Regarding the video quality, yes KZitem & Facebook both butchered it. The original file I uploaded can be downloaded here: www.haku.co.uk/video/First_Byte.mp4 (211mb) And a 30 second DVR clip (no re-encoding done to it) from the first flight: www.haku.co.uk/video/First_Byte_sample.mpeg (61mb) Some observed comparisons of megabytes/second compression levels: 1.67 MB/s = Average of 3 DVR files (12m10s, 1217MB of files) 0.82 MB/s = Final encode with music (4m16s, 211MB file) 0.40 MB/s = Video downloaded from KZitem (4m16s, 102MB file) 0.48 MB/s = Video downloaded from Facebook (4m16s, 124MB file) The difference does look stark between the DVR recording and the other encodes, but remember that KZitem, Facebook and my encodes are compressed with mpeg4 whilst the DVR records in mpeg2.
@DanielSingerX
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome flight! I'm loving my shark byte sooooo much!!!!
@Mr18031967
3 жыл бұрын
the sharkbite looks good bro i think im now ready to go over to it im going to order it tonight ill not go dji as i dont like what they stand for plus im running a new pair of orcas i got for xmas plus my racing thanks for this bro have fun
@ripperfpv9880
3 жыл бұрын
On one antenna pretty impressive I would say
@MCsCreations
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome flying, dude!!! 😃 Shark Byte doesn't seem as natural as DJI, but it's not bad at all! Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
It's probably because of the wide dynamic range setting in the camera is on, makes it so much easier to see to fly in low winter sun like this, lots of other cameras show bright sky and dark ground.
@stevefox3763
3 жыл бұрын
Everyone is going digital now, its great that there are options other than the Evil DJI. I have an Open HD setup here and have built a 450 quad round it on 5.8ghz and a Plane on 2.4ghz, both can do 1080p and im looking forward to the first test flights which haven't happened yet but are imminent but wanted to integrate analogue 5.8 video and a tracker into the same ground setup first :)
@SwAkoFPV
3 жыл бұрын
Smooth ! 🔥
@johnk8825
3 жыл бұрын
Your comments below about getting distracted looking around the video screen say a lot in themselves. Thanks for this.
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
It made me so glad I researched and bought my HD2's four years ago now, I love the 50 degrees field of view and I can continue using them for years to come :)
@mehulanand8623
3 жыл бұрын
In my opinion shark byte is completely worth it Less latency, no locking into its ecosystem, U can even use non fatshark goggles, Though i didn't check if the vtx is cheaper than DJI or not Personally I like that it doesn't prioritise quality over latency
@medrone7097
3 жыл бұрын
Looks good.This convinced me to keep it in the running for whenever I digitise.
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
The image quality is great, check my pinned comment because I put the file I uploaded to KZitem on my website for download, it's twice the filesize of what KZitem serves...!
@GhostRyderFPV
3 жыл бұрын
Question my dude - did the DVR or KZitem bork the quality compared to what you saw under the hood, or is this pretty close to the quality you saw?
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
Good question, it's very clear in the goggles so any degradation is a combination of the re-encoding I had to do to splice the clips together and KZitem's encoding. I should have upscaled it to 1080p before uploading to help maintain quality. Here's an untouched clip (not re-encoded) from the first recording of the first bit of this video if you're curious. www.haku.co.uk/video/First_Byte_sample.mpeg (61mb, 30 seconds long, it originally had a .TS extension but had to rename to .mpeg to make it downloadable, it's mpeg2 format) One other thing is that the camera was set to 50fps, I'll be making sure mine are set to 60fps for smooth playback. It was perfectly smooth in the goggles at 50fps, just that most computing displays are 60hz so 60fps footage looks better.
@steve_beatty
3 жыл бұрын
YT craps on everything...I uploaded a Shark Byte video at 1080p 60 fps and it looked nothing like my goggle view or original file and they even changed the codec on me ffs...lol..I think 4k uploads needed for anything you want honest video quality critique on......lol..🙄
@chibikaiju922
3 жыл бұрын
Nice! Shark Byte is looking more and more appealing everyday. Sweet spot to fly and I noticed nearly zero breakup! Have you tried any range testing? Love my HD3s and was sad to imagine retiring them for dji...I think I might have to go shark byte!
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
You want to know something funny? I grabbed two random circular polarized antennas out of my collection to put on top of the Shark Byte receiver and only when I came to take them off after flying did I discover one of them was RP-SMA, it didn't have the pin so wasn't actually being used! I was flying a friends craft since I don't have any cameras or VTX's yet to put on mine, they've been ordered and will arrive next week, hope to do a lot more flying with it, including range testing.
@chibikaiju922
3 жыл бұрын
@@licensetodrive9930 haha darn rp-sma/sma connectors, now Im really impressed! Looking forward to more shark byte vids. subbed :)
@Bigbeardfpv
3 жыл бұрын
what are your honest thoughts on sharkbyte vs traditional analog? I know DJI image quality is better, but I'm more interested in your flying experience.
@dauntlessfpv
3 жыл бұрын
(jaws theme)
@dauntlessfpv
3 жыл бұрын
youtube got rid of my asteriskes
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
@@dauntlessfpv I think KZitem makes words bold in comments when you put an asterisk either side of it.
@dauntlessfpv
3 жыл бұрын
@@licensetodrive9930 huh, nice video! certainly looks better than analog.
@licensetodrive9930
3 жыл бұрын
@@dauntlessfpv It's worth the cost, for a few moments during the flights I caught myself looking round the picture at the detail of everything rather than concentrating on where I was going.
@dauntlessfpv
3 жыл бұрын
@@licensetodrive9930 thats a good sign for the image quality
Пікірлер: 27