If you liked this video please consider checking out my video on the Hanoi Hilton, I think you would find it quite informative and interesting: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2pl3sZV5fKGlaIo You can also support this channel through becoming a KZitem Member through the "Join" button or by buying some merch from my website: www.coneofarc.com/merch
@thefelon8027
Жыл бұрын
Ill watch after this one
@ryanbennett1314
Жыл бұрын
I quite liked the lazerpig section. I'm not russia's strongest soldier but I found that he often misinforms people. It gets to points where it seems /on purpose/.
@Edgar-dp5qu
Жыл бұрын
Ill start by not trusting anything you say, shill
@pumapandora1310
Жыл бұрын
@@ryanbennett1314 i think he did an excuse for the T14 video
@osmacar5331
Жыл бұрын
being, Y'know, british, yeah gun is anything that is... a gun. it's almost like we have names for things.
@TakNuke
Жыл бұрын
Since humans can easily be killed the day of soldiers are over. Replace all of them with terminators.
@nikolaideianov5092
Жыл бұрын
Terminators can also be destroyed so they are also opsolite
@gentleman8948
Жыл бұрын
With UTube comments
@Vincent98987
Жыл бұрын
@@nikolaideianov5092with what you can destroy terminators?
@raymartcarreon6069
Жыл бұрын
@@Vincent98987either sheer torture to it's metal frame like in Terminator 1 or kicking them into a furnace/ molten metal like in the end of T2. Damage caused by freezing can also glitch out their systems like in Terminator 2.
@Lesbian.Monster.Hunter
Жыл бұрын
@@watamelonythey tried that in genesis, it didn't work
@obamnaprismus
Жыл бұрын
I can't stop laughing at the idea of a Panzer II with a 17cm howitzer. Imagine firing it and absolutely crushing the poor ol' Panzerino
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
They did put a 150mm on one so not too far off
@alessiobubbles5345
Жыл бұрын
You can most definitely put a 17cm howitzer from WW1 on a modified chassis: what will happen to the hull, suspension, crew is another matter 😂
@lemagicbaguette1917
Жыл бұрын
@@alessiobubbles5345 in Germany, it is a question if could, not should.
@madfluffyfox8739
Жыл бұрын
@@lemagicbaguette1917 “it works, so we shall do it.”
@kabob0077
Жыл бұрын
@@lemagicbaguette1917 [Insert Ian Malcolm quote from Jurassic Park here]
@_thisnameistaken
Жыл бұрын
An expert in a comments section told me that Germany should have melted down all the ferdinands and cast all that metal into stugs to win the war
@carlblack8574
Жыл бұрын
You can write an entire book with arguments from those kind of people. One time, a Wehraboo told me that if Michael Wittmann wasn't killed - By a plane, obviously... God forbid a Tiger I being destroyed by a Sherman - Germany would have been capable of turning the tides in the Western Front... No, i'm not kidding. This guy tought tank a single Tiger I crew could have turned the tides of the entire war, if they weren't killed. I didn't even bothered to reply...
@lexif.5463
Жыл бұрын
"Expert"
@lexif.5463
Жыл бұрын
@@carlblack8574I love when armchair historian wehraboos simp over the tiger 1 and are baffled to find out they were realistically meh tanks all together.
@carlblack8574
Жыл бұрын
@@lexif.5463 In my opinion, the Tiger Is were good tanks... But people hype the shit out of them, after all they were another heavy tank. I'm even going to say that the IS-2s were better heavy tanks designs. The IS-2s are often overlooked, when in reality they were some of the best designed heavy tanks of the war.
@trenteaston3515
Жыл бұрын
There was some guy on a Mark Felton Productions video claiming up and down that "the HE-177 was the best heavy bomber of the war if it had just been given more time to fix engine issues it would have turned the course of the war" which is rare you see a take as unique as that one.
@StrakanDocrusReakal
Жыл бұрын
As an australian, i can confirm that our kangaroos do, in fact, do most of our research. So yes, it would be kangaroo technology.
@SweetSniper5197
Жыл бұрын
Bloody Aussies. What about the Kiwis? Nobody ever talks about our wonderful breakthroughs... this was a joke, Aussies are awesome
@WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS
Жыл бұрын
ERA originally stood for "Explosive Roo Armour" and operated via miniaturised Kangas being placed in the small brick housing and kicking the incoming round away from the tank when it was in close enough proximity to it. The explosive element's purpose was dual fold, firstly as a backup to destroying the incoming round and secondly it's to hide the miniaturised kangaroo technology from the wider world.
@chezmix528
Жыл бұрын
They did win the war after all
@Legion-xq8eo
Жыл бұрын
Don’t forget the emus!!
@yosarianilivestech4018
Жыл бұрын
I love the comments about tanks being obsolete because they die to atgms, it's like in mtg people complaining that creatures die to removal
@Ulfur8574
Жыл бұрын
AiRcRaFt ArE ObSoLeTe BeCause Sams exist. That was pain to type fully
@jic1
Жыл бұрын
@@watamelony I've seen pretty much that comment about aircraft carriers.
@MrWolfstar8
Жыл бұрын
Tanks can’t take or hold ground now. The Russians proved that with their failed attacks last year. What’s needed is APCs with tank level armor to be resistant to artillery. Armored vehicles are not going away but the primary purpose is going to be infantry and drones instead of big gun fire power since infantry equipped with rapid fire grenade launchers and drone guided artillery strikes is more effective than tanks on a modern battlefield.
@yosarianilivestech4018
Жыл бұрын
@@MrWolfstar8 tanks never could take land on their own. Tanks always needed to be accompanied by infantry
@MrWolfstar8
Жыл бұрын
@@yosarianilivestech4018 I seem to remember Abrams by themselves racing to Baghdad and then ambushing everything that came their way while they waiting for the infantry to catch up. That’s taking and holding ground. Today those Abrams would be taken out by ATGMs and drone guided artillery because tanks are just too damn big to hide from drones. A similar force of heavy APCs like the Israeli Namer could move men and drones into an ambush spot, and long range artillery and rapid fire grenade launchers would cause the same effect and would be much harder to kill. Tank fire power was useful because artillery used to suck at actuality hitting the target before modern artillery and drones. Tank armor is still useful but the size of the tanks makes it hard to hide them from drone guided artillery and ATGMs. Better to use that armor to protect infantry instead of an obsolete direct fire system.
@Stealth86651
Жыл бұрын
Aircraft can shoot other aircraft down, therefore the day of the aircraft "if" over as well. In fact, pretty much everything the military uses is useless since it can be destroyed by other weapons/vehicles.
