Forbidden Knowledge: kzitem.info/door/PLCucw_H-iOGFEDwvlH4wXZTL4sofh8_QY You could check out "The Circles of Hell & Their Prince" with that link 🤍
@Urfavigbo
3 ай бұрын
Christianity's issue with the gnostic view of sophia and gnosis is not that it challenges the authority of the Church. The Bible stresses wisdom and knowledge. There are 7 gifts of the spirit. 3 of them are wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. So the quest of knowledge is not the issue. The issue is when you forget that it was Jesus who saves you. His death on the cross. You instead believe that it was your own knowledge that saved you. That's self righteousness. You also ignored that the gospel of Mary was considered heretical not only because it presented different views but also cause it wasn't a first century book.
@TheinternetArchaeologist
3 ай бұрын
so cute that you think you're smart?But you don't even understand What the word heretical means it literally translates to abnormal I get it you're a narcissist and you want to feel like you have some special knowledge But this just makes you look like a jackass Two fragile to understand their just as ignorant as everyone else
@danielstecher5302
3 ай бұрын
You have to save your self; for the temple of god is within you(your mind) Luke 17:21 & Acts 17:24. Matthew 23:13, the church has blinded you and in John 10:33-36 further proves that the lack of knowledge that Christians have, will always make them look externally for a God when it is already embedded in them. THAT is why the church didn't like the gnostic and as to why the Pharisees didn't like Jesus as well. Stop taking the bible literally, it is a book of allegory, parables, mysticism and astrology that is beautifully written, you just don't see it Matthew 13:10-13. Have a blessed day
@aryanz66
3 ай бұрын
Thank you
@Urfavigbo
3 ай бұрын
@danielstecher5302 so you used the Bible, which btw speaks of a God in heaven to prove that there is no God in heaven and you expect to be taken seriously? Come on now. And astrology? Something that is expressely banned in the Bible itself.
@Urfavigbo
3 ай бұрын
@danielstecher5302 Christianity does not deny that the kingdom of God is in us. Or that God is in us and we in him. Because the Son is in the Father and the Father in the Son. And so by uniting ourselves with Christ, we may also be in the Father and the Father in us. What we do deny is that we are gods. We are not. We are simply his faithful.
@mizukarate
3 ай бұрын
I'm a big fan of The Kybalion.
@sexysputnik
3 ай бұрын
dork
@chriselliott4621
3 ай бұрын
That was very well done, short and sweet, yet explaining the base of these books/scripts in layman. Good work!
@Chikicus
3 ай бұрын
You know this entire video, every aspect is AI generated right
@duckdialectics8810
3 ай бұрын
One key piece of information is how the canon was put together. Basically, the Christian community of intellectuals and leaders put up criteria for fixing the canon, which means basically "texts that can be assumed authoritative by any Christian quoting to any Christian", and these criteria are: 1) texts that have always been believed 2) texts that have always been held public 3) texts that have always been believed everywhere. From these you can see that all mystery schools got excluded from the canon, because they had secret (non public) teachings (and because you can't have people just pulling new texts from under the couch and saying "here the true sayings of Jesus no one ever heard about, they are true!"). Gnosticism is a bad term, because it refers to a big set of movements and groups wide apart in time and space, but the main problem of Gnosticism was it being localized, it was never "mainstream globally", and it had a cosmology massively different from the indeed mainstream views. There you have it, not as romantic as it first appears, no big conspiracy, just librarians cataloguing libraries xD
@TheUnseenPath
3 ай бұрын
"Assumed" and "always been believed" two things that in modern day are big no nos xD.
@duckdialectics8810
3 ай бұрын
@@TheUnseenPath A pre-condition for having institutions is a shared set of assumptions and beliefs. If these be "no-nos" for the Modern World, then the Modern World will soon no longer have institutions. The Law of Causation is a merciless mistress.
@tim57243
3 ай бұрын
Another key piece of information is that substantial errors were made when deciding what to put into the canon. Many of the books allegedly written by Paul are forgeries. Daniel was not written by Daniel and was written centuries after it claims to have been written, so many of its alleged prophecies are actually history. Daniel's prophecies after 164BC or so are substantially wrong, so it was written around then, despite it claiming to have been written by Daniel around 600BC.
