2017.06.15 US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Written Decision: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/09/05/16-16052.pdf Jury Verdict was $11 Million: www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0U527K/ Lose 2A Rights for Mean Emails!😳 Susan Bassi’s Emails That Disturb the Peace Are Domestic Violence! kzitem.info/news/bejne/sYGFnKWHoF-UZaQ Father Gets $$$ From Corrupt El Dorado County, CA: kzitem.infoi21jCcpJF7w?si=YiLrHHqIxxJcXp2j False Arrest Body-Cam One! 😳 El Dorado County, CA Obtains Warrant by Fraud & NV AG Participates!:kzitem.info/news/bejne/0ICF2pt5sJpngoo Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! kzitem.info/news/bejne/yYiXvmSdcKSYhm0 Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! kzitem.info/news/bejne/sISLuGR9hWuHopg Father Exposes Santa Clara Superior Court Complaint Shredding Operation: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1mqAqZdqqoFkY6Q Another Interesting Case (lots more on my channel): Lawyer Cites Fake Cases! 😳 Parent's Civil Rights Appeal Thrown Out Due to Professional Misconduct! kzitem.info/news/bejne/kqSj146miZmXnXo UNLIMITED IMMUNITY! 🙄 State Judges Are Supreme Beings! But You Can Win Declaratory Relief! 42USC1983 kzitem.info/news/bejne/s3yQqXWak5d6pqQ Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity! 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! kzitem.info/news/bejne/zaKO16CBe5FygHosi=q974eNTgxew4MKqE ----- I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted. Why I am the Father in Exile: How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!) kzitem.info/news/bejne/0Yyd25iQrYCKnIY Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV kzitem.info/news/bejne/q298y4uGhHd3om0 Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi kzitem.info/news/bejne/u52lzWGEhXiqdm0 Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) kzitem.info/news/bejne/rX6IuoWeaYmFjKA Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
@chrisoakey9841
Ай бұрын
The arrogance is amazing. Juries can't understand the law. But you judges with assume we know and understand it when charged. Just not to understand it when you would state it to the jury. Hypocrisy.
@honeyafun7450
Ай бұрын
at this point we must conclude that abolishing qualified immunity would save billions of dollars
@fatherinexile
Ай бұрын
Agreed! Stop paying the #TaxpayerDefrauders (lawyers and cops) and give the money to victims.
@kdub6593
Ай бұрын
And innocent lives.
@fatherinexile
Ай бұрын
@@kdub6593 So true!
@Tshikonelo
Ай бұрын
The current right wing SCOTUS will never abolish qualified immunity. They are with the blue line gang.
@chrisoakey9841
Ай бұрын
And would teach cops to learn the law instead of panicked cowardice. But sadly as we see time and again, SCOTUS does not give a crap what the law says. They are their own God's. As scene with presidential immunity, or 14th amendment. F the law, we say ...
@Stetsonhatman
Ай бұрын
I busted a laugh when the middle judge retorted to the government citing a case, “Yeah it was messy, I was there.”
@lostmysoul1595
Ай бұрын
And when the qualified immunity start being the basis for officers being above the law
@jeffmcginnis8051
Ай бұрын
The judges are laughing at this lawyers Incompetence
@lostmysoul1595
Ай бұрын
When did qualifying immunity start protecting officers from criminal prosecution
@ygrittesnow1701
Ай бұрын
It technically doesn't. It is only a protection from individual civil liability. Unfortunately unscrupulous DA's use it as an excuse to not charge cops with the crimes they commit.
@PUCKERBUTTFACE
Ай бұрын
Didn’t it start out as a split second ruling?
@SylvanasWindrunnerResurrected
Ай бұрын
@@ygrittesnow1701 Yeah, that has always been a problem. DA's and cops are BFFs
@jennifermoore2041
Ай бұрын
There's TOO MUCH OF THIS FOR US NOT TO BE ANGRY AND TAKE ACTIONS!!!!
@hillaryclinton1314
Ай бұрын
Qualified immunity.. when the courts make law
@chocolatethunder8477
Ай бұрын
It began in the 60's when it was created only for judges giving sentences under unconstitutional laws. The idea was to hold the politicians and lawmakers responsible for the violations of citizens rights under laws they created, and not the judges that impose those laws on citizens. It seems like a good idea on the surface, but it quickly evolved into the perverted version we have today.
