schrödinger: Mr Veterinarian, how is my cat doing? doctor: i've got good news and bad news.
@chinoman7234
4 жыл бұрын
Christopher Squires it not Mr Veterinarian. Their title is that of Doctor. 7 species required for graduation. Not just one
@imachavel
4 жыл бұрын
"The good news is it is alive. The bad news it is dead. It is both alive and dead. Also which one you see depends on your point of observation." This is truly mind blowing though studying quantum particle physics. I do not believe in far out quantum theory like time dilation and matter being in a time field where if physical phenomena can escape space scenarios they still cannot escape time scenarios. I believe time is a perception of the mind. Likewise I do not believe schrodinger's cat represents the true reality of alternate dimensions and universes existing at the same time and being applied to black hole theory etc. There is a practicality to it. It is mind blowing how Schrodinger's cat is applied in a practical sense through observation of sub atomic particles. Is the cat in the box both alive and dead at the same time? When unobserved the cat in the box acts as both. However when the box is lifted the particles behave one way or another depending on how observed. Eventually this became Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Practicality would tell us both cannot be real but both are subatomic particles behave like particles or waves depending on how observed. In a way this is how all things are in your sleep there is no gravity or physical boundaries but when you awake they quite clearly exist. Will we ever know the true reason for how particles exist as both at the same time but one or another when observed? Maybe never. It is a great mystery but still the more we understand this the more we understand the true atomic model and obviously if a formula was cracked for why it may take us light years beyond our current understand of atomic processes and fission and fusion and anti matter etc. Even though we know so much already there is so much we don't know.
@5-minutetalkshow263
4 жыл бұрын
we just have to open this box to know which
@crittermoded
4 жыл бұрын
Doctor: I've got good news and bad news, both of which I will tell you simultaneously.
@camilojazzfernandes
4 жыл бұрын
Scratchdinger: You mean it is now a zombie... hahaha
@entoythedragon8463
5 жыл бұрын
So there's a universe out there that I'm a hardworking successful individual?
@LondonCityGirl
5 жыл бұрын
hahaha, great comment - made me smile.
@vipinvnath4011
4 жыл бұрын
@@LondonCityGirl ah you from London?
@fevolenko3995
4 жыл бұрын
No. But on the positive side you might have finally disproven the multiverse theory 🤯
@PatLund
4 жыл бұрын
Yep
@atifvyarawala7077
4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Strange saw all the 14 million possible outcomes and you were hardworking in none of them.
@victordaas
5 жыл бұрын
There is also an universe where a man is put inside a box and this theroy is called schrodinger`s human
@Charlie-zd2dr
5 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahaha😂😂😂😂
@farttilldeath4737
4 жыл бұрын
Lamao
@victordaas
4 жыл бұрын
@Roger Edgerton there is also an universe where this is intelligent
4 жыл бұрын
ahahhahahaahahaahahahh
@DaRoachDoggJrr
3 жыл бұрын
@@victordaas nah. Not in a single universe
@hevnztrash7256
4 жыл бұрын
I'm gonna be totally honest, I found myself relieved each time the cat was observed, it was still alive.
@ayaankhan4316
4 жыл бұрын
So I said to shrodinger, "Think outside the box!"
@purpaxo
3 жыл бұрын
don't speak ever again
@sublime_tv
3 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment.
@Lady_Bug63
7 ай бұрын
LOL
@AnthonyL0401
3 жыл бұрын
schrödinger: I got you a gift me: *sigh* is it another dead cat? schrödinger: we won’t know until you open it!
@Malitubee
2 жыл бұрын
Dude this is hilarious
@AnthonyL0401
2 жыл бұрын
@@Malitubee thanks haha
@thumtak_
Жыл бұрын
Stolen
@duckduckshoes6393
Жыл бұрын
Not true cat actually makes sound from time to time so if you woudl stand close to the box you would know wheter the cat is dead or alive, no superposition.
@AnthonyL0401
Жыл бұрын
@@duckduckshoes6393 Noise is an observation
@cjlimbs2965
8 жыл бұрын
Seems like Schrodinger was not much of a cat person…
@krasoy
7 жыл бұрын
CJ Limbs in another universe he actually did the same experiment with dogs
@krasoy
7 жыл бұрын
POWERSTROKE LOVER yeah because in a parallel universe you'd be handsome.
@krasoy
7 жыл бұрын
idk why I said that
@latouselatrec
7 жыл бұрын
CJ Limbs actually he was.he had a cat
@Snarky79
7 жыл бұрын
+CJ Limbs: He would have made a boatload of moolah if he had talked about pussies!!
@zmanftw
4 жыл бұрын
Me: How many parallel universes are there? Schrödinger: Yes
@cadencooper1828
4 жыл бұрын
Nice profile pic.
@zarrowthehorse
4 жыл бұрын
nice pfp
@idontknow4398
4 жыл бұрын
I don't understand what the pfp is...
