2021: "No longer in active service" 2023: *"Hold my beer"*
@AlreadyTakenTag
3 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile the Su-100 still in use somewhere in Yemen. *sweats
@o-hogameplay185
3 жыл бұрын
still better than arjun
@katyusha1283
3 жыл бұрын
@@o-hogameplay185 Much exaggeration.
@o-hogameplay185
3 жыл бұрын
@@katyusha1283 it is a meme
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
@@o-hogameplay185 Stronk soviet HE shell hull breaks the Indian scam of a tank.
@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry
3 жыл бұрын
@@o-hogameplay185 an exagerated unfunny meme
3 жыл бұрын
First, congrats on the channel; it's refreshing to see not well-known vehicles, such as our M-55S. We would appreciate the mention that the M-55S and the video is from the Park of Military History Pivka and our channel. The tank is in our working collection, and it is a blast to drive! If you find yourself in Slovenia, you're more than welcome to visit!
@jebise1126
2 жыл бұрын
osli so še prisotini namesto kosilnice?
@user-kc6qr5eo1k
2 жыл бұрын
He could visit he is from Serbia
@yeet_ma_heat
3 жыл бұрын
I was waiting the whole time for him to say: "M-55S cannot be the worst tank in the world because that space is already occupied by Arjun"
@ExcaliburHeavyBattlecruiser
3 жыл бұрын
Say what you will about the other aspects of the tank, but IMO, it looks really cool with that curved ERA placement. At least this tank can win in a fashion contest against Arjun.
@dabelli3818
3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@abhilashyadav2274
3 жыл бұрын
Even T34 can win.
@cosmoray9750
3 жыл бұрын
HK kzitem.info/news/bejne/266E34qIhaCXq5g kzitem.info/news/bejne/1YGer4mcroKVomk
@salavat294
3 жыл бұрын
Ya, but remember its pedigree, the T-34 & T-44 for the haul, and IS-2 for the turret. When, Churchill and Western Generals witnessed the Victory Parade in Berlin, they nearly went into cardiac arrest when they saw the IS-2’s and IS-3’s. Compared to anemically armed and armoured Limey/Yanky tanks, the IS-series were monsters, and had the desired intimidation value.
@danielaramburo7648
3 жыл бұрын
I would take this tank over Arjun. I would take a T-34 over Arjun.
@SlavicSloth
3 жыл бұрын
Tbh I love these T-55 moderizations. They just look amazing and I dont care how out of date their performance is lmao
@re57k
3 жыл бұрын
same really
@TheConspirateWarrior
3 жыл бұрын
They are better still than any m48 mod crawling around excepting the korean-taiwanese. They been withdrawn mainly for polítical reasons
@commandergree6131
2 жыл бұрын
I mean, if a tank can look aesthetically pleasing to a point where it looks very different to its original model it's already doing something right, T-55s especially given how many countries used them and made their own mods to it.
@flack2998
2 жыл бұрын
ye. T55 already looks nice imo and they add more modern stuff makes it cooler.
@shaunvduke
2 жыл бұрын
#metoo - my favourites are the israeli super shermans and centurions. Serious millenium falcon vibes with lots of stuff just bolted on...
@potatopants4691
3 жыл бұрын
So not a bad tank, just an old one
@QualityPen
3 жыл бұрын
Well, bad by modern standards.
@randomguy7176
3 жыл бұрын
Agreed, my dad was a tankinst. He was a gunner in the T55. He likes tanks like me and He said the same thing comparing old modified t55s. Its not a bad tank its just outdated
@dizzyos
3 жыл бұрын
@@randomguy7176 Slovenian upgrade of T55 is quite ok. Because there is no new light tanks, such as T55. Mid or Heavy tanks are not suitable, because of their weight. RedEffect is mixing peaches and potatoes. He does not know that for some terrains, or mission, is more efficient light tank than mid or heavy type of the tank. RedEffect is (so far visible in his youtube movies, according the technical knowledge) the clown.
@covb2615
3 жыл бұрын
@@dizzyos Price is also something to count on. The more expensive the tank is, less will be produced. Thats why Even though the Saudis can just buy a bunch of Leo2s, but because the US is just giving Saudis "cheap" Abrams, why would you want to by a more fancy, stronk tank when its already effective at doing its job, you dont need to be fancy.
@nogisonoko5409
3 жыл бұрын
@@QualityPen It not like you are going to fight the superpowers in the battlefield, and if you do even if you have your hands on M1A2 Sep V3 Abrams wont save you from other threats that can be spammed by superpowers because they are rich.
@christianryansino3257
3 жыл бұрын
Sorry RedEffect, but no matter what tank you examine and call the worst, Arjurn will always stay in our minds no matter what and I think you already know why.
@thing.1263
3 жыл бұрын
CCP bot
@dankoz6340
3 жыл бұрын
Unlike this tank, Arjun has a vastly higher budget and is STILL in development for like 40 years?
@thing.1263
3 жыл бұрын
Dan Koz Arjun is better than Abrams t90 and type99 india will rise and invade Beijing jai hind!!!!