@greydearing
Жыл бұрын
Fully agreed, all in favor of just going out onto the battlefield fist draw?
@KyklopCZ-DaTrueOne
Жыл бұрын
@@greydearing That won't work either. What if the enemy breaks your arm? The only way we can wage wars is through sleeping competitions.
@Bob-Not-Zilla
Жыл бұрын
@@KyklopCZ-DaTrueOne the only true solution to this, is to have all conflicts be decided by Rock, Paper, Scissors.
@nightshade4873
Жыл бұрын
Anything made, can be destroyed by some means to a degree that its functionality is either diminished or eradicated, and can be disassembled unless designed otherwise.
@gabrielmachadovieira__1075
Жыл бұрын
BR You are prettier up close 👍 Good job to you cone da arca ✌️
@bricklingtonlego
Жыл бұрын
"Expert" commenters are the kind of people who say that Germany if would have produced more Tigers, they would've won the war.
@kiliandrilltzsch8272
Жыл бұрын
of course they would have won the war if they had 1000000 tiger II by 1929 like duh
@kabob0077
Жыл бұрын
They wouldn't have won even if they could mass produce Panthers and King Tigers, it's stupid to think they could have won if they did.
@Swellington_
Жыл бұрын
nah,the T 34 is the best tank EVER jesus christ!!! Its SARCASM!!
@dofusquentin
Жыл бұрын
@@kiliandrilltzsch8272 bro has never heard of logistics
@TypeKK
Жыл бұрын
@@kabob0077Live metal shortage and factory bombings reactions:
@rosehip9400
Жыл бұрын
You could do a satire video like this but you review correct comments and say dumb stuff to explain that they’re wrong and end the video with a rickroll
@naamadossantossilva4736
Жыл бұрын
April is far away.
@chocolatecaake_
Жыл бұрын
NAH CONE OF ARC APRIL FOOLS SPECIAL 2024
@hitechinc.7875
Жыл бұрын
@@naamadossantossilva4736 never gonna give you up!!
@flakcannonhans6170
Жыл бұрын
CoA also should use a Redditor voice when “correcting” all the comments
@KerbalRocketry
Жыл бұрын
he did, rewatch this video.
@enysuntra1347
Жыл бұрын
6:28 No, reactive armour is an Emu technology. During the Emu wars of 1932, armoured Emus used reactive extra armour out of feathers to harden their hulls. The next documented usage of extra armour blocks is from New Zealand, where corrugated sheets were used as extra armour on the Bob Semple Armoured Fighting Vehicle. From there, it went to Israel and the Soviet Union when Emus of the Trotskist Down-Under Avian Anarchist Liberation Front, a dissident Emu group, made the technology available.
@minimalbstolerance8113
Жыл бұрын
Ah, yes, I remember the Trotskyist Down-Under Avian Anarchist Liberation Front. It's a bit annoying that people keep confusing it with their rival organisation, the Anarchist Avian Trotskyist Liberation Front of Down-Under. That organisation was mostly made up of cassowaries, and famously had the slogan "What have the drop bears done for us?"
@enysuntra1347
Жыл бұрын
@@minimalbstolerance8113 Weren't the Inter-Island Anarchist Avian Liberation Front those cassowaries who came up with the idea to put explosives directly in their feathered extra armour, while the Emu and the Bob Semple relied on the enemy to bring the explosives? If I remember correctly, they trapped Bombardier beetles between their feather extra armour and their hulls.
@99999bomb
Жыл бұрын
History channel at 3am
@kingleech16
Жыл бұрын
This thread is redeeming a lousy day. Bless all you maniacs.
@Masterhitman935
Жыл бұрын
What will emutopia think of next! /J
@mpcrauzer
Жыл бұрын
Here in brazil we are calling these "experts" couch general, you need to see the pearls that show up on a article about the KC-390 caring a Black Hawk on its cargo Bay during a transport test
@Horseshoecrabwarrior
Жыл бұрын
In English, we call them "Armchair Generals." Same meaning! I guess they show up in every country.
@V-V1875-h
Жыл бұрын
or armchair admiral, which has a nicer ring, for the naval ishooos
@ДаниилСтепанов-р1и
Жыл бұрын
Same in Russia - Sofa/Couch Armies, we called them. Or in russian words - "Divannye Vouyska".
@siluda9255
Жыл бұрын
nunca ouvi ninguém usar esse termo seria algo tipo general de sofa ?
@mpcrauzer
Жыл бұрын
@@siluda9255 exatamente esse termo
@AWholeLegionary
Жыл бұрын
Watching ConeOfArc lose his sanity for half an hour.
@V-V1875-h
Жыл бұрын
RIP
@hitechinc.7875
Жыл бұрын
It's good to teach other people what's true and wrong source. Just opinion
@enisra_bowman
Жыл бұрын
@@hitechinc.7875 i doubt you could People named "covid masedmorons" teach anything, they would doubt that the earth is round even if you put them on a Spaceship
Next thing I know is that I unconsciously commented something stupid in the comments at 3 AM and got featured the video
@verty2689
Жыл бұрын
"does not excuse lazy sourcing" ironic isn't it?
@tram1839
Жыл бұрын
to be fair a lot of this was a bunch of "woozle effect" wasn't it? essentially everyone would inevitably fall for such things. (essentially all journalists nowadays are essentially never checking for woozle's and always take stuff for face value because they suck like that. so war/tech historians are by default 100 times better in my book.)
@XMysticHerox
Жыл бұрын
@@tram1839 Totally ok to fall for it. Shit happens. Whats not ok is smugly calling out others over research while doing so and then making some god awful crybully response when called out on it.
@tram1839
Жыл бұрын
@@XMysticHerox oooh, what was this crybully response? this a twitter thing or something?
@mozzym770
Жыл бұрын
@@tram1839 Cone put out a community post, and tries to play the victim. He seemingly forgets he was the one to start this whole thing with this video.
@andrewreynolds4949
Жыл бұрын
@@mozzym770 Wasn't Lazerpig the one who put out the first video that started it? I'm going to look into this BS, but I know Lazerpig to be incorrect or misleading in previous videos.
@danyelpaladintheimpetuous1438
Жыл бұрын
"Infantryman chokes to death by canned food. It is now confirmed that infantry is obsolete against such devastating anti-personel weapon." - some rando on the internet
@jackcausey1449
7 ай бұрын
Hey man machino stew was a mankiller (I might have spelt machino wrong)
@lollikabosso.w.n7153
7 ай бұрын
I was saying that if babies can choke by Lego bricks, whats the point of employing child soldiers
@No_Feelings
Жыл бұрын
Imagine dedicating an entire section of your video to a rant that's just completely wrong. Bravo cone, maybe you should dO sOmE aCtUaL rEsEaRcH like you suggest.
