Here I am, thinking they just put a fan in front of their car and look how the air moves...
@malikemad4
3 жыл бұрын
Fan spin , wind go woosh
@McPlayer8t
3 жыл бұрын
I mean in simple terms, that’s exactly right.
@guardrailhitter
3 жыл бұрын
@@malikemad4 yea, science!
@dand1585
3 жыл бұрын
They stick pieces of yarn to the body with masking tape to REALLY see the air, you know?
@SimRacingVeteran
3 жыл бұрын
@@dand1585 🤣
@vale.antoni
3 жыл бұрын
2:22 Oops. You have summoned Dustin from Smarter Everyday
@EmeraldMack992
3 жыл бұрын
Destin. Or Dusty if you are Stuff Made Here.
@vernement4752
3 жыл бұрын
@@EmeraldMack992 I don't why I just knew these two parts of youtube were connected by a lot of other people
@AuroraAce.
3 жыл бұрын
@@RandomGuy-ol6wi yea, I don't even watch F1 or like it yet I watch all of chain bears videos
@bhatkrishnakishor
3 жыл бұрын
😂
@deeznoots6241
3 жыл бұрын
Wind goes in, wind goes out. Nobody can explain that
@FerreiraSP_
3 жыл бұрын
Wind goes BRRRRRRRRR
@michelemariotti8198
3 жыл бұрын
Finally we have a Ferrari engineer on the channel!
@deeznoots6241
3 жыл бұрын
@@michelemariotti8198 can confirm, as a Ferrari Engineer i make sure we get as much wind into our car as possible, that way we get more wind out to produce more speed.
@TestarossaF110
3 жыл бұрын
@@deeznoots6241 wind = energy and energy = POWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! So yes I understand why Ferrari need you. Good job, keep at it!
@that.guy11
3 жыл бұрын
Chickens go in, pies come out
@christiancandler5988
3 жыл бұрын
Interviewer: "What makes you qualified to be an aerodynamicist for our f1 team?" Me: "I've watched all of chainbears videos and read Adrian Newey's autobiography" F1 team: "you're hired!"
@marcocarpanese5519
3 жыл бұрын
As a first year student in Aero Engineering who is yet to study anything that isn't calculus, this is oddly specific.
@sunnohh
3 жыл бұрын
Said Ferrari
@SamDixon3244
3 жыл бұрын
That's literally me 🤣
@satyris410
3 жыл бұрын
Well I watched a documentary about Williams from the early 80s with Ross Brawn as their aerodynamicist as well!
@jackn36
3 жыл бұрын
Having been doing this and just applied to F1 teams I wish this were true 😂
@Atty1997
3 жыл бұрын
I discovered this channel like 2 days ago and since then I have literally been doing nothing but binge watching your videos, it's like sooo addicting
@thesnitch7
3 жыл бұрын
like, that's like, awesome, like like like
@reisanibal1
3 жыл бұрын
I know the feeling 😉
@benevery
3 жыл бұрын
relatable
@aidenarmstrong2863
3 жыл бұрын
One thing I’ve learned about this channel is that even if a topic doesn’t seem interesting, he finds a way to make it interesting by diving into it
@engineergaming4295
3 жыл бұрын
@@thesnitch7 you sound like a Californian
@garf117
3 жыл бұрын
Video about laminar flow??? Someone call Destin from @smartereveryday.
@auronapi
3 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad I wasn't the only one who thought of Destin when he said laminar flow
@manuelroza12
3 жыл бұрын
simple: just throw some air onto those cars
@rishi0299
3 жыл бұрын
how hard can that be!
@antonydigerlando5195
3 жыл бұрын
@@rishi0299 you want the long answer 😂? Well... you have the boundary layer, flow speed, viscosity, cables, lengths, model sizes and how that affects what you’re testing, closed test sections, opened sections, jet types, fans, power... And more 💀
@johanpacheco22
3 жыл бұрын
@@antonydigerlando5195 fluid dymamics is oh so cool and oh so difficult
@antonydigerlando5195
3 жыл бұрын
@@johanpacheco22 read a textbook on some of it... it’s interested but very hard 😂
@rishi0299
3 жыл бұрын
@@antonydigerlando5195 I'm just joking around 😂
@LatiosBlade
3 жыл бұрын
Ferrari: "SOMEBODY WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN!"
