Once upon a time, there was a flying spaghetti monster named the theory of evolution. Though he had no mind nor goals, he could and did absolutely everything. No matter how complex beyond comprehension, beautifully seemingly designed, or mathematically improbable, he could do it. All he required was enough time, even though the time required for the miraculous things he did there was not enough of since the beginning of the universe. It didn't matter. He is believed in with the same mindlessness he consists of. He can never be disproved, saying that something is impossible for him to have done it, because there is absolutely nothing he can't do. After all, the theory of evolution is the quintessential flying spaghetti monster!
@OlegLankin
27 күн бұрын
@jockyoung4491 are you considering being a theistic evolutionist, since you consider the origin of life unrelated to evolution?
@triggerhappydad65
27 күн бұрын
I see what you did there 😜 Through the years, I've always chuckled when hearing the old "fsm" or "sky Daddy", and someone finally rightly used it AGAINST the atheists😂
@OlegLankin
27 күн бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 how it began is obviously 10 times more important than evolution. I see why some evolutionists try to avoid it, because it points so strongly to God, and that then topples evolution, because of what God said he did in the Bible - created each kind of creature, perfect from the start.
@OlegLankin
27 күн бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 no, the God of the Bible makes evolution impossible. You apparently didn't finish reading my previous reply - the Bible said that he created all the kinds of creatures, perfect from the start. Can you explain what you mean? Does that not contradict evolution?
@OlegLankin
27 күн бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 biological evolution is fictional, so it can't show anything. Genesis can't be false, because God can't lie.
@Jim-o4t
27 күн бұрын
"They thought life was simple" I laughed so hard... There is nothing simple about life or anything the creator has done. It is wonder upon wonder.
@kjhgfdfghjkdrtyuiwewe
26 күн бұрын
The Lords creation truly is beautiful and infinite :)
@blaster-zy7xx
26 күн бұрын
I laughed too. No one claims life is simple. The issue is that complexity does not mean god.
@globalcoupledances
25 күн бұрын
What is life? Is a virus alive? Multiplying is essential for life. Is RNA essential for life? Is a computer virus alive? Is evolution essential for life? Life can be simple if you know what life is
@Jim-o4t
25 күн бұрын
@globalcoupledances life is being a biological organism capable of dying. No a computer virus is not alive.
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
Amen! Our God is amazing.
@kjhgfdfghjkdrtyuiwewe
26 күн бұрын
These videos are such a blessing. My mom is an atheist but loves watching scientific videos like this. Trying to open her heart to the truth of the Lord. Please pray for us!
@akmurf7429
26 күн бұрын
The heart is deceitful (Jer 17:9) and blinds us to the truth. I pray the Holy Spirit will hound her until she listens. It really boils down to giving up one's self-will. Without self-will, there can be no love, and that is what god wants from us the most. We were created out of and for a loving relationship.
@KristianHannler
26 күн бұрын
I will pray for you!
@refuse2bdcvd324
26 күн бұрын
May God grant your mother a heart of repentance to accept Christ and his will for her life!
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
Praying for her 🙏🙏🙏 be encouraged
@bevanbasson4289
25 күн бұрын
The message of Jesus was ,repent your sins look after the poor the weak, the hungry and the forgotten, sell your possessions to help your fellow man because the kingdom of God is near. If Jesus was here would he be a Christian? Good evidence? watch a moonlanding or flat earth video, and you will be convinced, so much "real" and compelling evidence, yet here we are, with rovers still on the moon, rock samples and a round planet orbiting a sun, and your explanation is a sky God, creating beings so he can torture 90% of them for eternity, because 1 man and 1 woman disobeyed him.
@TickedOffPriest
27 күн бұрын
They thought that the cell was a fluid filled membrane with a nucleus and nothing more.
@timothykeith1367
26 күн бұрын
They think evolution is magic without a magician
@blaster-zy7xx
26 күн бұрын
No, that is another example of how wrong you are. Lookup “strawman”
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
22 күн бұрын
You're looking at 4.2-billion-year-old cells and claiming that they couldn't be simpler. That's a haughty delusion, buddy!
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
22 күн бұрын
@timothykeith1367 You think that your magical god can explain Biology.
@TickedOffPriest
22 күн бұрын
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 You are imagining that the cells are 4.2 billion years old. My God has power over science, but you are conflating science with evolutionism.
@cosmictreason2242
27 күн бұрын
Darwin and Marx: Copium of the masses
@blaster-zy7xx
26 күн бұрын
You misquoted. It was “religion is the opium of the masses”. It still is.
@joecheffo5942
25 күн бұрын
So you think Jesus was a capitalist?
@blaster-zy7xx
24 күн бұрын
The quote is: "Religion is the opium of the masses." And it still is. What is with theists who conflate socialism with evolution? They have nothing to do with one another.
@benellenberger5610
21 күн бұрын
@@joecheffo5942 not exactly. He was probably a Bitcoinist.
@sanidan2010
26 күн бұрын
What would I tell Darwin? “Sorry Charlie” try again.
@1969cmp
26 күн бұрын
'Go back to Genesis and talk to Gregor Mendel, he'll explain a few things about limited changes'.
