Outline: 00:55 Steve Simpson 02:00 Chevron Doctrine 17:44 Delegation 21:45 Future 23:55 Executive Orders 30:00 Free Speech 35:50 Politics 51:35 Other Cases 55:10 Abortion Pill Case 57:00 Immunity Case 1:07:45 Independent Councils 1:12:20 January 6th Live Questions: 1:18:34 Would you be able to explain how Lochner got overturned? It seems like such an obvious protection of individual rights, I've never heard a simple explanation. 1:23:03 Very much enjoyed the essays in your book "Defending Free Speech". Thank you for it. 1:23:13 Can you compare Francisco's behavior where he slapped Dagny in Atlas Shrugged to how in real life one should react to speech one doesn't like? 1:26:09 Favorite Supreme Court Justice of all time? Now? 1:28:40 Didn't the Chevron standard include an exception of courts found the agency to be "unreasonable"? Why wasn't that enough? 1:30:17 whats going on with the supreme court and statutes of limitations? is it good that most statutes are not jurisdictional? 1:32:22 Has the supreme court ever had a proper understanding of the constitution as understood at the founding? Are there examples of good interpretations from long ago? Are we doomed? 1:37:10 Why weren't the Founders more explicit in protecting propery rights? How do today's courts think about or regard property rights? 1:41:29 How can the Court decision making G.W. Bush the Pres. be 5-4? I never like that. Something this serious should've been stronger like 7-2 or unanimous. 1:44:32 Could Trump pack the court with sycophants? 1:48:03 What is the most impactful case in the next two years? Some case that could be big and likely lean towards more freedom 1:50:38 How reasonable is it to expect this court to rein in antitrust power? 1:58:59 Apologies If Already asked; I believe zoning is unconstitutional on 14th Amendment/commerce clause grounds. Do you agree, and do you know of any cases where those arguments are being made? 2:01:07 Has a judge ever had an major idealogical shift during their term? Or are they too old/set in their ways 2:04:16 Does the UK have a Constitution or equivalent? 2:08:36 Do you think "privacy" is really a valid reason to suppoort a right to abortion or to marriage? I don't see a "privacy" right in the constitution. Is "privacy" more evidence that individual rights are not properly understood? 2:13:37 What you think is the future of the Federalist Society / fellow travelers? Do you think NatCons will gain influence, i.e., those who believe 14A creates a "right to be born" & strike down any laws allowing abortion (I encountered some in law school)? 2:17:55 Is there a constitutional basis for excluding individuals from particular countries from immigrating to the US, or for treating certain countries different from others vis-a-vis immigration? 2:21:25 The use of AI by government authorities? 2:21:25 Outro
@diegomorales8616
Ай бұрын
Invite Simpson back often. I appreciate his easy to understand contexts, verdict reasonings, and practical implications.
@zardozcys2912
Ай бұрын
Awesome topic
@johngleue
Ай бұрын
Finally got one through.. Yeesh!
@zardozcys2912
Ай бұрын
Justice Fields dissenting opinion on the slaughterhouse case. Brilliantly trained. Will Google it.
@johngleue
Ай бұрын
KZitem won't let me post anything!! Aarrgggh..
@cweed
Ай бұрын
Steve Simpson’s audio is terrible, almost unintelligible on the apple podcast version
@zardozcys2912
Ай бұрын
How does civil asset forfeiture tally along with the requirement to compensate for taken property
@user-sp1md5xu8j
Ай бұрын
Do a review of Spencer's book " Urban Warfare." It's a very, very important book.
@Zurab_Rob
25 күн бұрын
@@user-sp1md5xu8j is that the neonazi or am I confused?
@user-sp1md5xu8j
24 күн бұрын
@@Zurab_Rob You seem very confused. Look for the book "Urban Warfare" by John Spencer.
@Zurab_Rob
24 күн бұрын
@@user-sp1md5xu8j ok sorry I meant Richard Spencer is a Neonazi its not the same person
@johngleue
Ай бұрын
Doesn't it make sense to let anyone sue for injustices? The trader's principle connects us as potential values to one another, so why wouldn't their loss also be your loss? Edit: or sue on behalf of someone else. It wouldn't matter if the victim didn't mind the injustice because principles in law need to be adhered to, or it will negatively affect everyone. Specifically rights violations by the government.
Пікірлер: 13