@bond007rules
3 жыл бұрын
Everyone else: wind tunnels Me: ooh he's got a SM58
@ThatBeTheQuestion
3 жыл бұрын
How can you tell it's an SM58 specifically? I'd think if most people are going to do voiceover work and want to pick something from Shure's offerings, it'd be an SM57B.
@ThatBeTheQuestion
3 жыл бұрын
@@lostalone9320 I didn't say SM57. I said SM57B. I didn't notice that he had a face cam on. I usually skip the ad. Wish I had an SM57, though. And a Peavy 6505+. Different use case, but that'd be killer.
@ThomasFilbert
3 жыл бұрын
@@ThatBeTheQuestion there's no such thing as an SM57b unless Google and the Shure website are lying? Maybe you mean something different all together?
@bond007rules
3 жыл бұрын
@@ThatBeTheQuestion The SM57B really doesn't exist - surely you're thinking of the SM7B as has been suggested? And yeah it's a SM58-shaped Shure mic, so there's not much else it could be. It's a durable yet high-quality mic at a good price, and I can see why he has one. I'd tell Stuart to get a SM7B for that warm radio sound, but given the high and steadily improving quality of his existing VO it may be a case of diminishing returns.
@sbinnala14
3 жыл бұрын
Wait... Why they all start with SM?
@Echo024
3 жыл бұрын
Extreme liver challenge: Drink every time he says “airflow”
@weylinwest9505
3 жыл бұрын
Liver.exe has stopped working.
@ankit99ize
3 жыл бұрын
Life.exe has stopped working
@gamerforlife9988
3 жыл бұрын
Universe.exe has stopped working
@Huntracony
3 жыл бұрын
Knowing quite a bit about computer simulation, I highly doubt we'll get rid of wind tunnels any time soon. Fluid dynamics (air is also a fluid) are incredibly complicated to simulate, not to mention things like resonances that come along with it. Even if we have the software to accurately simulate it (which I don't think we do at the moment, though I could be wrong), it'll be quite slow and it'll have to start over for every small change you make to the setup (like changing the angle the wind comes from). So, while simulations can be quite useful, I don't think they'll be replacing wind tunnels any time soon.
@nols9886
3 жыл бұрын
In the f1 2020 my team the one bloke is litteraly running a leaf blower on the car
@1RustyGee
3 жыл бұрын
yeah but its a branded lead blower
@roquesales_
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, but I think it's used to cool the brakes and radiators.
@SimRacingVeteran
3 жыл бұрын
@@roquesales_- wwwwwwwhooooooosh!
@nols9886
3 жыл бұрын
@Pauline Weinberger no i dont mean the track leaf blower i mean in the aero department in my team the guy uses a leaf blower to blow wind over rhe car if you dont have a good budget
@SamDixon3244
3 жыл бұрын
Same 🤣
@aromaj8
3 жыл бұрын
Keep Your Hands Off My Closed Loop Wind Tunnel!
@Enzo_RJL
3 жыл бұрын
its awesome to see how far you've come since the first video on aerodynamics (slipstreaming vs dirty air)
@blakedude0
3 жыл бұрын
F1: the air needs to be completely undisturbed for the readings Also f1 teams: we gonna put a massive pylon in drivers seat cause why not
@thesnitch7
3 жыл бұрын
cause: a person or thing that gives rise to an action, phenomenon, or condition. BEcause: for the reason that; due to the fact that: The boy was absent BEcause he was ill.
@Garfie489
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair its the only way to attach the car securely whilst also not disturbing the vital parts of the car being tested
@Chuckiele
3 жыл бұрын
@@Garfie489 And also, that part is already inaccurate anyway as normally there would be a driver :D
@VGOM2000
3 жыл бұрын
@@thesnitch7 Stop whining, everybody understood what he meant with that.
@thesnitch7
3 жыл бұрын
@@VGOM2000 in order to 'stop' whining I would have to be 'continuing' to whine. Given my comment was days ago - I have to ask what the hell are you whining about, you insufferable whiner?
@darthgorthaur258
3 жыл бұрын
My ex girlfriend actually did her master's in aerodynamic engineering and was aloud to use the Williams wind tunnel, she was working on a way to increase the max speed they could use rather than hit the make speed of the tunnel then extrapolating out from there because obviously they can't hit 300mh speeds with a wind tunnel...so they hit up to like 60-70 and then mathematically increase the speed to see what would happen....as such she was working on a way to make that obsolete and be able to get it up to actual race speed...she never could quite finish it before end of her course but Williams has carried on her work even to this day....as far as she's aware from talking to old friends who still worked there to recently and keeping track of the idea in mags an papers.. Edit: I haven't fully explained it very well in the post, I've just re read some bits and notice that... There is another post lower down which explains it abit more an better, she wasn't trying to allow the tunnels to run at any faster speed she was trying to find a way to reduce the need for the mathematical guessing how a part would behave at the top end because of the limits of the tunnels.