@zmanftw
4 жыл бұрын
@@idontknow4398 its half life lambda
@comradekenobi6908
3 жыл бұрын
There's world where Gordon Freeman invaded earth
@25Wingweaver25
7 жыл бұрын
The video fails to mention that Schrodinger created this experiment as a means to prove how ridiculous the theory is though...
@jimh9617
7 жыл бұрын
^ this.
@trevontex
7 жыл бұрын
I agree because if there were a split universe where as to humans are highly advanced (time travel, different dimension travel etc). , wouldn't they have came by now, and or try and communicate or something like take our resources or give us knowledge.
@eleanorsanford4466
7 жыл бұрын
DEV time travel isn't necessarily inter-dimensional, though. they might have traveled back to early settlements of their dimension but not ours. it's also possible that in our dimension we'll never discover time travel. who knows!
@muan5518
6 жыл бұрын
You guys i dumb..i watch rick and morty..i understand it all..smh
@FireyCurls22
6 жыл бұрын
1:08
@joeTo9988
Жыл бұрын
One of the most clear explanation about the Schrödinger’s cat!! Well done!
@iwuvwu123
8 жыл бұрын
So you're saying if no one observes the cat either living or dying it then has a super position? But doesn't the cat observe it all?
@machr293
8 жыл бұрын
+Travis Wells Why?
@blikjekattenvoer
8 жыл бұрын
+Travis Wells LOL. I'm just writing about theology and natural sciences. To me, the major problem is that the two poles, dogmatic believers and dogmatic physicalist use pseudo-scientific claims based on their ideologies. It really corrupts any valuable discussion (being interchange of arguments) and results only in a schism. If you believe that God must exist, fine. I'm on your team. But don't twist data to 'prove' you're right.
@Justwantahover
8 жыл бұрын
It's only a representation of how extremely small stuff behaves in the lab. Much smaller than a cat, he just explains it with a cat so we can visualize it. lol
@SuperSpasticNinja
8 жыл бұрын
+blikjekattenvoer Except there is actually zero tangible evidence for a higher diety. And scientists believe in things after scientific experiment have proven them to be in existence. So don't try and make it a 50/50 situation. It's not.
@maximisatwat
7 жыл бұрын
@Moonlight phan - That's the point Shrodinger was making, that Quantum mechanics suggests the cat is alive and dead at the same time, and that is absurd. It suggests there isn't just a single reality. Young's slits shows a similar thing in a different way. Experiements overwhelmingly support that this model is right.
@wmluna381
5 жыл бұрын
This was the video that actually explained this in a way I could understand - finally!! ✨
@blueorangelettuce
8 жыл бұрын
This implies we are living multiple lives, potentially ad infinitum, in parallel dimensions, without even being aware of one another, yet independently making choices and consistently creating new universes of possibility.
@cynthiahawkins2389
5 жыл бұрын
Jane Roberts discusses this possibility in many different ways, and levels of reality in SETH SPEAKS and also THE SETH MATERIAL. If you're curious, do look for it.
@shadowbanned7575
6 жыл бұрын
In one universe, I wiped my butt... In another, my butt IS the universe.
@mikealbrow4593
8 жыл бұрын
Schrodinger did not invent the cat story to show how weird quantum mechanics is, but to show how ridiculous the Copenhagen interpretation, in which the observer plays a critical role, is. He did not believe the cat would be in a superposition of dead and alive, he considered it nonsense and so do I. The later idea that the Universe splits in two at every quantum event that could have two outcomes is even more nonsensical.
@starlodear2987
6 жыл бұрын
But how did the Sliders on that show slide into all those other worlds?
@Gos1234567
6 жыл бұрын
Mike Albrow so how do you explain the double slit experiment ?
@stevebez2767
6 жыл бұрын
in that case this is not you wrote on a computer but louis xiv mirror missing sum maxswell max swell headliners looky warp o,no,psyco logs metes wot-o dir burtlaw saw stop spy me reps law sherry lepers 5,choose a day kill punx 9,rug rag sim e lards ghost ship mozart glance emc said=time for reg perring,churchills?? unknown...HAL,spin
@stavroskiri5193
5 жыл бұрын
I agree, but, weirdly enough, the Copenhagean interpretation seems to be the most dominant one ... Also there may be "a parallel universe" where you do reply to comments ... (no offense meant)
@stephenmwyatt2
5 жыл бұрын
OH FUCK NO.....that leaves nowhere for sensational fucktards that do not realize when college is over
@ihuxo
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! The logic of Schrodinger's Cat just wasn't clicking for me even after watching 2 other videos I still couldn't quite get it. After watching yours I am pretty sure I got it! You explained it so clearly to someone without any previous study! Thanks a bunch!
@PGonfire
8 жыл бұрын
I loved the video! Mind blown in this universe... In another universe, I did not like the video... but who cares, we aren't there! :P
@stevebez2767
6 жыл бұрын
so fa dough slash shakesperes sov ring gogo beer rings coyote cold tea reads po wets?
