Precise, and good professional information, but this assumes all athletes are weightlifters. Hence, not sure about the need of the complexity of the reasoning (i.e. standardising to the 2nd pull of the clean). If you do the test/drill to adhere to the specificity principle, no matter how you set up, just be consistent (for the test), and especially stick to the dynamic correspondence principle (for the exercise). If you alter the trunk/knee joint angles, and those satisfy the criteria of the DC in relation to a given sport movement, then fine all sorted without the need to look like the 2nd pull of the clean. The message perceived here could be that we should stick to the replication of 2nd pull of the clean regardless, why? If you are not a weightlifter, that standard position would be against the dynamic correspondence principle.
Пікірлер: 1