@@justryan5697 if you have the build that runs 240+ then why settle for 165hz?
@garganransis
Жыл бұрын
@@CRUMB. money that is another 900
@justryan5697
Жыл бұрын
@@CRUMB. you're right... but in the context of the video I don't think you "need" more than 165hz
@MollyAintIt
Жыл бұрын
If ur a tryhard and don’t have a job and all u do is play games competitively AND have the pc to run 240hz it’s definitely worth It.
@xLogicusx
Жыл бұрын
How does Jackery not have Halloween-themed ads this month with Jackery-o-lanterns? They've already got the color scheme going for 'em.
@Nabeelco
Жыл бұрын
For the USB port colours and their meanings: Blue = SuperSpeed USB Green = Qualcomm Quick Charge Yellow = High-current or Sleep-and-Charge So the blues are normal USB 3, the Green uses the Qualcomm Quick Charge standard (for quick charging your phone), and the yellow port is high current and/or sleep-and-charge where power will be available even when the device is off.
@Juice8767
Жыл бұрын
Thanks king! I have this monitor and I've actually come back to this video specifically for your comment a couple of times now after I forget which ports do what lol
@BARBLEFT
28 күн бұрын
green is for nvidia reflex support. you plug the mouse into that one.
@BlueFlash25
Жыл бұрын
Can you guys check out more “great value for the price” products?
@jimmified
Жыл бұрын
Specifically a vertical monitor?
@simsim6990
Жыл бұрын
YEAH MORE BFB CON
@marcosvictor4935
Жыл бұрын
You guys need to make internal standards for monitor testing, always use the same content, test HDR with pattern images or with specific videogame scenes that you know are problematic, etc, keep it consistent so we can actually make an informed decision! BTW to answer your question, I'd much rather pay 700 for a Sony Inzone M8 with the same backlighting, same HDR capabilities, NO stand and like 1440p or even 1080p to make up for the reduced cost
@mickey-777
Жыл бұрын
Yes i think ltt lab will do this. Short circuit is primarly unboxing and initial impressions.
@zeikjt
Жыл бұрын
That's what RTings and/or the upcoming Lab data dumps are for, you should always cross-reference data across multiple places anyways.
@tyraelhermosa
Жыл бұрын
I kind of agree. These semi-reviews aren’t very scientific and more reflect the presenter’s personal preferences. Hardware Unboxed / Monitors Unboxed do a better job for monitor reviews-as do Rtings, as you guys mentioned.
@sadmanh0
Жыл бұрын
ShortCircuit is always first impressions, not a full review.
@Chron1k73
Жыл бұрын
This isn’t GamersNexus or Hardware Unboxed mate, it’s just ltt
@stefafets2
Жыл бұрын
I feel like what gets overlooked a lot is the range of G/Freesync with monitors above 120Hz. 120 fps is smooth enough, but a jump to 165Hz means it can double frames up to 83 fps which makes quite a difference in my experience
@Mr.Morden
Жыл бұрын
At 144Hz things start to become less significant. The multiplayer gameplay difference between 120 and 144 is a lot bigger than 144 to 165. I don't even care about anything over that because I can't hire an electrician to install a new circuit, pay for new AC duct work, and pay $1500 for a graphics card. There comes a point where high end turns into absurd.
@stefafets2
Жыл бұрын
@@Mr.Morden I just explained why 165 or 240 isn't as useless as you say it is. If you play games around 60-80 fps because your gpu isn't an RTX 3090, having a 165Hz monitor means that your monitor is running between 120 and 160Hz, which generally means picture quality and response times are much better than when it's running at 70Hz for example, which would be the case if it's 120Hz.
Жыл бұрын
@@stefafets2 If your game runs at 70Hz and you have a Gsync / Free Sync monitor with a decent VRR, the monitor will only run at those 70Hz if G/Freesync is turned on, regardless of the monitor. You can turn it off, meaning the monitor will run at full speed but would have to display frames multiple times. But this has the downside that you get stuttering and an more inconsistent frametime of the displayed frames. If you activate G/Freesync and "limit" the monitor to the games lower 70Hz refresh rate, you will get a significantly smoother experience. When it comes to input lag, it doesen't matter if the monitor runs at 70Hz or it's full 120Hz / 165Hz. The time the monitor requires to draw new pixels or to swap colors will be the same.
@stefafets2
Жыл бұрын
@ I mean I thought I worded it pretty clearly, but what you say is incorrect. It might be a feature of Freesync premium pro only or something, but at low frame rates it will frame double or even triple, not drop all the way to 48Hz for 48 fps for example.
