When daughters cannot claim right on father's ancestral property|
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 & Vineeta Sharma V.Rakesh Sharma case
Section 6 of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005
Devolution of interest in coparcenary property.-
(1) On and from the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 , in a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law, the daughter of a coparcener shall,-
(a) by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as the son;
(b) have the same rights in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son;
(c) be subject to the same liabilities in respect of the said coparcenary property as that of a son, and any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to include a reference to a daughter of a coparcener:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub- section shall affect or invalidate any disposition or alienation including any partition or testamentary disposition of property which had taken place before the 20th day of December, 2004 .
(5) Nothing contained in this section shall apply to a partition, which has been effected before the 20th day of December, 2004 . Explanation.- For the purposes of this section" partition" means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908 ) or partition effected by a decree of a court.'.
Supreme Court judgment of Vinneta Sharma V.Rakesh Sharma, 11th August,2020
indiankanoon.org/doc/67965481/
Supreme court judgment on daughters rights on father's ancestral property
• Supreme court judgment...
#supremecourt #daughterspropertyrights #ancestralproperty
Негізгі бет supreme court judgment on daughters cannot claim right on father's ancestral property|
Пікірлер: 159