saab is like, im tired of people getting this wrong. heres the facts
@smurfhits5688
Жыл бұрын
🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪
@barriewright2857
Жыл бұрын
@@smurfhits5688 YES...! BE PROUD 👏🏿👍🏿🇸🇪.
@jacobbaumgardner3406
Жыл бұрын
@@barriewright2857 be proud 🇸🇪🇬🇧
@CharliMorganMusic
Жыл бұрын
You guys make amazing weapons! We can work together to support UA! 🇺🇲🇸🇪🇬🇧
@riturajsinghpanwar6470
Жыл бұрын
@@smurfhits5688 thanks from india for carl Gustav 🇮🇳🇸🇪
@B1gLupu
Жыл бұрын
While I was in the Finnish army, our tank company instructor described the NLAW with a single word: "Unfair"
@triadwarfare
Жыл бұрын
Just like how knights complained that the crossbow, then eventually, muskets, was unfair, and made them obsolete.
@douwehuysmans5959
Жыл бұрын
@@triadwarfare Crossbows were never able to penetrate plated Armour, that's an urban myth
@liamo8932
Жыл бұрын
Have you Finnished your service now
@liamo8932
Жыл бұрын
Sorry
@salamancajose1284
Жыл бұрын
@@liamo8932 really?
@generalpeeps
Жыл бұрын
people often get distracted talking about NLAW versus Javelin when discussing Ukraine which misses the point. They're not competition they're supplementary. There's a reason The British Military uses both. NLAW is amazing for anyone to eliminate a tank thats is in front of them and an immediate problem. They're cheap (in relation to Javelin) and are highly mobile. Infantrymen can quickly learn how to use the system and can still fulfil a normal rifleman role. The Javelin on the other hand can reach, see much further out and hit harder, ideally designed for a specialist AT team who want to clear a larger area in front of them from armoured threats. These systems work best when overlapped with each other, with Javelins providing anti-armour support over infantry from a dug out position behind them. Targeting the hardest threats while the NLAWs protect the infantry from any vehicles seeking to overwhelm them. They're both great systems although the NLAW really is the biggest force multiplier, specifically for a force like Ukraine, the MoD and Swedish Govt clearly did their homework while SAAB aced the task at hand.
@whatthat607
Жыл бұрын
There are a lot of open fields in Ukraine, making Javelins the biggest force multiplier for the majority of situations. NLAWs are far better in an urban environment though.
@SD78
Жыл бұрын
NLAWS are one-shot disposable weapons that can be carried and used by one soldier. Javelins are reloadable crew-served weapons, which is the trade-off for double the range and increased performance.
@Sindrijo
Жыл бұрын
One other thing that doesn't get talked about a lot is the utility of just having the optical targeting system of the Javelin for scouting and observation purposes, it's a very advanced piece of tech.
@danielbackovic
Жыл бұрын
It's the same with gripen, they did the homework.
@escapedcops08
Жыл бұрын
Like others imply, the nlaw is really for peasants and those who are for the most part... Incompetent. Javelins are specialty, purpose built, advanced pieces of hardware that hits HARD. It's a piece of machinery that you want people who know what they're doing touching, and no one else.
@Nativusdes
Жыл бұрын
Feels like a common trait for Swedish weapons to be effective but easy to use
@RedwihteGame
Жыл бұрын
Well, we do utilize guerilla tactics as main defence of our country. We know we won’t be able to stand against the invading Russians, therefore the weapons need to be easy to use so that civilians can be trained in a short manner r. Eg, volksturm (lol)
@Clarke5409
Жыл бұрын
@@RedwihteGame Sweden can stand against the Russians because they’re weak, disorganised, their funding corrupted and stolen. Just look at Ukraine!
@Leaffordes
Жыл бұрын
@sheldon fords How much does an MBT cost?
@mastermariner490
Жыл бұрын
@sheldon fords Javelin missile costs 200-250 000$ a Russian tank costs 3 million+ i would say they are rather cheap
@nvelsen1975
Жыл бұрын
Not all of them though. Ikea overran the world with little resistance true, but to this day very few understand the intricacies of that weapon system. 😉 Could have a team of engineers fighting that manual: There's still always 1-2 screws left at the end.
@ejr-mb8ty
Жыл бұрын
I’m so glad I saw this commercial. I’m definitely going with NLAW for all my anti armor needs going forward
@szymon308
Жыл бұрын
Order your own today! Available as long as the supplies last. Order in the next 5 minutes for a limited edition lgbt color ammunition
@tomperkins5657
Жыл бұрын
Harrr! I just ordered the mother-n-law for myself.
@threethrushes
Жыл бұрын
@@tomperkins5657 Perfect for dealing with the outlaws.
@antoniograncino3506
Жыл бұрын
@@tomperkins5657 The Mother of All NLAWS ?
@mozdickson
Жыл бұрын
S'all good man!
@danjohnson4082
Жыл бұрын
Sending Russian turrets into orbit every day... Ukraine offers its thanks to Saab and its engineers for such a great weapon. Keep them coming.