@Mr.Morden
Жыл бұрын
@@stefafets2 I was talking about 144 to 165 in multiplayer games. That's a much smaller delta and at 144Hz+ a much higher rate of diminishing returns begins to appear. In multiplayer games the character models at 144 and 165 are rendered in virtually the exact same spot having little beneficial effect on actual gameplay. Honestly though I'm so used to leading off at 60Hz it's not an issue for me.
@corndog9482
Жыл бұрын
If I had to choose between 10-bit 144 Hz vs 8-bit 240 Hz, I would take 10-bit color any day.
@evergreenalba
Жыл бұрын
Without a shadow of a doubt, I'd do the same. It makes for a far more well rounded package.
@KML3rd
Жыл бұрын
@@KFC-Warrior 10 Bit only helps in 10bit content. Most games and videos are 8 bit so, 255 red/blue/green values. 10 bit is best for hdr.
@KFC-Warrior
Жыл бұрын
@@KML3rd Lovely, thank you very much.
@katakouzina
Жыл бұрын
hdr is useless
@mawi5704
Жыл бұрын
With the current prices I think the sweet spot is 1440p 165HZ. It gives you decent refresh rate and resolution. Unless you really have the money, I wouldn’t go any higher, but maybe in the future it changes.
@fynkozari9271
Жыл бұрын
I bought xb271hu for like $600 1440p 165hz over 4 years ago. But it's 27 too small then I bought 32inch last year 1440p 144hz LG32gk650f for $330. It's cheap now. Might as well go 240hz.
@bazz1551
Жыл бұрын
some 1440 165 are the same price as the samsung odyssey line.. the G7 is a very good price for 1440 240. far better then this aoc one
@thor8334
Жыл бұрын
1440 p is awful imo, went for the 4K 144hz 28 inch odeyssy and it’s shocking how sharp it is next to my 27gl850
@bazz1551
Жыл бұрын
@@thor8334 wouldn't say awful tbh but compared to 4k it's obviously bad but it's a great sweet spot for most people. I got 4k 240 odysaey neo G8mainly cuz I have the money and well just do 🤣 that's my future proof monitor
@BenjaminWassink
Жыл бұрын
Gigabyte fi32q or the m32q is nice to. Got the fi32q for €350 from amazon in europe. 4k is nice to look at but you need a high end card above 3070ti to get the frames.
@2010karatekid
Жыл бұрын
I've never noticed much visually going from 165 to 240, but I can definitely feel a difference in inputs. Playing siege and csgo for reference
@Alexandra-Rex
Жыл бұрын
I played SplitGate which was super easy to run so it was basically locked to 240 FPS all the time, then after a few hours went back to Quake Champions where I was around 150 FPS, and it felt more choppy even though it was stable 150 as I had locked it to that so it wouldn't be jumping to higher rates, then drop a lot again. I think it's a case of you won't notice it in a side by side comparison, but if you use it a lot, you will notice going back. But is it really worth it then?
@Skyflairl2p
Жыл бұрын
After 144hz its easy to argue diminishing returns, I'd say 165 is the sweet-spot nowadays. After that it's 90% placebo and nobody can convince me otherwise.
@sentryion3106
Жыл бұрын
@@Skyflairl2p i play valorant and cs and at 240hz i can hit shot a lot better than at 144. Its an effect rather than something i can say i feel the difference
@BIGBAWSYY
Жыл бұрын
@@Skyflairl2p I can actually tell the difference. It's the feeling of the mouse movement rather than the visual difference. - How I know is when I play Apex, I'd suddenly feel some sluggishness and when I check the frames its always the culprit, with frame drops at like 170-200 being noticeable.
@Skyflairl2p
Жыл бұрын
@@BIGBAWSYY You're talking about a completely different metric here though. Framerate =/= Refresh rate. System responsiveness is the culprit there, obviously more frames is better, but more hz past maybe 165hz is placebo at best. But hey its your money anyway, im not saying "dont buy expensive monitors" rather, don't explicitly look for refresh rate - it's generally speaking not important after what is the standard already (144-165hz)
@waveformdistortion
Жыл бұрын
I have a 240Hz monitor, but only because I had to replace a failing monitor in the height of the pandemic shortages. My options were low-end office drone monitors, or spend more than I wanted to on a 240Hz monitor, as all of the 120/144/165Hz models were out of stock in the size I was shopping. I don't regret it, but I also wouldn't consider it an essential feature and would gladly step down to 120ish for my next monitor if all of the other specs were right.
