Its also the warmth in the low mid (200-400hz i guess) from 183 that is so appealing
@ertatta
3 ай бұрын
I was surprised to find out that I preferred the 183 being that it had a more colorful, resonant, & airy presentation. To me, B&K/DPA combined the best of the 2 previous mics, the technical precision of the 170 & the musicality of the 183. I’d like Schoeps MK2/2H & sennheiser mkh 8020 thrown in for comparison.
@patrikstromdahl8399
2 жыл бұрын
Definitely the 183 sounds most natural and with the nicest roomy absence
@ClassicalGuitarTones
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment, Patrik!
@polyphoniki
2 жыл бұрын
Nice performing ! Dpa is the best.
@ClassicalGuitarTones
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@themightyroars
2 жыл бұрын
83 sounds more woody but a bit too percussive. Perhaps different positioning would have helped. I like the 170 a lot.
@ClassicalGuitarTones
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment, much appreciated! For the session we recorded that day, I did put the KM 183 in a different spot.
@fitriyandifilms
3 жыл бұрын
Bravo!!
@ClassicalGuitarTones
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@user-yb8hk1xv6x
2 жыл бұрын
i like 170
@ClassicalGuitarTones
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@andresartesi767
3 жыл бұрын
Hi, at the end you give the info. = Mic A is the TLM170 and at the description the Mic A is other 😳
@ClassicalGuitarTones
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the correction, Andrés. I just checked the file names and fixed the description.
@thefelsch
3 ай бұрын
Which grid was used on the 4006A (close / free / diffuse field)?
@ytb917
3 жыл бұрын
183
@ClassicalGuitarTones
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Elevtr
10 ай бұрын
isn't 183 omni ?
@ClassicalGuitarTones
10 ай бұрын
KM 183 and 4006A are Omni, while the TLM 170 is multi-pattern, also set to Omni.
Пікірлер: 23