@blaster-zy7xx
23 күн бұрын
What would I ask God? Why did you chose to hide amongst so many other Gods? Why did you allow for so much evil? Why didn't you help write a holy book that didn't conflict with reality (modern science)? Why did you allow your followers to go so far astray in their claims of speaking for you without you intervening?
@richiejourney1840
18 күн бұрын
@@blaster-zy7xxyour asking questions to the God you are an atheist to. Shouldn’t you be asking your own goddesses-Lady Luck and Mother Nature why they are so messed up?
@jimschlaegel8454
26 күн бұрын
I appreciate the gifts that God has given some people [not me] to be able to rattle off an abundance of technical and historical information without notes in a coherent manner, yet still come across like a neighbor talking to you. Yet another well done presentation.
@mikehorton3664
27 күн бұрын
male and female are so differant that they would have to evolved separatly! 2 evolutions? evolution is man's fantisy. God bless, matthew6:33, proverbs 3:5
@ronaldmorgan7632
27 күн бұрын
Yeah, they never talk about that. That and that fact that to create another human requires that absolute cooperation of these different things.
@globalcoupledances
27 күн бұрын
What about sexual reproduction without gender? Like fungi, fern, paramaecium. Have you heard from Bill Nye why sexual reprduction had been selected by nature?
@blaster-zy7xx
26 күн бұрын
Wow. The level of willfull ignorance of creationists is jaw dropping. No wonder we have a convicted felon leading the Republican Party.
@brunobastos5533
25 күн бұрын
Really
@mikehorton3664
25 күн бұрын
@@brunobastos5533 impossible!
@RodericGurrola
27 күн бұрын
Good points. 👍🏻👍🏻. God bless.
@Vernon-Chitlen
27 күн бұрын
That the only known way proteins are made is by a molecular machine made of 40-80 proteins and 4 rRNA's that provide the code for the specific arrangement of only 20 particular of over 500 kinds of amino acids.
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
Correction: rRNA doesn't provide code. It just scans another RNA. Mostly (50 : 1) that RNA doesn't contain code.
@Vernon-Chitlen
26 күн бұрын
@@globalcoupledances So what is being transferred from DNA by tRNA>mRNA>rRNA for the particular and specifically sequenced amino acids to be assembled, defining a particular proteins function and folding into it's 3D shape? Ever heard of protein coding genes?
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
@@Vernon-Chitlen I see you are confused by all those biochemical terminology. I don't know where to begin. I remember that Professor Dave Explains has a biochemistry playlist. I can also advise the Amoeba Sisters
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
@@Vernon-Chitlen Very short answer: RNA-polymerase makes a copy mRNA (m = messenger). Ribosome scans the mRNA for the *start* codon. If not found then that mRNA is discarded
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
@@globalcoupledances professor Dave needs Jesus. He is in dire need of salvation.
@asmodeus5326
10 күн бұрын
Ok let's play the Intelligent design game. If you were going to intelligently design all this would you make humans as we are today, then put them on a planet that is 70% covered in water (97% of which is salt water which humans can't drink even though we need water to survive). So that Intelligently leaves human with 3% of drinkable water oh and the intelligence don't stop there because because in all the intelligent design you make sure 68% that drinking water in the ice caps and glaciers and around 30% is in ground water leaving roughly around 0.3% of fresh water that the brilliance made us need to survive accessible. First intelligent design portion gone through let's move to the second you decide around 57,308,738 square miles is land but wait would be too smart to make all of that inhabitable so you make about 33% of that desert and about 24% mountains so if we subtract that 57% uninhabitable land from the total land that leaves us around 24,642,757 square miles or 15.77 billion acres (43%) of hospitable land to live off to a brilliant start. Then make sure 40,000-50,000 humans die yearly in natural disasters well because you know the whole intelligence thing add in viruses, no protection if a meteor decides to plow into us. The you design human males with their testicles on the outside not really safest choice for reproduction, whales and hippos have theirs located inside seems way safer but hey I'm not the intelligent creator here you decided to connect our optic nerve to the back of our retina giving us a huge blind spot our brains have to ignore seems like a small oversight, why did we only get 2 sets of teeth when other animals got never ending supply, why does the vagus nerve run from the brain down around the hearth then back up to the larynx just to control the voice box could have just went from the brain directly to the voice box, also why is the food hole placed right next to the breathing hole seems like that might not work out for people sometimes. Ahh but yes I see such brilliance in the design
@omarvazquez3355
26 күн бұрын
All glory to God
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
to say Darwin's theory is totally wring becasue he didn't know what we know today is like saying Copernicus was wrong about the earth going around the sun because general relativity proved that the forces of nature are relative.
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
Love you guys! God bless, CMI 🙏🙏🙏✝️🕊️
@brianvell
23 күн бұрын
So basically, argument from incredulity therefore magic
@globalcoupledances
22 күн бұрын
I have proof that Robert Carter knows that evolution is true. Listen to his rhetoric. He wants his followers to stay away from science
@kharris3352
15 күн бұрын
Precisely. “I can’t understand it. So nobody can.”
@globalcoupledances
15 күн бұрын
Moderator has hidden my comment
@Eric-en9hk
7 күн бұрын
@@brianvell Basically there is no way things like cells could have formed by chance because of their complexity. And because we always trace complexity back to a mind, it is perfectly reasonable to believe that something as complex as life came from a mind.
