My Top 10 Problems with using Sir Thomas More's story of Richard III as a reliable source for the study of history.
For centuries, Thomas More has been held up as a completely reliable historian of the reign of King Richard III. This makes little sense - not only because it was written 30 years after the events by someone who wasn't an eyewitness. The story is littered with demonstrable errors and fabrications that make it unreliable. It's time historians stopped using More as a credible source for Richard III's story. Here's why.
Негізгі бет Top 10 Problems with Thomas More's Richard III
Пікірлер: 41