@swguren
3 жыл бұрын
@@thing.1263 Arjun is a shit tank made shit due to India’s budget with it, and corruption regarding it
@westernspy561
3 жыл бұрын
@@thing.1263 Yes, Arjun can withstand an atomic blast and even perhaps a gamma ray burst from another star!!!
@mydlear4238
3 жыл бұрын
Everyone is like : Redeffect what is the best tank? Redeffect : I guess it's time for a tank dumpster diving
@SolarFlareAmerica
3 жыл бұрын
It's because it usually comes down to splitting hairs over minor features, sometimes not even in active service yet.
@ushikiii
3 жыл бұрын
@@SolarFlareAmerica it's better to just present the facts in a more attractive manner and leaving it up to the reader or viewer to make their own opinions. That's why I like how him and other similar youtubers don't just flat out say one tank is the best.
@flexprime2010
3 жыл бұрын
best tank is t-34/85 change my mind!
@robiagacitei5487
2 жыл бұрын
Leopard 2a7.
@liamspence1291
3 жыл бұрын
Tbh from this run down, the M-55S seems like a genuinely good upgrade for the T-55, which is basically the AK-47 of tanks. Its not a modern tank by any measure, but a good work horse and the upgrades seem to make it at least a little more competitive in the modern enviroment.
@britishgamer666
2 жыл бұрын
These old tanks are, at best, mobile fire support. Only way to make these tanks effective in any realistic sense if to use them as mobile fire support, or accompany them with IFVs and other light fighting vehicles with modern or good ATGMs. * this comes from someone with no military experience or in-depth knowledge of modern ground tactics or strategy.
@mr.abrams8112
2 жыл бұрын
these would get rekt by remotely any modern tank which this tank couldnt kill
@ianbahamonde6679
2 жыл бұрын
@@mr.abrams8112 I think we all know they’d get smacked by a real modern tank but maybe they could work as gun platforms or as light gin carriages
@mr.abrams8112
2 жыл бұрын
@@ianbahamonde6679 maybe an m18 at most
@ianbahamonde6679
2 жыл бұрын
@@mr.abrams8112 yeah something like that but the proliferation of atgms doesn’t bode well for this tank there’s thousands of kormets or old tows around the world that could easliy pen this in one hit
@gasper5223
3 жыл бұрын
Finnaly we re on the list. The military was selling them and i think only one was sold to a czech private collector who paid around 850.000€ for one of those if i remember correctly
@curseditem8354
3 жыл бұрын
hmmm yes conscription
@RushZ3r
3 жыл бұрын
In conclusion: *Theres a lot of bad tanks in the world, end*
@abhilashyadav2274
3 жыл бұрын
Arjun tank is best worst tank
@ls200076
3 жыл бұрын
@trueblueprussian 23 "Ew Prussia, long live the third Reich! Death to the Kaiser!"
@einundsiebenziger5488
3 жыл бұрын
... there are* a lot of bad tanks ...
@RushZ3r
3 жыл бұрын
@@einundsiebenziger5488 Thank you kind sir for the correction! But... This is not the language class lol.
@grandayatollah5655
3 жыл бұрын
Could you update your old Iran video?
@yalilaltarak8486
3 жыл бұрын
YES PLEASE!!!!!!!!
@BoleDaPole
Жыл бұрын
Congrats to Ukriane and thank you Slovena for the donation of 25 m55s tanks 👏👏👏
@user-ge6lq4sj7f
Жыл бұрын
Krak Head 28
@testgame2742
Жыл бұрын
Congrats to Slovenia
@ricky7426
Жыл бұрын
@@testgame2742 we were promised better equipment we still havent got
@xlDeathlxJosey
Жыл бұрын
Not perfect but better than no tanks, I'm sure Ukraine will find a good use for them.
@acid2-128
Жыл бұрын
@@ricky7426 bro the crews have to be trained and like the video says these aren’t good tanks and you have plenty of T-64,72 and twardys along with what ever you are taking from Russia that you should use first
@simtyful
Жыл бұрын
The fact that it can shoot on the move instantly makes it better than a T62
@frenchhonhon
3 жыл бұрын
,,The Actual Worst Tank..." That's all I needed to see, I'm satisfied. My TR-85M baby can sleep well tonight.
@abhilashyadav2274
3 жыл бұрын
And so can Arjunk if the crew has scammed enough for their daily targeted limit.
@LupenSLO
Жыл бұрын
Today it was confirmed from Slovenian government that 28 of this tanks will be donated to Ukraine. Slovenia will get 40 german 8x8 transporters
@dudehaha3000
Жыл бұрын
"No longer in active service." If one of these gets a kill on a T72 I'm gonna shit my pants.
@testgame2742
Жыл бұрын
Except it cant penetrate them frontally maybe on an older t64a with potent munition
@NoBodysGamer
Жыл бұрын
hey just said it has Israeli 105mm munitions it can penetrate any tank
@mekolayn
Жыл бұрын
@@testgame2742 with DU shells it can frontally penetrate T-72
@SOULFLYSI
Жыл бұрын
How many tank battles happened in ukraine ?? None.
@andrews_lego_tanks_and_more
2 жыл бұрын
Still the best-looking T-55 upgrade out there, this thing looks really nice with all these upgrades and honestly if it did have some upgraded sights and engine it would make for a good border guard tank or something similar.