@royalbluegaming7763
Жыл бұрын
True
@ryanchatham9971
Жыл бұрын
Hope she sees this bro
@bjam8816
Жыл бұрын
@@ryanchatham9971who?
@tram1839
Жыл бұрын
@@bjam8816 probably something something lgbt identity. judging from the png-tuber stuff, best to leave it be before it becomes drama
@No_Feelings
Жыл бұрын
@@tram1839 jesse what the fuck are you talking about
@warcriminal5139
Жыл бұрын
You need to add clips of family guy or rocket league to keep the shorts-viewers entertained, they don't have a long enough attention span to comprehend the things being said
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
True, I should put sped up HOI4 gameplay or something on the bottom half of the video
@jic1
Жыл бұрын
I've seen it happen on other channels too, it's really quite remarkable. I can excuse people missing an important point in a long video, but when I see multiple comments from people about things that had already been addressed in the video, and the video was *less than 60 seconds long,* it really blows my mind.
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
@@jic1 I've had people leave TLDRs on my shorts. Like bro I literally condensed it down to an incredibly short video already what more can you cut out
@John.McMillan
Жыл бұрын
@@ConeOfArcI've had people ask me for TLDR's in comments I make for historical things. Comments that are less than one full paragraph. Barely longer than this comment. It's insane how low people's attention span is getting.
@pilotbug6100
Жыл бұрын
@@John.McMillantl;Dr?
@Obelion_
Жыл бұрын
i like the "tank is dead" i mean what, everyone gonna walk into battle? like yeah tanks are vulnerable, but they have been since ww1
@russman3787
Жыл бұрын
By their logic, the second the Germans made their ww1 AT rifle the game was up and the tank was six feet under.
@MercShame
Жыл бұрын
So, are you going to make an apology video to lazerpig since you didnt do your research?
@NeocadeX
Жыл бұрын
No, because lazer doesnt do his either, Chieftan and red effect refuted him point by poiint.
@MercShame
Жыл бұрын
@@NeocadeX cone didnt however, and this is his channel.
@morten123456789
Жыл бұрын
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I do wonder .... How you actually read the book about the King tiger point you make? .... Interesting stuff.
@kingleech16
Жыл бұрын
Be careful doing these comment roundups. They are funny/disturbing, but they can drive one mad. Like the Macarena.
@MonkeyJedi99
Жыл бұрын
I see your Macarena earworm, and raise you a Baby Shark!
@kingleech16
Жыл бұрын
@@MonkeyJedi99 You monster.
@randomka-52alligatorthatis34
Жыл бұрын
Stare at the abyss too much, then the abyss stares back at you. Wait, does this mean they will be more Hot Takes in Cone's Comment Section now?
@MonkeyJedi99
Жыл бұрын
@@randomka-52alligatorthatis34 First read through I thought you typed "hot cakes" and got a little hungry.
@jarink1
Жыл бұрын
I think of the phrase "poking the bear".
@zanderray9823
Жыл бұрын
Pretty poor take on the engine on your part saying that can't be the same based on displacement and cylinder count. Especially in the automotive segment (and even in the military as well). Back in the 70s when the fuel crisis hit a simple solution to reduce emissions was to reduce cylinder count. So they would litterly chop a block of a v8 and plug all the holes on it that would have led to the 7 and 8 cylinders. The other part displacement is even worse of a measurement for relationship. For example my engine in my ford ranger is the cologne 4.0 v6 (4.0 being displacement in liters) if you go back to the 70s a cologne v6 would be a a 1.7 liter motor. That's a bit over double the amount of displacement change in a time span that's shorter than that of the sl16 and the Russian engine. So not really saying your right or wrong here doesn't really matter but those metrics are pretty bad to use. The best thing would be the valve train type. This is great for differentiating engines as it takes an entire redesign and new engine block in order to achieve a new type. This being whether the engine is sleeve valve, overhead cam, pushrod etc etc.
@xale3658B
Жыл бұрын
That is a genuinely good point, thank you sir
@skaldlouiscyphre2453
Жыл бұрын
Other examples: The old Buick V6 was their V8 with two cylinders lopped off; same with the old Chevy V6, they took an SBC and chopped two cylinders off. The old Nissan L engine came in both 4 and 6 cylinder models, the 6 was essentially the the four, plus two more cylinders. Expanding on the old Ford Cologne engine, the Ford Cologne V6 was initially derived from the Ford Taunus V4 engine, both have significant parts commonalities, sharing V angle (60°), bore, cylinder spacing, etc. The four cylinder came in displacements from 1.3 to 1.7 litres, the V6 came in displacements from 1.8 up to 4 litres. Two OHC derivatives were also made, the older Cosworth 2.9 DOHC and the much more recent in-house developed 4.0 SOHC. There's also cases like the recent Jaguar V6 and V8, where they didn't even bother to modify the block for the V6. The AJ126 literally just blanks off two cylinders. Displacement isn't a very good guide for determining shared history, instead you'd want to look at stuff like bore spacing.
@zanderray9823
Жыл бұрын
@skaldlouiscyphre2453 ya you got what I meant lmao. But ya I'd agree bore spacing is another key way to determine engine lineage.
@skaldlouiscyphre2453
Жыл бұрын
@@zanderray9823 Definitely, you made a solid point. Hopefully I'm just reinforcing your point with a bit more depth. People who want to insist that a 16 cylinder design can't be made into a 12 need to be aware that it's one of the more straightforward modifications that can be made.
