Kathleen Stock is quite simply one of the smartest, sanest, calmest people on the planet.
@tinawebley3985
Ай бұрын
Kathleen Stock makes so much more sense than Rebecca Tuvel, simply because she is speaking plain truth.
@CathyKitson
Ай бұрын
Probably because she is older and has more experience as well.
@goodgrief888
Ай бұрын
Rebecca Tuvel has to retain her job in academia. She’s not well known enough to be able to destroy her academic career by speaking the truth, like Kathleen Stock was able to.
@tracygeddes5867
29 күн бұрын
You confuse opinion with truth, but I guess anything that challenges where we stand is not the truth. Quite convenient but not at all valid.
@tinawebley3985
29 күн бұрын
@@goodgrief888 Neither was Kathleen Stock when she spoke up. She was completely unknown.
@tinawebley3985
29 күн бұрын
@@CathyKitson 🤣
@collyernicholasjohn
Ай бұрын
“To be honest it’s boring and juvenile. I am so over it, and I just don’t give a s*it”. 😂😂😂
@slacktoryrecords4193
Ай бұрын
That’s becoming the position of more and more people.
@PM-gt9mh
29 күн бұрын
timestamp? :)
@comraderaoul
28 күн бұрын
@@PM-gt9mh 15:40 (clicked randomly, ended up there immediately!)
@squashfan9526
28 күн бұрын
@@PM-gt9mh 15:35
@simonbanfield2657
26 күн бұрын
@@PM-gt9mhapprox 15.40
@alexandragrace8164
Ай бұрын
Kathleen has the patience of a saint! She is our international lesbian heroine! Along with Julie Bindel, Kathleen has inspired lesbians like me all over the world to stand up to the violation of women’s, children’s, and gay people’s rights!
@trevorcook3129
24 күн бұрын
By saying the same things us straight men have been saying for years but would called slurs for. How the times have changed. People have joked about things like men being raped in gaol for years now it’s different if men are in women’s prisons?! I don’t think they should be allowed in women’s prisons. Just a double standard.
@joce11
23 күн бұрын
I totally agree about Bindel and Stock - both are wonderful women. That said, for me it was Kelly Jay Keen (KJK) who gave me the courage to finally speak the truth and aloud. KJK has given ordinary women many of whom are Lesbians like me the courage and platform to speak. Everyone I know was alerted to the consequences of gender madness by KJK. Nobody can cut through the gender insanity BS like KJK can and I admire her for this not to mention her ability to consistently hold the line when it comes to defending not just women's rights which includes Lesbians but also children's rights and welfare and the truth itself. Also, the brilliant Helen Joyce. All these women are marvelous IMO and I'm grateful to them all.
@janebennetto5655
27 күн бұрын
Kathleen all the way. ❤🇬🇧
@lindamckenzie1537
28 күн бұрын
"What is it about the maleness that makes males a greater risk?" Is Tuvel serious? What matters is that, for whatever reason, they ARE a greater risk, as a group, as clearly shown by sexual assault & other violent crime statistics, which we ignore at our peril. Specifically, the peril of vulnerable women & girls when forced to share close quarters with them. This is what we need to be focusing and acting on, to preserve single sex spaces. The academic questions about the "why?" of male violence are very secondary & we don't need to find an answer before we protect women & girls from male predators enabled by gender self-ID.
@darianbalcom8777
27 күн бұрын
She's a fool.
@slacktoryrecords4193
26 күн бұрын
Very well said.
@JoanneBartone
25 күн бұрын
Tuvel speaks like a white privileged academic. How she figures men who think they are women don't pose a threat to actual women is beyond me. She's naive at best, ignorant at worst.
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
The stats are now being sqeuwed as men are being recorded as women committing violent and sexual crimes
@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559
22 күн бұрын
It's as though she has just arrived on the planet and knows nothing about the species living on it. Men are bigger, stronger, and anatomically and hormonally different, which makes them more likely to engage in sexual predation. How a grown woman could be unaware of this is beyond me.