@duckdialectics8810
3 ай бұрын
@@tim57243 There are a couple of problems with that line of reasoning. First, what you wrote has no relationship whatsoever with the 3 criteria I listed. Supposing that the individual called Paul didn't write Hebrews, for example, what connection does that have with Hebrews being believed authoritative everywhere, publicly, since the begining? Secondly, those problems are mostly an issue of anachronism. You are taking the concept "authorship" for granted based on current notions, when authorship conceptions varied across time. There is a lot of commentary on that, but, trying to summarize, pre-industrial authorship was more related to doctrine than "who literally wrote the text", specially when considering near universal illiteracy and oral transmission. So, for example, "Homer" is more of mnemonic anchor for a tradition than an individual man. There is a lot you get wrong about ancient literature without that kind of angle. About Paul's letters specifically, consensus offers two most probably links between what seems to be "literally written by the individual Paul" and what doesn't 1) someone preserved in writing what they heard recited of a teaching of Paul, to further transmit it. This is very relevant since Christians texts were consistently suppressed for a couple of centuries, and writing was monstrously expensive 2) texts of adequate doctrine and rhetorical weight, recognized as authoritative for their content, were signed as the figure mostly associated with them as to protect the "literal author". Since it was a persecuted movement, using the alias (with their sanction and the sanction of the broader community) of an already marked public figure prevented direct persecution. This seems to be the case with Hebrews, which seems to have been written by Priscilla, wife of Aquila, both close friends to Paul, she was known to be very devout and highly talented. Paul only lent broader circulation to the letter by signing, and concentrating the death mark on himself alone was beneficial for all involved. Similar dynamics still exist today, for example, an Editor being the only name in a book's cover. Or a political figure commissioning, curating, then signing a political text aligned with himself, but written by a ghost writer. Big mistake approaching pre-industrial literature with post-indistrial eyes
@tim57243
3 ай бұрын
@@duckdialectics8810 The forgeries in the Bible are key information because people use the Bible as an authority. Accepting argument from authority from someone who lies about who they are is an obvious mistake, because then you are letting anonymous liars give you beliefs and orders you will accept. Notably 2 Th 1 8-10, in which it is stated that those who do not obey the Gospel will be "punished with everlasting destruction". It wasn't a response to your post beyond being key information. You offered unsolicited key information, so I can too.
@Leo-wy1by
2 ай бұрын
I love how confident Christians sound when calling other gospels “non-canonical” yet it took 300+ years to standardise the texts & make a canon. And even then the 4th century canon doesn’t align with today’s since Codex Sinaiticus has books not a single Christian believes in and on top of that even today’s Christian’s can’t agree on the canon.
@brandonbee3956
2 ай бұрын
Very reliving to read this educated comment after seeing some of the others on here.
@dustinhellstern7728
2 ай бұрын
EVERYTHING YOU, Yourself, “Know” about Alexander The Great….came about 250 years AFTER he died, & also that long to compile+Standardize so you’ll have to start by claiming EVERYTHING about him, iS JUST AS Sketchy as The Synoptic Gospels are…
@Hysterically_Accurate
Ай бұрын
Yeah, it’s kind of hard to do things like that when you’re being hunted down by the state and thrown to lions for entertainment. This is what Sacred Tradition was for, keep everything aligned until the time came that we could collect the best liturgical texts the church was using and compile them into a single codex. The reason none of these made it in was because they couldn’t have their authorship confirmed, were written centuries after the other gospels, or just flat out contradicted what was written in the gospels and letters that they could affirm. Regarding the current canon disputes, blame Luther. Every church that can trace themselves back to the apostles has the deuterocanon.
@michaelfisher7170
2 ай бұрын
Readings are considered heretical, dangerous, or forbidden for the simple reason that someone somewhere feels their power, authority, and money are threatened by them.
@jameswluby203
Ай бұрын
Other than the art and voice over, what other components of the video are produced with AI? Is the script also written by AI?
@Martianmckay42
2 ай бұрын
Seems all the books taken out were about inner knowledge.. can't have a bunch of people thinking for themselves now can they?
@krazykoolkat5231
2 ай бұрын
?????