@jimjamauto
Жыл бұрын
This is exactly how the three different Ford 351 V8 engines still confuse enthusiasts decades later. There's the 351 Windsor and the 351 Cleveland small block V8s, they are almost completely different engines. Then there's the last one which is basically a tall deck 351C, aka the 400M block, destroked with a 351W crankshaft called the 351M. Oh and it uses a big block bellhousing. All these engines were available around somewhat the same time, and to add to the madness, the 351W was available before, during, and after the 351M
@seanhunt1171
Жыл бұрын
“Do some actual research” says guy who was wrong on the engine lol 😂😂
@ramblingrenegade6346
Жыл бұрын
Aaaay someone else from LP's new vid. Notify me when the comments get spicy 😂
@atomicnut1486
Жыл бұрын
@@ramblingrenegade6346Love coming to see all the fresh comments, wonder if Cone will respond truthfully or give a half assed "WELL ACKTULLY"
@ramblingrenegade6346
Жыл бұрын
@@atomicnut1486 yeah. Honestly I did take Red's video too seriously because I just couldn't believe that the Russians would actually use an updated SLR-16, but when I saw this one it just left a bad taste considering Cone's own research blunders. Its satisfying watching all the fresh comments clapping back
@atomicnut1486
Жыл бұрын
@@ramblingrenegade6346 I just didn't like how Cone went on the attack. At least Red tried being proper lol
@karotgamin790
Жыл бұрын
god i love the community post
@PeoplecallmeLucifer
Жыл бұрын
17:12 Didn't even Russians admit their initial intelligence was HORRIBLE
@cahdoge
Жыл бұрын
I tried doing my own research on the T-14 and it's blogposts, press-releases and defunct websites all the way down. It's infuriating. There are no remotely reliable sources and not nearly enough information to properly factcheck all the bullshit, that get's thrown at you. Asking someone used to work in such an enviroment (an historian e.g.), for their best guess is probably the best we can do.
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
There's enough information to form a rough idea of the development and design of the vehicle but actual performance and other data is a bit trickier.
@common_moss8998
Жыл бұрын
@@ConeOfArc Are you going to make some sort of response to Lazerpigs?
@markolysynchuk5264
4 ай бұрын
It's likely that Russia is hiding something about the T-14, or at least just trying to give a better picture.
@FemboyModels
Жыл бұрын
About the Lazer pig bit. please don't do that again. And by do that again I mean being so rude to him. just if you're going to respond to him just be nice man
@Bandog23
Ай бұрын
I know I'm late but it's so funny seeing people feel bad for lazerpig as if he isn't an asshole himself
@Wallyworld30
Жыл бұрын
Cone careful. When you stare into the abyss the sometimes the abyss looks back.
@strayling1
Жыл бұрын
Or the Pig does.
@Wallyworld30
Жыл бұрын
@@strayling1 Yes, the Pig looked back!
@pershing3346
Жыл бұрын
@@Wallyworld30it is all a bit strange and I find it weird that Cone is citing blogs to prove a point on this. Blogs can be used as sources, as a way to prove how unfounded a blog citing a blog citing a blog citing a blog citing a blog.... I hope this doesn't become a drama thing for cone's sake...
@n0sc0p3dpwnd9
Жыл бұрын
@@Wallyworld30I think he meant the pig stares back, not that he started it lol
@andrewdickens9697
Жыл бұрын
Yeah that's exactly what he meant, I don't mind that cone responded to the stuff happening with lazerpig, but as an avid viewer of both channels I thought then and I think now that it was rude and uncalled for to respond like cone did. Why can't we all get along guys? Everyone makes mistakes and you guys have to share a space together, just be civil. All I can say tho is at least nobody acted like gonzalo lira
@M07...
Жыл бұрын
Should have sticked to wt bud
@jonsouth1545
Жыл бұрын
Regarding the use of the terms guns in the UK military one of the mottos (although not the main one) of the Royal Artillery is "Our Guns are our Colours"
@fluffskunk
Жыл бұрын
What seems to get lost in the T14 engine argument is that engine FAMILIES evolve and change. Saying the T14's engine is a "copy" of the Tiger P engine is inaccurate, but it can share bore spacing, crank journal size, some block dimensions... it's like the Buick/Oldsmobile aluminum V8 from the early 1960s, that engine was sold and licensed and modified so much that there were overhead cam V8 versions, iron V8 versions, iron V6 versions, and aluminum and iron turbo versions, powering everything from GM and Rover sedans to Formula 1 and Indycar. But the basic geometry was shared among all of them. This tends to make development easier and allow for accessories, production tooling and supply chains to be re-used between variants.
@theduke7539
8 ай бұрын
Right, so If I take a ford flat head V8, make the cylinders wider and shorten the stroke, Ive made a totally new engine right? Well no, Ive made a worse ford flathead. But atleast I would have done more than the russians have done to the Kharkov V2 engine over the last 80 years. And making modifications is just apart of life for engines. But there comes a time when an engine has been stretched to its absolute limit. The A85A3 reached that limit before it was even developed. X engines are pursued so rarely because they are horribly unreliable. Theyre inefficient and prone to breaking parts from excessive wear. And why was the A85 selected for the T14? Because the design bureau had to cut corners. Russia doesnt have the cash for R&D that the west does. Remember, GDP per capita, Russia is on par with Nigeria. Do you really expect Nigeria to develop a ground up new tank thats on par with western tanks? No. Because Nigeria isnt so stupid as to think it needs to maintain itself as a military power beyond its immediate defense.
@tobiasGR3Y
Жыл бұрын
Wow. This video aged poorly.
@BirbUp
Жыл бұрын
Like spoiled milk in a summer day!
@ftjyggfxfd
Жыл бұрын
@@BirbUp no need to insult milk they did nothing to u
@teku0000
6 ай бұрын
What happened?
@l-nolazck-rn24
5 ай бұрын
@@teku0000I guess it's because of the Russia things. Since it's been confirmed that nato pmcs were in there since the invasion and also the truth behind mobilization (it was an obscenely cruel opposition suppression method). That and well, Ukraine has been running out of troops and NATO tanks have proven worse than expected as the challenger doesn't go that well in the Ukrainian geography. The leopard is too unprotected and problematic (the why the U.S chose the Abrahams model over it) and the Abrahams being improved to survive tank on tank engagement. It's not that Russia best and shit but the tank community overestimated their grand strategy. Albeit not their intelligence services LOL. It's either this or they are just simping for Lazerpig kekkkkkk
@sofielee4122
Жыл бұрын
desert storm and its consequenses have been a disaster for american ability to comprehend that combat against near-peer adversaries will have losses
@CallanElliott
Жыл бұрын
The fact that a country like Russia is considered near peer to Ukraine says mountains...
@volatile_gaming9475
Жыл бұрын
The most accurate comment I have ever seen
@hedgehog3180
Жыл бұрын
@@CallanElliott Not really, Ukraine has always had one of the most advanced military industries in Europe right after the big players. A lot of Soviet military industry was located there after all and it was maintained after the breakup of the Soviet Union. Not to take away from the incredible achievements of the Ukrainian armed forces in defending their country but the war was never as one-sided as media liked to portray it when it first broke out. Since 2014 Ukraine has been embarked on a pretty serious military modernization program so that by the 24th of February invasion they were very well prepared. It's also why a lot of people thought that Russia wasn't going to invade because it didn't seem like they really had the strength to do so, having something like 300.000 lined up against the roughly 250.000 in the regular Ukrainian army.