@brianvell
7 күн бұрын
@@Eric-en9hk You can say there is no way all you want. The field of abiogenesis research has mapped most of the steps required to get from a brebiotic soup of chemicals to life
@Torby4096
26 күн бұрын
Even in 1974, the new high school biology textbook said the cell was filled with protoplasm with some complicated chemistry going on.
@akmurf7429
26 күн бұрын
Complicated chemistry? That's the understatement of the century!
@Torby4096
26 күн бұрын
@@akmurf7429 he he
@rizdekd3912
26 күн бұрын
Let's say something like that was true. If the cells were actually filled with homogenous protoplasm but still functioned as a cell does now...ie with no internal chemistry but from the outside the cell did everything a cell does now, would that make you more or less inclined to think it evolved naturally?
@Torby4096
26 күн бұрын
@@rizdekd3912 No. I already knew God and understood, "The Bible is true. If it looks like it might not be, then we must not understand what we are looking at."
@rizdekd3912
25 күн бұрын
@@Torby4096 "No. I already knew God and understood, 'The Bible is true. If it looks like it might not be, then we must not understand what we are looking at.'" So the complexity of the cell is irrelevant?
@1969cmp
26 күн бұрын
Darwin was wrong, Mendel was correct. The latter understood limited changes and was a creationist. Devoted evolutionist needs to start from ground zero and ask 'how did we get here', 'what assumptions were believed that became the foundations that evolution was built upon and are they firm foundations'. Cheers, ex-atheist and former believer in materialistic evolution.
@rizdekd3912
26 күн бұрын
If God created DNA, it appears it was created specifically so it could support evolution. Why else would God create such a complicated and tenuous mechanism...one fraught with problems (mutations, mistakes, folding, duplication) when replicating...if not to support evolution? Why would an omnipotent God make the mechanism to pass on life so fragile and complicated when he could have made it simple and invulnerable to corruption?
@1969cmp
25 күн бұрын
@@rizdekd3912 The complexity of DNA is what allows for speciation of a kind which is handy after the fall and even more so in a post flood environment. This also translates into specialised breeding that we see in livestock and dogs. Perhaps if DNA was too simple, life may not have been able to adapt to the post flood world, at least not in the diversity we have before us. In the end, I leave it to The Creator. It's His design and what do I peeny brains comprehend as of we know better and can create stuff from ex-nihlo.
@joecheffo5942
25 күн бұрын
@@1969cmp Don't go burning any witches please. This superstition sounds like fun and games until people take it all the way.
@MainBrainDaneInsane
24 күн бұрын
@rizdekd3912 God is omniscient, aka, all knowing. IMO, God knew full well the fall and sin would happen, so He made sure life was preprogrammed with enough genetic information that it could have protections against debilitating mutations, and for the variety of environmental and social pressures. Think how from only a few species of wolves we got all manner of dog species. That's because the information to make new forms was already present. Oh, and for God knowing, but doing it anyway? We could only love God as He loves us, only by willfully choosing so. But that opens up the freedom to reject Him too. Through that rebellion, we have sin and all the degradation it has caused. If we had no free will, we'd be nothing more than servile golems. Perfect, but not free in any way.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
we can be from stardust and be from God's hand. "For dust you are, and to dust you will return."
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
We can always hope that Darwin would come to find salvation but I think Darwin was more interested in "sticking it to the church." He was searching but he was searching in all the wrong places. I would hope thag he would find Christ and believe Gods word but it's hard to say. Charles had his shot in life. Hopefully he had a death bed confession and repented for his life. 42:00 ok, maybe not
@richardgregory3684
25 күн бұрын
Darwin had no interest in "stickign it to the church". Why would he? Believers create this false narrativre where scientists are pursuing some sort of vendetta against their religion and make up bizarre conspiracy theories. Darwin simply gathered evidence and then came up with an explanation for it.
@RestoredRandom
23 күн бұрын
The Balls to claim "Darwinists" claim life should be simple 😂 Religions claim simple creation from nothing by a god. Thats simple. And in reality simplicity is the Hallmark of design.
@globalcoupledances
22 күн бұрын
Yes, complex is bad design
@Pyramidalist
24 күн бұрын
Selection IS working ... how do you think is changed from wulf to chauchau or colly ... it was man made selection ... but nature works the same.
@tdzenda
25 күн бұрын
I believe that Darwin would choose to believe what he did 150 years ago. Once, you choose the path he took, you never lack arguments to stress your point.
@brunobastos5533
25 күн бұрын
You did it 2000 years ago
@blaster-zy7xx
23 күн бұрын
Darwin would not lack evidence to support his idea today. Today the evidence fills universities and natural history museums around the globe. The problem is that theists now are on the losing side of evidence for their superstitious and anachronistic ideas of our origins.
@Reg_The_Galah
21 күн бұрын
That is right, I come to that realise after refuting arguments for evolution, that many people have just made their minds up and don't care what evidence is brought forth. People who genuinely seek the truth will find it on their own.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
12 If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
I absolutely loved this video! I didn't know most of this stuff about Darwin's life! Definitely checking out the documentary :)
@akmurf7429
26 күн бұрын
Darwin was a philosopher. Hmm, isn't most religion, at its core, a philosophy (Budisim for instance)? So evolution is an alternative religion concocted to challenge, primarily, the Holy Bible, a historical narrative. Evolution is a religion that, requires, (not an option) death and dying BTW. Judeo-Christianiy is an exception in that it contains a historical narrative and is about a relationship with God, our creator, for eternity. Evolutionists would say religion isn't science. But they are the ones who made it that way by turning their religion into pseudo-science. Inconsistent at best!