@brendansunra
2 ай бұрын
Gnostics were a curious bunch. According to some theologians/historians, Gnosticism was a syncretic movement attempting to blend early Christianity with the mystery cults found throughout the Roman Empire.
@Martianmckay42
2 ай бұрын
Idk about that.. Plato was breaking people's brains a little before that.. and that word "cult" is unnecessary. The mystery sects would be more appropriate to call them.. to this day, it's referred to as esoteric teachings.. or OCcult studies.. and calling any of that a "cult" is why 98% of the planet thinks freemason's are evil and think elites kill babies for adrenochrome 🤦 back up and do your research WITHOUT any predispositions it seems you already have 😉
@Hysterically_Accurate
Ай бұрын
It’s less “think for yourself” and more “become your own god” Now who else do we know of, that tried to get people to worship himself over God…
@Mrhmm-S
27 күн бұрын
I mean, if the spirit of god is in us, why not, since technically that makes us God. God is omnipresent in the bible, that means he's everywhere, and it says he lives within us. So doesn't that mean he's just us? And we are him.
@maxopaladino
3 ай бұрын
The Book of Satan reminds a lot of modern atheism
@RobDaCajun
2 ай бұрын
Because that’s what it is. Most Satanists are just “edgy atheists”. They just want to flaunt the rules of “the sheep” to their faces. As William S Burroughs wrote in Naked Lunch. “Nothing is true, and everything is permitted.” Unfortunately, this religion and atheism in general is having devastating effects on our civilization.
@mariaaaa1128
2 ай бұрын
That makes sense
@kyleway8513
2 ай бұрын
LaVey was an atheist and the religion he founded does not believe in a literal god or devil at all. The Satanic Bible essentially consists of his understanding of esoterica, as well as his philosophy for decent living outside of theism. Some accuse him of being a grifter who preys upon the religiously frustrated, and its possible that he fits that mold.
@kyleway8513
2 ай бұрын
LaVey was an atheist and the religion he founded does not believe in a literal god or devil at all. The Satanic Bible essentially consists of his understanding of esoterica, as well as his philosophy for decent living outside of theism. Some accuse him of being a grifter who preys upon the religiously frustrated, and its possible that he fits that mold.
@Xyxle410
Ай бұрын
They're the same thing they are just mean about it
@sideshow5X
Ай бұрын
I noticed the books of zohar didn't make the list
@TH3FALS3PROPH3T
3 ай бұрын
I love this rapid fire style. Outlines key points and nothing more
@shanekc3502
2 ай бұрын
Because it’s ai
@ShelJones
3 ай бұрын
Rasta no satanist!!
@3sotericCompassionist1976
2 ай бұрын
All praises to the most high *Iyesus Kristos Haile Selassie I Jah Rastafari*
@alexhale6582
Ай бұрын
Ok so my mushroom trip was right, we make hell and heaven based upon our actions.
@Psychosis1179
2 ай бұрын
Gnosticism “Gospel of Thomas” This fantasy book is a collection of 114 sayings that are supposedly attributed to Christ. Some of the statements are paraphrased references from the four canonical Gospels, while the rest are esoteric (Gnostic) in nature. The book was discovered in 1945 near Nag Hammadi, in a cache with other Gnostic texts. To summarize the content of the Gospel of Thomas; it focuses on mystical knowledge and inner enlightenment. The Gnostics responsible for this abomination are the Naassenes. They, like later Gnostics, exhibited a syncretism of Jewish and Greco-Roman influences. In which, believing that the divine had made salvation possible through hidden knowledge rather than Grace by Faith, through Christ. Figures The Naassenes revered the serpent in the Garden as a symbol of divine knowledge and enlightenment. They believed that the impartiality of knowledge unto mankind was just, and as such, liberated humanity from the ignorance imposed by God. Moreover, they worshiped the Serpent for its wisdom. However, this entire view is contrary to the biblical interpretation. The Serpent represents Satan and the origin of sin. Barbelo to the Naassenes was the primordial emanation(figuratively the Devine Mother) of the unknowable and transcendent god, sometimes referred to as the “first thought” or “pronoia” (forethought). Barbelo represents the divine feminine principle and the importation of Wisdom to seekers. She is seen as the mother of all subsequent