Let me know if you would like to see more from my archives! I have tons of unposted video.
@vsevolodtokarev
5 ай бұрын
Yes, please! Especially of decent safes.
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
@@vsevolodtokarev I don't have any of those. If I know of a decent safe, I will recommend it here. What I have are videos of security failures, lots of dangerous gadgets.
@replacesoundboard
5 ай бұрын
Archived videos are always nice.
@iFlyiRideiRace
5 ай бұрын
Always good to hear from you.
@replacesoundboard
5 ай бұрын
Before watching the video, the biometric and the hidden bypass lock reminded me of the Verifi Smart Safe, before they listened to your feedback.
@replacesoundboard
5 ай бұрын
Well, at least the Verifi Smart Safe looked like it was worth its price
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
This box is nearly identical to the Smart Safes. The basic box fabrication has been around for years and years.
@replacesoundboard
5 ай бұрын
2:25 _"The damage is done."_ - Dave
@replacesoundboard
5 ай бұрын
I like how KZitem is capable of suggesting some videos in which you said these lines when I searched "the damage is done" on your channel. I think it's capable of searching (to some degree) within the automated captions of the videos for keywords. If I search "you could just give it a good shake", I instantly find the Union Safe with too many ways to break in.
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
@@replacesoundboard I did not know this! I'll play around with searching...
@iFlyiRideiRace
5 ай бұрын
If that button is moved to a different place, I wonder if this safe will get your approval?
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
No. The bypass lock installed in this is a short-cylinder cross lock. I've demonstrated how to open them on this channel using tools any non-expert lock picker can use. Besides, the reason that some biometric handgun safes were recalled recently was this identical programming issue. If someone makes a mistake enrolling a fingerprint, that person has no way of knowing the safe will still open for any fingerprint without actively testing the safe. The risk of somebody leaving a safe available to anyone is too great, so devices that have this programming oversight are being recalled.
@LynxSnowCat
5 ай бұрын
() I keep forgetting how stupid these things are programmed to be. Instead of greeting them with the same cheerful tune - Just changing the response to a farting noise when there's no print registered would immediately inform the user that the safe is compromised - without increasing parts count. Making it hesitate/require confirmation to 'lock' without a registered print (illuminating the scanner until button pressed again) would inform the user that it wants a print - without increasing parts count. Making it refuse to lock (quickly) without using a registered fingerprint would force the user to return it to a more 'secure' condition - without increasing parts count.
@tomcepek498
5 ай бұрын
Did you ever do a GunBox video? Also, will you be doing a Wyze review as well?
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
No, I never did a GunBox video. I doubt that I will. They just aren't that popular anymore. As for a Wyze review, I don't know. I'll think about it.
@tomcepek498
5 ай бұрын
@@HandgunSafe you’re the only source I trust.
@HandgunSafe
5 ай бұрын
@@tomcepek498 Flattery will get you nowhere. 😀Let me see if I have the money and time to look at the Wyze thing.
@tomcepek498
5 ай бұрын
@@HandgunSafe lol appreciate it- hopefully they send you a freebie
Пікірлер: 20