I find it very problematic when we pile on tools of approximation re imagine measure & qaunta violatimg basic language & phylosphical exercises. Gotta be connected to its earliest version of self. Einstein can only be a final reference, not a building block . Minkowski wanted all inertia frames of matter to work with newtons bucket of water. Im not sure why we cant use that to fine tune an inertia value on plank length scale of time measure that would work to explain stars inside galaxies spin. Why we wouldn't be to keep fine tuning what newton was doing . Often, our tools of approximations final results are not 1 to 1 ration accurate like the step by step leading up to get the final result is. Our factorys work with the final equations but sigma 6 is just enough to be profitable and get shit done. We scrap parts invoke hidden variables blame it on a number of musical chairs of super position to why it fails to get the answers we want. many worlds phase change flaws or blimeshes molecular structures. Just because A cutting speed B feed rate should work together doesn't mean it will . More often than not you testably do it a certain number of times enough to gain sigma 6 measure but then it fails when it shouldn't. But of course we manipulate our frame of reference this way daily its a very useful way our brains pardolia of mind seeks order in a sea of entropic decay.
@rami-succar7356
2 күн бұрын
they're called theories for a reason
@AH-Documentary
Күн бұрын
Yuppp
@EternalSearcher
Күн бұрын
Just remember this the next time you want to say 'we have an understanding of what the world around us is'
@rami-succar7356
Күн бұрын
@@EternalSearcher i've never said that, thank you for your advice we're as clueless as a headless chicken and whoever says otherwise is a buffoon
Пікірлер: 6