@Aurochs330
Ай бұрын
Most of the time that qualified immunity is granted, the officer violates their department policy anyways… if it’s a policy, it’s for a reason. So then why give them legal immunity?.. make it make sense
@reverendfry6088
Ай бұрын
In a functioning Republic with the rule of law, there is no such thing as Terry v. Ohio, Pennsylvania v. Mimms, or qualified immunity.
@patrickday4206
Ай бұрын
Remember everyone every time the government wastes resources it slows down the rest of the system. The government protecting itself can be abuse of process but I've never seen a ruling like that ever.
@ygrittesnow1701
Ай бұрын
Don't forget the cost. We paid for the cop to commit the crime. We paid for the cop to defend in court. We paid for the appeals process. And we pay for the settlement that ensues. The money that government is in possession of is ours. The government has NO money. So all of the money intended for programs and things for the community gets reallocated to cover the criminal acts of other government actors. Imagine if you got sued, lost and where able to go into someone else's bank account to pay the judgement.
@ronallen6578
Ай бұрын
@@ygrittesnow1701Forget the ruling, just give me 50% and it's all good 😅😅😅
@AlexeiTetenov
Ай бұрын
Without transparency, there can be no trust, without trust there can be no authority!
@YouveBeenMiddled
Ай бұрын
Really disappointing when _any_ counsel screws their client due to inadequate representation, but I'm not going to cry over spilt *spoiled* milk either.
@rickflash448
Ай бұрын
Real crime is that mic, good lord.
@FREEDOMNOW33
Ай бұрын
Why does that cop have his gun out of his holster . I see way to many cops pointing guns at innocent people of people NOT posing any kind of threat . People need more right to defend themselves from police .
@tc4660
Ай бұрын
The debate outside a jury of peers is nothing more than mental masturbation and a complete waste of time and money. QI is an illegitimate designation and rarely applies to “honest” mistakes. The original intention(s) for QI were lost long ago and have only been abused in an infinite envelope of acceptance for a long long time.
@nickybeingnicky
Ай бұрын
Yall should Subscribe. This man deserves more viewers.
@fatherinexile
Ай бұрын
Agreed! Thank you!
@RogerVKint
Ай бұрын
These are great videos. Thank you.
@otetechie
Ай бұрын
The Freudian slip where he accidentally said excessive force was perfect.
@user-rt2ri5ft5v
Ай бұрын
American justice in inaction!!!
@ronallen6578
Ай бұрын
Did you mean "Injustice"??
@TheOneandOnlyD-R-E
Ай бұрын
15:11 this lawyer was just plain lazy. "I dOnT wAnNA. It's fUtiLe." Im glad he was lazy, tho. Qualified Immunity has to go! It's against our natural rights.
@Sondan1988
Ай бұрын
It does need to go but it was created by the Supreme Court. When I had basic Government in high school I thought laws were created by the legislative branch and not by the judicial branch ?????
@cajunrandy2143
Ай бұрын
without technicality would QI have been stripped ?
@pab77777
Ай бұрын
If the police have qualified immunity taxpayers pay for the damage caused, If the police don't have qualified immunity taxpayers still pay for the damage. what is the point, taxpayers pay no matter what.
@damienoflaherty6493
Ай бұрын
Immediately dont like the Cops Lawyer! Seems Super Arrogant and Condescending and is Spluttering his way through it!I wonder does that come into the Judge's Decisions?
@johnmagnotta8401
Ай бұрын
How is it that law enforcement is both not liable for a citizens safety while also using public safety ad a reason? Didn't the Supreme Court claim that it is not upon an officer to protect a citizen? Like if he doesn't want to move from an active shooting then cops can't make him move? Maybe I'm off on this.. but it seems public safety is well behind "officer safety" and only brought up when it suits an officers position. I shot bc I was worried about the public. It's too much. Start voting in people that will use common sense.. the police can't just picking us off and getting off due to qualified immunity
@WayneAndrews-oo2mw
Ай бұрын
Mybe stop spending money on these lawyers and use it to pay for better trained police
@peterb2272
Ай бұрын
Did the lawyer come out if the gate and argue there was a dispute about material facts that need to be put to a jury, thereby blowing straight past QI? I think that the judges reaction starting at 8:40 is when the lawyer came out and said it explicity and 9:00 is when all the judges got how absurd his argument was.