@doomed_to_fail
Жыл бұрын
agreed. I got a shitty VA 240hz 1080p monitor and would love to change to a 144 or 165 hz 1440p or 4k display. I wouldn't even mind going for a 1080p 240hz again but the VA panel is horrendous. The black smearing is super noticeable and the pixel response times are terrible. Biggest mistake was getting a VA... really regret it because the smearing is extremely noticeable. Looking to upgrade soon...
@A.Froster
Жыл бұрын
@@doomed_to_fail Bruh ,VA monitors with the exception of the G Odyssey series from Samsung are terrible. If i may suggest, fast IPS are basically better than any 240hz TN on the market right now and they don't break the bank. But my next upgrade it's gonna be a 2k 240hz OLED screen , i don't think anything can beat perfect motion clarity at such high frame rates. If you want to splurge that's what you have to buy
@hmmmyes6934
Жыл бұрын
@@A.Froster I'm looking to upgrade to something like that as well, hopefully an Ultrawide, but it seems no one apart from LG and some other are making 38" monitors which I really like, and especially not in OLED/QD-OLED
@doomed_to_fail
Жыл бұрын
@@A.Froster Totally agree. I made the mistake of not doing enough research in 2020 when I bought the monitor. I was looking for something 240Hz below $500 and I saw one and bought it not knowing the true drawbacks of a shitty VA panel. I have seen people say that the G Odyssey series is good for a VA panel, but honestly I don't trust VA's anymore, the smearing is something I'll never un-see and I refuse to buy into it anymore. Ill definitely being going for a fast IPS as the IPS panel is by far the most popular right now not taking into account OLED screens. I found a blur busters approved monitor and found many good reviews on the product, here it is: ViewSonic XG2431, only drawback for me personally is that its 24" and I cannot seem to find the 27" variant anywhere in Aus stores. But that's not even a huge issue and Im completely fine with that. Right now its out of stock pretty much everywhere, its listing for $500AUD.
@doomed_to_fail
Жыл бұрын
I might place a preorder around Christmas time to see if it drops in price.
@filedotjar
Жыл бұрын
stopped at the $900 price tag. miss when short circuit wasnt just reviewing ridiculously expensive products that are barely better than something half the price edit: just looked it up and you can literally get 1440p 144hz monitors for 300 dollars less. sucks how out of touch this channel is at this point
@TheDestroyerPlays
Жыл бұрын
yeah this is true, like who is gonna buy this? it's just really overpriced even compared to other 27 inch 1440p monitors
@2649
Жыл бұрын
There are also great 240Hz monitors with less than half the price.
@filedotjar
Жыл бұрын
@@TheDestroyerPlays I checked and you can literally get 240hz 1440p for 600 dollars
@alvzcizzler
Жыл бұрын
They're sponsored, they only do 'reviews' of products that companies send them, maybe not always pay them but still
@TheDestroyerPlays
Жыл бұрын
@@filedotjar that's still a lot! i got mine for 230 euros, its 1080p tho but if all you want is 240hz then it's there
@Joshua-xh6bm
Жыл бұрын
The inzone is the obvious pick between the two. Bad stands (and it is most certainly bad) can be worked around without much trouble
@-SP.
Жыл бұрын
Yeah you can get a monitor stand using vesa mounts for like $20 on Amazon
@JhustineProvido
Жыл бұрын
3440x1440 120hz baby.
@domenicmitri
Жыл бұрын
The curve sucks, but ignoring the HDR thing, the Odyssey G7 1440p monitors I feel like are superior and cheaper at least in the US. I have had one for over 2 years and other than the curve being annoying + scanline issue, the monitor has been awesome. Stand is a bit much though on the 27" which is the one I have.
@skylarflare3120
Жыл бұрын
I love my G7 personally, the scanlines are noticable maybe once a week on a thumbnail but it doesn't bother me or effect the games I play so it's worth it. Will not be upgrading until it dies or 27" 240hz oled.
@jaccckky8978
Жыл бұрын
Just buy aw2721d when discount
@alejandrogross-rodriguez9875
Жыл бұрын
@@jaccckky8978 yep, thats the one, i bought the alienware, g7 and the lg 4k 144hz/166hz OC, played for 2 days straight on all of them, kept the alienware, g7 looks sooo washed out, lg was amazing tho but i only play cod thats why i didnt keep the lg.
@boostedfew8165
Жыл бұрын
Love my g5 34" curved not a single issue
@LethargicCarcass
Жыл бұрын
@@jaccckky8978 yeah for the most part I love my AW. But I also hit the panel lottery and have literally almost no ips glow and no backlight bleeding at all.