@blaster-zy7xx
26 күн бұрын
I always thought it was hilarious that theists attempt to insult science by calling it a “religion”. So theists must suspect their worldview is comically wrong.
@afuzzycreature8387
23 күн бұрын
No. But you do you. Philosophy is just a point of view. Science is about testability. Religion does not care about the ability to test. I'm not even anti religion.
@blaster-zy7xx
23 күн бұрын
Never warmed the chair of a college level biology class, hummmm?
@akmurf7429
22 күн бұрын
Yup. I skipped the brainwashing class. I don't need a PhD to see the just-so stories make no sense. Evolution takes a far bigger miracle than intelligent creation. I was once one of you and read everything I could get my hands on, but the, how, was always missing from the stories Evo's told. just believe me. Well, that's not good enough for me.
@akmurf7429
22 күн бұрын
Neither I nor Robert Carter are not calling science religion. We love science and would never insult it, but The theory of Evolution is not science! It is in fact an alternative story of beginnings in place of the bible and neither can be observed or repeated, This is the the definition of science (look it up). Evolution is nothing more than an alternative history of our beginnings from men who were angry with God. Science is done in the here and now and cannot prove history. The argument is about differing versions of historical accounts. In my view, evolution doesn't stand the test. We see what we want to see. I saw the observable evidence better fit the bible narrative. I don't see landforms being created today like those of the past. All the missing links are still missing from the fossil record, and how do you get a fossil, anyway. Not the way Evo's explain it. And these are just a couple of many examples. I don't think you understand the issue, no matter how well educated?
@l.m.892
24 күн бұрын
Ha. This is the first time someone has explained ATP synthase on YT. Say goodbye, NCSE. Great job sharing the science, guys!
@unletteredandordinary
25 күн бұрын
Rejection of the Trinity is not evidence of a corrupted mind. If Darwin’s family was Unitarian that just means they believed what is explicitly stated in 1 Cor. 8:6 “But for us, There is one God, the Father, by whom all things were created, and for whom we live. And there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things were created, and through whom we live”. The fact is, if your church does not affirm a belief in “one God the Father” then you’re technically not a Christian church.
@graemeross6970
25 күн бұрын
Did you know that the concept of the holy trinity was invented in the second century?
@unletteredandordinary
24 күн бұрын
@@graemeross6970 No, the trinity was not formed in the second century. It was gradually formed over several centuries. Some argue it wasn’t completely formed until the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE/AD in which the hypostatic union was adopted. My point is even if you can trace the formulation of Trinity doctrine earlier than the 5th century it still contradicts the earliest creedal statements Christians are required to believe. So if you teach, for example, that there is only “one God, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit” as opposed to what the apostle Paul elucidated, namely, “one God, the Father” then you have gone beyond what is written and fallen under a curse. You have departed and ostracized yourself from “the Way” of the first Christian church. If you can’t affirm everything Paul says in 1 Cor. 8:4-6 without adding to it or redefining the words used then you need to stop calling yourself Christians and identify as Trinitarians because the two are mutually exclusive terms. You can’t be one and be the other. Sorry…
@edwindundas863
18 күн бұрын
All the wars and atrocities that were perpetrated by “Christians” since Christianity became the state religion of Rome have been perpetuated by Trinitarians. The idea that actual Christians, even of the same denomination, would kill each other in the service of an earthly ruler or government is absurd. Remember Jesus said his true followers would be a little flock and would be no part of the World. A true sign of Christianity is the love they have for one another and even their enemies. Most of the men slaughtered in Europe during WW1 were devout Christians by today’s standards. They were fighting for their respective economic elites who also believed they were Christians. Satan’s a wily Devil.😈☮️✌️
@lebenstraum666
22 күн бұрын
Infinite complexity not knowable by God either thus your argument a scam.
@poliincredible770
26 күн бұрын
Please accept Christ, everybody!
@AWalkOnDirt
26 күн бұрын
Should a good faith provide a hedge against misleading arguments? If it can’t change behavior to promote forthrightness then what good is religion?
@rarajj655
13 күн бұрын
@AWalkOnDirt if your talking about religion "saving a person ' then your lost. Religion DOES NOT SAVE. Only a "RELATIONSHIP " With Our Lord JESUS Christ will save. No religion saves or helps anyone. Religion is hypocrisy RELATIONSHIP is change. It's only a relationship with the Creator of the universe through His Son our Lord Jesus Christ, upon repentance (in order to repent you have to be humble and accept you have sinned against the Lord God). Check yourself if you have ever lied, stolen anything (pencil & pens also count), ever had a sexual relationship outside of marriage or looked at the other sex with those thoughts, those are sins. The penalty or wages for sin is death, but then comes judgment without Christ it's eternity in Darkness, and torment "where the worm dieth not". These things used to be taught when we were kids in churches but because people didn't want to hear truth anymore "pastors wouldn't get paid for giving the message of salvation ". The idea of you say a prayer and you have insurance is not in the bible it's myth. Read the Bible for yourself then try to disprove it.
