Dang glad i found this channel thanx for the informative and thoughtful video
@fossilisedteacup
5 ай бұрын
This could also explain why people with socially deviant faucets of their identity ( for example: ethnic minority, disability or queerness ) also lean further away from the social beauty norms. If capitalism relies on your physicality or unpaid labour with reasonably few benefits, it stands to reason that you would wish to signal your disenfranchisement from it (whether this be a conscious or subconscious process).
@recurringparadox
5 ай бұрын
That is so true.
@a_tiny_orange
4 ай бұрын
🧠 🔛 🧠 i am absorbing this from your brain into mine, thank u 💕
@recurringparadox
4 ай бұрын
Youre so welcome
@martinloureiro6558
5 ай бұрын
12:07 - 12.27 is a great way of putting it! Thank you for this, I appreciate you taking the time to connect this bio sex obsession with the fear of death as I believe everything can be explained by this fear and its most common response- denial. Looking forward to the next video, hopefully with a bit of humour in there to keep it balanced! 😊
@BL-sd2qw
4 ай бұрын
I love this video!! I would love for you to give me your opinion on this: What are patriarchies? Well, my two cents, as someone that has studied a lil bit of human history + antrophology (especially matriarchied) and such, my two cents is that the systems that we have now are based on short-term survival mechsnism, while the systems indigenous people had were based on long-term co-existing strategies. This dichotomy can also be applied to what we call "femenine values" and "masculine values", which are directly related to the way most mammals (like us) reproduce with one another. Short explanation: females are the ones that get pregnant, therefore, all of them are necessary for procreation (they have "intrinsic value"). One male can impregnate more than one female, in that sense, not all the males of the group are necessary (extrinsic value). Males compete with one another to pass on their genes, while females relax in that sense and take care of the offspring (I hope you see where I'm going to by this). So it's not "men" or "women". There are matriarchal men (men that embody "female values") and patriarchal women (same but viceversa), the same as systems (matriarchy/patriarchy (I'm using Peggy Reeves Sanday's definition of matriarchy, not J. J. Bachofen's (cause he defined matriarchy as a reversed patriarchy, and some antrophologists like Peggy Reeves Sanday criticize this as an androcentric defintion))) So, back to my point: patriarchy is, as far as I have read, somewhat new (appeared around... 3.000 years ago? Something like that), and it kinda spread itself around the world (especially with colonialism). Capitalism is great as a short-term system for growth, but when it comes to long-term sustainability... it's not great. And that's why we have so many problem today.
@QWERTY-gp8fd
4 ай бұрын
patriach = king
@morphingfaces
4 ай бұрын
Patriarchy is the unjust power structure which oppresses and controls women and gender diverse people but you could just look it up lol
@losttribe9107
4 ай бұрын
Rule of the minority. Where can this go wrong?
@DeadEndFrog
Ай бұрын
As opposed to? I dont know about you, but i want to be able to live my life as i want it
@losttribe9107
Ай бұрын
@@DeadEndFrog If you want to steal, its OK then?
@DeadEndFrog
Ай бұрын
@@losttribe9107 i personally dont want to hurt anyone in any way. But for the sake of argument If someone wanted to steal, they would have to accept the Consiquence of doing so as well. Which is precisely the world we find ouerselves in. But it does not follow that todays world is any diffrent then minority rule, its just that the minority is accepted as elites. Which is why i asked as opposed to what? I for one accept No rule over me, and accept No justification upon my actions. I understand the Consiquence of my actions tho, and navigate the masses attempt at power over me.
Пікірлер: 17