@roywatling3856
Жыл бұрын
The Nerdforge PC in the background is awesome!!
@gultar4513
Жыл бұрын
I think both monitors mentioned are bad for that price. for just $100 more you can get the 34" QD-OLED from Alienware. Then you don't have to wory about dimming zones. On a side note, I learned nothing about this monitor that I would not have learned by reading the spec sheet on it at Bestbuy. Unless LTT is planing on becoming an advertising company you really need to standardize your process.. You should not be giving your opinion about the monitor you should be showing the viewer what is good and what is bad. In this way the viewer can make an informed choice as to wether or not they should buy that monitor. Should I save up and buy this thing or should I limp my current monitor along a little further till something better comes out. maybe my monitor just died and i need to know what the min i can pay now and still get what I need untill my finances get betting so that I can buy what I want. That is what a reviewer is there for. Otherwise you just a commercial for me to skip waiting for Linus's next video.
@cisvanderhoeven6085
Жыл бұрын
Yellow usb is ussually charge/sleep and charge. Green is qualcomm quick charge if I'm not mistaken
@Nabeelco
Жыл бұрын
Yep, I think you're right.
@smackaroy2235
Жыл бұрын
Surprised they didn't review the 274qzm. It's the same 1440p 240hz but has hdr 1000 instead of 600.
@goblinslayer5404
Жыл бұрын
144hz for me is more than enough. at this point what i really need is better panel tech, rather than higher resolution and refreshrate.
@Anna_Rae
Жыл бұрын
That’s why I do all my PC gaming on an LG C1. 4K, 120hz oled panel that looks gorgeous. Also has black frame insertion which is really nice. Gaming monitors are overrated and overhyped IMO. C2 can get even smaller sizes like 42 inch.
@eIectrostatic
Жыл бұрын
That's why I'm only considering mini-LED screens now...
@northernleigonare
Жыл бұрын
900 USD for a 144 or 240hz monitor with the only real benefits I see being the resolutions or the fact it probably has a good ips panel. It can't be just me that thinks that is just.. so... stupid. Its so high priced I could get something like the Samsung g9 neo or other ultra wides for the same price, or get literally two mid range (if you would call it that) LG 240hz 27 inch IPS monitors for the same price. I'm just shocked.
@noer0205
Жыл бұрын
There's an error in the title. Title says AOC AG274WG. Should be AOC AG274QG. Tiny slipup, as you got is right everywhere else (in-video text and description) and it's easy to fix. So no big deal, in an otherwise fine video. But you guess NEED to include the panel type in the introduction of the monitor. You tell us it's 1440p 240 Hz. But I'm 5 minutes into the video without hearing that the monitor is IPS. I paused the video and googled the monitor to find out if the monitor was VA/IPS/TN etc. Because the "wrong" panel type "makes or breaks" if this monitor is even relevant for me to consider buying. Other reviews normally include this in the beginning/introduction.
@SodersSTHLM
Жыл бұрын
That thing is 900 dollars?! I got the Odyssey G7 32” for half that price and that’s also 1440p 240hz and has 10bit color
@Kuznia_
Жыл бұрын
I have a 1440p and its 165hz and it's great price for performance
@rossharper1983
Жыл бұрын
Agreed. I'm using ultra wide 1440p 165hz, even my 11 year old daughter has had 1440p 165hz Acer Predator for 5 years now
@SenseiPichu
Жыл бұрын
I love how the character on the box is just t posing lolz
@anomuumit
Жыл бұрын
The difference of motion clarity between 30, 60, 120 and 144 fps is easier to understand if you think about the frametimes. At 30 fps a single frame takes 33 ms to update, at 60 fps 16.7 ms, at 120 fps 8 ms and at 144 fps 6.9 ms. Going above 144 fps you are reaching the point of diminishing results just because human perception starts to limit your ability to see individual frames when they are shown for just a couple of milliseconds. At 240 fps a frame is shown for 4.2 ms, which is half the time for a frame at 120 fps, but just 4 ms less in absolute value (30 fps -> 60 fps is a 16 ms difference).
@staticvoidmain
Жыл бұрын
had to check my play speed settings. he sounds like he just drank 5 cups of coffee and had somewhere to else to go to.