@darko.v
3 жыл бұрын
This explains why Williams have no points!!
@ThatBeTheQuestion
3 жыл бұрын
That's really cool.
@12th.jahlil
3 жыл бұрын
Thats incredible
@narancs5
3 жыл бұрын
Chainbear just said (4:05), that there is limit to how fast teams are allowed to run their windtunnels. So was your gf working on ways to break the rules ( like Ferrari with the fuelflow meter ) or did I misunderstand something?
@mr.goodcat582
3 жыл бұрын
@@narancs5 I thought only I didn’t understand that speedy speed part of the post.
@firepowerg
3 жыл бұрын
I have my own wind tunnel and it's very good for exhaust gasses! Also good for upsetting people in confined spaces.
@thesnitch7
3 жыл бұрын
you're adorable................
@firepowerg
3 жыл бұрын
@@thesnitch7 That's what my girlfriend tells me. When I'm not using the wind tunnel that is...
@conflict6292
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if thats how charlie is so much quicker than seb??.
@BastiaanNetjes
3 жыл бұрын
You always seem to blow me away (no pun intended) with your animations. They always make things so clear and easy to understand. Top job!
@allenqueen
3 жыл бұрын
I find wind tunnels and cfd animations fascinating to look at. Something about seeing the air move, which is generally invisible gets me excited. It's like I'm looking at something I'm not really allowed to. Rebellious.
@mceajc
3 жыл бұрын
I find it best to think about wind tunnels in this way: It is easiest to have your instruments and the thing you're interested in stationary. (Think how difficult it would be to have very precise instruments attached to a car as it is haring around a track in still air). Now your problem is having the moving air mimic stationary air, while actually moving past your instruments and the test subject. Still air doesn't move much, so you have to make sure the air interacts with itself much less than it interacts with the thing you want to measure. Wind tunnels trick the object into behaving as though it is moving fast through still air, instead of sitting still in fast air. So the big problem to solve is how to make the air behave as though it isn't moving, even though it's screaming around a loop very quickly.
@jussidjachenko9483
3 жыл бұрын
Why use a wind tunnel when you can just climb a tall mountain and use the wind there?
@andy_liga
3 жыл бұрын
Cause laminar flow and air velocity control, plus the air pressure plays a serious role in aerodynamic simulation
@charleyatkins9094
3 жыл бұрын
@@andy_liga wooooooooosh
@lcberchtold1208
3 жыл бұрын
I think it is the slicks, they don’t provide you with the necessary grip to drive up a mountain and how else would you get the car up there
@aliamr9768
3 жыл бұрын
Protect this man he's a genius
@aliamr9768
3 жыл бұрын
@@andy_liga R/WOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
@elmurcis1
3 жыл бұрын
I'm a huge fan (In wind tunnel).
@shyasaturtle
3 жыл бұрын
I really like your videos, they are simple and easy to understand and condense complex topics into simple, easy to watch videos. Thank you so much for making these videos :)
@McPlayer8t
3 жыл бұрын
I second that.
@SOME-RANDOM-GUY457
3 жыл бұрын
Mercedes: silky air,laminar flow, wind in wind out Ferrari: "Haha the wind goes Brrrrr"
@lewiswood6117
3 жыл бұрын
CB: Here's a nice video about wind tunnels! Me: lel PIV
@marshyyboyy
3 жыл бұрын
Actually theres very little laminar flow in a tunnel, it's almost entirely turbulent. the trick is to get turbulent intensity as low as possible
@ASJC27
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly right. It’s never laminar in a WT, and turbulence levels are almost always higher than in free air.