@marque2127
29 күн бұрын
Hello Rebecca. You were very civil during discussion. Thank you for that. When you said that gender ideology hasn't hurt anyone, I was wondering if you were just taking an opposing stance for discussion. . Parents have had their children taken away for not affirming pronouns, detransitioners are being silenced, and people are fired from their jobs for maintaining that there are only two sexes. It's not complicated. Male and female are fact regardless and independent of human social constructs.
@nejicoll
25 күн бұрын
Who was fired for saying there are only two sexes?
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
@@nejicollI think there is a list ... Kathleen lost her professorship..
@nejicoll
23 күн бұрын
@@helendancelot Your list is quite long. But no she didn't lose it, and even if she did was it because she said there were only two sexes?
@collyernicholasjohn
14 күн бұрын
@@nejicoll Joe Phoenix, Maya Forstater, Allison Bailey. These are a few I know of in the UK. All later won their cases in the employment tribunal.
@daheikkinen
29 күн бұрын
Good job, Cornell. More of this.
@user-jf3lo6ss2i
29 күн бұрын
I sort of understand Rebecca's point, if she'd said about transwomen who have had surgery instead of testosterone levels it would have made more sense to me. But Kathleen Stock is right, we can't rearrange society around these things, the obvious division has to be between the sexes.
@susanrockwell139
25 күн бұрын
Stock has the patience of Job.
@CathyKitson
Ай бұрын
What is it about maleness that's the problem? - 1) More aggression, partly, but not only, due to much higher levels of testosterone. 2) Much greater strength and usually greater experience in exerting in that strength. 3) The sexual element, most men are attracted to most women. Of course, not all men are violent or predatory. The majority would not misuse their strength. But the minority is big enough for it to be a problem for women. And surely this is more of a problem with men who are imprisoned for violent crime?? Really, it's not rocket science. A child of five can understand it!
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
Yes one man could devastate the life of hundreds even thousands of women especially if unchecked
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
Ie one man could damage the partner or future partner of thousands of men. Ruin the life of thousands of couples and individuals
@bettybray5366
Ай бұрын
Tuvel should spend some time actually looking at the effect of self-Id in American Women’s prisons.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
And elsewhere! Like the women who have been injured competing in sports against men! I hate that she is basically willing to experiment with real women's safety & bodies while she gets to perform her thought experiments from a comfortable & safe place. THAT'S ACTUAL privilege!
@richardcooke7909
25 күн бұрын
@@DonnaBrooks100% agree, Tuvel is a typical white liberal who feels some kind guilt, which means logical reasoning has been ignored.
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
@@DonnaBrooksand rake in the money for her comfortable lifestyle
@Susan.D
Ай бұрын
So hard to understand why language and definitions have been so easily and valiantly given away. They were never prizes that would, will benefit females, any female, person, no matter position. This is 2024.
@Amy-ky5wr
28 күн бұрын
So refreshing, people with different opinions on something having a respectful discussion to try to find the crux of their disagreements. If only all discussion about gender ideology were so respectful and productive.
@slacktoryrecords4193
26 күн бұрын
That question from the stammering and probably very young audience member, “Why did you self-ID a lesbian?”-and Rebecca’s nonsensical follow-up-was so irritatingly sophomoric. Sex is reality; there is no question about one’s maleness or femaleness. Sexual orientation is also something that isn’t just a vague “feeling”-it’s a biological response to erotic stimuli, it really can’t be faked, at its most basic level. No male person is ever a “lesbian”. It’s a ridiculous proposition. Kathleen’s response is spot-on, as was her point about the use of the word ‘valid’.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
Rebecca, go camping in a remote area with an entire group of men who say they're women & tell me you felt no fear that entire time. That fear women feel is the result of evolutionary biology based on a million years of men being stronger, faster, larger, & having other physical advantages over us. It's there to keep us safe. You're telling women to ignore that fear, ignore the evidence of their own eyes, ignore their intuition that something isn't right, ignore the experiences of women around the world & throughout history in deference to men. That's infuriating!
