And we all already know that they'll end up together.
@Aura946
Жыл бұрын
god I hope so, the way he smiles when she talks of what she wants to do
@cxa24
10 күн бұрын
Yea, they have to be together to block this
@hazellancaster5465
Жыл бұрын
Just finished watching and I loved it. Yeah it might be predictable at times, but overall enjoyable and the chemistry of the leads is just *chef's kiss*
@lenusniq_9746
Жыл бұрын
This was actually really good. And this was actually the way that Netflix Persuasion disaster should have been handled if they wanted to make a quirky funny movie - they should have told the story let's say from Mary's POV.
@warrior9694
Жыл бұрын
Actually wished this was a series. It was surprisingly good!
@jolijnattema1638
Жыл бұрын
If my dad would brought me a man like him, I would say "Thank you"
@britneytruong3698
Жыл бұрын
This is going to be a hit! I just know it!
@antonelle3477
Жыл бұрын
I ship them already
@maryy.angell
Жыл бұрын
i would give him ALL the chances, gosh his handsome, prince material ❤😆
@ashish_sunny
Жыл бұрын
Kaitlyn Dever is a very promising and versatile actress. She's awesome!
@brooklynbuglet
Жыл бұрын
holy crap! I'm loving this performance of Bradley Whitford. This looks hilarious
@tathoiclassicalindianbollywood
Жыл бұрын
Rosaline, bestie what are you doing? Leave that waste of space Romeo and let's show this love story some real romance!
@avengerwidow9
Жыл бұрын
sean teale is such a dreamboat tho 😍
@rosalynredwood4542
Жыл бұрын
I CAN'T WAIT FOR THIS!🤩the way he smiles at her🥺
@freedompancakes301
Жыл бұрын
Ngl I’d violate my anti-arranged marriage principles for Sean Teale.😍
@sofiandolga
Жыл бұрын
she's so pretty
@darkthaumaturge587
Жыл бұрын
Ah, yes, this is shaping up nicely
@kyakasooramlakavms
Жыл бұрын
Okay, but if Jake's dad is Rosaline's father, then does this mean Rosaline is Amy's sister-in-law, as I think she would freak out. Knowing Jake's dad's philandering, it's entirely possible that he has a daughter in Verona, among other places!
@ramblingnymph
Жыл бұрын
Bradley Whitford is a GEM.
@mrs_mothra547
2 ай бұрын
Literally going to try to find a service to watch this movie bc of him lol.
@chroniclessparks1367
Жыл бұрын
If they arranged me to marry this man, I will saayy "Hell yessss" 🤣🤣
@haroldsrandomvideos7144
Жыл бұрын
looks like a good movie 🎬
@DerekHoscorner
Жыл бұрын
Awesomeness job
@Orinatl
Жыл бұрын
“your a woman-you not supposed to talk about what you want…” an opinion that society still battles with 😂
@jolijnattema1638
Жыл бұрын
Sadly yes
@daisyhuangvuelvas6089
Жыл бұрын
Looks good 🔥❤️
@conitwo
Жыл бұрын
Love Sean from Reign! 😍
@sora4765
Жыл бұрын
This is VERY GOOD MOVIE. I RECOMMENDED IT TO YOU GUYSSSSSS
@fakhrisa
4 ай бұрын
this soooooo underratedddddd
@asniartirtarani6427
2 ай бұрын
i need a sequel. their chemistry is way too good to be wasted.
@taebreze
Жыл бұрын
best scene for me ;))
@reynapool3707
Жыл бұрын
i love it, pretty funny
@alexb4522
Жыл бұрын
“Hello” “ oop… Have a good time”
@scottibrown3274
Жыл бұрын
This looks cute, I might check it out
@kyivstuff
Жыл бұрын
Awww
@knightingale5660
10 ай бұрын
This movie was ripped away from us after only 6 months on streaming services!!! PLEASE someone put it back up!
@Icarus11000
Жыл бұрын
Release a Blu Ray for The Empty Man
@paimalala913
Жыл бұрын
I want to watch this..but Hulu won't let me sign up.. with their classic cant verify email though my email is very valid and correct... even netflix recognize my email 🤷♀️
@abiireland5912
Жыл бұрын
It’s on Disney if u have that
@paimalala913
Жыл бұрын
@@abiireland5912 thanks for sharing.. I just knew it yesterday that this will be on disney..but not sure about the date..do you happen to know?
@abiireland5912
Жыл бұрын
@@paimalala913 it’s already out!