@aliwalil4160
Жыл бұрын
Time to wake up, mate. Ukraine will soon cease to exist as a country.
@lorenzcassidy3960
Жыл бұрын
@@aliwalil4160 Here, 2 kopeks for you tovarish.
@lmx1472
Жыл бұрын
@@aliwalil4160 not sure about that, half of russia's tanks beg to differ
@mastermariner490
Жыл бұрын
@@aliwalil4160 Time for you Ali baba to fly away on your carpet
@mkh123
Жыл бұрын
@@aliwalil4160 This will coincide with the release of Half-Life 3 and the next coming of Christ?
@Temedin
Жыл бұрын
I went to an anti-tank training course organized by MPK, a Finnish voluntary defence training organization. We had the chance to learn the NLAW system, and it really is an amazing weapon,;very easy to use, and effective against pretty much any modern vehicle from lightly armored cars to heavy main battle tanks.
@JustinRM20
Жыл бұрын
Did you guys get to fire real rockets or do they use dummies?
@Temedin
Жыл бұрын
@@JustinRM20 unfortunately we only had the chance to use the training module, which has no ability to fire anything. The "proper" anti tank specialists (such as those in frontline jaeger battalions) train much more with the weapon, and I've heard that some lucky people even get to fire the real thing during combat training.
@homomorphic
Жыл бұрын
NLAWs big advantage is weight. If you're an infantryman on patrol every pound counts and a Javelin is nearly twice the weight of an NLAW. That said, if your are motorized infantry the Javelin's 2.5 mile range (5x that of NLAW) and much bigger warhead (nearly 10x the yield) is the way to go. In rural fighting having NLAW for patrols and Javelin for motorized assault teams is extremely effective. When it comes to urban warfare NLAW is the king of course.
@KingdomRepublic
Жыл бұрын
Wait you mean to tell me there are free defense course training for civilians in Finland? Just tell me how do i sign up?
@SonsOfLorgar
Жыл бұрын
@@KingdomRepublic umm... no, not free, paid, and it's compulsory conscript trainig for at least 7 months for every able bodied Finnish male citizen of 18-45yo that the defence budget allows them to afford. In Sweden, it used to be the same, then a conservative government put the conscript system on ice indefinitely in 2006 and turned the armed forces into an expeditionary force. In 2014, a social democrat govt reintroduced a reformed conscript system where every citizen is pre-evaluated at 17 for compulsory conscript training of those found able and suitable to start the year they turn 18 unless granted reprive due to studies or inescapable personal obligations. (Total numbers in each year batch is also limited by defense budget) What he refers to as volountary courses is probably part of volounteer national defence militia training, comparable to the US national guard, it's not open for the civilian general public at will.
@Stefan_Boerjesson
Жыл бұрын
Once being a hired guy working for SAAB it feels very good to see what they've accomplished.
@rampage3337
Жыл бұрын
i saw a add on arbetsförmedlingen and was like wait wtf why is saab hiring? now i remembered that they made more than just cars lol
@Stefan_Boerjesson
Жыл бұрын
@@rampage3337 Remember SAAB Fairchild?
@mahman1565
Жыл бұрын
@@rampage3337 rip saab cars 😢
@adamsaint2890
Жыл бұрын
@@mahman1565 Yes, you can blame GM for that though. Bastards.
@andreelindevall1203
Жыл бұрын
Bor ett stenkast ifrån SAAB i Linköping men aldrig fått chansen att få jobba där, men man får väl göra nya försök att få komma in och börja jobba, vore sjukt intressant
@vova3379
Жыл бұрын
SAAB thanks a lot from the Ukrainian nation for such an excellent weapon, which help our army defend our motherland (especially in the first few hardest weeks).
@isakjohansson7134
Жыл бұрын
You're defending yourselves against the wrong enemy
@vova3379
Жыл бұрын
@@isakjohansson7134 you can come here and ask our people what they think about who is their enemy and also get information from them how many their relatives and acquaintances were killed by russians and how many from them were civilians.
@isakjohansson7134
Жыл бұрын
@@vova3379 Your account is fae as heck bro i aint buying it.
@vova3379
Жыл бұрын
@@isakjohansson7134 My account registration Sep 30, 2011, also I have open channels, etc, also my account can be found on facebook and linkedin with Ukraine location, what's about you?
@highdefinist9697
Жыл бұрын
@@vova3379 I recently noticed that those Russian troll comments can simply be flagged as "Spam" or "misinformation" or something like that, and often they get removed or hidden. Seems less effort than actually responding to the same nonsense every time.
@JigilJigil
Жыл бұрын
Russian soldiers have pretty good experience of NLAW and Javelin effectiveness.
@KuyAurelian
Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately not too many end-user testimonials from them. Most receiving customers seem to be quite silent about it. But I guess that's just Russian bias...
@TheGreatCatsby-pd2tt
Жыл бұрын
Уже провели испытания ваших NLAW and javelin на полигонах. Хрень полная.