@j.f.fisher5318
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, just upgrade to thermal sights, especially with independent thermals for gunner and commander, and it would be quite solid. Of course it still all comes down to crew training, leadership, and logistics. But that would give a good crew the tools they need.
@mrmakhno3030
2 жыл бұрын
Vietnamese T 54M is very good looking, and suprise, it has thermal imaging. That tank will be good enough in a battle against Chinese sneaky Type 15. T 90S will wait at 2nd line to confront Type 96 and 99.
@leshiy9202
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it would be a good borfer guard tabk if it wouldnt be our main battle tank
@drewcanton235
Жыл бұрын
A worse tank it may be I don't know but because Germany has kept blocking the transfer of Leopard II's Ukraine gladly accepts this from a very generous neighbour...
@catparka7698
Жыл бұрын
True that.
@adishoogendorp4194
Жыл бұрын
This is not a bad vehicle for Ukraine by any means. 1. It has more than enough protection against small arms and even heavy machine guns. (given they don't expose the sides and rear if we talking about autocannons and stuff) 2. ERA that can stop any light AT weapon Russia has. 3. Laser tracking system. 4. Thermals? 5. Enough protection for most indirect arty hits. Pretty much heavy armored IFV with comparatively great firepower not to mention it is soviet so Ukrainian crews can be trained using it within days.
@NoBodysGamer
Жыл бұрын
Ukraine has so many tanks now so 28 even if they not the best is just a drop in the bucket, better something than nothing Also Ukraine has a whole line of outposts with Belarus that mostly stuffed by National Guard and has all the "B" type weapons, so i guess these tanks will go there
@noc8218
Жыл бұрын
@@NoBodysGamer Yeah National Guard will be happy
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
Russia uses ATGM and the ERA won’t do much
@adishoogendorp4194
Жыл бұрын
@@NoBodysGamer They do not have many tanks. :D
@adishoogendorp4194
Жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 No they do not... Well they do but they don't have atgms with top attack capability. So ERA will do great.
@MrSedsone
3 жыл бұрын
I'm quite surprised to see a video on M-55S, I was under the impression it's too obscure of a tank. So, quite nice to see someone talk about a tank from the country I live in heh.
@sonofabitch256
Жыл бұрын
The Worst Tank just survived a direct hit from Krasnopol 152mm artillery round in turret area.
@SOULFLYSI
Жыл бұрын
Acording to Redeffect the worst tank M-55S last week survived the blast to the turret with moderate damage.
@Pukovnik141
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for reducing volume on outro melody. It's not ripping my ears anymore. You make good videos with interesting topicsand is refreshment on youtube. Thank you.
@darryldouglasmarbaniang7162
2 жыл бұрын
The M-55S is actually an awesome weapons platform. Modernizing a tank that came from the 50's, in order to meet the standards of the late 90's to early 2000's, is already quite an impressive feat all by itself. Salute to Slovenia.
@jbremc22
Жыл бұрын
Slovenia never used them, basically government payed few millions to upgrade old tanks and then decided they are still out of date and storage them.
@darryldouglasmarbaniang7162
Жыл бұрын
@@jbremc22 Still... But when you look at the stats, then you can definitely see all the possible potential if the tank were to be really pressed into active service.
@76456
3 жыл бұрын
Idea 1 - Venezuelan AMX-30 2 - TAM from Argentina or 3 - SK K1 type 88 4 - Type 85 (don't know if it is used today) 5 - Shout Afrikan Centurions or theyr TTD MBT 6 - is there any AMX-32 or AMX-40 out there?
@lukabogdanovic4658
3 жыл бұрын
The type 85 is okay
@mikkt7827
3 жыл бұрын
AMX-32 and 40 remained prototypes, and weren't that bad for their time.
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
I'd say even the SADF Olifant Mk.1A/SANDF Olifant Mk.2 shits on the Arjun. And that's a really old tank, bro.
@SONNENKVLT
3 жыл бұрын
Yes one about the TAM
@Banana-ry1uo
3 жыл бұрын
The TAM is fine, it is made for rough terrain, main reason why the tank is so light
@lukapavlovski6067
3 жыл бұрын
You should make a video about the PT-91.
@extremekiwi1311
3 жыл бұрын
I asked him to make a video on this tank and he did it, thanks man
@alexwest2573
Жыл бұрын
I wonder if these will be used to counter the T-62s that Russia sent
@michaelrego7433
Жыл бұрын
200 T90m just arrived in Ukraine maybe these are to take on those
@alexwest2573
Жыл бұрын
@@michaelrego7433 that’s a one sided fight if the M-55S have to fight the T-90M
@ChorltonBrook
Жыл бұрын
105mm shells are NATO standard, they changed the barrels to British challenger ones.
@MostlyPennyCat
Жыл бұрын
HESH TIME BABY, AW YEAH!
@matebodo9379
Жыл бұрын
Fresh news, 28 is donated to Ukraine.
@Ludovit110
Жыл бұрын
Well little did he know...
