Everything is acceptable, but the side pole impact is terrible it will split in half in real world scenarios.
@Shockwave0099
Ай бұрын
Great job. To me it looks like the car is physically quite safe, but since there are less passive and active electronic safety features, it gets less stars. Not a big deal
@jurajrabcan2053
Ай бұрын
70% addulct occupant is really weak, it is not because of electronic safety featrues
@DJIMAVICAIR-nc7jx
Ай бұрын
Nasty for lateral impact.😅
@ZadakLeader
Ай бұрын
If you read up on the NCAP site, it is an improvement over the old cars. I personally think the car is good for the price, sure it doesn't have all the smart sensors more expensive cars have, but if you ask me, those are allso "nice to haves"
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
Other cheapper cars have 5 stars
@ZadakLeader
Ай бұрын
@@Gt-mt9cy Examples? Also I was just talking about Dacia itself, it's improving over the years
@michaelbohm4806
Ай бұрын
@@Gt-mt9cydo you have exappmles which cars under eur. 19000 have 5 stars. Would be interesting.
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
@@michaelbohm4806 ex skoda kamiq
@theanswer1993
Ай бұрын
Great job Dacia. For the price this is a great score! It's loosing stars only on active features which you don't even need if you know how to drive a car.
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
Captur Arkana better
@martin84
Ай бұрын
@@Gt-mt9cy and much more expensive
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
@@martin84 You are in the mistake. Check pricelist - Captur price starts at 18800 EUR with Eco-G engine.
@ezioauditore9416
Ай бұрын
Are you kidding? 🤦♂️
@theanswer1993
Ай бұрын
@@ezioauditore9416 Every new car is safer than a car from a year ago.
@martin84
Ай бұрын
I see comments like, it doesn't score 5 stars so it is a dangerous car... That would also mean that all cars from like ten years ago (which back then scored 5 stars) are now dangerous cars. Of course that makes no sense. Dacia is a save car that has more safety stuff on board than most cars from 10 years ago. You can see they focus now heavily on driver assistance systems. Some of which people are happy to turn it off if possible.
@jean-yvesderick6085
Ай бұрын
Ne mélangé pas les années, nous sommes en 2024 ! il y a 10 ans Dacia n'aurait même pas obtenu 1 étoile ! Ont est en 2024, et pour moi cette voiture ne répond pas au normes Euro NCAP, beaucoup de voiture Chinoise obtienne aujourd'hui 5 étoiles, c'est au groupe Renault, à rectifier le tir pour obtenir les 5 étoiles !
@martin84
Ай бұрын
@@jean-yvesderick6085 3 stars doesn't mean the car is bad, if you really crash with the duster it will protect you like any other car in the same segment. 3 stars mean that it has less driver assistance systems than cars with 5 stars. But many of those driver assistance systems are just annoying. So annoying that more and more brands are now putting a button on the dashboard of the car with which you can load your own configuration of safety systems. You can turn off all systems you don't want to be activated with one button. So much for having 5 stars rating
@nfswmaster9249
Ай бұрын
nope... this car is not as safe as the cars from 10years ago who took 5 stars. Cause this car has always same problems: poor safety for adult occupant (above 70%) which is an old standard, even the 2017 Duster had similar score (71%). It just improved ADAS a little bit, from 37% to 57% (still very low) but everything else is the same. Side impact is still very dangerous with this car. So again, 10 years ago 5-star cars are still much better than this one which would have been maybe a 4-star in 2015.
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
@@jean-yvesderick6085 The star's count is irrelevant, much more important is safety rating for adult and children occupants. And in case of adult safety, the rating only 70% is poor.
@paolobaronio3295
10 сағат бұрын
Pensi sia economica? Ma è il suo prezzo plastica pure scadente e lamiera con finiture del cavolo il tutto per un prezzo alto per l'auto che mi offrono.
@regen387
Ай бұрын
Cars scoring less than 80% in adult protection should be banned from being sold. Period.
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
Captur e mai ieftin si are 5 stele. Ce argumenteaza pretul Dusterului??
@YouTubenonesense
Ай бұрын
Si-au batut joc de masina si arata lipsa de respect față de clientii Dacia. Motorul hybrid e cat Arkana la pret dar Arkana are 5 stele, interior mai de calitate si ....nu mai intru in detalii tehnice. Singurul lucru de apreciat e ca sunt sinceri si trimit modelul la test spre deosebire de Suzuki care n-au mai testat Vitara din 2017
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
@@KZitemnonesenseasa e .... Eu iau Duster doar second-hand daca iau. Asa e altceva...Dar nu sa ceri preturi ca acum...
@todellinens
Ай бұрын
Right. I'll happily keep my trusty '13 Sportage.
@nfswmaster9249
Ай бұрын
ADAS have been improved a bit, but the problems are still the same. Side impact is just crazy, adult occupant safety is still quite low.
@mro_software
Ай бұрын
get a chery its have 5 star rating for the same price and much more tech and comfort stuff
@Athırsızı_1
Ай бұрын
It's nothing but a walking coffin. Anyone who loves their own life should not buy this.
@sangnguyen-nk6gb
Ай бұрын
❤ 0:23 0:23 0:23
@qstas1312
Ай бұрын
3 stars???😂😂😂...2024 model year and 3 stars???👎👎👎👎Nope...