@thegodfather_8455
Жыл бұрын
@@TheGreatCatsby-pd2tt must be why you lost 1k plus Mbts, and troop transports
@TheGreatCatsby-pd2tt
Жыл бұрын
@@thegodfather_8455 Where do you get that information from? Oh yes, from the Ukrainian media.
We, ukrainians are wery thankfull to you! It helped a lot to stop russian tank colomns. Great job!
@tanner1111
Жыл бұрын
Your Profile pic is a lovely take on the Ukrainian flag brother, of which i only learned about not so long ago... Slava Ukraini!!!!
@sammyautomatic3944
Жыл бұрын
@@tanner1111 thank you! 😊
@blacksabbath12
Жыл бұрын
you r doing great! we are at what, 7th mobilization?
@HeadhuntexGamer
Жыл бұрын
@@blacksabbath12 You tell us, if you have evidence that this is the 7th. Fact is that Ukraine has so many volunteer it doesnt even need to call waves.
@RakibHasan-ee2cd
Жыл бұрын
No you didnt even receive this lol
@pjacobsen1000
Жыл бұрын
SAAB: "Your baby is safe in our cars, but not in a main battle tank."
@chilldude30
Жыл бұрын
🇸🇪 + 🇬🇧 An amazing combination
@sirrodneyffing1
Жыл бұрын
Britain gave Ukraine 5000 BEFORE Russia invaded. It stopped the Russian tanks dead and showed Ukrainians it could fight back. It was a game changer, ready right when it was needed.
@KingdomRepublic
Жыл бұрын
Yeah i heard about those 5000 but not all of them were NLAW or even anti tank some were anti air and anti ship. Still NLAW is king of anti tank warfare
@kotikbr9395
Жыл бұрын
They got so much they shot cargo trucks with them
@himars_m142
Жыл бұрын
@@KingdomRepublicwhat about javeline?
@KingdomRepublic
Жыл бұрын
@@himars_m142 whataboutism never helped anybody 🌝
@himars_m142
Жыл бұрын
@@KingdomRepublic what do you say about javeline?
@Pfaltzgraf
Жыл бұрын
Probably the best invention for peace-loving small countries against the great aggressors.
@heinrichrahm1531
Жыл бұрын
The NLAW: for when you really don't want to talk to your in-laws
@whitescar2
Жыл бұрын
NLAW is truly an amazing piece of kit. A great value for money deal.
@hyy3657
Жыл бұрын
IKEA
@hoplahey
Жыл бұрын
Not for the russians.🤣
@eioclementi1355
Жыл бұрын
£20'000 not that good value
@whitescar2
Жыл бұрын
@@eioclementi1355 20 grand for taking out IFVs and MBTs that cost at least ten times that? Sounds like a great deal to me. Much better than Javelin at any rate.
@eioclementi1355
Жыл бұрын
@@whitescar2 £200 drone dropping a hand grenade 20 miles away could do the same job. I'd rather have 1000 drones then one RPG.
@AdurianJ
Жыл бұрын
Swedish infantry weapons have a long history of being really good.
@erikaskeroth9720
Жыл бұрын
Well the trend Expands to submarines, figter jets, ifv's, navy/coastal patrol, artillery and more. It's actually easier to say what Sweden doesn't manufacture, like helicopters and aircraft carriers.
@Ampel_off
Жыл бұрын
Great weapons for killing more people. Yeah great stuff, woohoooo. Maybe there should be more wars in Europe, so that more and more people realise again from their own experience that it's no fun.
@thogusdonatus4607
Жыл бұрын
True But the Downside is that the price tag for the Weapons is a bit higher then the Rest due to that we go whit Quality over quantity
@erikaskeroth9720
Жыл бұрын
@@thogusdonatus4607 I agree with you, but i but I fear that if we didn't have manufacture them someone other cuntry would have made them instead. But it's very similar to what Alfred Nobel thought about dynamite and smokeless gunpowder, 130 years ago . And the world didn't get any better for it.
@dbz9393
Жыл бұрын
It was a British and Swedish weapon it's not owned by one single country as it was a joint effort
@Mrspawnshoppe
Жыл бұрын
Heja Sverige.
@rasmussoobik8359
Жыл бұрын
"Hey, I would like to buy a good and reliable car: Saab: I got you bro "Thanks, hey do you know where i could get a shoulder mounted anti-tank weapon aswell?" Saab: you're not gonna believe this
@felldin
Жыл бұрын
Thank you guys at Saab for releasing this video. I feel it's needed out there to explain a thing or two to the internet, and even I who finds stuff like this incredibly interesting finds new stuff. Thanks again!
@mickewester3124
Жыл бұрын
but it wrong, the missile does not fly 1 meter over its target. its 0,8 meters
@longnamedude3947
Жыл бұрын
@@mickewester3124 It's easy for someone to visualize 1 metre VS attempting to visualise 0.8 meters
@janinsweden8559
Жыл бұрын
Good to hear SAAB telling the story of the NLAW development as there are many misunderstandings among people about who developed the weapon.
@rayjames6096
Жыл бұрын
It's the British trying to usurp the credit for it.
@rchatte100
Жыл бұрын
@@rayjames6096 It wouldnt exist without the British and is made in the UK.