@OohTarquin
26 күн бұрын
She's a QQ 😮
@gisellemagraibhaigh8342
24 күн бұрын
Great comment. Hopefully she can learn that lesson by other means rather than an unfortunate physical demonstration
@5pctLowBattery
Ай бұрын
Future historians will read about this and say: "Who unlocked the padded cells?"
@unowen-nh9ov
Ай бұрын
Future archeologists will look @ our pelvises & not be able to determine which men chose to live as women.
@catherinerobilliard7662
14 күн бұрын
@@unowen-nh9ovexcept of course no man can live as a woman
@jaijai5250
2 күн бұрын
@@unowen-nh9ovwell said 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
@AnthonyDavies-hk8dk
Ай бұрын
From studies, male violence does not decrease upon CSH, not at all. Female violence and offending patterns do increase to close level, for females on testosterone.
@ponny2948
Ай бұрын
Important to note tho that women on testosterone still do not have the same strength as the average male tho.
@marysalluce9685
Ай бұрын
What is CHS?
@pankakesnotstellar
Ай бұрын
@marysalluce9685 cross-sex hormones. It's the correct term rather than the queer preferred hormone replacement therapy ( HRT) all trans people aren't replacing any hormones they produce, they block the hormones they produce and take synthetic hormones of the opposite sex.
@pamelaroyce5285
Ай бұрын
@@marysalluce9685cross-sex hormones - the hormones that occur naturally in the opposite sex.
@slacktoryrecords4193
Ай бұрын
@@marysalluce9685CSH = cross-sex hormones
@nadinechandler8879
Ай бұрын
That was fantastic, thank you both!
@ninakamenic3679
29 күн бұрын
Rebecca had to try and do lots of senseless mental gymnastics, but Kathleen doesn't fall for it 😂
@tbone3492
Ай бұрын
If you wonder what is wrong with academia Rebecca Tuvel so clearly demonstrated it. Elitist, top down philosophizing. Stock nailed it.
@kathartzell4856
Ай бұрын
Absolutely!
@connorkianpour1077
Ай бұрын
She participated in an event with someone whom she disagrees with, respectfully pushed back when she thought it was appropriate to, and emphasized at many points the common ground she shares with her co-panelist... Did we watch the same video?
@goodgrief888
Ай бұрын
This purity spiral idea that everyone has to completely agree on every single point is why our entire world is so toxic right now. I, for one, appreciated that they both respectfully spoke to eachother, agreed on some things, disagreed on other things, and neither called for the other to be not allowed to speak. I wish people in the comment sections of social media could behave the same.
@alexandragrace8164
Ай бұрын
Well said! ❤
@Martin-jd3oc
29 күн бұрын
You are so right.
@BrendanPoole
Ай бұрын
Great talk. How did we get here? So crazy
@CMA418
Ай бұрын
A willing and/or unwilling blindness to our own susceptibility to confirmation bias and self-deception?
@lucys.1381
29 күн бұрын
Rebecca, I love what you said about how cancellation negatively affects the subject of cancellation as a knower! This is hardly ever mentioned.
@larrycahoone2771
26 күн бұрын
I don't understand the criticism of Tuvel in these comments. She's great, she was vilified as a very young assistant professor, and survived. She's younger and maybe not at tough as Stock, but then who is? Both philosophers are speaking the important truth. We should be grateful to them.
@maxdashu
29 күн бұрын
Rebecca's attempted analogy to black male prisoners is so off the wall. It's not greater criminality, but racialized prosecution, conviction and sentencing, most easily demonstrated by the handling of drug cases. She should know this.
@jaijai5250
2 күн бұрын
Exactly. I suppose she doesn’t have to consider the impact of structural, systemic and institutionalised racism, because she is a beneficiary of w supremacy. She annoys me with her constant comparisons to race. They’re two completely different things.