@juanpablo681
Жыл бұрын
Interesting video. They have recently been passed on to Ukraine. Useless? Not at all. Tank-to-tank battles are rare, so the 28 tanks will come in handy for some Territorial Defense units holding the line or on the frontier with Bielorussia. I would guess that they will be organized into platoons of 4 tanks each, in order to compensate their lower levels of firepower, but make the best use of better systems than legacy T-72.
@Palach624
Жыл бұрын
I mean they can probably be destroyed or damaged by most man portable rocket launchers but I'd still rather be inside of a T-55MS than M113 or a BMP.
@tessjuel
Жыл бұрын
@@Palach624 Yes and even an M113 or BMP offers better crew protection than what a mortar or towed artillery team has. Ukraine has had some succes using tanks as substitutes for self propelled guns and in that role the M-55S shouldn't be that much worse than a modern MBT.
@bruh7894
3 жыл бұрын
Even this tank can destroy Arjunk
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
With solid shot AP
@abhilashyadav2274
3 жыл бұрын
Even T 34 can destroy Arjun tank
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
@@abhilashyadav2274 FT-17 can destroy the Arjun.
@stinkostonko6335
3 жыл бұрын
You would think with how recent the modernization was it would have a few extra add ons but honestly it would have been a waste of money and resources to do so with how old the platform is at least in my opinion.
@Nikowalker007
3 жыл бұрын
Considering that RPG7 and AK47 are still one of the most popular weapons you see on the modern field, I would say T55 still has some potential to cause damage to infantry or any type of infantry carrying vehicles... Tank like any weapon is only good as its crew and the command personnel. If you give T90, Abrams or Leo2 to a poorly trained crew they would not have a lot of chances against well trained crew in this T55S. This scenario is very unlikely to happen but still possible considering how many Turkish and Saudi Arabian Leopards and Abrams were burned by insurgents in the Middle East during the last 5 years .....
@stinkostonko6335
3 жыл бұрын
@@Nikowalker007 good point, was thinking more on the technical side of things but i definitely see where you are coming from with crew experience. It is definitely an important aspect to take into consideration. The things that I thought were interesting was the ERA compared to other modernizations, the LWR and a more advanced sight. But you're right, all that means nothing if you can't use it properly hahaha
@sethmullins8346
3 жыл бұрын
I think the t-55 would be a fine tank to upgrade, since it's very similar to later soviet and Russian tanks anyway It's main problem is it's lack of any fire control systems for the gun, even a stabilizer. A two plane stabilizer and even modern ammunition for the same cannon would do a lot for it.
@Nikowalker007
3 жыл бұрын
@@sethmullins8346 That's true . Modern Fire control system and at least 2nd gen. night vision would definetely help T55 a lot
@hendi1571
3 жыл бұрын
@@sethmullins8346 from t-54b onwards, T-54 and T-55 variants were equipped with STP-2 Tsyklon two-plane stabilization for main gun. There simply are NO modern tank rounds for its original main gun (D-10T). Most modern Apfsds rounf is 3BM11 with penetrator 3BM25 "Izomer" introduced in the late seventys offering around 280mm at 2km, which is absolutely outdated nowadays. Heat is not much better, 3UBK9M provides 350mm at 2 km. Needless to say, the gun itself is outdated. It has a terrible fume extractor, is rifled and overall obsolete. And there won't occur any new ammo as there are only two other 100mm guns in active service: 1st russian 2A70, used on BMP-3 which is a low pressure gun, and 2nd MT-12, which is a smoothbore gun. Neither's ammo is interchangable with D-10T (rifled, full pre)ssure while the latter is obsolete as well. The only rays of hope are atgm like tandem shaped 9M117M1 "Arkan" providing penetration of 750mm after ERA, which is neither state of the art nor great but not that bad. But only T-55M and T-55AM received the necessary guidance equipment so you would have to add this. And a tank cannot rely on atgm solely.
@Xerdoz
Жыл бұрын
Some of these will be sent to Ukraine. Having tanks is better than having none. It can take out T-72s. It can suppress defensive positions and it will crush infantry. It's not a great tank on its own but as a support tank it's way way better than a Humvee with a machine gun.
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
I doubt it can take out a t-72
@Xerdoz
Жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 Sure it can. Maybe not at front but from the sides it should do just fine with APFSDS rounds.
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
@@Xerdoz I highly doubt that
@hbrnas
Жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 With DU ammunition it can
@user-kr1qk8iq1i
Жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 1980s M413/DM33 can easily defeat front armor of T-72A and side armor/mantlet of every other variants.
@warlord970
3 жыл бұрын
Slovenes: It might be a trash tank, but it is OUR trash tank
@Yugoslavz
3 жыл бұрын
Our you say
@alfa955
3 жыл бұрын
@@Yugoslavz hahaha ne me jebat
@hardstyle4life394
3 жыл бұрын
M-84,still in service in my country, greetings from Bosnia & Hercegiovina ;) EDIT: M60A3 also used to train on
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
M-84 is good, Serbia has the M-84AS and Croatia has the M-95 Degman, both of them proving that the T-72 platform can still be used effectively today.