@smOOdiebOOdie
Жыл бұрын
@@rchatte100well, built in Ireland. Still Swedish tho. Car manufacturers have factories in a lot of countries but it doesn’t make the cars build in said countries theirs 😅
@stephenhookings1985
Жыл бұрын
@@rayjames6096 not really - I helped in the early stages back in 1991. So for sure that part was British.
@AnonyMous-ql9nj
Жыл бұрын
@@stephenhookings1985 source or it didnt happen. Literally anyone anonymous can say this on the internet bro.
@yodubba
Жыл бұрын
Javelin for open field battle Nlaw for urban combat both are extremely effective
@felldin
Жыл бұрын
The javelin is amazing but with one big hurdle, it's price.
@kainhall
Жыл бұрын
@@felldin also bigger..... the CLU is huge, the tube itself is huge on the javelin . NLAW just looks much more compact and light sorta like a HMG vs a LMG
@philonetic321
Жыл бұрын
@@kainhall Good analogy. Javelin is best within 2.5km, maximum of 4km shoulder fired or 4.75km from a vehicle, up to 5.5km against air targets. NLAW is best within 600m, maximum of 1km and has a direct attack mode which may be used against helicopters. The NLAW is completely disposable where only the tube on the Javelin is disposed and the launch unit is reused. NLAW weighs 12.5kg, Javelin weighs 22.3kg. The NLAW has 600mm of armor penetration, the Javelin has 800mm of armor penetration, both have top-attack modes. The Javelin utilizes a dual charge system to defeat explosive-reactive armor (ERA), contributing to the increased weight. Javelin has the ability to correct its flight path to an extreme degree. Russian tanks aren't equipping the tops of their tanks to defend against Javelin, they are doing it because of NLAW. NLAWs are responsible for up to 40% of Russian tank losses in Ukraine so far. If a tank has full ERA and some luck, it can survive an NLAW.
@whitegoose2017
Жыл бұрын
@@philonetic321 Even a 'light rpg' can be effective against tanks. Target the tracks and if the tracks get loose then that tank is out of commission. I highly doubt any crew want to play pretend they're now a stationary turret. It's not the quality of the weapons it's how they are used.
@philonetic321
Жыл бұрын
@@whitegoose2017 To a degree, perhaps. Though the NLAW is far more advanced than an RPG. I'll take quality any day. Javelin and NLAW are so far ahead of the RPG that it's not even a question. Guided vs unguided. Firing an anti tank weapon gives away your position so it had better be doing its job on the first try.
@andreinarangel6227
Жыл бұрын
NLAW - making Russian tank turrets fly higher and higher!
@_Matsimus_
Жыл бұрын
YESSSSS!
@patrikberglund2873
Жыл бұрын
Aaaaahh. Excellent response from the instructor himself. Seriously though look up his channel if you like military tech. Questions, have you any information on guided ammunition for the carl gustaf 84mm/M4?
@johneklund3310
Жыл бұрын
Eyyy
@hellishcyberdemon7112
2 ай бұрын
@@patrikberglund2873 There cant be "guided ammunition" for a recoilless rifle, it burns up all its propellent at launch and pushes it out the rear the weapon, unless your talking about ammo that has fins and an additional rocket motor
@Badzarely
Жыл бұрын
The fact that a large business haven't turned of the comment section on their KZitem shows a lot of character. Wish more companies would leave their comment sections open.
@DeusMort
Жыл бұрын
Mine was removed. I just said that the amount of destroyed tanks was alot due to this great system... :S
@Dennan
7 ай бұрын
@@DeusMort sometimes some are removed automaticly by youtube spam system
@AnonAnonAnon
Жыл бұрын
I've seen many videos here on KZitem of NLAW in use in the Ukraine against Russian tanks. I remember being taught about Soviet/Warsaw Pact tanks in the 1980s, the reactive armour, the speed and aggression of Russian tank regiments. Scary stuff in BAOR. We had a system called LAW80 which we thought was the dogs bo**ocks! NLAW totally blows that system out of the water! I only wish I was still serving to have a go at firing one!
@grievetan
Жыл бұрын
"nooo, i had such a manly army ad!" "haha, NLAW and Javelin go boom"
@noelsandberg5771
Жыл бұрын
Common sweden W
@hizzlefix1781
Жыл бұрын
Sweden makes the best stuff in the world.
@lambertlum1087
Жыл бұрын
Sweden: small population, but good products.
@shades2.183
Жыл бұрын
Sweden always made groundbreaking weapons, always, for thousands of years.
@aceeastwood2871
Жыл бұрын
I am made in Sweden😎
@Jonsson474
Жыл бұрын
@@aceeastwood2871 Some times we fail.
@aceeastwood2871
Жыл бұрын
@@Jonsson474 🥺
@ppahpa
Жыл бұрын
Дякуемо вам за найкращий виріб для знищення росіян
@isakjohansson7134
Жыл бұрын
Nato puppet state just like the rest
@dorjon6121
Жыл бұрын
Swedes. Punching SO FAR above their weight, for so many decades now 👍👏👏
@chilldude30
Жыл бұрын
So true. I lived there for a couple of months in a suburban block outside of Stockholm and found the people to be great and the country to be very well run, relatively speaking.