@newcreationinchrist1423
25 күн бұрын
41:00 "Charles, open your eyes....."
@globalcoupledances
23 күн бұрын
He did! He saw evolution
@7inrain
14 күн бұрын
If Darwin was alive today he would embrace the knowledge that we gained about evolution in the 160 years since he published "The Origin of Species". And he would shake his head in disbelief about these two ignorant clowns in the video who are adhering to a worldview from thousands of years ago despite having had every opportunity to educate themselves with all the knowledge that we have available via public sources.
@globalcoupledances
12 күн бұрын
Robert Carter in the video is not ignorant. He knows that evolution is true but he uses rhetoric to pretend the opposite
@stevebearsley1472
8 күн бұрын
@globalcoupledances I once encountered someone who believed that nothing, with nothing, made everything so very complex happen. But that is so foolish, surely no one would believe it! Yet fools believe foolishness. The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God" (Psalm 14:1).
@globalcoupledances
8 күн бұрын
@stevebearsley1472 - "nothing, made everything"? That violates the First Law of Thermodynamics! What you call "God" I call "Natural causes". The fool says "There are no natural causes"
@7inrain
8 күн бұрын
@@stevebearsley1472 The fool has said in his heart: "Science is too complicated for me. Therefore I believe in an invisible man in the sky, invented by goat herders of the bronze age who knew as much about Physics, Cosmology, Geology and Paleontology as me: Nothing!"
@stevebearsley2308
7 күн бұрын
@@7inrain Hmmm... I'm sorry that science is too complicated for you. If you knew any real science you would be able to understand these things. So, try to learn a little. Even a little understanding of the complexity of life is helpful. Cheers
@bigbluebiblebus
26 күн бұрын
Thanks for doing this. Could you do another one that has more concrete descriptions of the complexity of life so that we can use that to help nonbelievers see. It seemed you were going that way but then spent tmost of time on debunking evolution. Thanks again!
@obiwankenobi2520
25 күн бұрын
“Debunking evolution” as if it is a fringe science. Every accredited university will teach you evolution is true and you can understand it more if you took biology
@Vernon-Chitlen
27 күн бұрын
What would you call Darwin's speculating that life originated in a warm little pond? The non living chemicals became living?
@Vernon-Chitlen
27 күн бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 An individual totally ignorant of the prebiotic chemistry required for life. Who's speculations encouraged Karl Marx, and Margaret Sanger.
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
warm little pond makes sense because no sign that it occurred in the oceans
@Vernon-Chitlen
26 күн бұрын
@@globalcoupledances I mostly use that term because those are Darwin’s words in a letter to Joseph Hooker, Feb 1871
@Vernon-Chitlen
26 күн бұрын
@@mcmanustony I attended a democrat dominated public school. They believed it more important to practice putting condoms on cucumbers than grammar.
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
@@Vernon-Chitlen you are correct about the term. Whole Wikipedia article with that title
@refuse2bdcvd324
27 күн бұрын
Still waiting for someone who believes he evolved from a nonhuman to show us who in his lineage was not human.
@refuse2bdcvd324
27 күн бұрын
@@jockyoung4491 still waiting....
@globalcoupledances
27 күн бұрын
The parent of the first human was nonhuman. Children of that first human are always human. The question is if something like molar pregnancy counts as human
@riverbank2193
26 күн бұрын
@@globalcoupledances the change is very gradual. It's like saying you can't take a step in Maine and wind up in California. It's impossible. But if you put together enough steps, you can do it. That's the difference.
@globalcoupledances
26 күн бұрын
@riverbank2193 - yes, that is evolution: change over many generations. First human, first chimp and their common parent look the same. It took 7 million years (700 thousand generations) to come to modern chimps and humans. The difference is that current humans have that single allele not found in current chimp and vice versa
@kjhgfdfghjkdrtyuiwewe
26 күн бұрын
That would be peak LOL
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
that the chance of life existing is small does not exclude God. He made the world the way it is, and we can see how he did it.
@alinucalinuc4124
26 күн бұрын
Awesome!
@souljarain17
12 күн бұрын
We need to share this to all the unbelievers! God bless all❤ P.S. God created man in his image so it makes sense that when God created the animals he would use the similar traits for eyes, ears, faces, organs etc. That just shows me that there is a Creator and he is our Triune God! King of the Universe!
@ShoestringRacer
4 күн бұрын
Mankind created all the gods in his image. An obsession with obedience and worship and control over others with threats and rewards are all sad unsophisticated human traits
@terrifictomm
25 күн бұрын
I love the parallelism of fractal patterns with the complexity of creation. Also, if this interests you, you MUST READ Chapter 17 of C.S. Lewis' book, "Perelandra." "There seems no plan because all is plan."
@sinclairj7492
26 күн бұрын
Well, his successor Dawkins still holds to the same belief.
@oliverjamito9902
26 күн бұрын
Thank you for attending unto our OWN!
@zzausel
23 күн бұрын
You are not serious. Darwin himself spoke about complexity of biology and conceded that there might be some more principles of evolution. And you should know that the main characteristic of science is knowledge about premisees and applicability, within limitaion. Of course there are corrupt scientist in our world, so as there are journalists like you who not even try to be fair.