@paimalala913
Жыл бұрын
@@abiireland5912 what? Yeayy! 🏃♀️thanks!
@transformersfan500okane3
Жыл бұрын
Add the Hobbit came out today Sean Teale and Kaitlyn Dever would've been great roles as Kíli and Tauriel
@yuskekurusaki6563
Жыл бұрын
Por favor ya suelten el segundo avance de Avatar 2 🙏🏾😥
@clivechiam
Жыл бұрын
Only on Hulu? It’s on Disney+…
@Lyebak
Жыл бұрын
Oh thank goodness.
@dreamydonno
Жыл бұрын
I just tried looking for it on Disney+ and it definitely isn't on there. Is it certain regions that have it?
@sosos4306
Жыл бұрын
They put most hulu movies and shows on disney+ in the countries that don't have hulu (which is every country other than the US) since hulu is majority-owned by Disney
@GabyHernandez-rv3vo
Күн бұрын
😮😮😂😢
@Jack_TMR
Жыл бұрын
first
@MICANAL_L-F-G-G
Жыл бұрын
Bbbbbbb
@matthewhart9610
Жыл бұрын
I'd much prefer if historical and pseudo-historical productions, even satires and comedies like this one stopped peddling to modern sentiments and had more emphasis on historically realistic ideas. The idea that a noblewoman in the time of the Renaissance would even think of not getting married, specifically for her family's benefit, just wouldn't happen, I mean they might quarrel over the specific match, but for any woman at the time to even think that going off to 'travel the world' is a possibility is ludicrous, it would just be so completely outside their worldview, they wouldn't be possible to even come up with it, the idea just would exist to them.
@Kentrc11
Жыл бұрын
Religious arranged marriage is cringe
@Emma.Lou1
Жыл бұрын
Well it is now, but it wasn't in the 1400s.
@kyakasooramlakavms
Жыл бұрын
We shall inform Shakespeare 😂
@kingslayer3365
Жыл бұрын
It's good that this is not real, then
@cmm5542
Жыл бұрын
@Reghan Exactly. It really wasn't a gender issue, but a class and age issue. Your 'elders and betters' decided important matters for you, and boy or girl, you were lucky if you got any input at all. It was freer in the lower classes because who you married wouldn't have such far-reaching consequences, so your parents might let you pick. If gender politics had existed back then as they do now, Mary and Elizabeth becoming the absolute rulers of England would have squashed out the patriarchy. But they didn't know or care about this as an issue. Elizabeth COULD have said: 'I will marry whomever I please, but he will have no control in the realm and females will now hold the headship in marriage regardless in my kingdom' and no one could have stopped her. But it simply wasn't the ideology of the time, and Elizabeth didn't appear to think it needed changing even as a female ruler. It seems bizarre from our modern perspective, but male and female gender roles were simply accepted as part of the 'natural order' and power struggles happened mainly for other reasons - religion and changing notions of statehood in particular.
@nightangel972000
Жыл бұрын
Once again, we see modern concepts of feminism added to past eras. As if a woman in Renaissance Italy would have been allowed to argue with her father in such a way.
@brunoss.3273
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, because every romatic comedy historical film has to be precise, eh
@Sammathnar
Жыл бұрын
Probably they did, but no one wrote it down of course. History was written by men, for men, and they did not write about their rebellious daughters.
@cmm5542
Жыл бұрын
@@Sammathnar Actually, men who had rebellious daughters DID record it. There is plenty on record, to take just one example, of Mary I's defiance of her father's demands after he annulled his marriage to her mother. She wouldn't accept him as head of the church, wouldn't engage with any attempts to marry her off, generally fought back. Henry was of course an absolute tyrant who eventually compelled his daughter's cooperation just as he controlled all his subjects, male or female. But that doesn't alter the reality OR the historical documentation of Mary I's resistance. Or there's Isabella of Aragon, who married the man of her choice in such a clever political move the king still couldn't disinherit her as his successor. There are plenty of primary historical sources out there written by women: diaries, letters, court evidence, wills and testaments, artifacts, household bills, popular culture references and literature - exactly the same primary sources written by and about men, in fact. History is not 'written for' anybody: it is an overview and analysis of ALL the primary sources provided by the people in a certain era, which has always included both men and women. People who cherry-pick which evidence to include in their SECONDARY source 'history' to suit an agenda, whether male or female, are simply not good historians. Anyone who actually studies the history from the historical evidence itself rather than at second-hand from limited popular conceptions, will be leaning about both men and women. They were both there, both shaped the world they lived in, both left records and their mark on the world for future generations. The idea that history does not include the women is a complete misunderstanding of what is actually meant by 'history.' History is the past, women were part of the past and part of history, and no one's perception of the past alters that reality or leaves them out of history. Just because not all historians chose to study women's contribution doesn't mean it wasn't there any more than those who don't study men's contributions means theirs weren't there either. Good comprehensive history cannot avoid learning about both. The most conservative and narrow history of the Tudor Era is still going to give more focus to Elizabeth I than to any man, because that is what actually happened and that is what history is about, not prioritizing one gender over another.