@gtboard
Жыл бұрын
True 🤩😁
@nietzchepreacher9477
Жыл бұрын
Had no idea saab made it, thought it was pure British. Fair play
@anderssvensk4317
Жыл бұрын
As a engineer I'm proud to be a Swede.
@HeyAddieImTojo
Жыл бұрын
Fan till o med efternamnet är dyngsvenskt😂
@anderssvensk4317
Жыл бұрын
@@HeyAddieImTojo LOL 😆
@ЄвгенДніпровський
Жыл бұрын
The best Russian tank killer in Ukraine !! Many thanks for NLAW to UK and Sweden !! 👋👍👍✌✌
@teatanks6481
Жыл бұрын
The NLAW answers a question airborne forces have had since their inception: "how do we keep AT weapons light but useful?" While previously weapons such as the M72 or RPG-18 were the only real practical LAT Weapons for airborne or paratroopers to carry, but had the shortcomings of short range and low armour penetration. Perfect for things such as APCs or Trucks, but if a tank engages then there's little much to do. The NLAW now gives effective guided AT at a low weight and cost, perfect for combat behind enemy lines. Truly the best AT system of our time.
@hj45lp
Жыл бұрын
SAAB has done it again! Really Cool! - If only you guys would still make cars, I think they would be unique and absolutely fantastic... From a happy former 900 driver 👍😎
@skitidetdu6672
Жыл бұрын
Cars created by jet fighter engineers. That's something special.
@hj45lp
Жыл бұрын
@@skitidetdu6672 That's how SAAB cars started originally, until they sold the car branch to General Misery...
@adamsaint2890
Жыл бұрын
@@hj45lp Yes, this. GM to blame for screwing yet another good company.
@rabidbeaver167
Жыл бұрын
meanwhile in russia: make more tanks blyat
@steveosborne2297
Жыл бұрын
More like , quick drag us out some T62s
@morganingemarsson9494
Жыл бұрын
And then the t55:s…
@CunnilingusVolcano
Жыл бұрын
My Nlaws can destroy my wife and I relationship, I’m sure they could destroy a tank as well
@yellowprime8491
Жыл бұрын
Ruzzian and their Zympathizers huffing copium hard in the face of NLAW and Javelin. Imagine if they faced current gen weapon systems.
@steve-real
Жыл бұрын
The NLAW has destroyed literally thousands of armored vehicles including tanks. It surprised me just how effective this tech is
@ljprep6250
Жыл бұрын
VERY well done, Saab. That's a lean, mean, and effective weapon system. $40k vs $250k for the Javelin, it's extremely cost effective as well.
@terrysullivan1992
Жыл бұрын
Slightly inaccurate. The Javelin System is about $ 216,000 with one missile included. Replacement missiles are around $ 80,000 each.
@swedenthefirst
Жыл бұрын
Always nice to see the fruit of successful collaboration by likeminded nations. Let’s keep utilising each other’s strengths to all of ours advantage, instead of biggering about whoever contributed more.
@Ampel_off
Жыл бұрын
Great weapons for killing more people. Yeah great stuff, woohoooo. Maybe there should be more wars in Europe, so that more and more people realise again from their own experience that it's no fun.
@DeusMort
Жыл бұрын
The amount of Russian tanks being taken out in Ukraine by this gun is ALOT! It really is David vs Goliat and a very scary weapon to face as a tanker on todays battlefield! NLAW. Sending turrets into space since february! Great platform from SAAB! Bra jobbat! 💪
@blacksabbath12
Жыл бұрын
you r watching the same blown up tanks from different angle. UA math 1 tank = 10 pictures =10 tanks
@tomcluny8423
Жыл бұрын
@@blacksabbath12 Russia has resorted to using t62 tanks for a reason
@sababugs1125
Жыл бұрын
@@blacksabbath12 it was so nice of Ukraine to also make sure the damage to the tanks was different in every picture
@icantalktrash
Жыл бұрын
dude tech is so crazy just being able to look at something for three seconds and your missile locks on in a man portable launcher is just mind-blowing to me
@ВолодимирОлександрович-п2л
Жыл бұрын
Thanks from Ukraine for this awesome weapon!
@LiveDonkeyDeadLion
Жыл бұрын
You often see the javelin referred to as a saint, but NLAW is God on the battlefield
@philonetic321
Жыл бұрын
Biiiiig difference.
@TheArklyte
Жыл бұрын
NLAW may be not the ultimate system as every design is a game of compromises, but together with Javelin and Stuhna/TOW2 they leave almost no area uncovered. Hopefully US will purchase some NLAWs in the future and will supply Javelins back to Sweden and UK to dissuade tanks ever coming close to infantry, no matter the range.