@hardstyle4life394
3 жыл бұрын
@@choppergunner8650 M-84 at its time was 1 of the best in the world but now it is 30 years old,we in Bosnia don't have upgraded version as far as I know
@jakobpuc298
3 жыл бұрын
In sliovinija we have some M-84 made in Croatia. greetings from slovinija
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
@@hardstyle4life394 It's a neat tank, IDK why but I consider it to be superior than the Russian T-72.
@hardstyle4life394
3 жыл бұрын
@@choppergunner8650 hahaha yes it is strong and very sexy,and as I remember M-84 is Yugoslavian T-72 but better, and it is like Ukrainian T-84 which is made after T-80,so yes you are right it is superior than T-72,much superior
@viktorreiter8811
Жыл бұрын
a big shoutout to our slovenian friends who jumped in to help ukraine in the race of fielding the oldest and shittiest equipment in the war! the russians definitely set the bar high with the T62, but we are getting catching up boys!
@terrynewsome6698
Жыл бұрын
Honestly between this and a t-62m that was rusting in a field in the Cassius mountains since 2008. I think this will be much preferred.
@basharalassad1073
3 жыл бұрын
id love if war thunder added those t-55 modefications. its also one of my favorites since there are soo many types of t-55ths , i like soviet cold war tanks in general too
@Swindle1984
2 жыл бұрын
The T-34 is still in active service in Cuba, North Korea, Yemen, Vietnam, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Guinea, and a couple other countries. None have been updated since the 1950's. I'm pretty sure THAT is the worst tank in modern service.
@purplenurp5590
3 жыл бұрын
I NEED IT FOR WARTHUNDER, I NEED ITTTTTTTTTT.
@123asap6
Жыл бұрын
M-55S now being sent to Ukraine... Lord save the poor souls who have to crew that thing.
@othertipo
Жыл бұрын
Better than the T-62 Russia send to Ukraine. The T-55S is more comparable to the earliest versions of T-72 Also the 105mm gun designed to use NATO ammo, and can knock out most T-72 variants.
@Doomer35
Жыл бұрын
I'm sure it will do okay in Ukraine, probably...
@getgaijoobed6219
3 жыл бұрын
4:43 I’ll take one, what’s the asking price? 😂
@kristiankrajnansky4480
3 жыл бұрын
500 000 silver lions
@tahaemad5809
3 жыл бұрын
@@kristiankrajnansky4480 lol only wt players will understand
@Merkava_APS
3 жыл бұрын
@@tahaemad5809 nah mate it's obviously A TIER VIIIIIIIIII AND ITS 2929293831 MILLION Golden eagles
@maximpact4070
Жыл бұрын
They are being delivered to Ukraine now
@congnghequansuvn474
Жыл бұрын
What about Vietnam's T54M?
@stonaciousstone4171
3 жыл бұрын
I can tell you from first hand experience that the m551 Sheridan has to be in the top 3 worst tanks ever. I spent 8 years on those God awful lil beasts and I cannot think of anything nice to say about them. I think that if they were ever to get into the real shit they woulda ve roasted. But... They were alot of fun. Airborne
@shadowrunner3k94
3 жыл бұрын
You should do a video on Syrian tanks, they have modded* many t55/t72! would be interesting...
@HOVX.612
3 жыл бұрын
Comrade , what do you mean by ( modded ) , and the t 55 isn't in service now I think ,( I am a syrian ) most of the tanks I saw were t 62 and some modern russian tank , by the way a good suggestion , I wish to see my country's tanks in a video as they fought hard in the war , and I wish you a good day......
@OmarSlloum
3 жыл бұрын
@@HOVX.612 a communist Syrian?
@HOVX.612
3 жыл бұрын
@@OmarSlloum لا يا زلمة سوري مسلم و أفتخر ، العلم الأحمر رمز الشيوعية بينما المطرقة و المنجل رمز الأشتراكية ، أنا لا هاد و لا هداك ، مجرد مواطن عربي سوري من العاصمة دمشق و رمضان كريم No syrian muslim and I am proud , and the red flag is the symbol of communist , and my profile photo is the socialist symbol , I am not a communist neither socialist , just a normal syrian from Damascus , and Ramadan Kareem
@OmarSlloum
3 жыл бұрын
@@HOVX.612 اه خلص لكان كويس. تحيا سوريا وعاصمة الشام دمشق.
@HOVX.612
3 жыл бұрын
@@OmarSlloum الله يحييك
@ravener96
3 жыл бұрын
idk, the t55 is a very interesting vehicle. its small relative to most tanks, but carries a full size gun. a modern interpretation of the t55 would be very neat. it's light, its low. electronics dont really take any space anymore, so that should be able to be good. it's not really a light tank, but you get two of them for the mass of an M1abrams
@ravenouself4181
2 жыл бұрын
more like 3 tbh
@jackmears8017
Жыл бұрын
I came to watch his video after finding out Ukraine, is going to be given them very soon and I do believe with the upgrades to the engine and thermal imaging you mentioned
@stevinharper3551
Жыл бұрын
Turns out the gun is British watching this again after they sent some to Ukraine
@anthonylewis679
3 жыл бұрын
At a very quick glance, it initially reminded me of some sort of upgraded crusader tank !