@winstonchurchill5892
Жыл бұрын
Russia suffered more casualties fighting littral militia men inside their own country for 4 years than any US invasion since the war on terror. This montera of high losses solely applies to russia, in ww3 mabey but in a regular conflict russias ability to send young men to the Graves will remain uniquely russian.
@Serub
Жыл бұрын
@@winstonchurchill5892 Those "literal militia men" Were trained and led both by former Soviet commanders (who were pretty good, judging by their performance in Afghanistan), and by various fundamentalist guerilla fighters (from the same Afghanistan, where they had 10 years to come up with tactics to counter the Soviets'), not to mention using the exact same weapons the Russians were using. And after the first disastrous campaign, lost for the reasons mentioned above, while the Russian generals were busy jerking off or something, the Chechens were preparing, and quite thoroughly, I must note. And yeah, fighting a prepared and a highly-motivated army in urban environments tends to raise the casualties significantly. You can compare photos of Al-Falujah or Baghdad to Grozniy after the respective battles to notice the difference in the intensity of the fighting.
@t10god
Жыл бұрын
Johannes Bauer blatantly remaking history in a youtube comment is one of the funniest
@danielpalai156
Жыл бұрын
The problem is, that people like him do believe in what they say
@raven_1133
Жыл бұрын
13:37 Don’t worry Cone, he just works for the Red Cross.
@henrynagel7175
Жыл бұрын
I thought the 3d printer was a bench press 💀
@nehrigen
Жыл бұрын
An apology to LP is probably in order here...
@jamesmandahl444
Жыл бұрын
lolol what??? LP didnt correct anyone about the t-14 engine which is totally different and not related to the experimental german tank engine.
@marseldagistani1989
Жыл бұрын
@@jamesmandahl444 It is a modification of the Sla 16
@warpbeast69
Жыл бұрын
@@marseldagistani1989 Which it actually isn't. Per the 0 sources provided by the pig boy.
@stefanogalliano5634
Жыл бұрын
@@marseldagistani1989how so
@Munkynuts
Жыл бұрын
@@jamesmandahl444 it shouldn’t matter if he did make a mistake (he didn’t) no excuse talking smack towards a colleague. Imagine if LP did the same when cone admittedly misidentified the panther model. It’s hypothetical because LP isn’t a lifeless jerk, waiting to catch mistakes from other folks doing same kind of work. It was pathetic regardless of who’s correct about an engine model ffs.
@thedreysepodcasttv4852
Жыл бұрын
Here comes the storm
@animatorofanimation128
Жыл бұрын
8:55 That commenter is going to be very confused when he reads a Napoleonic history book and sees that the British only had 152 Guns with them at Waterloo. "Guess they all shared between them?"
@AshtonK1816
Жыл бұрын
And this is why you don’t lead out with such a sarcastic, snide tone. It makes you look really, really bad if it turns out you’re actually the one who’s wrong.
@theflyinghetzer4335
Жыл бұрын
Ok, The engine wasn't really meant for a particular tank, but IT WAS installed on a Tiger 2(). But even then, why are you making such a huge deal about this. The engine was partially made BY porsche FOR an unreliable german tank. Still gets the point across that the engine is unreliable and has no place in a modern tank.
@theflyinghetzer4335
Жыл бұрын
Refrencing Professor Porsche's wars
@JacksonYT198
Жыл бұрын
imagine reading what you source
@Demicron
Жыл бұрын
Well Lazer pig clapped back.
@jasontofini3412
Жыл бұрын
"do some real research man" GETS DISPROVEN BY HIS OWN SOURCES
@FaffyWaffles
Жыл бұрын
Whoo boi lazer pig made a response video
@_np7
Жыл бұрын
I'm a big fan of you but you just got dunked on by LazerPig, your "seriously man do some own research" backfired horrendously.
@sceligator
Жыл бұрын
I appreciate you giving yourself an aneurysm for our entertainment.
@zombeyfreak7162
Жыл бұрын
Sad that they never went beyond the 8,8cm ≠ 88mm logic
@jic1
Жыл бұрын
Huh?
@killergames391
Жыл бұрын
Metric system bad. Ooooga booga!
@SweetSniper5197
Жыл бұрын
@@killergames391 Imperial system is worse
@jic1
Жыл бұрын
@@SweetSniper5197 Not really, although fractions are a pain. Anyway, I think he was being sarcastic.
@jkjkrandom
Жыл бұрын
@@jic1if he wasn't being sarcastic he has no idea how metric conventions work
@jacobs.9797
Жыл бұрын
"Possible Löwe Interior Layout" killed me lol. Had to do a double take on that one.
@T51B1
Жыл бұрын
Do some actual research yourself. The SLA16 WAS installed into a Tiger 2 but didn't complete trials. I have no idea why you chose to pull the 'Well, ackchyually' card and give the guy grief about research and sources when you didn't even do the same yourself.
@technoruffles7747
Жыл бұрын
He literally says it was tested on a Tiger 2 at 22:20. I am convinced people don't actually watch the videos.
@markolysynchuk5264
4 ай бұрын
@@technoruffles7747 Or comment before watching.
@spinerfiend
Жыл бұрын
This is the kind of behaviour that keeps me from the sub button, you're just sad.
@FippeFi
Жыл бұрын
There's probably some sort of lineage between Sla.16 and the engine mounted on T-14 Armata, considering that X-layout engines are a relative rarity - I don't think anyone has produced a notable one in a while. From what I found with my limited research, most are just glued-together V60s to increase power, which the Armata's powerpack looks to be as well. Coming from engine harmonics viewpoint, X-layouts are probably unpopular because they will have much higher adverse loads on the crankshaft if the firing isn't done very cleanly, so they're likely to end up as maintenance nightmares in the long run. A 90-degree X-layout would be balanced, but it'd completely lose the space savings which is why you'd do an X-layout to begin with... Anyway, this is probably something we'll be able to read on in 10-20 years, all this is speculation on my part. Either way, good commentary on the matter.
@gheetza14
Жыл бұрын
just because they are both X engines, does not mean it is probable they are related in any way
@FippeFi
Жыл бұрын
@@gheetza14 Pretty much! However, I'm fairly confident that it's likely a case of someone making an Sla.16-style X layout engine after WWII in soviet russia, then someone else looking at that and going "huh that's neat" and then making another, etc; so the lineage is caused indirectly if anything.