@P0nyl0ve
Жыл бұрын
I agree if this was supposed to be a 100% accurate movie, but it's not! It's a modernized comedy film! They aren't wearing (very) historically accurate clothing and the way they're talking is completely modern, not to mention they didn't speak English in renaissance Italy
@P0nyl0ve
Жыл бұрын
@@cmm5542 Wow that's so cool!!
@GKViddingHD
Жыл бұрын
This is so American ... No manners.
@ArtemisScribe
Жыл бұрын
I'm so bored of the "I don't want a completely reasonable for our time period arranged marriage, I want to be a GirlBoss!" plotline in "historical" dramas. They're all the same. Can't we think of more interesting points of conflict for female characters these days?
@cmm5542
Жыл бұрын
I quite literally could not agree with you more. How much more deepening it would be to our human experience if we actually learned about women dealing with the central issues of their OWN time period, rather than pretending they cared about the same issues central to our own. For example how no one recognizes what the religious and societal implications would have been for Romeo and Juliet killing themselves: this actually would have been a huge talking point for the original audience that few address today. EDIT: Even though suicide is still a serious issue in modern society and understanding how people addressed it back then might even help us in addressing it better now. But pretending girls back then were feminists when they weren't doesn't help us deal with feminism today. Elizabeth the First could have used her power as queen to successfully promote feminism, but she had clearly either never heard of it or didn't see it as an issue.
@ArtemisScribe
Жыл бұрын
@@cmm5542 the worst part of making an "arranged marriage bad" plot for this is that Romeo and Juliet is already the ultimate version of that story. Lord Capulet initially is a good father, he planned to wait until Juliet was a more reasonable age for marriage, he wanted to be sure that she would be happy with his choice of husband for her, and then he turns and decides to marry her to Paris too young and against her will. And that is the reason why he loses his only child and the legacy of his house, because he was a bad father! Whereas this is going to be "I want to marry for luuuuurv!" and then she's going to fall in love with the man who was picked for her anyway so we take a plot that says "hey, good fathers listen to their children and think about the consequences of their actions" and turn it into "actually its fine to force your child into an unwanted marriage because you'll be proved right in the end" I dunno, I guess I'm sick of people who have clearly never actually *read* Romeo and Juliet taking it and saying "I'm going to make it feminist!" and then they actually end up making it more misogynistic.
@bullrun2772
Жыл бұрын
Goddam I didn’t we get offended over the smallest thing ever doesn’t surprise me thi
@cmm5542
Жыл бұрын
@@ArtemisScribe That is really great analysis. I get that the romance tends to be the most entertaining part for most viewers - it is very often what I am looking for in a book/film myself. But turning every theme of a complex work into a part of the romantic angle, which is actually just one thread of many in the plot, with many deeper questions addressed besides falling in love, frustrates me. I have watched plenty of cheesy romantic Hallmark films that take a tiny romantic angle from a classic and present it from a different angle, usually with a modern twist, and I don't mind because they are simply inspired by Shakespeare or Jane Austen or whomever to make their own story, which they certainly aren't pretending is part or derivative of that classic canon. If this was just 'Shakespeare-inspired YA rom-com', I'd have no issues with it. But it's being presented as a SATIRE or parody of Shakespeare's own work, critiquing and subverting ideas we are supposed to assume were in the original play! But they weren't.
@ArtemisScribe
Жыл бұрын
@@bullrun2772 I'm not offended. I'm just discussing themes I find interesting in Romeo and Juliet and mildly critiquing a common trend in the way the play is often looked at by modern adaptations. Not everything is a hysterical condemnation. I just really like talking about this play.
@sailormoon296
Жыл бұрын
Just finished watching and I loved it. Yeah it might be predictable at times, but overall enjoyable and the chemistry of the leads is just chef's kiss
Пікірлер: 76