@RePlayBoy101
3 жыл бұрын
the m55-s was retired before it entered service... it actually was just in the reserve its entire life ... i drove one and to be fair in the 90s it seemed like a good idea since slovenia didnt really have any other weapons to counter another yugo attack
@Klote3241
Жыл бұрын
The gun is what makes the M-55S valuable to Ukraine. The British gun is compatible with a wide range of modern ammunition, including armor-piercing sabot rounds that can penetrate the armor of a modern T-72. More importantly, several Western companies produce 105-millimeter shells, meaning Ukraine shouldn’t struggle to maintain a steady supply of ammunition for its single M-55S battalion.
@xijinpingpong4426
Жыл бұрын
Now Ukraine got them. Germany gave Slovenia some trucks in exchange for giving the tanks to Ukraine.
@robovinefilms1811
Жыл бұрын
It's official, Russia's sending T54-T55's on a train as of this morning.
@calion7643
Жыл бұрын
It was few years old video for parade or something
@DieGottesliebe
Жыл бұрын
Today news .. Slovenia send 28 tanks T55S to Ukraine with exchange to military trucks from Germany ..
@Russinh0
2 жыл бұрын
T-55 is a 70 Year old tonk, but still Functional, Obsolete but Functional
@markorstb
3 жыл бұрын
Oh well...there is an worse tank from Yugoslav War era. Bosniak forces during the war had some T-55's and have made a variant to make the tank "better". They had added the turret of M18 Hellcat(tank destroyer from WW2) on the T-55 hull. Idk if there is much data about this cursed tank but it would be nice if RedEffect covers the topic.
@Aboleo80
Жыл бұрын
They didn't try to make it better they just had a t-55 hull and a Wolverine or Jackson turret (not exactly sure) that they somehow fitted on the t-55 hull. When you don't have anything you take whatever you can.
@Jinruialan
Жыл бұрын
it does look really cool ngl
@guilhermedealmeida9360
3 жыл бұрын
awesome content man, make a video on the Brazilian Osorio tank
@gabon4000
3 жыл бұрын
1:46 It has 30° of protection against a TOW-YOTA.
@Salamandra40k
3 жыл бұрын
Sorta like the M60 upgrades STILL on the market, these upgrades arent really to be used in tank-on-tank combat. Just having heavy armor in an area or situation where there is no other real heavy armor, REGARDLESS of what YOUR heavy armor is, is a big deal. Hell, having a WWII T34 against guys in trucks with machine guns is a major up to your side. Having an upgraded T55 with ERA, laser warning, and even passive NV is better than not having heavy armor at all.
@muamero.8528
2 жыл бұрын
Cant overemphasize how relevant this comment is. Not all conflicts and dare I say the vast majority of them have tank battles. What one tank can do to another is irrelevant in that context. They are used as mobile bunkers/pillboxes raining HE on everything. T-55 can be terrifying if you got nothing to counter it.
@ediiorgovan4054
3 жыл бұрын
this guy's roasting tanks on his channel since 2019, i think he wants to see how many patriots he can trigger
@ernstschloss8794
3 жыл бұрын
He knows the stuff he talks about...if someone feels "triggered" by it, they should stop baby-crying
@curseditem8354
3 жыл бұрын
in slovenia we hate our country anyway
@abhilashyadav2274
3 жыл бұрын
@@curseditem8354 Why??
@curseditem8354
3 жыл бұрын
@@abhilashyadav2274 well we're so deeply politically divided that everyone hates everybody and everything
@HandleMyBallsYouTube
3 жыл бұрын
A true patriot should embrace such criticism, you can't fix a problem unless you know what it is and where it is. Being aware of your own strengths and weaknesses is paramount for the success of any nation, especially in war. Ignoring your own weakness goes against the core values of patriotism because it's counter productive in every way shape and form.
@diobrando2575
3 жыл бұрын
I really love how it looks.
@FlyWithMe_666
Жыл бұрын
Slovenia just gave these tanks to Ukraine today, while receiving 35 transport trucks and 5 fuel trucks in a deal with Germany.
@catparka7698
Жыл бұрын
Germany covers it's butt again.
@MagentiumPRIME
Жыл бұрын
Honestly, in my opinion, the Ramses II tank, a modernized T-55 is worse as it doesn't even have upgraded protection
@MagentiumPRIME
Жыл бұрын
It's the egypt main battle tank
@onbedoeldekut1515
Жыл бұрын
Do you think they got the thermal sights when sent to Ukraine?
@mbtenjoyer9487
Жыл бұрын
Probably not thermal sight are expensive and it would be dumb to put them in a garbage vehicle like this even Ukraine t-64 and t-72 would be a better option
@jaydonly2336
3 жыл бұрын
Still better then Arjunk :0
@clarkmcconachy8599
Жыл бұрын
These have just shown up in Ukraine. But they won't be used as tanks. They're now an ISV.
@northernstar4811
Жыл бұрын
The Slovenian M-T55S tank is being sent to Ukraine. They said with all the upgrades it can take out a T-72 tank. At least its better than some of the Mad Max vehicles the Ukrainians are now using.