@zebby
Жыл бұрын
Just do what my dad does and put all your allen keys in a bundle holding it together with a rubber band that's definitely from the Cold War times and when you need a certain size you just fiddle for half an hour to find the right one! (:
@NoLongo
Жыл бұрын
Like 180hz is the max I can appreciate. The vesa pixel response rating standard can’t come soon enough. I have a 240hz “1ms” TN but even that’s a blurry mess at really fast motion.
@Gromuhl
Жыл бұрын
Why use the wrong ufotest to determine blur??
@XenomanX
Жыл бұрын
I ordered one of these a few months back and it arrived with a defective panel (there was a whole column of pixels stuck on red). Interesting to see even a big review outlet had an issue with these.
@Robashhh
Жыл бұрын
@3:12 He says he has small hands and stuffs his thick fingers into the stand 😂
@BobSentell
Жыл бұрын
I have a pair of AOC 1080p monitors I bought from Walmart for $30 a piece six years ago. Other than the color calibration of one of them going off, best money I ever spent.
@iTzNicCole
Жыл бұрын
i thought the thumbnail was unbox therapy 😂
@bush2137
Жыл бұрын
From what i know blue ones are just usb 3.0 or 3.1 or whatever, green is for nvidia reflex to connect a mouse for ultra low latency and yellow is a fast charging port
@Nabeelco
Жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that's for Qualcomm Quick Charge. There was even an option in the OSD menu for it in the video. I think you can use any of the blue USB ports for reflex.
@deminybs
Жыл бұрын
gonna stick with my 27" odyssey G7 until 2nd or 3rd gen QD-OLED panels
@AnimeRoot
Жыл бұрын
Intel used these monitors in their ARC Bus\Truck. They are very nice, good image and smooth. They used arms and the blinders. Very good overall, no reports of bad DP from them.
@Spanko91
Жыл бұрын
everyone talking about high refreshrate and 4K. and here i am with my old 1080p 60hz monitor, happy as ever
@JoshuaEatonCA
Жыл бұрын
When I moved from my old 4K panel at 60 HZ that was more of a cinema display and I moved to a 144 HZ 1440p panel for gaming, it was a huge and I mean absolutely huge difference in gaming. Not only did gaming performance increase massively but it was just so much more fluid
@xorkatoss
Жыл бұрын
AOC 24G2U 23.8' 1080p 144hz 1ms IPS Freesync bought this for €219 (euro) back in covid era and it is simply amazing! of course at that time I was using my puny GTX 1050 Ti (because covid) but even now that I upgraded to a used GTX 1060 6GB (160 euro) I still don't get that high fps in games LOL! the only games I can go 144fps easily is CS:GO/Overwatch/LoL but other games like Cyberpunk2077/Spiderman/SIFU/NFS:Heat I am just happy with just over 60fps which is still playable! maybe down the line I might spend more euros and upgrade to something better like a GTX 1080 (300 euro) depends on what I find at that time :)
@vandey3420
Жыл бұрын
Headphone stand on the side is a pretty neat feature... until it breaks...
@NeoCyrus777
Жыл бұрын
If it's 8 bit + FRC it should still say 10 bit like the Samdung Odyssey G7 does. If it says 8 bit, you're not getting FRC. That sounds like it's an issue. I might end up buying this monitor so I'd really like to know if it supports 10 bit (8+FRC) colour at 240Hz?
@seansuico
Жыл бұрын
Thanks Lew from Unbox Therapy!
@StaySic4Ever
Жыл бұрын
Today for those that play online fps and appreciate extra clarity definitely good choice. Just waiting for OLED to catch up... LCD is so meh.
@tassadarforaiur
Жыл бұрын
At this price point, I don't care if the monitor wouldn't directly benefit from a higher end display point standard. It would be great to see display port daisy chaining present
@reconic355
Жыл бұрын
My gigabyte m27q x was a bit more than £400 for 1440p 240Hz and great colours. Would not spend over double the price for middling HDR and built in GSync
@C_x_wtchrexe
Жыл бұрын
Suggestion: PLEASE mention the panel type (IPS/VA). This is one of the most important specs and belongs in every monitor review.
@big_matt3496
Жыл бұрын
Curved panels are VA. Flat panels are IPS. This is a general rule of thumb. So id say it’s IPS
@denisruskin348
Жыл бұрын
Way too expensive considering the Samsung G7 exists for less, with faster response. If this had good local dimming, it would’ve been a different story.
@ArcturusCOG
Жыл бұрын
144Hz is all I need since I run 4k on an RTX3080FE.
@griftgfx
Жыл бұрын
High refresh rates aren't just for motion clarity. It's about latency, too. And those benefits extend to games not played at or beyond those framerates as well.