emanations (aeons). She serves as the consort of the supreme god, and through their union, the spiritual universe (pleroma) came into being. Adam Kadmon is a concept derived from jewish mysticism; specifically Kabbalistic Judaism. To the Naassenes, Kadmon was the primordial man(universal prototype) whom represents all the future forms and states of humanity within him. It’s said that his pure knowledge had been handed down to those who sought it. Kadon acts as a guidance to seekers and bestows gnosis. This belief is pantheistic or panentheistic. Both of which are condemned in Christianity. Sophia to the Naassenes parallels Satan in many aspects. Sophia is both Light(Wisdom) and Corrupt(the Fall and Material World). Her ignorance created the Demiurge and thus, the material world. Furthermore, because of her actions, Sophia is the universal symbol for gnosis and the guide for all who wish to be saved. The Demiurge is in many ways the incarnation of Satan. He is ignorant of the higher divine realm (the Plērōma) and believes himself to be the supreme god. Unlike Satan, the Demiurge is unaware of his origins. Furthermore, he is the creator of the Material World and is referred to as the god of the Old Testament. Gnostics Christ The Naassenes saw Christ as a manifestation of a higher, divine principle. Christ was a pre-existent being whom descended into the material world to bring saving Gnosis to humanity. Like Christianity, Christ to the Naassenes was dual natured, but unbalanced in proportions. To them, he was more divine than man, but a created being. “These [Naassenes] have a novel opinion regarding the blessed nature, and a unique conception of the ineffable places, [and] they have also songs to the epitome of that which ‘is unutterable.’ They call this mystery profound and ineffable silence and they say that it surpasses every being that is known and is concentrated in one single existence, to which they have given the name of 'the man(Christ)' (perfect or complete)”(Hippolytus of Rome,"Refutation of All Heresies, Book 5, Chapter 6). "They call this ineffable principle the Jordan, and they say that it is conjoined in the system of all things with the third (principle) [then they say that they were famous] for causing that 'the man among them(Christ),' the renowned (one), declared (Him) to be progenitor(decadent)”(Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies, Book 5, Chapter 7). “They [the Naassenes] maintain that first of all a perfect spiritual being was produced by the invisible and unnameable Dennis, whom they speak of as ‘Jordan.’ And that this being is called by them ‘Man,’ symbolizing him according to their fashion, as they think proper. From whom, they say, other likenesses and unions... sprang from him, by contemplation, just as we have already remarked about the power within the pleroma. These emanations, as being likened to Christ... those which are known as essentially existing within, became one as an assembly to which nothing is wanting”(Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 1, Chapter 30, Paragraph 5).
@BrielleMyers-v8c
23 күн бұрын
The secrets of John, So this is where Phillip Pullman got his inspiration for the "his dark materials" series. You know, the Golden Compass book?
@kek105
2 ай бұрын
Hermetic Chads unite
@Josiahministrie
2 ай бұрын
Christ is king 👑 Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess that HE☝🏾is Lord Peace and blessings
@eclat4641
2 ай бұрын
Conservatives sound like they dont like most things lol
@DivoGo
Ай бұрын
I have read The Gospel of Mary Magdalene by Leloup. Talk about being set free!❤
@LiamMacD
2 ай бұрын
I actually Own a Copy of the Book of Shadows. Very interesting book.👏🏻
@timmy18135
3 ай бұрын
You left out thunder, perfect mind
@Hope_Fiend
3 ай бұрын
The Nag Hammadi Library contained 52 separate works. Out of the other 46 that aren't in this video why do you specifically mentioned Thunder Perfect Mind? I would argue that compared to shit like the Apocryphon of John & Pistis Sophia etc are substantially more "dangerous" than a poem about the nature of duality and the existence of divinity within and outside ourselves. Or are you jus name dropping a random text 🤔🤔🤔 LOL
@SuperChimcham
2 ай бұрын
People worship the Bible not Jesus
@ianjohnston379
3 ай бұрын
was the trump insert really necessary? could have put biden in there looking confused and it would have been more poignant.