@banditodorito4091
Жыл бұрын
Well it will be good enough to fight the LPR DPR
@georgethompson1460
Жыл бұрын
Considering the quality of the Russian Army it could probably still take out a T-90M.
@cai_thepug2525
Жыл бұрын
For a T-55 this isn't bad really, and it's probably one of the cooler looking T-55's lol
@viderzen3390
3 жыл бұрын
This IS tank from my country
@curseditem8354
3 жыл бұрын
Trst je naš
@markomarko660
4 ай бұрын
It was considered as very bad tank right up until they were donated to Ukraine then suddenly they were "very good tanks with very good new equipment"
@kurosumomo
2 ай бұрын
I mean a L7 is an L7, plenty of modern wheeled tanks are being made with L7 or equivalent 105mm guns. The chassis is trash, because it's old, but the FCS are pretty much more modern than any Leopard 1 that were sent there and the added protection is better than no protection. Supposedly few examples also survived direct hits from artillery and AT weaponry. As a tank compared to the modern MBTs it's pretty bad, but as a gun it's pretty similar to a lot of other 105mm equipped vehicles. If I had an option where I would want to be on the battlefield between the M-55S and a 105mm Centauro, I'd pick the M-55S.
@Fergusius
Жыл бұрын
Coming to you from the future!!! 2022 to be exact and these tanks are now fighting in Ukraine, with Ukrainians against Russia.
@kreatywnanazwa4402
3 жыл бұрын
My dude, take at look at p-91 twardy. polish t72 modernization
@G0TIMAN
3 жыл бұрын
Is it that bad? I thought it was a good modernisation.
@Henry-uq1hl
3 жыл бұрын
It is not that bad for modern standards. Not as bad as something like TR-85, it's more comparable to the T-72B3.
@leomarin2205
3 жыл бұрын
@@Henry-uq1hl tr85, was designed and built as a defensive tank, to oppose the Russian t 72, not those of the Warsaw Alliance, as armor is superior to the t 55, t60 patton, leo 1 and the first leo 2 variant, the worst tank is the one you praise :))) luserilor :)))))
@Henry-uq1hl
3 жыл бұрын
@@leomarin2205 Designed to face Leopard 1, still in active service when there is already Leopard 2A7 lol, talk about pathetic
@hlvscomendandeche8744
3 жыл бұрын
@@Henry-uq1hl prolly more like B3M or even better
@kayaphus4303
Жыл бұрын
They are now confirmed given to Ukraine.
@StoneCoolds
Жыл бұрын
It seems those tanks were donated to Ukraine in exchange for some german IFVs and trucks
@justanormalgermanboy9269
3 жыл бұрын
Great video, could you Review the South African Olifant MK 2 some day?
@maikelperezmartinez1080
3 жыл бұрын
Hello RedEffect, thanks for this video. What do you think of the T-55AGM ?, It is an update on the T-55 with a new 125mm gun, won't it give you better chances than the TR-85M1 and M-55S in a current conflict?
@mr.bageute7249
3 жыл бұрын
What do you think about czech t72m4cz ?
@blockczlp7148
3 жыл бұрын
Id like to see a review of T72M4CZ as well!
@militaryanalysis5028
3 жыл бұрын
It is not a bad tank, i would say it's around the same level of a T90 or perhaps even better in some aspects (commanders thermal sight and much better coverage of ERA on the turret). But unfortunately Czech has only very limited number of this tank I think 32
@blockczlp7148
3 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 30 T-72M4CZ tanks and 3 VT-72M4 recovery tanks.
@00tree
3 жыл бұрын
"We are selling our M-55Ss" "Highest I can go is a grand."
@LupenSLO
3 жыл бұрын
And as Rick from Pownstars would say: “And I take all the risks”
@bibsieeee
Жыл бұрын
Today was announced that Slovenia is going give Ukraine 28 M-55s
@dariogifc0
Жыл бұрын
I think Slovenia is considering sending these to Ukraine as of now (Sept 2022).
@Mortrag
Жыл бұрын
It's already a sealed deal, that 28 M-55S are send to Ukraine.
@dariogifc0
Жыл бұрын
I guess any help is welcomed by the Ukranians, but I hope these vehicles are not death traps. Depends how they use them ofc, could be ok against infantry carrying only small arms. Maybe as part of static fortifications also.
@Mortrag
Жыл бұрын
@@dariogifc0 I'd also say they have specifically for Ukraine two advantages over more modern western tanks: 1. I should be easier to retrain crews to one of them, because of the soviet-origin, than to a Abrams or a Leopard. 2. Logistics should be easier too, also because of it's roots in the eastern bloc. Modern tanks are all nice and that, but they are of little use, if the crews can't drive them and no spare parts are available.