@stavroskiri5193
5 жыл бұрын
then how do you know?
@primogaming69
5 жыл бұрын
so which other universe have you gone to? xD.... btw. i had front row seat on the goku-jiren fight. it was intense.
@parishna4882
5 жыл бұрын
Silly person. Every time you die you enter into the existence of the closest dimension. You fell off your bike as a young child, and yet, you only scraped your knee... but everything, somehow, changed. You almost got side swiped by that truck that friday night, on the way home. Made you shake, and be thankful you didn't take that last drink. Yet, everything became different... Every time something changes that you just can't put your finger on, oh all the kids are calling it the mandela effect.. but. it's just you migrating closer and closer to knowing if that cat is alive or not. One meaningless death, at a time.
@jillionairess
2 жыл бұрын
I’ve watched many videos on Schrodinger’s Cat and this one explained it my untrained mind the best. Thank you!
@NithilanDhandapani
4 жыл бұрын
Since I came across this concept this is the second video I am watching. And I am 100% sure that i dont have watch anymore for better understanding. A good explanation love. Kudos. GOD bless you
@andrewnagengast2349
8 жыл бұрын
Flip a coin, I call heads, you call tails. It's tails. But actually it was heads, but because you looked at it and called tails, split into a different timeline, therefore you cheated, it was heads in the original timeline!
@gerardomoran7919
7 жыл бұрын
The theory never mentions going back in time, in the sense that one could look at something that happened and then make a choice in the past... nor it mentions that our choosing will forcefully change the result of the timeline we are set in to our advantage. Nor it mentions skipping between timelines. I don't think you have te right approach to it..
@andrewnagengast2349
7 жыл бұрын
but you can argue that whatever timeline you're currently in happened because of the events or lack of events that had occurred which "caused" the timeline that happened to occur.
@mk17173n
7 жыл бұрын
what a load of crap. I like how no one mentions that the idea of big bang contradicts this quantum crap. How did the Universe come about through and create its structure if the first particles couldn't have a defined position unless it was observed.
@andrewnagengast2349
7 жыл бұрын
or maybe we only see one outcome, because only one happened? And maybe this theory is total bullshit? HowBowDah?
@mk17173n
7 жыл бұрын
what caused the collapse onto a state if only way the collapse can happen if it was observed. This is why Einstein was right when he said you are telling me the moon is not there unless I observe it?
@gabet.1880
4 жыл бұрын
Great video! However, I am still confused as to why observation collapses multiple superpositions of a particle into one position. I understand how the observer effect can alter the position of particles and waves, but what I don't understand is why it would matter if something is being observed in terms of whether it is in a superposition or in a single position.
@freedomstavern4287
8 жыл бұрын
Just shake the box!
@GunsNBudder
8 жыл бұрын
To shake the box would lead to an outcome which itself would be necessarily observable, therefore...particle collapse.
@Wildboy789789
7 жыл бұрын
Freedom's Tavern it's a load of bullshit, if a tree falls and no one's around to hear it guess what, IT FELL AND IT MADE A SOUND we live in reality not fairy land
@donnabaker9920
7 жыл бұрын
+wildboy789789 Or...it (the tree) fell and it made a vibration (or sound wave). Our ears translate the vibration into "sound". So...if there is nor physical ear to interpret the vibration...did it?
@Wildboy789789
7 жыл бұрын
Freedom's Tavern the point is, it didn't act any differently because no one was there to witness it, the tree and vibrations acted normally either way
@LanasDestinyNewsHD
7 жыл бұрын
@ wildboy789789 your just a typical dumbass lol
@petecowley3481
3 жыл бұрын
Surely that means that’s there’s a universe in which someone has figured out how to travel between universes, and decided to come to ours to tell us about it
@to_hells_way6618
3 жыл бұрын
*So, If the Cat is Dead, then "Your Curiosity" has Killed the Cat.*
@jbgaters
2 жыл бұрын
Get out.
@israali1673
4 жыл бұрын
Who is here after watching episode 7 of s3 dark?
@kenezapologist2802
4 жыл бұрын
Me
@kevinikeonu3844
4 жыл бұрын
lol me. who's here after watching the whole season?
@MeiTanteixX
4 жыл бұрын
didn't take any effort to find this comment lmao
@achyutpatil9365
4 жыл бұрын
me too hahah
@FexxerUwU
4 жыл бұрын
Stop. Nobody likes these comments.
@netjunkie9
8 жыл бұрын
In the original experiment (theorized), the Geiger counter tripped a switch that broke a flask of Hydrogen Cyanide which killed the cat - not the tiny amount of radiation.