@Thats_Mr_Random_Person_to_you
3 жыл бұрын
Dunno about others but my gut suggests that wind tunnels will never be 100% phased out just because CFD is still based on 'approximations' so cannot tell the whole story alone. That is to say the CFD calculations are computationally hard. And there does come a point where the software has to stop doing the calculations and say 'yh, thats a good enough approximation' otherwise you would be running the calculations for an infinite time. And with the inherent aspect of chaos theory (small varuations to initial conditions massivly changing the output) more accurate simulations require more computation of more 'particles' etc.. etc.. I may be wrong, but one huge benefit of wind tunnels is the ability to compare the real world with the CFD models, allowing to to verify the CFD calculations and make tweaks to the CFD calculations to better match the real world model. It might be plausible that the CFD models become so good that the extremely tiny gains gained by verifying the data with the wind tunnel may not be worth the cost of doing so. But my gut tells me that in the race for 1/10th second gains, plus the F1 regulations evolving and changing to introduce challenges means its just unlikely.
@lknanml
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the laugh. I had paused the vid at 0:39 to get a drink. Walk back in and my GF asks. What do horses and a guy with a camera in field have to do with F1 wind tunnels?.... I said where do you think the term horsepower came from? I think the smirk on my face just earned me the I have a headache tonight dear award......
@RadeticDaniel
3 жыл бұрын
Well the horsepower was actually proposed vaguely about measures of work for the "average horse" (actually a good nugget of curiosity). Not all wrong there, despite not being what this video is about xD
@vinniev77
3 жыл бұрын
Probably a stupid question but wouldn't it be more useful for the teams that don't expect to be out front to test in turbulent/chaotic air flow? Like obviously getting a baseline understanding for qualifying and seeing if parts work as expected is necessary but surely seeing how the car behaves and can be improved in traffic would be more useful to some.
@otm646
3 жыл бұрын
You first have to understand the dynamics of your shape in near perfect conditions. Otherwise you're throwing in a bunch of variables that you don't necessarily know how to account for.
@petouser
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Chain Bear. I love your videos, but I want to propose a topic for a future video. Can you explain *graining* ? And why it occurs, while others don't have at? And how some drivers are able to drive it away? In the last race in Turkey some drivers suffered from really harsh graining, and it's really hard to fully understand it for normal people!
@210parrish
3 жыл бұрын
So if the teams are upset about "dirty air" when behind other cars in corner, is there not a way to test "dirty air" in the tunnel?
@RadeticDaniel
3 жыл бұрын
Yes, they can try some variations of perturbed flow, but not the exact configuration produced by another car. To produce a valid simulation you need the correct pattern and for that you'd need to measure the flow behind every car of every team. The best you cn get are simulations of your own two cars runing close to each other and maybe some data on generic turbulance in winter testing =)
@justabruh2345
3 жыл бұрын
why don’t teams test and design cars in dirty air since that’s what’s gonna happen most often
@goodboy4129
3 жыл бұрын
I guess after the pack has been separated most will be running in clean air but I can’t see any flaw in your idea too
@pedrospeeder
3 жыл бұрын
Dirty air is difficult to understand, predict and reproduce consistently, giving that any minor adjustment (such as a change of pressure, direction, conflicting vortices or even the amount of time that turbulence has been "forced") might be enough to pile enough differences to make your analysis useless. It'd also requires a ton of processing power to mathematically analyze, as does existing high-end CFD that computates laminar flow. And we don't have that much power, nor the knowledge to actually try and tackle it yet.
@user-eq7zq6so3j
3 жыл бұрын
So essentially asking to make it for air that it cannot take advantage, and its too unpredictable, that would need a change in regs and car philosophy for that to work, but they just took the easier and better approach of ground affect this time
@zequijusti
3 жыл бұрын
No, they are trying to simulate a mass of air standing still while the cars pass through it. You need laminar flow to recreate that.
@user-eq7zq6so3j
3 жыл бұрын
@@zequijusti thank you for your insight
@NONOOBZ4EVR
3 жыл бұрын
I know how wind tunnels work, I just love watching any new chain bear video! Great work as always
@crackedemerald4930
3 жыл бұрын
yes this comment right here officer
@Vic4ful
3 жыл бұрын
To keep up with SWIRLIES F1 aerodynamics teams have come up with some...BOBBLAGE This would have been a very nice crossover between Chain Bear and WTF1
@Sheamu5
3 жыл бұрын
Laminar flow?! Where's smarter every day in the comments?
@keisuketakahasi4584
3 жыл бұрын
ok... cool... but how do they develop parts from that? i expect them to look at the wind tunnel and be like "yup thats efficent" but how would they make it actually better?