@buckbeezi6263
Ай бұрын
Lawyer tried to reinvent da will rather than following protocol n it backfired.
@BewarePeople-od2bd
Ай бұрын
Not a accident
@RichardHeadGaming
Ай бұрын
Qualified immunity was to protect officers doing their day to day duty, as in some armed felon in the process of a crime being shot and trying to suit for it. Not protecting officers committing crimes. Any officer committing a crime is subject to all laws just like anyone else. Qualified immunity was expressly talked about when they made the 1st, 2A, 3rd, 4th, and 5th amendments to protect us from tyrants. It was to ensure Some government official would not give his "troops" immunity and ability to just seize property and person for any reason with no repercussions. (like the King of England and his troops were doing in the US at the time).
@YRPAudit
Ай бұрын
I love watching these...yrp keepp stalking me
@fatherinexile
Ай бұрын
I am going to keep stalking you, and I don't want any funny business with restraining orders! 😂
@jayytee8062
Ай бұрын
Hung Lamb 🤣
@robertfrench7031
Ай бұрын
Why can't the money that the police are getting sued for come from the money that they get from us yearly it would take money away from the other activity's that they have all year and I promise that the powers that be will make sure they follow the law
@davidswanson5669
Ай бұрын
Why does everyone in the appellate world try to sound exactly like Justice Breyer? I guess it’s just flattery.
@corralescoyote
Ай бұрын
I usually don’t feel like I have much to say, but this attorney for the cops is talking to the judges as though they don’t understand what QI is. Then the judges show that his argument is weak and feeble for not citing relevant case law and not following the correct procedures… My only knowledge of law comes from watching tv, movies and KZitem vids, but even I can see that this lawyer is incompetent. Not just that, but he’s rude and belligerent interrupting the judges, presuming they’re gonna favor the cops until/unless persuaded otherwise.
@incredibleadventures1027
Ай бұрын
He is required to give the strongest defense he can. His side has no case so he is trying the cry like a baby route. Gotta do something
@USMC6976
Ай бұрын
This one is tricky. The man had a knife, he advanced toward the officer - even though he was facing away. I wonder, if a demonstration would have convinced the jury the officer did fire in self defense. I'm surprised the verdict wasn't overturned.
@fatherinexile
Ай бұрын
It was disputed that he was advancing toward her. There was an eye witness, the neighbor, who was former law enforcement, that said he wasn’t advancing. That’s exactly the role of the jury. To decide issues of fact based on all admitted evidence.
@USMC6976
Ай бұрын
@@fatherinexile A jury decided who they wanted to believe, that doesn't make it true/factual. I find it hard to believe not one person was recording this event. But I wasn't on the jury, but I have lots of questions.
@futurethinking
Ай бұрын
@@USMC6976 Jury decided, it doesn't make it true but it makes it true in eye of the court. You can have different opinion, but court cannot overturn jury verdict because they disagree with which facts jury believed in absence of clear evidence.
@RichardHeadGaming
Ай бұрын
There is nothing Tricky about this. It is impossible to be self def if the person is not even facing the officer. Anyone on their property can be armed according to 2A. Just because he had a knife on his property does not make him a threat. He was not an imminent threat to anyone. He was not talking or saying anything (meaning he did not threaten with words). Just because he had a weapon does not fall into self defense ruling saying just reaching for a weapon is enough to defend ones self. The officer was the intruder or visitor at the time and can not just claim defense. The reality is the officer shot the guy in the back out of fear, not duty or self defense. An intruder on your property can not claim self defense if they are met with a weapon at their entrance of said property. Was he doing the moon walk with a knife?
@USMC6976
Ай бұрын
@@RichardHeadGaming that's not true. There are rulings saying otherwise, depending on the circumstances. They let a cop shoot and kill a man inside his home because he was holding a gun. He wasn't pointing it at anyone. I'm not even sure he knew the police were there.
@davidboyd9744
Ай бұрын
This blows his whole argument out of the water! She shot him in the back!! That means he was NOT COMING TOWARDS HER HE WAS GOING THE OTHER WAY!!!
@AlexeiTetenov
Ай бұрын
Without transparency, there can be no trust, without trust there can be no authority!
Пікірлер: 78