@RRJTT
8 жыл бұрын
+netjunkie9 I'm glad that someone pointed this out, otherwise we've got some crazy radiation source here :')
@hearwho8438
7 жыл бұрын
netjunkie9 I think the vid said that the radiation killed the cat so it's simpler
@Arancil
7 жыл бұрын
Altair Ibn La-Ahad I think the video said radiation kills the cat because the person who made the video didn't do their research. She doesn't point out that Schrödinger's point was that the dead cat/alive cat at the same time scenario was absurd and obviously not true, showing us that the contemporary view of quantum mechanics was flawed.
@malcolmmarshall4371
Жыл бұрын
Yes but a lot of these explanation leave that out
@lindieinred
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Much easier to understand than the TED explanation.
@praneelpathak657
4 жыл бұрын
Schrödinger's smiley: : ) :
@DhirajMishra-mn3wy
5 жыл бұрын
Schrodinger cat is just an amazing concept to explain about unique aspect of quantum theory. His wave equation is more complicated.
@ervansolihin5504
9 жыл бұрын
Could you believe that?! Universe is full of mysteries :D and great explaination tho :)
@LondonCityGirl
9 жыл бұрын
Ervan Solihin thanks Ervan, I appreciate you watching and commenting :)
@clydea3679
5 жыл бұрын
THE UNIVERSES ARE FULL OF MORONS WHO DON'T GIVE A DAMN FOR ANIMAL WELL-BEING.
@spiritualanarchist8162
6 жыл бұрын
Actually, what almost everyone seems to have forgotten is that A. 'Schrodinger'S cat' was Schrodinger ironic statement concerning the theory of superposition. B. The point of the whole cat being ' both death and alive' was his way of asking the question 'Where lies the border between quantum reality and Macro reality? He chose the unpredictability of Uranium's decay as the representation of quantum reality. And the cat presenting the macro reality . The cat being 'both death and alive' pointing to the absurdity of superposition.
@Meliekmilkz
7 жыл бұрын
There was a man that had a pet cat/dog, so smart, that when he said to the animal: Do you wanna play fetch or not? The cat/dog played fetch or not at the same time.
@Larissas-Jungle
3 жыл бұрын
more like AND not
@edgarpena3994
6 жыл бұрын
Could there be a universe where the cat puts Schrodinger in a box?
@quovadis7119
5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@pranitp.29
3 жыл бұрын
Lmfao
@m1k34l3
5 жыл бұрын
I learned 2 things: 1.i understood this theory 2.that Stan lee did his research veeery well :) Rip Stan lee :(
@baianinhooreidasinuquinha4312
4 жыл бұрын
Why exactly?
@brianswingle198
4 жыл бұрын
this quarantine got me searching up some crazy shit
@Highwizardd
4 жыл бұрын
ya.......
@pushkarkulkarni4861
5 жыл бұрын
Anyone will be in love with physics when he truely understands it. If ur not in love, u dont understand it
@wmstuckey
4 ай бұрын
What people fail to mention when talking about quantum superposition using Schrodinger's Cat is the difference between a classical bit of information (like a computer bit being on or off) and a quantum bit of information (a qubit). Both bits produce one of two outcomes when queried (measured), but a classical bit has only one measurement possible while a qubit can be measured in many different ways (infinitely many, actually), each with two possible outcomes. For example, when you pass an electron through an inhomogeneous magnetic field, the electron is either deflected towards the North magnetic pole ("up") or towards the South magnetic pole ("down"). You can orient the N-S magnetic field in any direction you like and the electrons will still give one of those two outcomes, so electron spin is a qubit with two outcomes of spin "up" and spin "down" relative the the N-S magnetic field. Now suppose you pass electrons through a N-S magnetic field oriented vertically and then send those that were deflected "up" (literally up in this case) to a N-S magnetic field oriented horizontally. What do you expect to find? Well since the electrons have vertical spin up and spin is a vector (picture an arrow pointing upward here), then you probably expect the electron to pass straight through the horizontal magnetic field, i.e., they won't be deflected left or right at all ("up" or "down" relative to the horizontal N-S field). That's because the electron's spin vector (arrow) points up which means it doesn't point side-to-side (left of right) at all, so your horizontal spin measurement of a vertical spin up electron should seemingly yield a result of zero horizontal spin. But what you find instead is that 50% of the vertical spin up electrons are deflected left ("up" towards North pole) and 50% are deflected right ("down" towards South pole). True, 50% left plus 50% right *averages* to zero, but that's not what you expect from the measurement of a vector quantity in ordinary classical mechanics. [Aside: Quantum mechanics gives the classically expected results on average over the discrete or quantum measurement outcomes.] This is quantum superposition, a vertical spin up electron is a quantum superposition of 50% horizontal spin left and 50% horizontal spin right and we write that as |V+> = |H+> + |H-> (divided by root 2 for normalization, but I don't need that to make my point). The point here is the horizontal spin measurement of the quantum state |V+> produces each of its two "up"-"down" (left-right) results in 50-50 fashion. This is exactly what you hear people say about Schrodinger's Cat, i.e., you open the box and find the cat is dead with 50% probability or find the cat is alive with 50% probability. With that information alone, Schrodinger's Cat could be a classical bit or a qubit. If Schrodinger's Cat is a qubit, then there must be a measurement of the cat-box system like the vertical spin measurement of the state |V+> that produces |V+>, i.e., |H+> + |H->, with 100% certainty. We know the measurement "open the box" producing "Live Cat"-"Dead Cat" results in 50-50 fashion is analogous to the horizontal spin measurement of |V+>, so what is the measurement of the cat-box system giving |Live Cat> + |Dead Cat> with 100% certainty in analogy with the vertical spin measurement of the state |V+> that produces |V+> with 100% certainty? And what does its outcome mean physically? If you can't articulate that measurement and outcome of the cat-box system, and every possible measurement between that measurement and the "open the box" measurement, then the cat-box system is just a classical bit ... like flipping a coin to find heads or tails. No quantum superposition there 🙂 To read more about the quantum information approach to entanglement for the "general reader," see "Einstein's Entanglement: Bell Inequalities, Relativity, and the Qubit" due out in June 2024 with Oxford UP.