@metal.strawe
2 ай бұрын
using "everywhere at the end of time" as the background music made me happy
@thewisecraker8727
3 ай бұрын
This is a very poor understanding of the gnostic texts and early orthodoxy and even the overall concept of heresy. You can tell the creator only sourced modern interpretations like manly p hall, and other “pop occult” authors and the likes not any church fathers or 1st century sources I urge veiwers to explore the truth behind these topics
@duckdialectics8810
3 ай бұрын
I tried to point out as much. The video is more than a little shallow and biased.
@chiefgully9353
3 ай бұрын
As some one who does explore the esoteric of judism and Christianity. The things he said are in line with both church and non church scholars. Like wise the use of heretical is as defined by the word. Esentialy everything you said does not coincide with scholars from the secular, Christian, or Jewish camps about these topics. And your quip only illuminates your lack of understanding of heretical not the authors.
@thewisecraker8727
3 ай бұрын
@@chiefgully9353 what church, secular, and Jewish scholars are you referring to,and please reference and site the sources you speak of so I can further educate my limited knowledge.
@PariahPsypomp6775
3 ай бұрын
"pop occult" mad because the Church doesn't have a monopoly on knowledge and information anymore. May the new aeon wash over us all!
@Hope_Fiend
3 ай бұрын
Quit choking on Irenaeus's dick for a second, Manly P Hall was a quack and is completely irrelevant to this dude reading Wikipedia articles about these documents. And anyways, we found 3 copies of the Apocryphon of John in the Nag Hammadi and a 4th in the Berlin Codex. In some instances we have only 1 primary source copy of a few of the "canon' books of the Bible. This suggests that the Apocryphon of John was rather popular amongst the common folk before the authoritative church snuffed it out. In the early years of Christianity tpeople followed Sabellianism, Docetism, Monophysitism, Adoptionism, Nestorianism, Apollinarianism, Arianism, Socianism, Donatism, Pelagianism, Manicheanism, Bogolism, and many more. None of these were considered heretical until they were retroactively declared to be by the 'Church' AUTHORITY. Have you never heard the phrase "history is written by the victors"? Why are you so desperate to follow the dogma of a group of men who clearly cherry picked bits of pieces of the faith that allowed them to preach a doctrine that would frighten people into fearing a divine omnipotentence helming a cosmic panopticon who will smite people and damn them to burn in eternal hellfire for thought-crime? Did you know that there is absolutely zero mention or even suggestion that the serpent in the garden was Satan? Go crack open your Bible and tell me how many times Satan / The Devil is mentioned directly, and in those instances, what is he described to be doing? You will discover that the "Devil" that pervades in the minds of every modern Christian is an entirely separate fictional construct that not only was used to ensure thr impoverished and subservient class remain obedient and keep in line in order to fuel the lavish lifestyles of the clergy and their financiers, the Devil has cloven hoofs because the "Church" took the Hellenic portrayal of the greek God Pan, a creature known as a Satyr, And applied "evil" connotations to Pagan ideas to help accelerate the conversation of "pagans"/non-christians into chattel, sorry excuse me, into Christians. If the Devil is a construct used as a tool, what else was made up for nefarious purposes? Did you know that the Orthodox Church considers Roman-Catholicism to be straight up Heretical? Not schismatic, Heretical. The first true Christians saw the actual human being that was Jesus as a shining paragon of virtue and an example to follow. This was a man who from only the kindness of his heart acted selflessly in a dog eat dog world. He did these things not to be rewarded by going to heaven, or out of fear of a celestial prison warden ready to throw you into a flaming pit for rubbing one out, he did them because it was the right thing to do. And that energy came from within himself. "the Kingdom of God is within you" How in the world are you able to see that and label that as wrong or call it "heretical"? Let me gently repeat myself so you may better understand, quit blowbanging Iraeneus and the rest of the wealthy charlatans who hijacked Christ's message and corrupted it into the abusive fist of tyranny that is the "Church", drink some water so you can wash all that nut out of your mouth and wake up and realize the only person who can determine if your relationship with God / Jesus is valid, real, and true is yourself. Unless you like choking on old Bishop dick, if so keep doing you
@thesnuggler9606
3 ай бұрын
I like that you used "Everywhere At The End Of Time" for your background music.