@benghazi4216
Жыл бұрын
Since the US bought so many AT4's I wouldn't be surprised if they do the same with NLAW. But worryingly the US military industrial complex is getting stronger and stronger, and thus we see less and less foreign systems in the US military. It seems every competition they hold now is just industrial espionage. I mean bringing in all the worlds artillery systems, including the Nora, for a competition for the US contract, then deciding to design their own domestic solution is quite laughably transparent. The domestic contender didn't exist, but won anyway. It's like a comedy on corruption.
@TheArklyte
Жыл бұрын
@@benghazi4216 sadly that's often the case when countries with strong military industry do contract competitions. However I'd say that nowadays I see more of the opposite, US opening more to designs from its allies, even if mostly for licensing only. Though I may be looking more at small arms. Even in case of competitions, there is a possibility of buying or at least licensing components of the system. P.S.: what SPG competition do you mean? I haven't heard about US replacing Paladin with equivalents of Pzb2000, Archer or Caesar yet.
@TheArklyte
Жыл бұрын
@@TheXmabax US doesn't have a plane that competes with Gripen. F-16 is too old, they don't want to sell F-18 on terms people want and F-35 has different(even if similar at first glance) niche. Main competitors of Gripen are Rafale and Typhoon. And it seems like a lot of people choose Rafale. To be more precise, approach of many NATO members is to buy F-35 for its unique capability, but continue to use(or buy new ones) Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen or even F-16 as lower end multirole fighter with lower maintenance requirements(not even cost, just the time it takes to send components to US) and more familiarity. So majority of flight ours, routine patrols and training would be done NOT by F-35, those would be mostly intended for potential engagements or real escalation.
@ianmills9266
Жыл бұрын
I think we manufacture our own javelins in the UK these days
@cm275
Жыл бұрын
At 2:28 you can see a Russian tank in its natural state, turret less and burning.
@UngoyPrime
Жыл бұрын
Modern warfare is being reduced to infantry warfare once more because of antitank/aircraft capabilities of ground troops.
@shingshongshamalama
Жыл бұрын
The unit cost of a Javelin is almost a quarter million dollars. The unit cost of an NLAW is roughly thirty to forty thousand dollars. Sure, there are some things that the NLAW just can't deal with. But which would you rather the company have? Two more Javelins? Or a dozen extra NLAWs? For two million bucks, you can have eight dead tanks, or you can blow up the entire mechanized compliment of an enemy battalion.
@JigilJigil
Жыл бұрын
Javelin firing range is 2500 m to 4750 m. NLAW firing range is 20 m to 800 m.
@leonardocurcio6199
Жыл бұрын
My 9-3 had pretty much the same effect on a unlucky lorry I hit some years ago 😂
@pvtnewb
Жыл бұрын
The NLAW in Squad is a joy to use, really easy and accurate, 10/10 would be a heavy anti-tank unit again.
@chuckythecat9894
Жыл бұрын
They have an nlaw in squad?
@pvtnewb
Жыл бұрын
@@chuckythecat9894 yeah, Project Reality is about to as well, maybe next year or 2024
@ThePearsson
Жыл бұрын
After this video i would say it’s still 95% Swedish. It’s made from Swedish weapon-tech like The warhead from Bamse and tech from Robot bill, also from Carl Gustaf and some parts from south Korea. It’s like if mr Bean called Ikea and ordered an NLAW tank killer. Mr Bean get the NLAW from Ikea. The Swedish IKEA NLAW has one part from south Korea and four from Sweden. Now Mr Bean Open the flat package and screw the five ready parts together. Mr Bean donate the Swedish NLAW to Ukraine and all his friend write about that awesome British made NLAW that is all British because Mr Bean screwed the four Swedish and one south Korean parts together. Question for British NLAW cred-thiefs. If you order and buy electricity from Sweden, and Sweden then studying and building a nuclear plant from where they transfer the electricity. Is the electricity British if you then send it to Germany? 😂🇸🇪👌🏻
@twarvg8562
Жыл бұрын
Your analogy might hold some water if the NLAWs were also made in Sweden, which they're not. The British MoD told SAAB what they wanted, SAAB designed it, UK built it. No NLAWs are manufactured in Sweden, and the design work isn't done in the UK. Brits could design their own system and Sweden could build NLAWs, but that's not how the work is divided up for this system. It's a 50/50 partnership.
@gtboard
Жыл бұрын
Also envented by a Saab employee.
@P.G.Wodelouse
Жыл бұрын
maybe the swedes should be taking some of the nasi cred they got for selling the gas chambers to the germans, we know what swedes really are sit down neutral coward.
@randomyoutubecommentersecu7639
Жыл бұрын
Glad to see it doing what it was meant to do on russian tanks. Great tech guys.
@harounhajem7972
Жыл бұрын
If you like this one then I can tell you that they also developed a missile to render the Russian boat fleet useless.
@SonsOfLorgar
Жыл бұрын
@@harounhajem7972 Rbs15 ❤
@luisguevara7402
Жыл бұрын
So it was really invented in Sweden
@MLVL312
Жыл бұрын
Watch again it’s from all over, Sweden the U. K and financed By the U.K
@AnonyMous-ql9nj
Жыл бұрын
Yes
@AnonyMous-ql9nj
Жыл бұрын
@@MLVL312 No, it was invented/developed in Sweden. Just produced all over the world and constructed in the UK. - Production is not the same as invention. Sweden factually invented the weapon aka SAAB which is a Swedish defence company.