@francobaby1005
5 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. In another universe it was absolutely dreadful. Oh well, good thing we aren't there ;)
@prophecybydefault4708
2 жыл бұрын
In one universe all evil dissapeared and humanity ascended to a higher state. Oh well, good thing we aren't there ;)
@captaincrayon8276
4 жыл бұрын
Finally a video that actually made this make sense
@TheEoGuitar
7 жыл бұрын
I really like your videos!! Keep up the good work
@LondonCityGirl
7 жыл бұрын
thank you! :) x
@MrUranium238
8 жыл бұрын
26 cats voted this video down
@LondonCityGirl
8 жыл бұрын
Great comment! ;D
@yungcrowley6415
7 жыл бұрын
and 1,100 upvoted it
@idontknow4398
4 жыл бұрын
@@yungcrowley6415 Those were dogs
@amunosiris6812
3 жыл бұрын
the first time someone explained these ideas in a logical way bravo! encore!
@ImaginaryTerrie3
5 жыл бұрын
So since I'm here in my room with no one observing me am I in a super state? Am I everywhere?
@ajesusencounter8261
5 жыл бұрын
What I thought, too
@crittermoded
4 жыл бұрын
No, because you are observing yourself by being consciously aware of your own being and surroundings, thus preventing a superstate from occurring.
@roshnirandhawa5238
4 жыл бұрын
Only if you are smoking a joint
@iamjleeds2
7 жыл бұрын
Best explanation of Schrodinger's cat and its implications I have found.
@quahntasy
4 жыл бұрын
Hello from 2020. *I’d say just shake the box*
@joerafferty3248
Жыл бұрын
Erwin Schrödinger was driving home one night when he was pulled over by the police. The officer asked him to step out of the car while he searched the vehicle. After a while, he went to the back of the car and opened the trunk. In that moment, the officer said, "hey do you know that you've got a dead cat in here?" To which Schrödinger replies, "Well I do now".
@djiskindacool2905
6 жыл бұрын
Why can’t you just get a glass box?
@amymartinez7631
5 жыл бұрын
you would be observing the cat
@parishna4882
5 жыл бұрын
No, a glass box is a fish tank, and only a blindingly slow and retarded pet fish would think of such things.
@arcaipekyun4232
4 жыл бұрын
Doran Krotan observing would affect the result of the experiment
@fredtheskrub4525
4 жыл бұрын
@@arcaipekyun4232 would it though? i could watch a murderer kill a man and would he stop? would he continue if he didn't see me? of course. of course he would. just because you can observe things most likely doesn't mean it'll change. you didn't observe it but you will still see that a murder happened in the news.
@arcaipekyun4232
4 жыл бұрын
Fred The Skrub reference is not right. Thing is if there were no observers in your example, then you wouldn’t know what has really happened. As soon as you observe, you will learn it. But if you were there watching it, then you would directly learn it, so there wouldn’t be that situation where you didn’t know what happened. When you talk about schrödinger’s cat and that observing changes something, you mean that immediately when you observe that, for you that very thing will go from uncertainty to certainty. Same goes for the murderer. If there are no observers, then it would be an uncertainty, and what has happened would only be certain when someone goes to the crime scene. But if you were watching it, then the uncertainty would not happen, and the situation would be clear. You understood this wrong. Observer changes the event is not that observer changing something from happening to not. It is that with an observer there are no uncertainty.
@sherwindavirao2738
7 жыл бұрын
I love the way this was explained. I understood this topic even more.