@TheForklifter
Жыл бұрын
From my understanding Soviet X engine development goes back to the 50s. I forgot the name of the X diesel engine developed in the 60s but that used the Sla-16 as a reference among other X diesel engines known at the time. The development of the A-85 which is the T-14's engine dates back to the late 70s and was known as the 2V amongst other names. It was used in many projects before the Armata. There was a experimental T-72 with a welded turret and the 2V16. To my knowledge the 2V and this earlier engine I mentioned are not directly related in a technical sense but they have used it as a reference. Later on the Object 187 made use of it as well as the Object 195. It was offered as an engine for commercial purposes later on which is where the whole T-14's engine being a pumping engine thing comes from.
@Hunter12396
Жыл бұрын
22:27 That's not quite right. It was intended to install the Sla. 16 in a Jagdtiger, but the Jagdtiger ended up not being available at the time, so it was in fact installed in a Tiger II at Nibelungenwerke. (Professor Porsche's Wars - Karl Ludvigsen)
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
I've heard that and the other way around. Hard to say which is correct
@Peeperisnotafur
Жыл бұрын
The part about lazer pig has aged like milk.
@shittinontheceiling3474
Жыл бұрын
How dare you. Milk can last relatively long with proper chemical treatment
@cptmiche
Жыл бұрын
Milk sitting out in the Florida sun circa right now.
@atomicnut1486
Жыл бұрын
@@Sim6dot9profile picture is about right
@tangarz5357
Жыл бұрын
@@atomicnut1486 i kinda thought the same
@scourgex1479
Жыл бұрын
Honestly was subscribed to Cone before this, but after Cone’s “actual research” statement I was soured and unsubbed. Glad LP responded
@spent808
Жыл бұрын
Have you seen a microphone around here?....LazerPig dropped one.
@Bandog23
Ай бұрын
By doing what? Lying?
@worldwartanker4542
Жыл бұрын
I like the barrel lowering to reload comment. Reminds me of a story one of my soldiers had when he was in the Marine Corps a few years ago. During a training excerice, every time they fired the cannon, the entire electric system would shut off and put them dead in the water, so they'd have to restart it 🤣
@joshsquatch7474
Жыл бұрын
Coneofarc: "I'm gonna callout other people for their bad takes." Also Coneofarc: *gets info from live journal*
@jasoncp3257
Жыл бұрын
Crazy to think I've done more historical research than this dude and I Don't make historical videos
@elaqgarahulelpon1479
Жыл бұрын
People really be argueing over whether Cone-man thinks War thunder or World of Tanks is better, meanwhile I'm one of the only 3 people in the clan he made to continue playing Armored Warfare.
@thefelon8027
Жыл бұрын
Armored Warfare clearly the better game
@elaqgarahulelpon1479
Жыл бұрын
@@thefelon8027 This is now day 1 of asking ConeOfArc to do something with the game Armored Warfare.
@yi_hou3092
Жыл бұрын
18:26 Imagine trying to reload the Sturer Emil as it has its Gun on the Lowest Depression Angle. good luck trying to use that 1 Piece Ammo kid
@cutezachie
Жыл бұрын
You had the ability to edit your own vid, and you still posted it with you tripping over your own words? o.o This is as sad as seeing a kid trying to give a book report in front of the class. And every bit as disinteresting.
@xcritic9671
Жыл бұрын
What's the funny-looking humanoid creature with the weird hair in the middle of the room?
@billyxxxx1738
Жыл бұрын
Well, this is going to be interesting. Here comes the Pig.
@johnnycab8986
Жыл бұрын
you mean NAFOtrannies
@iosefstalinium5068
Жыл бұрын
hes a NAFO loser
@jofelfusyoutube
Жыл бұрын
seriously dude? come on.
@kaylencowan4355
Жыл бұрын
you fell off man, the irony in this video is killing me
@mikerage1011
Жыл бұрын
Laser pigs comments on the engine are correct . And had you done sone good research you would have figured this out. One of the sources for this info is by a former British army intelligence officer. " Sergio Miller". As well as other sources. So you might want to watch getting ahead of yourself.
@Evilgrebo
Жыл бұрын
Short form content is where intelligence goes to die. I've had people comment on a 15 second video and they clearly hadn't watched all of it or if they did completely failed to understand.
@creeperfest2497
Жыл бұрын
well that lazerpig rant aged badly
@gamerfan8445
Жыл бұрын
I thought you were better than that.
@Grimshak81
Жыл бұрын
Arc, love you for finding the tank, but your reaction to LazerPig, especially in tone, was big fat massive leaking own goal XD
@berryreading4809
Жыл бұрын
Here for the upcoming comments🍿 "Never trust any information in any video, regardless of the creator at face value" -This video creator who makes videos on historical topics and equipment... 🤔 (BTW I watched this video when it originally came out, just back for entertainment 🤠)
@iosefstalinium5068
Жыл бұрын
keep sucking that NAFO troll off
@identity7536
Жыл бұрын
Just so someone said it, lazerpig has since also admitted he made a huge error there. He also said he should have looked it up in mire detail. Still bad, but it should be mentioned that he corrected himself, before this error is the main thing his T-14 video stays in memory for
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
That's good and I hope he does better in the future with his research so his channel can both grow and provide good information to viewers. However with such a high view count the damage from the first video has already been done and only a small percentage will likely see any apology/correction. A large part of why I included that section in my video was to highlight the issue to hopefully inspire the viewer to be more wary of trusting the information you hear in a KZitem video. That includes my content as well
@identity7536
Жыл бұрын
@@ConeOfArc I agree the damage is doine and a correction won't revert it. but My point is that it should still be mentioned that he was aware after and didn't diny it. you know ? details that make a difference
@Ghost1828
Жыл бұрын
Ironic
@easy_eight2810
Жыл бұрын
Every time I see a "T-14 has engine from WW2 german tanks" comment, I know they've just done watching a Lazer Swine video
@ougioshino6940
Жыл бұрын
Is quite sad that those comments may show up for years because people can't fact check stuff
@easy_eight2810
Жыл бұрын
@@ougioshino6940 Yeah that video is full of bs and it doesn't look like he's gonna admit his mistakes any time soon
@Paciat
Жыл бұрын
Watching a video is one thing. Thinking its not full of pig shit after hearing that "T-14 has engine from WW2 german tanks" is another. You have to be dumb or indoctrinated to believe that. Or both.
@hedgehog3180
Жыл бұрын
My favourite part of that video is when he reveals that he thinks that armored recovery is done in the middle of combat and that's why armored recovery vehicles are based on tank chassis'. He just accidentally lets slip that he knows nothing about how modern combat actually works.