@mr.goodcat582
3 жыл бұрын
They gather data from existing car, analyze it and then model something new in PC. If it works “on paper”, they make it for the wind tunnel, if it shows expected results- the part is produced for a real car.
@RadeticDaniel
3 жыл бұрын
It's a sort of tradicional advanced mathematics problem. Get a surface shape that has ideal facing area when observed from all points where wind is expected to come from in various situations. To much area and you're dragging, to little area and you have no downforce, the right amount in the wrong places and you become Williams with little downforce and lots of drag. . After that you run through computer models checking different air densities, humidity levels and temperature just to be on the safe side about the boundary layer behaviour. All that is still not considering cooling for brakes and power unit, what makes it harder yet.
@nunotpinto
3 жыл бұрын
Question: Why is it better to have the flow of air as smooth as possible? When running on a track, the air doesn´t have a laminar flow or does it?
@amirsafari7140
3 жыл бұрын
As a project for our fluid dynamics class,i built a tiny wind tunnel,that was a very cool experience and I've learned a lot, design the wind tunnel and calculating drags,fan speed and ... Were so cool
@mustangdoctor3834
2 жыл бұрын
What gas do they use so you can see it?
@anchorbait6662
3 жыл бұрын
2:18 they got to you didn't they? What do they have on you? How much money are you getting from the laminar flow freaks over at Smarter Every Day? We can help you Mr Bear, you don't have to be afraid anymore.
@bhatkrishnakishor
3 жыл бұрын
Who thought of Smarter Everyday when Chain bear said laminar flow
@MajesticDemonLord
3 жыл бұрын
Well... this Video was a load of hot air... (Due to being accelerated)
@aprilwest-ryan1618
3 жыл бұрын
What app do you use to make you animations because I would really love to know
@GreenTheGrape
3 жыл бұрын
Cheeky song reference in the video thumbnail
@dyslexofficial2798
3 жыл бұрын
So if the air in the wind tunnel was turbulent the cars would preform better in traffic then?
@dave6429
3 жыл бұрын
Video starts at 1:05
@22Uzbekistan
3 жыл бұрын
use SponsorBlock addon
@lcberchtold1208
3 жыл бұрын
Just find out yourself everyone! Don’t let his sponsors think their money ain’t worth it!
@SimRacingVeteran
3 жыл бұрын
If teams tested in dirty air they’d know how the car reacts. Boom problem solved. It’s like if I mix DOT 3 and DOT 5 together I have DOT 8 right?. 😃👍
@dom6770
3 жыл бұрын
We all know the skillshare trial is not limited to 1000 people.
@CloroxBleach-cq7tj
3 жыл бұрын
2:22 *A wild Smarter Every Day Appears*
@Vok250
3 жыл бұрын
When the computer algorithms get good enough, we'll just have cars generated by neural networks.
@benevery
3 жыл бұрын
like the Czinger CZ1 thing?
@hockeykid8130
3 жыл бұрын
1) I love you & everything you’ve done to teach me more about the intricacies of F1 2) why do they have to use 60% models, why can’t they use full scale models
@rockingttalent3666
3 жыл бұрын
Making a full scale model can be quite expensive and time consuming and if any changes are required, it is easier to do it on a smaller model. Testing is done on certain prototyping principles and laws and conditions (lot of science stuff) and basically use something similar to ratios and proportions (in layman terms)
@hockeykid8130
3 жыл бұрын
@@rockingttalent3666 thank you!!
@zequijusti
3 жыл бұрын
@@rockingttalent3666 say it. non dimensional numbers have to be the same
@rockingttalent3666
3 жыл бұрын
@@zequijusti haha. Correct. I just wanted to explain in much simpler terms.
@ASJC27
3 жыл бұрын
Most teams don’t have a full scale tunnel. They are much bigger and much more expensive to run so FIA outlawed full scale completely.
@jaimemj2
3 жыл бұрын
that's a great video and those are some wonderfull animations that help explaining the topic, although i think that in situation like 9:50 with those three cars, it would be easier to detect the animations i you turn down the bright level in the other two, so light guides the eye, or maybe it was just me and it didn't affect anyone else, anyway great video thanks for explaining this kind of complex stuff to mundane people like me.
@policeboy1288
3 жыл бұрын
“PIV” 😂😂😂😂😂 I love this channel man
@jsquared1013
3 жыл бұрын
What's so funny about the abbreviation for Particle Image Velocimetry?