@tamaldas9216
4 жыл бұрын
Anyone here from Dark
@ReptilianRichardRamirez
4 жыл бұрын
No, but it is an excellent show that does a great job of applying these quantum science concept
@BenR66
3 жыл бұрын
Haha yes I needed to understand Season 3 episode 7
@cornemouton2740
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, looks good, started watching it
@BenR66
3 жыл бұрын
@@cornemouton2740 I doubt youll regret it
@arnavkumar8388
4 жыл бұрын
Way more satisfying than any other videos over this theory
@adama9300
6 жыл бұрын
"OH, a world where we're all evil" "Been there-it sucks"
@amelianotchoahtae
3 ай бұрын
Box: meow Schrodinger: ignore that
@manasinikam2708
4 жыл бұрын
the biggest use of this theory is seen in dark season 3 by seeing that u correct understand it🤗😁😅
@nikster4729
4 жыл бұрын
thank you, you explained this very clearly. this is seriously crazy stuff
@ExploreLearnEnglishWithGeorge
4 жыл бұрын
in my universe we call this "Cat's Shrodinger", it's about a Shrodinger in a box, meow.
@paydankgang7772
4 жыл бұрын
My head has never hurt this much
@shune84
8 жыл бұрын
just so you know if you try this the cat will probably be dead
@glazar102170
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, London City Girl, that was a fantastic breakdown.
@sauvejean-luc3814
4 жыл бұрын
I usually take this as the poorest theory I've ever heard
@ianriddell5635
7 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Super straight forward, well informed and easy to follow. Definitely subscribed, keep up the great work!
@ashishkushwaha3812
4 жыл бұрын
So I am rich, handsome, and famous in another world. But my states collapsed into reality and it is my observer's fault :D
@davidgv3527
4 жыл бұрын
Great video. Easy to understand.
@zn3rgy1000
7 жыл бұрын
Put a camera on the box and the Universe will not split. 😊
@NotSandhorst
5 жыл бұрын
but then you still wont know if the cat is alive or dead until you look at the camera and maybe in another universe the camera doesnt show anything there cant just be two super positions there are infinite ones and that is probably why black holes were created. too many super positions so there is super position that stops super positions. i dont know what im trying to say any more....
@deathkitsune6839
5 жыл бұрын
nope, cause now it has split, one where there is no camera put on the box
@parishna4882
5 жыл бұрын
No, a passive observation has zero impact on the experiment. In this case, there is no requirement other than passive observation, to determine if the cat is alive or dead. However, at a quantum level, one must interfere with whatever is to be measured in order to gauge a difference. A dark room, you're blindfolded. Reach out to see if there is a glass of water in front of you. You feel the table, interfering with it as you do, and suddenly you feel your hand knock over the glass of water. By sheer observation, you destroyed the coherency of the glass of water, but you did discover that it was there. You have to alter the outcome, at a quantum level, just to know if the experiment was viable. But a cat in a box has no such inclusions. A better test would be to put 2 cats in a box.
@mr.waelaboelyazid.1365
6 жыл бұрын
thank you for your easy to understand explanation
@HowardWimshurst
6 жыл бұрын
did anyone else look this up after watching the film "coherence"?
@jknMEMES
4 жыл бұрын
Nah, Schrödinger Flirt from me_irl
@chalisharidhati5616
3 жыл бұрын
HAHAH bunny girl senpai for me
@jrcraig9791
3 жыл бұрын
Chelsea Chalisha yep rewatching rn
@polaroidsky
3 жыл бұрын
I'm here because of Dark
@Goldensimba815
3 жыл бұрын
Big Bang theory
@mmangaboi_5355
4 жыл бұрын
I wasn't looking for an explanation of superposition, but I got it and kinda needed it.
@ashwajeet12
4 жыл бұрын
If you haven't seen dark series on Netflix then watch it and then watch this video again!! You'll be surprise!!
@MegaBlessing2011
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@JoeyBlogs007
Жыл бұрын
Particles can only travel at the speed of light, so they cant be everywhere at once. A particle can naturally decay without being measured, but it cannot be in two states at the same time. At any given instant in time, the particle can only be in one definite state, either as a particle or a decay product. The process of decay involves the particle transitioning from one state to another over a certain period of time, during which it cannot be in both states simultaneously. The experiment was only conceptual thought experiment, not to be taken literally.
@rubyhoney6177
5 жыл бұрын
MAN MADE IT TO THE MOON.......LOL TELL THAT TO STANLEY KUBRICK
@elockett4367
5 жыл бұрын
Haha yes we're already living in the reality where we didn't land on the moon
@jedripley3391
3 жыл бұрын
These videos give me hope that my cat is still alive in another reality . In memory of Charlie who broke my heart the night he died . I love Charlie
@bas73971
7 жыл бұрын
If you replace the cat with a human, is he still both dead and alive? The human can look for himself, but why can't a cat?
@jpian0923
7 жыл бұрын
Replace it with anything you want. The point is, is that Superposition is nonsense.