@deruta37
Жыл бұрын
@@easy_eight2810He did admit his mistakes in The Rounder Table lmao
@ebbonemint
Жыл бұрын
Cone is one of those kids who reads a Carnegie approved textbook and preaches it as the gospel. 1. Read our information 2. Memorize our information 3. Match our information to the buzzword when asked a question 4. Woohoo peel-off star shaped sticker The painfully “average” kid pretending to be smart because it seems exciting to be good at something, except you get an actual genius like laserpig who wears the facade of a fool for the sake of being entertaining and actually has concise and accurate information. Who could’ve imagined, a genuine intellectual who doesn’t present his information like stale monotonous bread with near zero vocal inflection. There’s a reason I neglected cones subscribe button all this time, the various videos I’ve watched really failed to impress, it’s just regurgitation of common information. But here comes Lazerpig and within the first few minutes I subbed, this was a few years ago albeit he’s gained a massive following since.
@Meczyk
Жыл бұрын
Dude, you owe Lazer Pig an apology. A big one.
@seb_1504
Жыл бұрын
🤡
@boofusgoofus614
Жыл бұрын
no he doesn't owe that bumbling idiot an apology
@thatguy46744
Жыл бұрын
@@seb_1504 lol virgin.
@NeocadeX
Жыл бұрын
No, he doesnt.
@thatguy46744
Жыл бұрын
@@NeocadeX yes he does lmfaooo.
@Scottishlandwarrior
Жыл бұрын
I had to laugh at that where it was said "Just like at the start of WW2 the battleship was over" and in the first Gulf War there was a battleship that took part called the USS Missouri making that comment utterly pointless.
@hedgeearthridge6807
Жыл бұрын
Pretty much any time someone starts off a statement referring to Ukraine as "The Ukraine", you know it's gonna be followed by some profoundly ignorant vatnik brainrot. Especially some copium about tanks, or cities, or "historical borders". I like historical borders too, lets talk about Kievan Rus.
@colinjohnson5515
Жыл бұрын
Cone is getting some flack for the kind of hand-wavy different cylinder count and displacement argument but after some googling I think Cone’s conclusion is correct. Some differences I think are key when evaluating if the 12N360 is derived from the SLA 16: The SLA 16 is air cooled, has a welded sheet metal crankcase, the angles between cylinder banks are 45 and 135 degrees and makes 685hp. The 12N360 is water cooled, I couldn’t find the type of crankcase material but welded steel is extremely rare for production engines. It’s cylinder bank angles are 60 and 120 degrees and it makes 1200-1800hp. There were several X configuration engines developed during WWII and they all were too complicated and eventually abandoned. I understand due to the obscurity of X configuration engines it is a kind of copy. But then modern boxer engines are just copies of the VW Type 1 engine, V6’s are just a copy of a V8 and I5’s are just I4 engines. It’s a common theme to claim Russia just copies western designs but that trivializes the effort it takes to complete a design.
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
I appreciate that you went and did your own research to come to a conclusion. I do disagree that the different piston count and displacement argument is a hand wave though. I pointed those out because it proves the Armata couldn't be using an outright copy of the SLA16. I never said there was no possible connection between the two. I haven't seen any evidence they are but it's not something I can definitively prove one way or the other with the information I've seen.
@colinjohnson5515
Жыл бұрын
@@ConeOfArc I don't mean to be another overly critical commenter but I guess I failed. However Land Rover's AJ126 is a V8 block/crank with V6 heads so cutting down an X-16 probably has little change to primary and secondary balance. An X-type engine would have similar balance characteristics to that of a radial layout and it was common to add/remove banks of cylinders from radial engines while keeping most of the design the same. Bore and stroke changes likewise don't necessitate a redesign. Modern engines are optimized around a single bore and stroke but the old small block V8s were offered in many different displacements with the same block. Dr Porsche helped design the SLA 16 specifically because of his experience with air cooled designs. But the 12N360 achieves its high power per volume performance because it was designed from the ground up to be water cooled. I just think there are stronger arguments to be made when making the "it's not a copy of the SLA 16" argument.
@ConeOfArc
Жыл бұрын
@@colinjohnson5515 an argument can absolutely be made (although I haven't seen much evidence myself) that the A-85-3 could be a derivative of the SLA16. I don't really think this is the case but that's just my opinion. It's a very minor terminology change but it makes a big difference on the meaning of what you're saying. Sort of like leaving out a comma in a sentence can completely alter what the person meant
@SicilianSSFR
Жыл бұрын
Did you find anything on the 12N360 camshaft layout? A long while ago, before this debacle started, I've read that it was a DOHC with 4 valves per cylinder. However, i can't find anything on the valve count and the camshaft layout today. If that information could be found, it would be another one in the many differences both engines have, although the bank angles and water cooling already rule a copy out.
@colinjohnson5515
Жыл бұрын
@@SicilianSSFR ugh I just spent another 90 minutes trying to find any technical information on this engine. I found some research that improved cold start performance but absolutely noting about cam and valve types and counts. For all I can see it could be a 4 cam pushrod system with 2 valves per cylinder like the SLA16. Using the way back machine I tried to find info from dead links. But it’s all the same info repeated in every language from sites all around the web. It feels like a conspiracy to me. I mean I’ve probably spent 3 hours searching and I don’t really have any more information than you can find in 1o minutes. Does this engine really exist? I think the 12N360 aka 2A12-3 aka A-85-A3 aka 12CHN15/16 is probably designed and built by Bigfoot.
@uku4171
Жыл бұрын
"Do some actual research"
@me67galaxylife
6 ай бұрын
"Provide a source"
@Coka-Rolla
Жыл бұрын
Probably should just stick to talking about tanks...
@rasmaster2111
Жыл бұрын
Damn, maybe you should reaseach better
@panzerknackerauto8227
Жыл бұрын
I like how he ignores all the comments calling him out about lazer pig
@Pouzdraken
Жыл бұрын
because no one cared until lazerpig said something
@bingusboy9677
Жыл бұрын
Ngl lazerpigs video kinda destroyed cones imagine
@SaulWhittle
Жыл бұрын
Cone has fell off, long live the pig
@NeocadeX
Жыл бұрын
Lazerpig got rolled and smoked by 3 different channels, clown.
@mharley3791
Жыл бұрын
Oh they cooking you
@c00kedmilk
Жыл бұрын
Lazerpig 1 Cone 0 😂
@CONxNOR
Жыл бұрын
Shit it was so bad Cone might deserve a -1 on this
@Munkynuts
Жыл бұрын
I honestly think cone should stay down on the mat, apologize or stay down 😂
@Auueiw4-
4 ай бұрын
?