@RogerTheil
3 ай бұрын
Ah, that's where I've heard it before
@WolfHeadedDragonQueen
3 ай бұрын
I love that you named it for me so I can put it on my jukebox - thank you.
@thesnuggler9606
3 ай бұрын
@@WolfHeadedDragonQueen You're welcome. The entire song is over 8 hours long. It's an art piece that's meant to show what it's like to have dementia or Alzheimer's. The artist is "The Caretaker".
@thesnuggler9606
3 ай бұрын
@@RogerTheil Yep. The Caretaker (the artist) will never let Ballroom music die.
@prettypinkbunnies44
Ай бұрын
It reminds me of the poppy playtime music.
@dennissalinas704
3 ай бұрын
Nothing is forbidden from the sun and the moon, only those that wish to remain empty vessels are forbidden to enter. 😅
@taitasutomoushimasu
3 ай бұрын
Whoa bro, you dropped your fedora
@dennissalinas704
3 ай бұрын
@@taitasutomoushimasu Constantly blown by the wind 😂
@connorohare229
3 ай бұрын
There is such a thing as info hazards where they will sound benign and reasonable on step one, but if you follow them to their logical conclusions, you and the people in them will die. Gnosticism claims that all material reality is bad and the purely spiritual is good. If you stop and think about it for a moment, it's literally saying that God, who made us in His Image is bad while the purely spiritual rebel is good. You, as an Image of God are being tempted by a seductive cosmic predator that hates you for existing and wants your death and destruction as the sadistic end. The Council of Nicaea were doing the will of God throwing out those counterfeit gospels versus the real one which states that only by faith in Jesus Christ will eternal life be achieved back to the Father, that Heaven and Earth(material reality) will join together in union. So no Gnosticism is cringe and delusional.
@ianharper3213
3 ай бұрын
and nothing is made new under the sun...
@johnalexir7634
2 ай бұрын
The Old Testament is in many places a truly horrible book if you actually read it. People only defend it because of the religious programing they've received, which produces a buffer of cognitive dissonance.
@Chaoxianghuang
2 ай бұрын
U know nothing
@johnalexir7634
2 ай бұрын
@@Chaoxianghuang What a compelling argument you raise, good job! There's the programming in action.
@Chaoxianghuang
2 ай бұрын
@@johnalexir7634 Psalm and the book of proverbs are great books
@Chaoxianghuang
2 ай бұрын
@@johnalexir7634 you probably just don't like em because There harder to read because there old books.
@johnalexir7634
2 ай бұрын
@@Chaoxianghuang I've read it many times. Yes there is some wisdom for sure. I was referring more to the ugly stuff, condoning slavery, commanding genocide, and many horrible stories if you were to read them more as if they were a newspaper than a religious book. These are the things believers try - and fail - to explain or defend successfully.
@Personallibraryofwisdom
2 ай бұрын
“Dangerous”
@gianpaulgraziosi6171
2 ай бұрын
You forgot Pistis Sophia.
@Hacktheplanet422
2 ай бұрын
♥
@Brucec-x6r
3 ай бұрын
Like a game of chess.both sides make up one game.
@sebastianstroescu1834
3 ай бұрын
🔥
@chessdancer
2 ай бұрын
Gotta love how over half of these are Gnostic scriptures
@denpabacon8501
3 ай бұрын
I've always liked the Gospel of Thomas.
@talkmone
3 ай бұрын
A wealth of wisdom
@Psychosis1179
2 ай бұрын
It’s Gnostic. Just read the first verse. It contradicts Christ
@denpabacon8501
2 ай бұрын
@@Psychosis1179 That's why I like it, I didn't read non-canonical religious texts to reaffirm orthodox beliefs.
