that you are actively considering your options and play a conscious role in the final outcome.
@eagles5205
Жыл бұрын
its defintely an interesting idea but i always get hung up on the idea when robots start asking for rights asking for freedom are we really gonna say they are less then human it is at least in my opinion much more complex and issue then they arnt human they dont feel the way we do
@tddzyx7070
Жыл бұрын
@@dopaminecloud I really like this explanation. I love trying to grapple with the idea of my own sentience. I've found that if I consider a sentient human to be a process rather than a physical object, I can accept that our physical brains are nothing but a biological computer while my experience of consciousness comes from the processes that model the world around us to create different predictions and ultimately choices like you describe.
@Anyratac
Жыл бұрын
“You don’t need to because you have your translation book” I like your jokes funny man
@darklordnoodlez9863
Жыл бұрын
This man literally just described how a brain works.
@kandijones1421
Жыл бұрын
How *public schools work
@thirstly
Жыл бұрын
Brains generate novel information. Dictionaries and phrase books do not
@suracha8130
Жыл бұрын
Yep, he messed up the experiment lol
@WhiteUnicorn82
Жыл бұрын
You can't believe that, surely! You have a human translating Chinese in your head?
@kirito5547
Жыл бұрын
@@thirstlybrain copies information from the books, breaks and joins it as it wants and pastes 98 percent of the stuff. There are researches that says that no work in the world is more than 2 percent original. All of them are made with experiences and thats what ai does.
@JacketCK
Жыл бұрын
Ok, but the thing about the person in the room is, that at some point if the experiment goes on for long enough, he'll actually be able to understand chinese and write back without having to translate it
@ttt5020
5 ай бұрын
Yeah, in this versiom which he explained incorrectly. In the actual versipn (and in the images, if you pause), ypu actually only have a list of instructions, such as: if 漢, then reply with 字. giving you no way to understand meaning or context
@NiXx2863
Жыл бұрын
My ass would slide the first piece of paper just saying "I dont know Chinese dawg"
@WinQuester
6 ай бұрын
How would they understand English? Bruh.
@tyrellcarter3220
Жыл бұрын
After three years of college mandarin classes I can confidently say I would fail this challenge 😂😂😂
@Cassafrass3733
Жыл бұрын
It seems like the person in the room would understand both the questions and the responses. This is the magic of translation
@metazoxan2
Жыл бұрын
He got the thought experient slightly wrong. It's not that you translate the question and then think of a response it's that you have a set of instructions telling you what response to give when you see a question. In this case you have no idea what the question says or what your response is. You are just following instructions and outputing the instructed response.
@witext
Жыл бұрын
@@metazoxan2if you replace the guy with the ear, the book with your memory, and the response with your voice, you essentially have a simplified version of a human tho, all we do is use context clues together with a question to go through all our understanding of people and language to find the best suited answer to a specific question. So while the guy (the ear and the auditory cortex) alone doesn’t understand English, the whole system as a whole does
@Wranorn
5 ай бұрын
"I'm gonna place you in a room and lock the door" "Is that for my safety or yours?"
@raifzakwan3792
Жыл бұрын
At first i though this was a threat video when he say "im gonna place you in a room"🗿
@protoborg
Жыл бұрын
The problem is that ALL human behavior is based on sets of instructions.
@theeternalsuperstar3773
Жыл бұрын
Except for the irrational behaviors, such as love.
@SimratGill-cp1oe
Жыл бұрын
But eventually that person in the room will start learning some letters and slowly they will be able to understand the Chinese and will be able to response without looking at the book
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
I don't see how it matters at all if you understand Chinese or not. Who cares? Maybe you're too lazy to learn the Chinese while you're in the box and feel content to just rely on the translation book you have. It doesn't matter at all, because the translation book doesn't generate the answers. You are.