@sa80slayer85
Жыл бұрын
After seeing lazerpigs recent video. Oof arc
@Shirikawolfeins
Жыл бұрын
We need standoff between ConeofArc and LazerPig, since most ppl claiming tiger II engine is inside T-14 come from lazerpig, but ppl like RedEffect already debunked that video.
@justy1189
Жыл бұрын
Or did they??😎😎
@streetfightinmanrs
Жыл бұрын
Ooh, a rare double L comment. This is a good one for those who will be sorting by new in the next few hours.
@GoofballAndi
Жыл бұрын
Disappointing, unsubbed.
@pokenaut7803
Жыл бұрын
Before anyone else comments, you are aware youtbers can check how long and how often you watch their videos...
@theowlfromduolingo7982
Жыл бұрын
5:59 never knew that sometimes three mgs are mounted on the turret. Is there also an additional coaxial mg or does the M2 fulfill that role?
@splabooshkey3343
Жыл бұрын
The israelis tend to mount a fair few more machine guns on their vehicles than most other nations. This example of a magach 6 i believe uses the standard coaxial 7.62mm as an american M60 (as magachs are upgraded M48s and M60s), a pair of 7.62mms on the roof and the .50 cal on the front of the turret
@hoosierfarmkid
Жыл бұрын
Commander and loader pintles (look to be 7.62 but have pretty sure I’ve seen the TC have a .50 in other cases) and a co-ax .50 on the spotlight mount, I believe the bracket was originally made for gunnery training if my memory of what The Chieftain said is correct. Standard co-ax is left if place (7.62 M1919 I believe)
@hoosierfarmkid
Жыл бұрын
@@splabooshkey3343They also did it on Sho’t, Merkava, and probably Tiran.
@splabooshkey3343
Жыл бұрын
@@hoosierfarmkid yes indeedy
@emperorschampion6396
Жыл бұрын
22:35 Oh boy. ,,Shoudn't have said that, should NOT have said that!''
@CONxNOR
Жыл бұрын
How to damage your reputation in one simple video. Lol, lmao even
@niksonrex88
Жыл бұрын
Nah he boosted his reputation in my eyes
@brittbarlow6111
Жыл бұрын
@@niksonrex88😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Pouzdraken
Жыл бұрын
Yeah man lazerpig got a huge miss with that one. Seriously I still see nothing wrong with what cone said about lazerpig. In his video, he presents cone as a massive asshole hellbent on taking down lazerpig, making a 26 minute video about him for views and money. When its only just a 5 and a half minute section at the end of a video, the part where most people won’t watch of a video most people don’t care about. The worst thing he ever said was Lazerpig has a bias
@nonyabidness6492
Жыл бұрын
@@Pouzdrakenyeah ignoring the "do actual research" part totally invalidates your claim
@Pouzdraken
Жыл бұрын
@@nonyabidness6492 and citing your sources intentionally as “look it up yourself lazy fuck” no mater the point to it makes me take you massively less seriously
@Neuttah
Жыл бұрын
The Pig thing is extra annoying because he also has a tendency to take unspecified angy pot shots at Tank Archives, for, I'm guessing, T-34-related reasons.
@casematecardinal
Жыл бұрын
Its because the truth is his kryptonite
@John.McMillan
Жыл бұрын
The guy lies constantly. He claims he has "experts review every video", multiple of them. Yet his videos are full of mistakes every time and very obvious bias that is so massive it over rules actual history and facts.
@SiphonRayzar
Жыл бұрын
@@John.McMillan I've never once heard him say anything about having an expert review any of his videos. Do you have a source on that, or are you just making shit up?
@ДаниилСтепанов-р1и
Жыл бұрын
@@SiphonRayzar his NAFO podcast, you NAFO shill.
@jorgesepulveda4379
Жыл бұрын
Because the t34 video was made to make those comunist bastards angry
@Edgar-dp5qu
Жыл бұрын
So Pig won this round
@An-American
5 ай бұрын
Pig won the whole thing
@pixytokisaki1457
5 ай бұрын
@@An-Americanwrong, check the pig's community post. Man basically admitted defeat and went into therapy.
@therandommailman
Жыл бұрын
holy shit, you got called out.
@TheOnlyKingBee
Жыл бұрын
Well looks like youre gonna eat your words about lazerpig... He was right. He does actual research
@Slayer44556
Жыл бұрын
He didn’t tho….
@imdakingbaby
Жыл бұрын
@@Slayer44556he did tho....
@Orcawhale1
Жыл бұрын
No, he didn't.
@Lv-sl3rm
Жыл бұрын
Fuck LP. He has his own issues, massive ones at that.
@karakarakiri9568
Жыл бұрын
He wasn't...
@lemagicbaguette1917
Жыл бұрын
Is ineptitude based solely on theoretical capabilities or on both ability and usage of said ability?
@steffent.6477
Жыл бұрын
I really hope Lazerpig releases his correction/reaction video soon. Those T14 comments are getting tiresome.
@steffent.6477
Жыл бұрын
@MisterMing Oh look, a commieboo... I'm sure there is a lot of problems with Russias tech but LP should still try to use facts even if it's difficult because of state propaganda and secrecy.
@alphana7055
Жыл бұрын
He is a glowie, so no, he will just ignore. In reality he doesn't need to because the lazerhogs are so brain dead they will believe anything he says with zero critical thinkingm
@casematecardinal
Жыл бұрын
@MisterMing its not that its propaganda against Russia which to be honest it feels like. He just has a massive bias and no intent to do his due diligence.
@Spinomaks
Жыл бұрын
@@casematecardinal It is propaganda. The guy is NAFO!
@steffent.6477
Жыл бұрын
@@alphana7055 To be fair without Red Effects video 99% of people who are not hardcore historians wouldn't have fact-checked everything in LPs videos.
@americanhat3766
Жыл бұрын
God that Panzer 2 with the 17cm snub-nose looks so damn derpy, it makes the 15cm Sig look normal 😆. There was also apparently a Tiger 2 with a 17cm gun as well called the Grille 17, dunno if its 100% real or not, but I'd love to see a video over it.
@alexturnbackthearmy1907
Жыл бұрын
Totally fake. There were some plans, sure, but that is all that was ever made. Germans never put on tank something bigger then 15cm sig.
@CaptainMorrgasm
Жыл бұрын
*only does generic internet based research* “sErIoUsLy MaN dO sOmE aCtUaL rEsEaRcH” Ironic isn’t it??
@conorthurley6979
Жыл бұрын
Very disappointed with the comments towards lazerpig, do your research and don’t get personal. Very poorly handled I am unsubscribing
Пікірлер: 2,8 М.