@Psychosis1179
2 ай бұрын
@@denpabacon8501 hidden knowledge doesn’t save you, the Grace of God by Faith in Christ does
@denpabacon8501
2 ай бұрын
@@Psychosis1179 I'm not looking to be "saved" by adhering to a Canon decided by people, I trust in the divine to resonate within me when I find truth, and there is divine truth in some of these documents. There can be guidance and divine truth in many things outside of a single book. It actually might be more accurate to say that these divine concepts and ideas exist outside of our own material reality manifesting themselves in infinite ways, and I have faith our creator instilled us with the ability to recognize this process. Both you and I have the same capability to recognize this just as much as the original deciples did, so it's not really "me" deciding what is spiritual truth but the capability "God" has instilled in all of us, well those of us blessed to have a sentient mind. Whether or not you live up to these ideals is the hard part. Something I noticed reading this comment section is people using their religion and ideology for spiritual vanity and moral superiority rather than spreading wisdom to provide meaningful utility and purpose. Fanatics who take the literal interpretations of words to reign over their fellow man than to lift their own people up. You're talking to the wrong person here, I don't have much faith in a religous ideology with semet!k roots. Not that there isn't divine truth or providence in the Bible but many things can exhibit this form. As soon as the knowledge/ideas/proponents of "God" are translated into a language for us to interpret and understand it carries an element of man within it. The medium possesses a potential for deviation or from its original purely divine source. That's why I always exercise a form of skepticism in anything I read, regardless if it's a non-canonical scripture or the Bible itself. That's how I can parse out the falsities in the Bible like the Earth only being 6/8 thousand years old, or all the other contradictions and untruth contained within it.
@shelleyswift5687
3 ай бұрын
This "toon" is just what I needed today! Informative and funny, I can totally relate better to Jesus with glasses! Great job!
@Toonexplainer_
3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much I really appreciate it 😁😁🤍
@jaredcarlsonripple6692
3 ай бұрын
great video honestly keep this up thank you
@MR-jg8ip
3 ай бұрын
I can’t wait to check these out ❤
@matthewklahn3204
3 ай бұрын
Gnosticism wasn't heretical with early church leaders, until it was. Valentinus was almost pope. It was pretty mainstream at one time.
@onionsans
3 ай бұрын
Heresy is and is always heresy. The church just had to drive it out
@matthewklahn3204
2 ай бұрын
@@onionsans it WAS the church. I think you are confusing me trying to make sense of Christ's word, meeting and figuring it out. Each disciple had their own message and it's important to study and figure out why. Valentus was no heretic, but as the Lord said to Peter what is bound on earth shall be bound in heaven. Let's not forget that the entirety of Protestantism views the Church as heresy. Mark 9:38-40 Find your views inside and do not judge others. He who calls on the name of the Christ is not our enemy, my brother in Christ.
@onionsans
2 ай бұрын
@@matthewklahn3204 1. The apostles all agreed with each other. Some even include lines in their letters directly calling out bad beliefs of Gnosticism. Also, Gnosticism wasn't "the church", the church isn't some visible institution that blatant false Christianity can exist in. 2. The *Catholic* church, and it's not that the entire catholic church is heresy, it's still considered borderline Christianity, but Catholicism commits many heresies directly argued against in the scriptures, and is too wrapped up in tradition to realize that Jesus hated tradition. 3. Mark 9:38-40 doesn't support Gnosticism, since Gnosticism discredits Jesus, therefore is against Jesus.
@matthewklahn3204
2 ай бұрын
@@onionsans Paul and Peter in Antioch, Paul and Barnabas about Paul Mark. You are just a bit incorrect and it's understandable how broad the proto-church is. Gnosticism does not, in any way, discredit Jesus. The term is too broad to use in the way we are for this discussion as there are many Gnostics who hold the material to be evil which is antithetical to the Great Plan. Do not forget, until the first council of Nicea we did not even agree if Jesus walked in the flesh or the nature of Jesus the Nazarene and Christ the Messiah. Calling the Catholic church heretical is against the scriptures, as I referenced earlier. Matthew 16:19 "I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven" Focus on your heart, the kingdom is inside. And Jesus the Nazarene came to break the shackles of man made dogma and religion. Bless you and keep up the good fight. I have no qualm with you frater. Edit: The heresy you see within the Catholic Church may be a misunderstanding of what they are doing. For instance, they do not pray to Mary but behoove her to pray for us sinners as an active member in the body of Christ, through Christ.
