What an insightful discussion , really appreciate lawyer's detailed explanation...
@KaliYugaSurfer_
Ай бұрын
"Close the Bible and open the Manu Smriti. It has an affirmation of life, a triumphing agreeable sensation in life and that to draw up a lawbook such as Manu means to permit oneself to get the upper hand, to become perfection, to be ambitious of the highest art of living." - Friedrich Nietzsche
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
Nabila did not present the concept of “Meher” properly. Mostly Meher is fixed at the time of Nikah by both the Parties that has to be paid by Husband if he divorce his wife. And it cannot be claimed if the Wife demands Qula- Seperation.
@mohammedsayeed413
Ай бұрын
Nabeela has explained it very Gratefully and we need more insights from her on issues like these
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
Nabila did not present the concept of “Meher” properly. Mostly Meher is fixed at the time of Nikah by both the Parties that has to be paid by Husband if he divorce his wife. And it cannot be claimed if the Wife demands Qula- Seperation.
@snehlatahumane1981
Ай бұрын
मेहर के चलते मुझे मुस्लिम विवाहिता महिलाओं का हक़ मज़बूत होता है ये सुकून देता है जबकि हिंदू विवाहित महिलाओं के साथ ये कोई गारंटी नहीं होती
@artslover362
Ай бұрын
Didi Hinduo m talak K koi pahchanh nhi Ha Tum logo ki Tarah
@Natureandlove06
Ай бұрын
@@artslover362achya . Hindu mai bas chod do Bina divorce kiye.. Jaise Gobi ji ne kia hai...
@adeshkumar977
Ай бұрын
Manuismriti murdabad..? Samvidhna jindabad..?
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼❤️❤️❤️👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽🌷🌹🌷🌹🌷🌹🌷🌹🌷🌹
@n.nauakari1710
Ай бұрын
@@adeshkumar977 sharia law ? Muslim personal law ?
@Natureandlove06
29 күн бұрын
@@n.nauakari1710love day Tujhe kya lena dena desh mai Constitution of india chalta hai sharia nahi...
@TheAb9211
Ай бұрын
To be frank, Indian law will remain a mess until a separation of church and state happens. Bottom line is that there shouldn’t be a space for religion in laws - personal as well as criminal. Both Hindus and Muslims can peacefully coexist in western countries where there are single laws and no religious interpretations. But in India both religions keep asking for exceptions in laws for their own things. PS: Its the same case for other religions.
@rajeshsinha7421
Ай бұрын
शरीया और मनुस्मृति फिर तो दोनों से ही फिर नहीं चलनी चाहिए समाज को 😅😂 नी
@ForeverKinG848
Ай бұрын
Thanks .... For giving chapter in podcast ... 🎉🎉
@user-vt1md9wb5p
Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤ न्यूज़ लॉन्ड्री का कार्यक्रम बहुत ही शानदार होता है आपका बहुत बहुत शुक्रिया
@gulshanparmar1587
Ай бұрын
❤
@rehanalota6478
Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤
@lekhasuryan8871
Ай бұрын
It's such an eye opening episode. I never miss this episodes
@pragyanpandit4758
Ай бұрын
The envy! Education system is getting tainted day by day with certain group of people's radical ideologies and beliefs. Manusmriti had clearly emphasized everything on brahmins and Kshatriyas glory and supermacy ,while metioning other two just briefly and with discrimination. Clearly,showcasing conservative racism and selectiveness. And it's also known that all these theories and restrictions are written by humans from their point of view back in that time period. Yet, people just glorify all such according to their T&C and benefits. Knowing history for knowledge is good, but for blind faith and supermacy is dangerous. What's with all this superiority complex,when we all are humans , birth and death is the truth.
@saquibshaikh4829
Ай бұрын
Who decides the amount of the Mahr? Deciding the amount of the Mahr is to be left to the woman and her guardian. If the woman disagrees with her guardian about the amount of the Mahr, then what appears to be the case from the words of the scholars is that they should take as a reference the Mahr of a woman of similar standing. If she agrees to the Mahr of a woman of similar standing, but he (the guardian) wants more than that, then no attention should be paid to his wishes. If he is the one who wants a Mahr like that of a woman of similar standing, but she wants less than that, then what matters is his view.
@anandakumarkhedar7241
29 күн бұрын
यह अंध भक्ति से क्या अभिप्राय है? आप अपने आप में सुधार लायें। मुर्गे की तरह प्रार्थना आपको ज्यादा अच्छी प्रतीत होती है। जहां वर्तमान में लबादे रहना उचित है! क्या आप अपने आय और व्यय का ब्यौरा हमारे सम्मूख रखेंगे।
@saquibshaikh4829
Ай бұрын
20 years ago when i used to go for interview i ised to tell my Mother is a home Manager
@johnyepthomi892
Ай бұрын
Atmanirbhar bharat
@Elodie12313
Ай бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2749">45:49</a> Kadwa sach sahi main.. Gen walo Se Pucho IIT kai liye kitni mehnat karni padti hai .. Lekin Tumhara dhanda Hi OBC,sc,st ko Pagal bna kar chlna hai to kuch nhi bologo....😂😂😂
@saurav3719
Ай бұрын
Ews le sita run d ke dalal mat bn
@nectorsnow34
Ай бұрын
@@saurav3719Teri XX parent ka NO3- bataiyo Zara?