@awiljama5234
23 күн бұрын
So, Darwin was wrong because biology was early but we have to believe the Bible which was even earlier.
@MrLogo73
25 күн бұрын
Creationism's claim is, that everything was created. Then this appeal to complexity makes no sense, because it proposes 'complex therefore created'. But you already claimed, that everything was created, not only complex items. Unless you think, each and every thing is complex, which would make you a confused person. First, think your argument through before turning it into a youtube video.
@DepletedUrbranium
24 күн бұрын
You need the contrast between canvas and painting even though you create both. Proteins are just nanorobotic machines. It's the holy grail of SETI, just here at home.
@MrLogo73
24 күн бұрын
@@DepletedUrbranium When you claim, that simple things are also created, then your line of argumentation, that creation follows from being complex is not an argument.
@DepletedUrbranium
23 күн бұрын
@@MrLogo73 That's not my argument. I disagree with his method. I've talked to him at length and so I know he could have easily espoused his position more clearly, but he just depended on his audience being more intellectual than critical. You can't see what he's talking about unless you learn how these proteins interact with each other, epistatically and pleiotropically, along with their mechanical nature. In this case, it's mostly not your fault, it's his fault, because of what he knows but failed to communicate. Most of his other interviews are better, but this one he messed up because he expected too much intelligence from his audience. I've talked to him at length about his knowledge on this topic, and he did not represent it well here because he expected lay people to understand that protein networks are highly integrated but he kept using the word "complex". Your objection is well founded, and I believe he will do better in the future. It's the mechanical nature of these basic protein structures that provides the evidence he's talking about, and he did not articulate that as well as he should have.
@globalcoupledances
21 күн бұрын
@DepletedUrbranium - If you have the opportunity to meet Robert Carter again then ask him why he made the mistake with his claim that every generation has 60-100 mutations? I have calculated that he knows that is a calculation of human-chimp common ancestry
@boni2786
24 күн бұрын
Great!
@Pyramidalist
24 күн бұрын
Information is somehow just usable content ... H²O is just like that ... the result is using the unique structure of it ... repeatedly ... in an unimaginable amount of parallel and in time following processes ... so the result may then somehow a stable molecule ... containing more content/information ... even this parallel and in time repeatedly ... so there starts a sequence of information ... becoming more complex. Of course this is not random and caused by laws of physic and chemistry ... the combination of molecules may be random ... but the result is following this laws. The amount of atoms/molecules and billions of years made it to humans. The law or rules of physics and chemistry ... here is a fundamental question left for science.
@JimWilliams-s8z
23 күн бұрын
Exactly. It like a Neanderthal finding a space shuttle in the desert and deducing it flopped into functionality by swirling clouds of sand..
@toosiyabrandt8676
17 күн бұрын
Hi King Solomon was WAY ahead of Darwin! He said ‘THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN’ Wise words when you realise that no one has ever measured any curvature on the earth’s surface, so we really are UNDER heaven both physically and spiritually!
@potheadtoker11
5 күн бұрын
Dude said 'Darwin probably would've been an evolutionists but wouldn't be a Darwinian evolutionist'. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
@dougsmith6793
24 күн бұрын
Biological complexity would shock Darwin? No doubt, he'd also be shocked by its simplicity -- just a few basic abundant chemicals ... carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur ... as building blocks for every kind of life.
@Steve101747
Күн бұрын
When David looked into the nighttime sky he marveled at the majesty of God. If he could have seen into the microscopic level it would have buckled his knees.
@tikaanipippin
27 күн бұрын
There is a great vacuum in the universe that is not filled with virtual particles. It is filled with the minds and prejudices of self-proclaimed believers.
@zackuidl
21 күн бұрын
The first two words are "darwinian evolution" 🤣... dead giveaway of what's coming (hint: it's not science). And it's been like 150 years....of course we have learned more. "darwinist" "evolutionist" haha This is just silly
@ForeverBleedinGreen
15 күн бұрын
This man is far TOO respectful to Darwin. I mean it's one thing to treat the man like a good Christian should, but it's another to anoint him by showering him with praise he does not deserve. I have always given credit where credit is due - and that INCLUDES bad credit, the kind of credit only the man who knowingly murdered God deserves. Need I say more? Yes! When you can make your opposition look bad with the truth why not? Is it unChristian-like to give bad credit where bad credit is due? I will answer that with a question - do we praise our children when they lie, cheat, or steal as Darwin did? Of course not! So tell me - why do most apologetics heap so much misguided praise and respect on the man who murdered God?
@BillMurrey
7 күн бұрын
I have to voice my objection to the film the voyage that shook the world, first the narration is so faint you can hardly hear it and secondly it starts out talking about how good a "scientist" Darwin was which is baloney. It goes right against what this clip says about him. He was NO scientist and to have some evolutionist on there 'singing his praises' when he was a little boy...bullcrap. A lot of people believed he was mentally ill and he was agoraphobic. He knew nothing about life and was not a 'very inquisitive and inventive youth', check out all the schools he flunked out of. I don't know if I'll finish watching this junk or not.