@LyricalSteeler
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, design and development took place in Sweden @ SAAB.
@worldtoday9244
Жыл бұрын
Ukraine 🇺🇦 needs more NLAWs asap. 🇬🇧 🇺🇸
@frankdiaz7167
Жыл бұрын
🇸🇪
@harounhajem7972
Жыл бұрын
Here take some
@dionzeka
Жыл бұрын
🇬🇧
@hyy3657
Жыл бұрын
i guess the tactic has changed. they need artillery now
@SonsOfLorgar
Жыл бұрын
@@hyy3657 there's SAAB&Bofors Excalibur and BONUS 155mm shells for that... And STRIX 120mm IR homing mortar AT rounds...
@andrewwww7684
Жыл бұрын
I make the the graphite choke or exhaust nozzle part daily on a CNC machine in the UK and I'm so proud to do so.
@KatsCats2619
Жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊 👏
@mccleod6235
Жыл бұрын
It is so heartwarming to see how people can come together across the world to build a more effective slaughter machine.
@TheCynicsCynic
Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Countries should just let themselves be invaded 🙄🙄🥴 You aren't too bright are you? LOL
@philricher9844
Жыл бұрын
Sad but true, but when the Wolf is at the door would you rather be the guy with the advantage or not?
@capeljov2666
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, and what is even sadder is that it is necessary.
@KirosanaPerkele
Жыл бұрын
A wounding machine would be more cost and resource effective. Evacuation and aid ties enemy resources.
@eamonnclabby7067
Жыл бұрын
Kudos to our innovative Swedish friends....E...
@lateo74
Жыл бұрын
"cooks and Logistics Officers" really are low down the technical chain🤣
@gtboard
Жыл бұрын
Well done Sweden 🤩
@kilianortmann9979
Жыл бұрын
There is a lot that was said in this video, without being verbally said.
@erikaskeroth9720
Жыл бұрын
I its like Saab waving a finger at Russia
@emiltoczyski260
Жыл бұрын
Ive shot one of these, even got the start booster on my shelf. Good weapon
@Eskeletor_210
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Saab for your products
@rodrigoribeiro5225
Жыл бұрын
the swedes are way ahead of their time a simply impressive job 😯
@naezro
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Saab, for developing a weapon to protect the free people of the world. Battle proven and tested.
@janinsweden8559
Жыл бұрын
Known as "Missile 57" in the Swedish Army
@jaxvoice718
Жыл бұрын
Amusingly "Robot 57" (where "robot" in this case means missile)
@LeinoSmaul
Жыл бұрын
I call it irl cheats or ctrl+z :D
@SonsOfLorgar
Жыл бұрын
@@LeinoSmaul ctrl+z+delete🤣
@TheOwlol
Жыл бұрын
Hope I get to see/use some of this tech in next generation of the Carl Gustav :)
@nooblangpoo
Жыл бұрын
Having the tandem power of a short to medium range using the NLAW and the medium to extremely long range of the Javelin ensures that a soldier can have kilometers of anti tank power.
@russellvonastel7111
5 ай бұрын
Everything Sweden produces,more specifically SAAB is of exeptional quality, absolute reliability, thank you
@Retroscoop
3 ай бұрын
IKEA furniture excluded, that is....
@MrLeovdmeer
Жыл бұрын
NLAW: the nighmare of the Russian army.
@subvariantstrain
Жыл бұрын
Nothing drives like a SAAB
@belfastmafia
Жыл бұрын
never realised they were made here in Northern Ireland. very surprised certain political parties haven't spoken out about it
@manitoublack
Жыл бұрын
no better advertisement for an anti tank weapon, than a battlefield full of smoking T72's
@ridhobaihaqi144
Жыл бұрын
Really miss Saab's car 😢😢😢
@Mrfailstandstil
Жыл бұрын
saved thousands of lives in Ukraine, thanks Saab!
@edwardching827
Жыл бұрын
Thank you NLAW helps to defend Ukaine from invader!
@slikerdet
Жыл бұрын
It was the swedish bill 1 RBS 56 manportal SACLOS that was the first top attack system. Then came javelin and tow with a missile that could do top attack
@SkurtavusGrodolfus
Жыл бұрын
Precision Swedish Engineering
@Visionbygt
Жыл бұрын
1 week of instruction in the swiss army to use this beast!!! Very fun to learn using the "game/Sim" that you provide. Saddly haven't the opportunity to fire a real one, due to safety distances
@ISE9
Жыл бұрын
Yeah we had a competition in my platoon who could get the highest score on the more difficult levels.
@paulpowerson
Жыл бұрын
Thank you saab! From Ukraine.
@SuperZieman
Жыл бұрын
Гарна річ! Підсмажила вже багато русьнявих танків.
@captainbuggernut9565
Жыл бұрын
Well done UK and Sweden.