@massam9343
Жыл бұрын
i upgrade my monitor from 27 inch 144hz to a 32inch 240hz and honestly speaking i do notice the difference in input since i play game such as cs, apex, valorant, warzone. HOWEVER, i would always recommend my other friends to take ANY kind of monitor as long as it is above 120hz until 170hz with non-tn panel. Then telling them the extra cash should go for a better ram, storage, graphic card, aio, motherboard or case. because 240hz probably for ppl who have a high end gaming system and want to bump up all those graphic to ultra max while maintaining high fps. especially if u using rtx 3090 in a 1440p resolution.
@sonicjms
Жыл бұрын
tbh I find the idea that anything over 144Hz leads to any measurable increase in overall win rate to be kinda sus, hell I'm not even convinced if over 60Hz does
@Wylie288
Жыл бұрын
Not everyone is neurotypical. capping framerates to 130 makes a game like Doom Eternal completely unplayable chaos my brain cannot parse well enough to see. Where as 144hz is enough where I feel very overwhelmed, but can at least understand most of whats going on. 240hz would be a god send.
@JKNProductions
Жыл бұрын
Yellow is usually high powered and green usually means faster data (3.1) vs a normal (blue) usb port
@Nabeelco
Жыл бұрын
No, green is Qualcomm Quick Charge, and yellow is indeed high current USB, or sleep-and-charge USB.
@waihongchee9140
10 ай бұрын
What if the monitor cost like 400?? Is it worth it?? 🙏🏽
@jamescrossman4642
Жыл бұрын
1:40 this may be a revolutionary idea… try throwing away some of the Allen keys
@atodaso1668
Жыл бұрын
Still at 60hz 1080p here lol, I don't know any better.
@Glaubwuerdigkeit
Жыл бұрын
Yellow USB typically means Power Delivery >500mA
@DepressedMusicEnjoyer
Жыл бұрын
Small number of dimming zones can be worse than 1, when going over with mouse and you see areas lighting up so clearly
@kingchunk77
Жыл бұрын
If so much of the closing argument was around the broken panel, why would you not reshoot that bit again, you already reshoot trying the display
@cattunger
Жыл бұрын
I like how on the box the swords-woman is just A-Posing.
@Piketom1
Жыл бұрын
It depends. At 4K in games like AC Odyssey, Forza Horizon 5, and CB 2077 I can’t max out the frame rate of my 144HZ display even with a binned and over clocked 3080.
@MaxMichel89
Жыл бұрын
I have a Monitor from this Brand 1440p 165 Hz and I Like the osd Puck. I mostly use it to Change the brightness to Not disturb my wife when sehr already sleeps. There are programmable hotkeys for the osd so that ist nice.
@ChurroWaffles
Жыл бұрын
I don’t know how much of an advantage 240hz refresh rate is going to give me in FPS games but if I can own in Overwatch 2 and Warzone 2 then I’m all up for it.
@WellKnownAlias
Жыл бұрын
Yeah so, does it only pivot one way? I noticed trying to pivot it the other way never worked and you kept having to pivot it one direction only. If so, this becomes a worse option for a lot of people imo because having it as a vertical monitor you ideally want the bezel to be as small as possible next to your main display as well as keeping access to the osd/power button. Effectively this would only work on ONE side of a main display, not the other.
@speedyg123.
Жыл бұрын
27in 4K 120hz with a glossy panel from a reputable company is my dream
@Anna_Rae
Жыл бұрын
While it’s not that small, the LG C2 does that beautifully. OLED panel and can be 42 inches.
@MushiMGO
Жыл бұрын
Odyssey Neo G8 is 32inch 240hz 4k 1000nits. The oddysey 8 is 4k 165hz I believe for about 700 dollars.
@whskyhamr
Жыл бұрын
That HDR Impressions section was odd because with how crisp the image looked from the off angle, you could almost say it was superimposed over a greenscreen. Monitor technology is such a crazy deal now, those prices included.
@Clyoza
Жыл бұрын
240hz is benfical when you actually start playing games that are fast enough to where u need the refreshing. Games like Overwatch and quake greatly benefit because you're getting almost double the refresh rate from the fast moving characters allowing for very smooth responsive gameplay experience
@4doorsmorewhors
Жыл бұрын
Every game is the same, when you double the fps you get smoother gameplay.