@johnyepthomi892
Ай бұрын
Obey the law unless you have power or connections to power.
@indranisahu7119
Ай бұрын
Nowadays I am not seeing this channel very often. Somewhere I am feeling it's becoming another version of The Quint which I seriously don't want. Please do bring reports like you did for electoral bonds and election 2024. Pollpati kholo other than just of Modi(bcz he is bore now I don't care) amritanjan shah, and godi Vandana. More pollpati
@sonfire1
29 күн бұрын
All are Liers 😂
@maheshpaswan804
Ай бұрын
Jatiwadi Manuwadi Modi BJP RSS Sarkar SC ST OBC our Minority ka Ghatak Vinashak hai In sabo ka Tamaam tarh ke adhikar Samapt kar dena chahta hai
@rajeshsinha7421
Ай бұрын
मीम भीम भाई भाई वाले अम्बेडकर के मुसलमान विचारों को क्यू नही मानते 😅😂😊
@Dadasahab1234
Ай бұрын
Very poor presentation.
@Mukundbsingh
Ай бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
This hijabi women will never talk about Islamic Sariyaah. Will she ever talk about fatwa-e-alamgir, sunni Sariyah and all that. ??? What about thoughts of Buddha on women isn't that controversial and misogynist.
@vivek1raja
Ай бұрын
Shoo sanghi scum!
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
Why are you jealous of the Hijabi women? What she talked about Meher, Iddat etc is ISLAMIC Shariyat. You keep crying with WhatsApp knowledge
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
Nabila did not present the concept of “Meher” properly. Mostly Meher is fixed at the time of Nikah by both the Parties that has to be paid by Husband if he divorce his wife. And it cannot be claimed if the Wife demands Qula-Separation This is Shariyat Islamic .
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
@@unison2679 mehar is also there in Islamic muttah( also known as legalised prostitution). So you mean Rate and Status for a legalised prostitute is same for the Women Who came under traditional Nikaah
@Natureandlove06
29 күн бұрын
@@_alok_vyas_tell me thaughts of Buddha on women ? Buddha ki bat mat kro ni toh BRAHMANISM ki Chaddi utar jyegi
@Vforvendetta1122
Ай бұрын
मनुस्मृति एक कला जादू था जो हमारे समाज को खत्म कर दिया नफरत से भर दिया
@Elodie12313
Ай бұрын
Ha To Ab kya 70saal baad Git ga rahe ho... Padho likho aage bado 😂😂
@Vforvendetta1122
Ай бұрын
@@Elodie12313 एक और नफरत का नमूना ये रहा
@allah_phaad_de_rasul_ki_gaand
Ай бұрын
Aur tu ek rondu namuna😂😂😂@@Vforvendetta1122
@ShubhamSingh-og2cl
Ай бұрын
Manusmriti jaane k 70 sal bad bhi vo communities bpl ke neeche h most uneducated community hai bina reservation k ek proper competition me nhi baith skte pr Sara problem manusmriti m tha Clown 🤡
@SmokeyVlogs
Ай бұрын
Allah Teri Quran Maili 🎥
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
India under Manusmriti was most prosperous nation where as india under this Constitution is a 3rd world country
@vivek1raja
Ай бұрын
Sanghi lowlife
@unison2679
Ай бұрын
😮Come out of your Cocooned WhatsApp knowledge WhatsApp Uncle 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
@@unison2679lmao it's a research paper work you can even get this information from Archives Government of India 🤣 illiterate like you always say that www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=cgijeddah.gov.in/web_files/267622636-History-of-Indian-Economy.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi0_c2W46aHAxXLlK8BHeUECWIQFnoECBYQBg&usg=AOvVaw0TjDKA_8XtTgcfqLfg2bhw
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
@@unison2679 haha that's also available on Archives of Government of India www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=cgijeddah.gov.in/web_files/267622636-History-of-Indian-Economy.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi0_c2W46aHAxXLlK8BHeUECWIQFnoECBYQBg&usg=AOvVaw0TjDKA_8XtTgcfqLfg2bhw how illiterate you are that you denying research papers on history of Indian economy
@_alok_vyas_
Ай бұрын
@@unison2679 haha! that's also available on Archives of Government of India www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=cgijeddah.gov.in/web_files/267622636-History-of-Indian-Economy.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi0_c2W46aHAxXLlK8BHeUECWIQFnoECBYQBg&usg=AOvVaw0TjDKA_8XtTgcfqLfg2bhw how illiterate you are that you denying research papers on history of Indian economy
@centristlibertarian
Ай бұрын
why wives can take maintenance but husbands can't? Isn't it directly voilates the constitutional right to equality? What if wife earns more than husband, does she still eligible to have maintenance?
@diwakarkumar1469
Ай бұрын
Historical, financial and social inequality is the answer but I agree judgment must be done on individual basis.
@nectorsnow34
Ай бұрын
You are right but Muslim women of India needs those rights first? Right now their marriage laws (Muslim laws through Sharia) prevents them from fighting for these rights.
@centristlibertarian
23 күн бұрын
@@nectorsnow34 I dont even undersatnd why can't we have uniform laws for all the religions. The law of the land should always be above these religious personal laws. When will this cancer of religion get cured.
Пікірлер: 69