@Oldschool_Gamer_
Жыл бұрын
You can get a driver's license for their car in 1-2 weeks You can be certified to use their anti tank weapons in a day It's that easy
@MaskinJunior
Жыл бұрын
He fought the NLAW and the NLAW won.
@TecraX2
Жыл бұрын
I guess his race is run...
@tinto278
Жыл бұрын
I found NLAW hard to use in squad unless I used it in direct fire.
@5.56mm
Жыл бұрын
You obviously did something wrong. 😉
@tinto278
Жыл бұрын
@@5.56mm yea still have not worked it out. 🤣🤣Good thing it works in real life.
@LeinoSmaul
Жыл бұрын
trust me... easier to use irl
@flolito14
Жыл бұрын
What an outstanding weapon! Austrian Bundesheer needs to adopt it.
@DreamcastQ
Жыл бұрын
Thank you Saab !!
@randomexcessmemories4452
Жыл бұрын
This being the official channel of Saab, it'd be cool to see you guys look back at all the great cars you used to make. My family has owned 9-3 convertibles for many years, and we were so sad to hear that you had decided to stop making automobiles. Someday I'd like to own a 900 Turbo. That'd be fun.
@hj45lp
Жыл бұрын
While I totally agree with you re SAAB making cars again, the 9-3 was already a GM product, build on the Opel/Vauxhall Vectra platform. The last true SAAB was the 900 until spring 1993, the convertible a little longer (also produced by GM, but still the original SAAB design). - And, yeah, a 900 turbo would be a dream to drive! 👍😎 (edited to correct my all-too sloppy statement of the 9-3 being a rebadged Vectra, it did have SAAB elements until the end)
@randomexcessmemories4452
Жыл бұрын
@@hj45lp Mhm. We had an early 9-3 which still had the Saab design and then the subsequent GM models. They never felt as smooth or well-built as the early versions.
@hj45lp
Жыл бұрын
@@randomexcessmemories4452 You are right, apologies for my earlier comment: of course GM first continued the originals, then made a new 900 on the Vectra platform, which became the 9-3, but retained SAAB-DNA until the end.
@SonsOfLorgar
Жыл бұрын
Not the same SAAB company
@SgfGustafsson
Жыл бұрын
@@hj45lpThe Saab that made this video split the car company off in 1989. Each Saab developed after that was by Saab Automobile which rapidly became influenced by GM, who owned 50% of it immediately. The reason Saab AB split the car company off was to “sell” it to GM, so unless you had a classic 900 or older, these guys had little to do with it.
@TecraX2
Жыл бұрын
For people who are not content with their country "only" having 75% more land than 2nd largest country on planet...
@phillipm9285
Жыл бұрын
I can’t believe that I just watched a commercial for the N LAW, and really enjoyed it
@LegitimaDefensaPazYLibertad
Жыл бұрын
Epic Sweden. 👍
@yorkshire_tea6875
Жыл бұрын
Essentially it's the next best thing to a javelin but at 1/10th the price
@philonetic321
Жыл бұрын
Hmmmm, I wouldn't compare it to a Javelin. Javelin utilizes a smart infrared guidance system with autonomous self correction, can go 5.5km and destroy planes. It also has a dual-charge ERA defeating system. NLAW can go 1km and uses predictive guidance. They aren't in the same category. NLAW is still future-tech when compared to systems such as the RPG but it's not made to do what a Javelin can do, like a Javelin isn't made to do what a JSOW can do.
@Juel92
Жыл бұрын
This is great and all but the greatest thing SAAB ever did will forever be my 9-3 -98.
@francislaguna9142
Жыл бұрын
NLAW is the game changer ATsystem.
@LPmcGamer
Жыл бұрын
Cant wait for Russian Trolls saying its Western Propaganda
@Ubique2927
Жыл бұрын
As a Royal Engineer who carried a Charlie G around for 16 years without firing a shot in anger. How about a video about the new Charlie G ammo.
@michaelhammar2778
Жыл бұрын
Behave and respect Carl Gustaf nothing else!
@corvanphoenix
Жыл бұрын
Any chance of an NLAW-ER? A longer range version would be awesome!
@paullangford8179
Жыл бұрын
Javelin.
@rick7424
Жыл бұрын
At longer ranges you need a guidance system. ATGMs are not exactly lightweight.
@Nicer_Ricer_JDM
Жыл бұрын
I thought it was British made but Saab makes very excellent Jets so I’m not surprised 💯💪
@stabilis8895
Жыл бұрын
Watch the video. Sweden made the blueprints under British spec, then it's made in Britain.
@yellowgreengo6764
Жыл бұрын
@@stabilis8895 i love that Swedish weapon, it is a great Swedish weapon, made in Sweden by Swedish people and that is what im going to tell everyone from now on. Also, Gibraltar is going to be part of Spain again, as Hong Kong is China now, and Malvinas will also belong to Argentina soon. Enjoy becoming a muslim country by the way.
@stabilis8895
Жыл бұрын
@@yellowgreengo6764 Incorrect on pretty much everything you said!, Where you from? I bet you lie! Coward
Пікірлер: 1,5 М.