@legenda85
3 жыл бұрын
The tank was a 'child' of Balkan wars and sanctions imposed on Slovenia, making T-55, which were inherited from EX-YU in bad state, suitable for use. Ignoring all the politicizing in Slovenia how the money has been spent it must be remembered that this project was meant to deter any sort of para-state attack on Slovenia and is a part of a larger package of arms that was bought including the towed Soltam TN90 guns and 120mm Soltam mortars. Kfir jets were also evaluated but later the decision was made for F-16 (examples that were not sold to Pakistan due to nuclear sanctions) and Cobra gunship combo, all of which were scrapped when things got back to normal in Ex-YU. . The battlefields of the 90's were at the nearest point 45 kilometers from Slovenia. The tank was mostly expected to be fighting against WW2 stock as well as T-55 of ex-JLA. It was also meant to bolster the Slovenian arms industry, directing it into 'western' weapons systems. Technical details, the armor is a Blazer, so called Super Blazer (what that should mean is unclear), all together the modernization cost around 52 million euros, for 30 tanks, with all the ammo and spare parts around 2,6 millions was spent on each tank. Most of the work was done in steel works Ravne ST. One was sold with ammunition on public auction two years ago, for the rest of 27 no buyer was found and they are in deep storage while one is meant as a museum piece. The price paid for the one sold was 820 000 euros.
@mihasalamun7860
2 жыл бұрын
I think the f 16s went to croatia not to us (Slovenia)
@qui2205
3 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the Vietnamese T55M will be. They drop the Israeli T55M3 upgrade, which have almost the same configuration to this to do their own upgrade due to financial problem. They produce some ERA locally borrow the Israel ERA technology, few new electronics and still using the D-10T guns, only adding in something to improve it accuracy. Although its good for the local military industry, but i doubt it will beat anything that come from China for the last 20 years
@deanromania6748
2 жыл бұрын
4:03 Yeah, but that was a licensed produced T-55, so it's just as ancient.
@lexthemystic3541
Жыл бұрын
It's a mess. Our TR-85M1 is an upgrade to the TR-85, which was an upgrade to the TR-77, which was a slightly modified T-55... But yes, you're right, and he's being a hypocrite.
@HabszStadT
3 жыл бұрын
I think I know what I'm gonna buy in future...
@bstange
Жыл бұрын
Great Video. I heard that they are now beeing "sold" to Ukrain. What do you think about that? My guess: Even if it is an old Tank and not very capable it's better to have a tank than not to have one. depending on the used case they can make difference.
@WereScrib
Жыл бұрын
TBH, considering the T62s present, they're...in many ways superior to those. A tank is better than no tank, and a tank with proper structure is better than none. The thing is, despite people in these comments calling these things useless, the L7 gun is more than capable of dealing with threats. I'm sure though, they'll avoid using them as 'anti tank' vehicles, and likely in an infantry support role--or very likely as trainers. Ukraine does need to continue training soldiers. More then that, a number of parts, due to soviet doctrine are usable on Ukrainian T64s. Even if they're not used as is for more than trainers--the parts that come with any sale could be used in centralized repair resources to fix road wheels, as an example.
@acid2-128
Жыл бұрын
I think it’s going to take a while before Ukraine starts using them even if they do because of the amount of T-72 type tanks from most eastern block countries they have been given and what they are capturing from Russia
@alexthor6739
3 жыл бұрын
I have a suggestion, can you please do a video on the PT-91 MBT and it's variants like the PT-91M?
@uporabn1k
3 жыл бұрын
The ammo that this tank shoots is Kranjska klobasa. It is very deadly as it is coated with potent horseradish.
@domi7161
3 жыл бұрын
Thank u Love from slovenia
@jaymin5946
3 жыл бұрын
the guy is from Serbia that is why white eagle is one of the best and your tank is worst and I think that soon he will start trash talking bosnian and croatian army just wait.
@domi7161
3 жыл бұрын
@@jaymin5946 what
@jaymin5946
3 жыл бұрын
@@domi7161 I repeat to you red is Serbian guy I think I am not sure but I see he disses countries that are close to Serbia and Serbia is the best that is all.
@SladesShitboxGarage
3 жыл бұрын
Do a vid on the Olifant Mk2
@choppergunner8650
3 жыл бұрын
Olifant stronk! It killed many MPLA/SWAPO/Cuban T-62s and T-55s during the Border War!!!!
@launch4
2 жыл бұрын
Thing about all these old vehicles is if the weapons and machinery is still in working order and it's still viable from a logistical perspective then it makes sense to keep them on or upgrade them here and there as opposed to just abandoning them. I just wonder how useful all that heavy steel armour is?
@isiso2059
3 жыл бұрын
Can you please take a look at the Swedish stridsvagn 122b+ or the regular stridsvagn 122
@dominiksoukal
3 жыл бұрын
Please do one on T-72 M4CZ
@doorcf
3 жыл бұрын
Hey man try the Tifón 2A an hilarious upgrade offered to peruvian T-55s but that wasn't accepted for a good reason
@calvintay755
3 жыл бұрын
T-80U's dumb cousin lmao
@sq33zed95
3 жыл бұрын
What do u think about T72M4 CZ Czech Main Batlle tank
@ArreatPLvro
3 жыл бұрын
TR85 is basically t55 with uprated Hull armour and 1 more road wheel pair...
@lexthemystic3541
Жыл бұрын
Ehh... A but more complicated. TR-85M1 is a FCS upgrade over the TR-85, which is a mobility upgrade over the TR-77, which is a slightly modified T-55.
Пікірлер: 1,2 М.