@dsdy1205
3 жыл бұрын
@@jsquared1013 P****** in V*******, if you've spent any time in that part of the internet
@hoxfrey9093
3 жыл бұрын
I'm watching this while procrastinating my fluid flow engineering class 😂😂
@RadeticDaniel
3 жыл бұрын
motivation goes a long way to put in those extra ours, i'd say you were studying anyway xD
@TheMrFishnDucks
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Very informative. Keep up the good work.
@LuisLuna-te4gf
3 жыл бұрын
I laughed a little too hard when he said smooth and air flow is going to lose its meaning lol good shit chain bear.
If dirty air is THE problem right now, why are they not testing in these situations and finding a balance between the two? They put so much time and resources into making sure the air is as clean as possible but aerodynamics are hardly a problem right now?
@satyris410
3 жыл бұрын
You enjoyed making this video didn't you
@danielegerussi7453
3 жыл бұрын
I love this amount of weekly videoos thaaanks you're awesome
@EvanKLife
3 жыл бұрын
Realistically, CFD will never be able to fully replace physical wind testing-non-laminar and transition airflow is simply too complex to be accurately modeled. Werner Heisenberg was quoted as saying that when he dies he wants to ask god, “Why quantum mechanics, and why turbulence? I’m pretty sure he can answer the first one.”
@JakandDaxterAddict
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think wind tunnels will disappear anytime soon. Thing about CFD is you can go on about more accurate predictions with finer mesh, DNS calculation etc, but you CANNOT ever take that as gospel. You need something physical to confirm your results and prove your accuracy and find an error margin (which will never be zero, not even close, especially when looking at the speeds an F1 car travels at), otherwise your lovely calculations aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
@Root3264
3 жыл бұрын
My question is; schouldn't they optimise for turbulent air too? this is what is more realistic, maybe they could develop better wings this way, which produce more downforce in turbulent air? I just wondered...
@ryofurue
3 жыл бұрын
I was wondering: can't FIA use CFD to restrict turbulence behind the cars? First FIA would give a CFD package to the teams. The teams then feed their CAD data into the software and have to modify their designs until the turbulence (using some measure) is less than the FIA-set threshold. Then the teams would send their final design to FIA, which would verify that the turbulence is below the threshold using the same software. FIA would reserve the right to add sensors to any of the actual cars during the race weekends to improve their CFD program and update the software once in a while. In this way, the difficulty in following the car in front would finally go away.
@videogamevalley7523
3 жыл бұрын
.....every time I watch your channel I learn something I didnt know or understand before. thanks my g (school is never out, jus done differently)
@conflict6292
3 жыл бұрын
Excellent vid. Cant hear lamina flow without thinking of Dustin (s.e.d). Allways good to hear Anderson get a mention, i could be wrong but was it not Gary Anderson that invented the pito tube rig ??.
@sdsd2e2321
3 жыл бұрын
Isn't it fucking obvious? A 12 minute video is not necessary
@abilashtitus8248
3 жыл бұрын
Playboy chain bear😂
@jackywng1236
3 жыл бұрын
Win tunnel sucks in a complicated way, that's how it works.
@lokopixo2338
3 жыл бұрын
what about computer-generated nature-mimic structures ? we're seeing more and more "organic inspired" stuff being generated by computers these days, how is it applied in F1 (if it is or could be) ?
@vernonbear
3 жыл бұрын
We had a cooling problem on our Van Dieman RF88. We tied some red wool to the front suspension, ragged the car past the pits at Silverstone, took photos of it as it drove by and established that the air was being shifted up over the radiator cowlings. Wind tunnel? Pfff. We learnt from sailing telltails 😀
@anirudhjilla5908
3 жыл бұрын
I wish my physics teacher was atleast 10% as good as you. If so I wouldn't be watching youtube all day long with soo random pointless video. Ps: your videos are the best one's and I wait for them daily to pop up on my feed😍😭
@tipsyMJT
3 жыл бұрын
What the hoke about PIV? I mean I know about Post Indicator Valves but I'm not sure why that funny? What other meaning does piv have?
@HATECELL
3 жыл бұрын
Is there a rule limiting model size and wind speed for tests, or are there practical reasons? I've been at the Sauber wind tunnel about 10 years ago and that thing is totally big enough for a full size car, and can apparently go over 300km/h, so they could just put the real car in it if they wanted to
@freddiefreeloader77
3 жыл бұрын
I think Chainbear just outed himself as a member of The Church... He does witter on...