@carloshoratio5100
7 жыл бұрын
The whole thing with the cat is an analogy: of course the cat doesn't consider itself to be both living and dead. The point of it is to illustrate the basic concept of quantum superposition. Also I find it quite misleading to say that, if a particle is in a superposition of states, that it is literally in both states at the same time, e.g. the cat is both alive and dead. You can never observe the particle (cat) to be in more than one state at a time; the act of measurement collapses the superposition into a single state, with a certain probability of collapsing to each state depending on the exact form of the superposition state. I think it's better, though perhaps no less misleading, to say that the particle (cat) is not in any observable states (is neither alive nor dead).
@vlermler6823
6 жыл бұрын
Reminded me of the book Dark matter
@NoYoDomle
6 жыл бұрын
i'm here because of that book :D , glad to find another reader here!
@parishna4882
5 жыл бұрын
Only those of us who are aligned with the 8 of clubs, will know the answers to your questions. But as we are firm and unchanging. Suck eggs.
@designer-garb572
4 жыл бұрын
The moral of this story is, do not make presumptions based on common sense in case someone has a theory they can't prove.
@SharkSlaYer2009
4 жыл бұрын
Who came here after watching DARK? :D
@MotoAlias
2 жыл бұрын
Just because it can be several different things doesnt mean that it is all these things at once. It's either dead or alive, it's not both dead and alive until looked upon.
@abhishekramesh4504
4 жыл бұрын
I came here after watching dark
@whynotgamezz3213
4 жыл бұрын
This was actually a really big help, I was making it harder than it actually was.thank you
@ThePickleJohn
6 жыл бұрын
"There is a world where man never made it to the moon" its like me saying there is a world where the earth is flat. Couple layers of irony here
@heathen2487
4 жыл бұрын
This gives new meaning to "That was me in a whole nother life."
@caseyw.6550
3 жыл бұрын
Nother. Lol
@melissacampoverde1100
8 жыл бұрын
Here because of COHERENCE
@LondonCityGirl
8 жыл бұрын
+Melissa Clark hope the video helped :D I'm a big fan of that film - some of my subscribers recommended it to me.
@havoc2431
8 жыл бұрын
+Melissa Clark Great film. Imagine it happening in real life. I think the way they all freaked out is well justified. I would sure as hell freak tf out.
@brownbearnishant
6 жыл бұрын
me too
@danielsteele2295
4 жыл бұрын
Hello, I am undecided as to whether I subscribe to the "super state" theory detailed here, or to the theory that there's no breaking in the natural behavior of particles, but rather a breaking in our observation and data. To illustrate, I could play devils advocate and say that the cat in the box is already dead or alive, and the only reason I do not know is because I have not observed it. Anyway the video was great, thank you. As always science and theory will have to suffice until understanding takes hold. Here's hoping it happens in my lifetime, I'm ever curious.
@maisto84
4 жыл бұрын
whos here after hearing this from Dark?
@reineh3477
10 ай бұрын
Every time someone talks about multi universes I remember this: John Oliver (comedian/tv-host) interviews Stephen Hawking (Physicist) John: Does that mean that there is a universe where I am smarter than you? Stephen: Yes. And also a universe where you are funny. John: a universe where I am dating Charlize Theron? Stephen: No!
@nasekiller
7 жыл бұрын
ok, first of all, you stated the experiment wrong. the cat is not killed by radiation, the radiation triggers the release of a poison, which in turn kills the cat. furthermore, you completely failed (or actually didnt even try) to resolve the paradox. obviously the cat is NOT dead and alive while the lid is closed and its state is certainly NOT determined the moment you open the lid and that is NOT what this thought experiment is telling us. the very simple explanation for this "mind-boggling" paradox is that "observation" in this context has nothing to do with US (as sentient and intelligent beings) observing it. it simply means that the particle interacts with another particle and thus has to collapse into a certain state (because the outcome of the interaction is dependent on the state of the particles at the time of the interaction). these interactions happen all the time and as soon as a certain outcome is reached, the fate of the cat is sealed, whether we open the lid or not (well, technically we can save the cat by removing it from the poisonous environment fast enough, but thats not the point) also, i am pretty sure, that this multiverse-theory is BS. i might be wrong about this (i am not a theoretical physicist^^), but I always thought that the state of the particle at the time of the interaction actually IS determined; we are just not able to predict the state of the particle, because it is impossible (for us) to gather all the data needed, so we have to rely on probabilities (until we can observe a certain state). now, if this assumption is correct, there are not multiple possible states, so there is no reason for the universe to split.
@Arancil
7 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU. It's nice to see someone who has actually bothered to read up on this instead of spewing bullshit like in most of the other comments (and indeed the common misinterpretation in the video). The entire point of the experiment is to say "and obviously that's absurd and untrue on a macroscopic level" essentially. Quote from Schrödinger: "It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks."