@Clyoza
Жыл бұрын
@@4doorsmorewhors lets put it this way. does anything in csgo that moves as fast as tracer/genji ? aside from the bullets no. even the nades have trajectory based movement thats inherently slower. so my points stands. in csgo seeing something move will most likely render literal duplicate frames cause the thing barely moved. whereas in ow EVERYTHING is moving. thus its more useful in ow than it is in slower games.
@4doorsmorewhors
Жыл бұрын
@@Clyoza bud... Double the fps=smoother image... On any game. Even if the object is moving slowly it will be SMOOTHER. Fast and smooth are two different things.
@4doorsmorewhors
Жыл бұрын
@@Clyoza The reason people buy 240hz displays is to have a SMOOTHER image. Not to play csgo.
@Clyoza
Жыл бұрын
@@4doorsmorewhors bud i used the word beneficial because of diminishing returns. my points was to explain that its more usefull in some games than others thats all. u wont be benefitting as much for going from 144-240 in slower games. thats all
@cleaved3453
Жыл бұрын
The difference from 30 to 60 is like the difference from 60 to 360. So it makes a huge difference for sure. So yes you do want a higher refresh rate monitor. Its the same as back in the day when people said 30fps is good enough, 120 is good but the higher the better and it does matter in competitive games, outside of those 60 fps is acceptable for most things.
@Wylie288
Жыл бұрын
Depends on the person. 120 to 144 *matters* a lot to me. 60fps is literally not good enough for me to play many games. One example you probably know is Doom Eternal. 120 wasn't enough. 144 barely is. But at least its barely. If it dips my brain can't process whats going on and it becomes massively overwhelming and MLs become unbeatbale.
@cleaved3453
Жыл бұрын
@@Wylie288 You have to understand that what you are experiencing and ruining your game is the dips not the 120 fps. So if you try locking it at 120 instead of having it flactuate between 120 and 144 you should be fine. The difference is very small so im 100% thats your issue. As for 60 fps sure its way worse than 120 and 144. If you were used to 360 fps i would understand seeing 144hz barely good enough but if not its a little weird.
@LOGICALMAGNET
Жыл бұрын
Yes Jackery's Explorer 1000 Pro is Amazing
@TechManMax
2 ай бұрын
This monitor is £425 brand new on Amazon UK now. Think that's a much fairer price tbh...£900 is crazy!
@RafaelSilva-yv3oh
Жыл бұрын
Why are we talking about this like it's new and the "thing"? These prices are absurd, when you can get Asus 1440p 270hz and Samsung 1440p 240hz for waaaaaay less. We should be talking about 1440p 360hz and 4K 240hz as high end now.
@Lunacy_Phoenix
Жыл бұрын
Frames win games, end of. HDR is just nice to have.
@danielb.2385
Жыл бұрын
I love the fact that the cyberpunk PC's getting screen time instead of laying in a warehouse with an inventory number (with components gutted for other purposes).
@TheDestroyerPlays
Жыл бұрын
i got a dell monitor for 230 euros on sale 1080p, 24.5 inch and 240hz!
@tomppeli.
Жыл бұрын
Looks like I'm still going to have to wait on that monitor upgrade
@superhamz7
Жыл бұрын
bruh, my 27 inch 2k 165hz costs £200, 900 on a monitor is a different breed of human
@LethargicCarcass
Жыл бұрын
Caring about 4K resolution on a 27 inch screen is just stupid to me. I’m using a 27” 1440p 240hz monitor and I can’t see any reason to upgrade anytime soon until oled
@MrXaniss
Жыл бұрын
Recently got a 180hz ultrawide, 180hz is perfectly fine for me haha, then again I've never experienced 240hz
@REDDVL2008
Жыл бұрын
Why didn't he use the LTT screwdriver at the beginning?
@Toby_AM
Жыл бұрын
Tracking targets in competitive FPS is so much easier on 240Hz, if you have the mechanical skill.
@vortexfn5846
Жыл бұрын
I HAVE NEVER BEEN SO EARLY FOR LMG CONTENT OMG IM FREAKING OUT YAYYYY AHHHHH
@PushyPawn
Жыл бұрын
You can't ask for a better review than that.
@DJaquithFL
Жыл бұрын
What I simply do not understand is how and why the RTX 40 series and the forthcoming AMD series GPUs lack DisplayPort 2.0?? I mean, considering that DisplayPort 1.4 is completely saturated with the RTX 30 series it seems extremely asinine. HDMI 2.1 is not that much better. And since most of these monitors only have one HDMI port, how do you connect your PC and potentially a Console to the same monitor? Really really dumb...