@robertmcclintock8701
25 күн бұрын
( 。゚Д゚。) The universe was created in 1976. It is too hot to make a universe at the time of the big bang. It can be created at anytime. God is slow and easy. A human can do a lot with their lifespan. I got the hunk. God got the chunk. Everyone else can have the rest. That is song spirit of ''76 by The Alarm.
@АлександрГодзиковский-ь1р
25 күн бұрын
God Bless you guys. God gave us the knowledgeable Worrld, science and Mind. Thank you Jesus Christ for your salvation. Amen 🙏
@Salimkeshavjee
23 күн бұрын
That took a weird turn. Yes to intelligent design, but I wouldn’t narrow it down to Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism - maybe an investigation of consciousness.
@tomametchev2040
21 күн бұрын
oh great, now religion uses science to undergrid its position , which is ironic
@stellarspacetraveler
20 күн бұрын
The majority of Nobel Prizes were awarded to scientists who were "religious". You're welcome.
@rarajj655
13 күн бұрын
@tomametchev2040 hmm you might want to look up the history of how "science" cane about.. might just surprise you. I think it's more like materialism and atheists highjack the entire scientific field.
@stellarspacetraveler
13 күн бұрын
More than 50% of Nobel Prizes were awarded to scientists who are "religious".
@robertmcclintock8701
25 күн бұрын
( ・3・) We need to popularize the idea of getting God married. Getting God married is a good use of someone's time. You are supposed to make the environment intelligent so no God is needed. We fixed the video and audio for the best experience possible. Cameras are supernatural and all of them captured 3D that not a gimmick. The audio loud don't make violence so has depth. Nobody has to buy anything for it to work.
@robertmcclintock8701
25 күн бұрын
(*T^T) Natural selection is the character flaw in evil that is integrity is more important than life otherwise evolution is tragic circumstances with nothing intelligent happening. Almost everyone survive until they reproduce. Nothing is getting selected except for the character flaw in evil. I found a replacement for the character flaw in evil that I liked but God makes me forget things that will cause me trouble.
@timothykeith1367
26 күн бұрын
Alfred Russell Wallace
@JerynToney
22 күн бұрын
Darwin had a hard time being a darwinist in his own day. If you read Origin of the Species, his memoirs and autobiography, he was quite open about his skeptecosm of his own theories. Darwin was funded by people who wanted a critical argument against the Gospel, and he knew it. Darwin concluded that the closer you look, the more the evidence pointed to intelligent design.
@dougsmith6793
24 күн бұрын
I dunno. Used to be a believer. The more I learned, the more naturalism made sense. Under creationism, there's no reason whatsoever for naturalistic explanations to be successful at all -- God simply does not have to abide by naturalistic laws. But naturalistic explanations are monstrously successful, down to the highest possible degree of scientific precision / accuracy. This cannot be coincidence, but has to be God's intention. So either God is a naturalist, or naturalism itself is the creator.
@jimschlaegel8454
23 күн бұрын
Don't miss the free access to the 2009 Darwin movie they offer in the notes. It's a great movie, and worth it just to not recognize Dr. Carter... before the beard.
@joelsterling3735
23 күн бұрын
Never know. If he were alive today he could have green hair, call himself a woman and be completely and hopelessly addicted to tik tok 🤷♂️
@robertmcclintock8701
25 күн бұрын
( ω-、) It's intelligently designed that if you master evolution it just makes you a baby doctor.
@richardpickersgill3434
19 күн бұрын
The instructions for life is within our dna or spirit. What would God do to preserve his work? He would "create a "book" to keep the faith". The instructions for life is within us.
@ATBej
8 күн бұрын
Image a robot powered by AI. Can we expect it to come into being via evolution? Or did iylt require an intelligence 🤔?
@oliverjamito9902
26 күн бұрын
Pop! Darwin have done his best! According to His own understanding! Likewise love with patience towards Darwin! Pop it's ok to correct one another. Without being offended in front! Together! Can bring forth clarity, coherence, adequacy, evidence....concerning creation and all thy shared "i" AM!
@1969cmp
26 күн бұрын
Pop..... we can abandon materialistic evolution.....and discredit theistic evolution.....pop.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
If you look at the fossil record it's pretty obvious that huge changes did not happen at once like the fly with legs instead of antennae, that fly certainly died without reproducing.
@lastchance8142
21 күн бұрын
"The heavens declare the glory of God" and the cell displays His handiwork. "The fool has said in his heart...there is no God".
@kharris3352
12 күн бұрын
38:32 He offers this weird example as evidence evolution is fake. He is silent on the fact that this flatly refutes his “each after their own kind” religious doctrine
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
it's entirely possible life begin in space not on earth in ponds, only basic amino acids have been found there, but we have not searched much
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
the insertion of Randomness into the early universe is a fundamental misunderstanding of reality that I see almost everybody make.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
I absolutely love the explanation of the creation of ATP synthase!
@eysa77
25 күн бұрын
I’m so sad I wasted about 40 mins listening realizing at the end he is just promoting for Jesus
@bashpillai8727
22 күн бұрын
So which god created all this life, christian god ,muslim god, hindu god.?
@1969cmp
26 күн бұрын
'Achilles Heel' documentary is excellent.