@anthonygarvey1
3 жыл бұрын
What happened at 5:07 ? Man-IP-u-Late? I can't work out if you've gone Canadian or Kiwi?
@pedrorequio5515
3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, the end of the wind tunnel is not near, solving full equations is impossible, and will be for a while, it takes an unbelievable amount of time to solve even for the most simple of flows, the problem with today's CFD analysis is that simplifications can lead big mistakes, its not like anyone can turn a comercial program and understand it, even the engineers struggle with it. Engineering is about validation, so wind tunnels are tried and true. Dimensional analysis is a simple way to solve insanely difficult problems in this field.
@MSportsEngineering
3 жыл бұрын
Springs and dampers are not typically ran in rolling road wind tunnels. Load cells in the suspension don't make sense if those devices are absent. You sure about that part CB?
@GracedSeeker763
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't the air in the back half of the car be inaccurate in a wind tunnel though? In the wind tunnel, the wind is being sucked away from behind the car, where that does not happen in real life, where the car pushes through the air. As an example, think about the air goin over the rear wing, in real life the air would be thrown very high up, whereas in a wind tunnel it would be sucked straight back, possibly affecting the air flow going underneath the wing
@Thermalions
3 жыл бұрын
But you didn't answer the real burning question - do they use "Keyboard or Joystick (K or J) ?"
@govind9402
3 жыл бұрын
Intro looks great with 3d solids, shadows, negative effect and minimalist effect.
@TheOnlyLonelyMonkey
3 жыл бұрын
Why is only laminar flow simulated, and not e.g. dirty air creater by cars ahead? This would also be an area where windtunnels will stay ahead of CFD for a good while
@andredeketeleastutecomplex
3 жыл бұрын
Should be banned for racing, it produces the ugly cars we've all seen in last 30 years.
@luisinncd
3 жыл бұрын
Shouldnt they try and disturb the air flow with another f1 car to try and see how the car works following another car to help predict race simulations?
@marcophilhom6844
3 жыл бұрын
How dose creating a perfect wind flow in a wind tunnel compare to race day. Is the wind on race day going to be perfect. Or is it going to be disturb flow or turbulent flow? Does the car require a perfect condition to operate like it did in the tunnel
@ryaramaf1gobshite397
3 жыл бұрын
Do F1 team’s put two car’s in at once to look at how well it can follow through dirty air?what about the FIA & this nxt gen car?
@kimi_hakim
3 жыл бұрын
Hi Chainbear. Can you do a video about fuel management? Been searching all your videos to no avail.
@grannieannie1371
3 жыл бұрын
So did Williams allow you to photograph their computer? That was a very smooth video Stuart. Sorry someone had to say it.
@benmerilion1581
Жыл бұрын
Main part i dont understand is Which of the f1 races has a track that moves at same speed as the wind. Aren't all tracks static and the wind would naturally cling to it.
@vegadanial7240
3 жыл бұрын
isn't it better to just use the regular wind tunnel which has turbulent or bit of it or whatever that is to achieve more representative number? since the wind in real world isn't flowing smoothly?
@spacecowboy3063
3 жыл бұрын
I have an idea for an episode. What do they mean by "balance" and how is it adjusted? They sure do talk about it a lot.
@govind9402
3 жыл бұрын
And how F1 manages the weight distribution and center of gravity in a model cars
@Chuckiele
3 жыл бұрын
Wait, only a model? So no running engine? Wow, no wonder they see such different results in the real world then.
@marcophilhom6844
3 жыл бұрын
Does it matter what type of airflow comes in to the engine Laminer disturbed or turbulent? Is one more efficient than the other.
@wadewaddell5552
3 жыл бұрын
I'm drunk, and your an ass for making me think this hard lol, but great stuff.
@cmbarijusami8227
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah.Doppler effect is a whole another video.
@McPlayer8t
3 жыл бұрын
Neeeeeeeeummm!
@Coolbreeze0988
3 жыл бұрын
The fact that we’re measuring wavelengths of light just to make a car go skirt skurt
@chadleymaggott3786
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be cheaper for teams to do more on track testing rather than spend hours in the wind tunnel?
@higochumbo8932
3 жыл бұрын
Why can't the car be real size? Too much required air flow?
@rival2028
3 жыл бұрын
Chain Bear is Ross Brawn in disguise.... i mean how else would he know all this? 😂
Пікірлер: 369