@DJaquithFL
Жыл бұрын
.. and DSC is garbage and I absolutely will not buy a monitor that employs that. My current Alienware OLED is completely saturated by my RTX 3090. I'm looking at the forthcoming 240-260 Hz OLED monitors. And the only two viable options that I can think of are HDMI 2.1 and DSC. I also only purchase monitors that have the G-Sync module.
@DJaquithFL
Жыл бұрын
.. I'm certain that you're fantastic at some things but I'm sorry you are not a good source for monitor reviews. Find someone that can actually play games on a competitive level and if there isn't anyone there then that's a good place for Linus to go ahead and hire more people. Find a retired /ex MLG player, that person would add such credibility to your channel.
@jeppebjrnson2171
Жыл бұрын
i have an asus 1440p 270hz 27inch monitor that only costed me 670 dollars. and ngl its perfect if you ask me. (fyi its the ASUS XG27AQM monitor)
@peppyrobo7049
Жыл бұрын
1440p 144hz seems to be the standard and best way to experience online gaming while 4K 60hz is for story driven/ non reactionary titles.
@ChrisWatson1993
Жыл бұрын
Stop, it hertz
@rahulsharda1591
Жыл бұрын
What monitors do you have in the background? Please tell.
@JordonAM
Жыл бұрын
Needing more than 240Hz is kind of crazy. Pretty sure that's like the standard among esports players. 360Hz and above just seem farfetched and too expensive for the average esports player. Even this panel's price is too much. Also adding onto that, miniUSB and not USB-C for the remote? You can charge 900 dollars but can't bother to at least make it USB-C? Odd.
@ta985
Жыл бұрын
The mini-USB is so users don't plug in random stuff, cause people rarely have them around anymore
@REDNAXent
Жыл бұрын
I bet the old panel wasn’t broken I bet they just didn’t configure the settings in nvidia control panel
@marcoang8359
Жыл бұрын
What's that glowing building model in the background?
@typerightseesight
Жыл бұрын
When I bought mine I didn't know my cpu couldn't do 240hz so it's still sitting in the attic somewhere until I upgrade to a newer generation.
@thor8334
Жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for the market to move up in refresh rate and standards so we can buy a 4K 240Hz oled for 800 bucks, i’d say 4 years from now
@johncole4882
Жыл бұрын
How can the HDMI 2.0 be used for this monitors 240hz? I'm confused, I thought it needed to be 2.1
@SaltyMaud
Жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for some _reasonably priced_ 3440x1440 240Hz monitors. Until then I'm sticking with 1080p240, don't want to bother with a stopgap monitor at this point.
@dandel2226
Жыл бұрын
Samsung odyssey g7 has a 1440p 240hz for less then 900. Was a review done on that?
@PookDaWook
Жыл бұрын
Ok I get that these videos aren't meant as reviews, but please at least do the Blur Busters test with a pursuit camera on gaming monitors. It would only take a few minutes during the shoot. Without any objective testing to inform the viewer, it's hard to see Short Circuit as anything more than a channel for advertisements.
@inmypaants
Жыл бұрын
I have a Acer Predator 27” 1440p 270Hz monitor and honestly it’s perfect
@microtasker
Жыл бұрын
I like how it is a co-partnership with that Congress lady from New York.
@DerelictDoug10266
Жыл бұрын
I notice a good difference between 120 and 240, UFO test or in a game. But I've been on high refresh monitors for a long time now.
@Katoptrys
Жыл бұрын
I'm basically immune to refresh rate above 60 Hz. It's a blessing and a curse at the same time. I cannot tell a difference between 60, 120, 240 or 360 Hz, which sucks because it's supposed to be a nice experience, but it's allowed me to spend less money on monitors and stuff like VR headsets, so I can get a better panel instead of a higher refresh rate
@OMGioel
Жыл бұрын
what do you mean by "immune"?
@Katoptrys
Жыл бұрын
@@OMGioel I am completely unaffected by changes in refresh rate above 60 Hz. I can tell when the framerate dips below it, but anything above 60 looks IDENTICAL to me, even on a 240 or 360 Hz display. There's no extra smoothness or responsiveness. Everyone seems to agree that is how it works, so I believe it's just me not being able to experience it for some reason
@sznikers
Жыл бұрын
@@Katoptrys good for your wallet but i hope you're not bus or 30tonne lorry driver : P
@Wylie288
Жыл бұрын
@@Katoptrys Thats good. If doom eternal drops to 130s my brain cannot parse whats going on in master levels. I need to keep a solid 144, and even then its very overwhelming visually. Want to trade problems?
Пікірлер: 684