@onionsans
2 ай бұрын
@@matthewklahn3204 1. The Gnostics discredit Jesus as God, and is therefore against him. 2. You misunderstand. The Council of Nicaea wasn't some thing where a bunch of people studied the bible. No, they were solidifying the beliefs of the church. Also the Gospels include the first Christian creed, which is that Jesus is God. 3. Matthew 16:19 does not support apostolic succession or the authority of the church in any way. 4. They pray to Mary. They pray for Mary to pray on their behalf because they think Mary is some kind of God. They believe Mary has sway over Jesus. Jesus is God. They believe that Mary has sway over God. Have fun with that. They also believe that Mary was eternally a virgin and that she never sinned, which is absolutely and completely provably false based on the words of Jesus and the Apostles. So yes, the Catholic church is heretical.
@MuhammaddAlaa
2 ай бұрын
Islam doesn't have any problem with mysticism, occultism nor esotericism, unless we're talking about magic, atheistic beliefs or any other belief in any god other than Allah.
@DavidStyles-p5l
2 ай бұрын
Jesus was healing people walking water turn a piece of fish to feed thousand turn water to wine and you saying and you saying he ain't doing magic he was doing miracles
@elenafelix9839
Ай бұрын
Love the content hate the background music
@John-el.
2 ай бұрын
Hmmmm it seems that the most dangerous is missing....
@Brucec-x6r
3 ай бұрын
All convincing evidence of both sides of any debate all one with the dreamstate
@olajuwonerinkitola6028
2 ай бұрын
At 5:32 I think u were trying to say indulgence?
@Brucec-x6r
3 ай бұрын
All one with the dream of this world.
@astrologikalmusic
3 ай бұрын
Awesome video, very clear and detailed explanations. You earned my like and sub!
@eclat4641
2 ай бұрын
Well that one sounds more inline 1:10
@chuck9112
3 ай бұрын
Why is this dangerous?
@colinwaller3792
3 ай бұрын
Heretical is more appropriate, contrary
@Dovahkiin0117
3 ай бұрын
@@colinwaller3792ya which would get ya burned/stoned back in the day Hence dangerous
@zxylo786
2 ай бұрын
@@colinwaller3792And what is heretical? What is classified as heretical? Who says its heretical?
@michaelfisher7170
2 ай бұрын
once someone somewhere felt that these books threatened their personal authority, their influence, or their money. that's why its "dangerous".
@generalyousif3640
2 ай бұрын
@@zxylo786 The church of God that Is established by Christ and lead by the Holy Spirit
@uranium2383
3 ай бұрын
238 Just gave you that 1k 🔥
@Toonexplainer_
3 ай бұрын
Frrrr tho I'm so happy😭 Thank you so much man 🤍🙏
@0xPRIMEgs
3 ай бұрын
...Is there audio?
@Cletus9
3 ай бұрын
You can turn on captions or braille in the options
@FindtheShrooms
3 ай бұрын
Why make the video political?
@williammcmurter7757
3 ай бұрын
Because he felt like it. Its his video not yours, don't like it move on. Thats Freedom bitch.
@mostshenanigans
3 ай бұрын
When one side of the politics is trying very hard to shut down some contents, the very action of mentioning these contents is inherently political.
@FindtheShrooms
3 ай бұрын
@@mostshenanigans Got it you're a political channel. I'll stay away. Have a good day.
@chriselliott4621
3 ай бұрын
Most humans who need to find their eternal soul inside themselves; have forfeited that experience by focusing on the external/temporary existence and getting caught up in politics to appoint random people to lead their external lives.. The answer is always inside the chest (heart/treasure chest), not outside of it. To find the key, is to find your internal nature, thus unlocking the path to the eternal kingdom. You are a spirit in a body; the spirit is eternal/forever, the body is temporary/limited. If you choose the body over seeking your spirit-nature, you have forfeited the search for the keys to unlock who you really are.
@onionsans
3 ай бұрын
@@chriselliott4621 tf you on abt
@TahoeJones
3 ай бұрын
The complete list of ignorant superstition.
@michaelfisher7170
2 ай бұрын
would include the bible, torah, and quran. and every other "holy" book ever composed.
@TahoeJones
2 ай бұрын
@@michaelfisher7170 Absolutely. Superstition is easy to spot. A belief with no proof. Hand me down Campfire stories.
Пікірлер: 259