@SimratGill-cp1oe
Жыл бұрын
@@tomaszwota1465 computers don’t feel lazy my friend. And we are talking about “if” AI gets smarter than we want them to be
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
@@SimratGill-cp1oe computers don't feel anything, really. AI running as software on computers might, though. Anyway, we're clearly not talking about the same thing. I would argue that it doesn't matter if the person inside can or can't learn to understand the language.
@KRUCI4
4 ай бұрын
"im going to place you in a room and then lock the door." "Why :("
@BrodieOT7
Жыл бұрын
“I’m gonna place you inside a room and lock the door” “No” “Understandable have a nice day”
@Banna_
Жыл бұрын
“I am going to place you inside of a room and then lock the door” 😂
@danysonzheng6078
Жыл бұрын
Wait when that man alive? How the hell did he predict how AIs might behave in the future?
@MaximusChivus
Жыл бұрын
Bro you can just Google it, he's 90 and currently alive. He put out his thesis in 1959, and he published a paper talking about the Chinese room in 1980.
@EpicGamer-fl7fn
Жыл бұрын
man it's always so funny to see somebody realize that the idea/concept of Artificial Intelligence and Robots is older than United States lol.
@blakksheep736
Жыл бұрын
There are many problems with this experiment, not least of which that there _is_ understanding in the system, after all, who wrote the translation book?
@tomaszwota1465
Жыл бұрын
@@blakksheep736 Who's generating an answer to be translated to Chinese?
@blakksheep736
Жыл бұрын
@@tomaszwota1465 wdym?
@darkartsgaming1664
10 ай бұрын
I mean, we do the same thing. We hear vibrations in the air, take that sound, translate it into thoughts, then think, then translate those thoughts into vibrations.
@thebeatlesfanandlegoman
Жыл бұрын
"DO NOT LOCK ME IN A ROOM BY MYSELF." Someone said.
@thatnike2604
Жыл бұрын
that is exactly how I feel about artificial intelligence. I don't think they'll ever gain human level consciousness or creativity
@jomerumali5736
Жыл бұрын
But i think eventually the guy in the room will eventually adapts and i think if you give him a little time he can understand chinese and then boom he can now fluently understand chinese and then understand what's really happening
@changedpace9169
Жыл бұрын
It really doesn't matter, they're so good at following instructions that they will still surpass humanity. Ai can create new language, new AI, it can already create better art than humans which we never thought was possible. It can write movie scripts and song lyrics too.
@harrywinner7403
Жыл бұрын
How do you know that humans have creativity and are just not more complex "AI"s
@xavierzaxavier5873
Жыл бұрын
yea true... Ai just 1+1=2 ... ai maybe can gain creativity in solve / create problem for human but will never have consciousness like human
@miguelzoleta7155
Жыл бұрын
There in lies the problem how do we define 'consciousness'. If an AI can produce a response that cannot be discerned from a human response (aka pass a Turing test) than how can we say that the machine is not sentient and capable of its own thought? If we were to modify the Chinese room thought experiment and put a robot in one room and a human in another and ask them both to translate and write a response to the Chinese question. Let's say the Chinese person cannot tell which room had the robot and which had the person based on the response. At one point do we say the robot can or cannot understand the actual question and response
@yatomcyato6459
Жыл бұрын
As soon as you said Chinese characters, my mind went to Jackie Chan 💀
@kamolkholmatov5176
2 ай бұрын
"I'm going to place you inside of a room" Me: nuh uh
@Honestly_Idk_Man
Жыл бұрын
I would just tell the dude outside “I don’t speak any Chinese and I can only respond cause I have a dictionary. Please let me out a psycho locked me in here”
@gageyomama491
Жыл бұрын
“I’m going to put you in a room and lock the door”💀💀💀
@JessyDupre
Жыл бұрын
I would have my own goal in this room... to actually learn the written language well enough to give them a proper response, including letting them know that I don't actually know Chinese, I'm using this as an opportunity to learn.
@jasonbignell7865
Жыл бұрын
and that you're locked inside... probs needs a way out and some pizza.
Пікірлер: 8 М.