@connermcmahan3993
7 жыл бұрын
You literally just strawmanned the video lmfao
@Arancil
7 жыл бұрын
Conner Mcmahan What? Saying that things that aren't the video *aren't in the video* is stating a fact, and as the video doesn't actually contain a) a full and correct version of the experiment and b) the purpose of the experiment, those aren't strawmen either. Amusingly, calling either of our responses a strawman is a misrepresentation you're ragging on, thus making your statement a strawman. Good job!
@connermcmahan3993
7 жыл бұрын
All strawmen are facts. And the purpose of the experiment is in the second sentence of the video
@Arancil
7 жыл бұрын
Conner Mcmahan No, the second sentence is blatantly wrong. The purpose is to point out a flaw in the Copenhagen interpretation, not to point out an aspect of quantum physics. His point was that the cat is EITHER dead OR alive, never both, so the model doesn't extend to a macroscopic level, which among other things questions when collapse occurs. The video suggests that the experiment examines quirks and doesn't mention Schrödinger's intentions and conclusions. It's misleading.
@xeserupseinopelttil4574
7 жыл бұрын
thank you. haven't been able to find a simple explanation on yt
@sabercrosby8128
8 жыл бұрын
slight problem - the cat is a living entity with consciousness and has its own observations that are fracturing realities and collapsing wave functions (superPositions). So why would the cat care if a human was observing the box? theres a 50/50 chance the human might not make the observation from the cats perspective. what about micro-organisms inside the box? they are generating their own consciousness and effecting reality, They must be considered too. This sounds more like a god analogy. Erwin Schrodinger was very religious and i think this is about a creator. God is watching at all times, if you are good and follow his word you will receive the positive outcome etc. God = energy field.
@Theycallmeroman
8 жыл бұрын
Your "attempt" at trying to sound enlightened and knowledgeable made me laugh out loud quite heartily. Thank you.
@sabercrosby8128
8 жыл бұрын
Theycallmeroman wasn't trying to sound enlightened or knowledgeable. I asked valid questions. I'm guessing you like schrodingers theory but don't like the fact that he believes in a creator?
@condomgraveyard666
7 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was thinking.
@newjerseyjustin
6 жыл бұрын
I was totally onboard with this comment until I saw god in it
@mutableintellect7624
5 жыл бұрын
@Theycallmeroman: And yet, it wasn't nearly as hilarious as your "attempt" at understanding him. And so all the thanks goes to you, my friend. Perhaps they should call you "inane".
@Yonah_144
3 жыл бұрын
The answer to this scientific theory is that scientists have to study spirituality to get the answer. Atoms and subatomic particles move based on *thought and emotion* being vibrated from the person, meaning God and the human mind is the same thing. This is also known as the law of attraction, meaning a person attracting a red car to themselves through this process. The atoms don't come to the person on their own, it's the person causing all this to move. So to make it sound more easier: The type of thought & emotion + The vibration + the conscious and subconscious mind = The type of universe that is being created.
@redpillchen233
7 жыл бұрын
Why would nobody actually do the shcrodinger cat experiment???
@Serotonindude
6 жыл бұрын
because it would potentially kill cats half of the time :O
@amalguptan6716
6 жыл бұрын
Because we can't observe the experiment so we cant do it
@StacieMMeier
6 жыл бұрын
They haven't, there be no point...As he explained, we cannot see this other Universe. Our selves in that Universe shall, we however, like they could never know that the other result happened. He never killed any cats, nor did he ever attempt it. He was simply stating a fact and logic because Cats have the strange ability to survive what other animals cannot.
@stevebez2767
6 жыл бұрын
d.i.d iza dodo do eng were ridz ya? DEScryptives box out in en v lope?
@sambhramshetty2100
4 жыл бұрын
Finally, I found the missing puzzle! Now I understand what happened in dark series
@sethandbo9378
5 жыл бұрын
Hit or Miss? I gue- Shut up. It's both now.
@TheRisky9
4 жыл бұрын
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar. And then it doesn't
@JTM45100
5 жыл бұрын
This doesn’t prove anything.
@Longhorn77Gunner
Жыл бұрын
Best explanation yet. Thanks.
@alwayswondering4051
4 жыл бұрын
Success in understanding something can never rely solely upon common sense, intuition, mathematics, or upon every known physical law. Some questions which cannot be asked, formulated, or even concieved may well still have insurmountable barriers. They may always.
@aldhizak
3 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 thanks!!!
@aussieraver7182
2 жыл бұрын
Check out the Double Slit experiment. Blew my mind!
@SiC_DoUrden
3 жыл бұрын
Chess Grand Master: Checkmate I win Me: but did you really?
@jaded_tofu
5 жыл бұрын
Alright, time to go to sleep calm and without thinking all night about all those possible parallel universes!
@alsak2157
3 жыл бұрын
So to be in a superposition, people dont have to know where you are or what you are doing. Intersting..
@Noobixm
2 жыл бұрын
This experiment is literally just stupidly genius.
Пікірлер: 1,7 М.