@raf952
25 күн бұрын
Darwinian Evolution helped to fill the vacuum of knowledge. New information has refined and extended Darwin's theory, but the core principles of evolution through natural selection and common descent remain well-supported by scientific evidence.
@ianmonk6211
25 күн бұрын
Wow you missed the whole enchilada here. They just shot holes in the theory of Evolution. And you prove God by fulfilling his prophecy of being willingly ignorant and deceived by Satan.
@ZeekRulezz990
18 күн бұрын
It's very complex and we don't know it happened so it must have been cre
@ced3763
22 күн бұрын
You have to be completely blind not to understand evolution. it was already obvious enough in darwin time with darwin knowledge and mean, everything we have learn after that confirm it, the only reason why someone would dispute evolution is because it clash with and contradict the scriptures. No one came up with a better suited theory , and evolution isn't simple, it took 3.5 billion years to make us who we are, a number so mindnumingly big, it is impossible for a mere mortal to understand , yet it perfectly explain why we feel so adapted to this world, not because it was designed for us but because we evolve to it.
@kunalramjunum1207
25 күн бұрын
Jesus Christ is the creator of life on earth. Jesus Christ is God. All glory be to him.
@epicofgilgamesh9964
25 күн бұрын
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Genesis 1:1-2 --- not a creation ex nihilo"* - Dr Steven DiMattei *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Hammurabi - World History Encyclopedia"* (Hammurabi (r. 1792-1750 BCE) was the sixth king of the Amorite First Dynasty of Babylon best known for his famous law code which served as the model for others, *including the Mosaic Law of the Bible.)* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@TroublezAhead00
25 күн бұрын
@epicofgilgamesh9964 Well, if the Tower of Babel incident did happen, then maybe those stories are based on truth. As they split, they took truths they knew to be true and over time changed to match their own culture. It seems that a lot of cultures have similar arching themes. Kinda like how Thor, Zues, Ba'al, and Marduk use lighting as their weapons and are also sons are a higher god. If you read the Baal cycle, some of the characters described have strong similarities with Hindu and Greek gods. Perhaps instead of looking at their "myths" as solely made up and false, we may need to see that there are some truths in there that have been confused. I mean, it is named the Tower of Babel(Confusion).
@danielmandigo636
22 күн бұрын
He would still be a darwinist (a denier of God) Evolution was his excuse.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
There is no such thing as randomness. not even mathematically.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
You can commune with the spirit world. It will kill you.
@seanmckenna6122
17 күн бұрын
Absolutely correct sir .wish more people could see that😢
@christtheonlyhope4578
25 күн бұрын
Like, support and prayers for you. God bless. 🙏
@HuFlungDung2
25 күн бұрын
Evolutionists love carts. They dream of carts, can't imagine the world without carts. But they know nothing about horses. Makes it really hard to understand why there'd be such a thing as a cart.
@spatrk6634
24 күн бұрын
yes because cart is created with a purpose. horse is not. horse evolved.
@noles9998
22 күн бұрын
Don’t be surprised by Darwin’s hate for God
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
I know Jesus Christ well, and I love him.
@richardgregory3684
25 күн бұрын
Yes, of course he would. Because it would mean that Darwin would also be educated in modern biology, none of which contradicts evolution. Modern evolutionary theory isn't "Darwinist" - Darwin got the basic concepts right, but there was much he did not know. This is like asking if Galileo would still be a heliocentrist if he knew about the James Webb Telescope.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
I believe you are so close to understanding the Truth
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
All of life is ONE machine, under God.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
Please read Genesis again, and ask God to minister to you.
@ZeekRulezz990
18 күн бұрын
created by a designer is a G''d of the gaps fallacy
@timothykeith1367
26 күн бұрын
So-called "simple" life would have no DNA. Is there even a conception of a "simple" cell without DNA could have been like? Before Watson and Crick how did they think of "simple" origin of life? Why would proto-life become extinct? If its not actually living as we know life, but can reproduce - the proto-cell seems unkillable to me.
@erikt1713
26 күн бұрын
Life would quickly consume proto-life. Nowadays you cannot leave a piece of an apple outside in the sun without bacteria starting to consume it and fungi settling on it. In the primordial ocean, more complex molecules would have had a far greater chance to stay complex as they were not gobbled up by something. There is a general tendency of decay, but by far not as fierce as our current micro-organisms make it.
@rarajj655
13 күн бұрын
@@erikt1713how do you know this? Is their proof of what the environment was like before? Or is this "theory "? It would seem to me "science should be repeatable, evidence based " if those are not met then everything else should be considered "theory " period.
@erikt1713
13 күн бұрын
@@rarajj655 I know some from experience some by definition. Experience shows me a strong tendency of decay, but looking closer it's most often life that does it, like spores and bacteria. Before there was life this did not apply, by definition.
@tastysidewalk4676
21 күн бұрын
it is like a fractal, so much like a fractal that it is one.
@shdwbnndbyyt
19 күн бұрын
The point for Darwin and his relatives appears to have been to cast doubt on the Biblical narrative for the ignorant.... so it is likely that he would either stick to his ideas or adapt later ones, as long as it persuaded people to not believe the Bible.
@StudentDad-mc3pu
18 күн бұрын
absolutely nonsense, apart from being a rather pathetic lie, it's also a motivation Fallacy.
Пікірлер: 666