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
Star's count is irrelevant. Adult and child occupants safety rating is more important and Duster III has adult rating only 70%. Same brown colored body parts (this means that many bones would be broken) as previous car's generation - so zero passive safety progress.
@whysoasync4933
14 күн бұрын
@@JohnDoe-ti6pd Where do you see the brown colored body parts?
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
13 күн бұрын
@@whysoasync4933 Download detailed PDF report and You will see it. I can't provide link, because YT will delete my post.
@nikolucian
Ай бұрын
cualquier coche con 5 años en el mercado saca 3 o menos estrellas. Dacia no tiene tantas ayudas y eso le baja mucho la nota. Pero es un coche muy seguro.
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
70% safety rating for adult occupants with very high load on their chests is not safe.
@user-bc7bm7ny5h
Ай бұрын
no i kupieny. Lecim lawetą i bedziem go robić w przyszłem tygodniu.Lakiery, chłodnica i szkło jusz zamówiene. Na początku przyszłego miesionca na otomoto leci.Polecam, Auto-Wiesiek Car Reparing Łenkowody Poland
@atelierulautorobertovlogs7374
Ай бұрын
Bmw E46 e mai sigur ca Duster 😀😀 Bine nu poți compara Dacia cu Bmw
@Eys.Mel.
Ай бұрын
ВЕЩЬ...
@Bounty5996
Ай бұрын
Embarrassing 🙈
@nuraydinbozdogan3632
Ай бұрын
tin vehicle
@aquariys
Ай бұрын
So it.s the same as the previous model only more expensive😂😂😂😂😂😊
@ioannisstavrou2677
Ай бұрын
Not safe car
@sr.bartolo
Ай бұрын
Mi kadjar es más seguro con 5 años más antiguo que el Duster 3. Me ha decepcionado. Pensé en comprarlo...
@subifox734
Ай бұрын
Pero el tuyo no a pasado la prueba ahora . Seguro saldrían menos estrellas
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
Buy Renault
@sr.bartolo
Ай бұрын
@@subifox734 pensaba que hacían siempre la misma prueba?
@subifox734
Ай бұрын
@@sr.bartolo no . Cada vez puntúan más las ayudas electrónicas y protección de peatones . Y las de impacto q son las realmente importantes , más exigentes
@aarondynamics1311
Ай бұрын
The scoring system is a lot stricter now than it was back in 2015 when the Kadjar was tested. Had it been tested today, the Kadjar would have got a similar if not a worse score than this Duster due to its lack of advanced driver assistance systems and the scoring for the tests being generally stricter. Likewise, if the Duster had been tested in 2015, it would have likely scored a full 5 star rating or at least come very close
@Gt-mt9cy
Ай бұрын
Sa ramana ei cu ea
@johnny6293
Ай бұрын
Nothing much, then.. The side impact is threatening 😢
@AstaRoth0086
Ай бұрын
Junk
@Cycyos
Ай бұрын
Adică mori direct... Ca ce arătați voi... Cam trasa de par...... Are câteva ranforsari făcute cu gust pe interior 👍👍👍
@jean-yvesderick6085
Ай бұрын
Avec 3 étoiles, cette voiture ne répond pas au normes NCAP, voiture dangereuse ! 😢
@martin84
Ай бұрын
That would also mean that all cars from like ten years ago (which back then scored 5 stars) are now dangerous cars. Of course that makes no sense. Dacia is a save car that has more safety stuff on board than most cars from 10 years ago. You can see they focus now heavily on driver assistance systems. Some of which people are happy to turn it off if possible.
@thierrygamer2413
Ай бұрын
voiture dangereuse faut pas abuser non plus mdr, les normes pour le NCAP sont devenu trop contraignante 3* c'est pas mal, si on repasse une mégane 2 qui avait 5* à l'époque elle aurait 1* maintenant pourtant elle n'est pas dangereuse, la personne derrière le volant est bien plus dangereux que la voiture
@subifox734
Ай бұрын
Si fuera peligroso no se vendería en europa la eurocap lo forman empresas independientes . Y valoran para q los coches tengan mogollón de ayudas electrónicas ( q casi todos desconectamos ) y vender más caro . Con 4 ayudas más sacaría 4 o 5 estrellas . Lo q nos importa son los daños x impacto
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
@@thierrygamer2413 ... because the star's count is irrelevant, much more important is safety rating for adult and children occupants. And in case of adult safety, the rating only 70% is poor.
@JohnDoe-ti6pd
Ай бұрын
@@subifox734 And in case of adult safety, the rating only 70% is poor.
@salvatorelongo8958
Ай бұрын
Peccato! Sono rimasto deluso: mi aspettavo un punteggio migliore, specialmente per gli ADAS.Era una delle auto che avrei preso in considerazione, per un futuro acquisto. E l'avrei pagata anche 2000€/3000€ in più se avesse avuto ADAS più sicuri.
@kal-El774
Ай бұрын
Es un Dacia......es normal que sea poco seguro. La marca debería de mejorar éste modelo para conseguír las 5 estrellas.
@TM-cf9ek
Ай бұрын
What an idiotic remark. Like it's a Seat a car made by shepherds for shepherds.👎🏻
@entropy_of_principles
Ай бұрын
....Dacia is not "poco seguro", is SAFE, the other points is just pure marketing because of non-active sensor use.
Пікірлер: 86