@goodgrief888
Ай бұрын
Thank you for the wonderful discussion and the opportunity to hear educated people discuss a topic that is so fascinating, but that we often don’t get to discuss because it’s so polarizing. I appreciate that both participants were respectful and allowed the other to speak without demanding purity.
@richardcooke7909
25 күн бұрын
Rachel suffers from toxic compassion on the trans issue and safeguarding women’s spaces. Which makes her view on being cancelled somewhat hypocritical.
@evakatz6351
17 күн бұрын
I think it’s extraordinary that women describing themselves as feminists would be so ideologically blinkered that they discount the reality of male violence and it’s effect on women. This feels like such a fundamental betrayal, I can’t quite believe it’s happening.
@catherinerobilliard7662
14 күн бұрын
As a second-wave feminist, I don’t recognise those who centre men as feminists. They’ve usurped the name woman to include men, so it’s a short step to say supporting these men is feminism.
@h6hfelie
Ай бұрын
I would actually love to see a legitimate debate between these two women regarding their points of disagreement.
@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559
22 күн бұрын
How do you define 'legitimate'? Given how outmatched intellectually Tuvel is, and how determined she is to ignore reality, there is no way that she could win a debate against Stock. Because their ideas are so crazy, there are only 2 ways in which trans ideologues can approach debate: either they deny reality, or they acknowledge reality and say we should ignore it.
@charlesbrown1365
25 күн бұрын
Pursuit of social justice must be based on truths .
@user-nk7kq3rr6c
26 күн бұрын
great discussion. sharing
@tigran56
27 күн бұрын
Kathleen! Rebecca writes books? Yikes. In that tone of voice, that vocal fry, that reveals so much?
@ChrisUllman-xb5ji
29 күн бұрын
God love you, Rebecca, because I know you mean well, but you remind me of the guy in our golf foursome who always gives pointers or tips on what the other 3 are “doing wrong” in their golf swing, or has marginal impulse control and has to blurt out after every strike of the ball “Good shot!” Also, what’s funny in this p-cast is watching Stock’s droll and mildly exasperated expression with many of the comments from Rebecca. Rebecca, academic teaching is meant for people like you. Do not lose that position ever, because you’ll be eaten alive outside the bubble. The name we have for the guy in our foursome that we use when he’s out of earshot is the one I have for you: Good Shot. I know this sounds cruel, but it’s given by me ”humbly and with charity.” (Your words)
@connorkianpour1077
29 күн бұрын
This doesn't sound cruel - it *is* cruel. And you mentioned no substantive disagreement you have with Dr. Tuvel in this comment - just ad hominem attacks against a clearly intellectually curious woman. This comment gives us no reason to think poorly of Dr. Tuvel, and gives us every reason to think poorly of you
@Ukie1MTMP
29 күн бұрын
@@connorkianpour1077 Lighten up a little, Connor! I have to confess to a HUGE degree of admiration for K Stock, and generally agree with her ideas on this subj. and am likely a bit biased, but I tried to be objective... I found it fascinating to watch the discussion a SECOND time - for the SOLE purpose of watching R Tuvel's body language and facial expressions throughout. Her obvious and constant self-conscious behaviors betray her lack of confidence, either in herself or her ideas or BOTH. I don't know that I've EVER seen such a telling display, really. Coy, funny faces, eye rolls and a peeking side-eye, hair twirling...juxtaposed against Stock's easy, self-assured demeanor, the contrast was stunning. I wound up feeling bad for her, she was so profoundly outmatched.
@connorkianpour1077
28 күн бұрын
@@Ukie1MTMP More ad hominem attacks and bizarre psychologizing
@darianbalcom8777
27 күн бұрын
She is an idiot. She's so so afraid of being seen as not nice, that she makes an utter fool of herself, like so many women are doing. The trans narrative is a threat - that's true - so you have to have self-respect and commitment to honesty to not cow to it, but plenty of people are able to do that. I have no respect for those like Tuvel who fail to even recognize the threat and that they are being threatened, and therefore their job is to not cow. That's all it is, is a threat to get us to roll over. Our job is to not roll over.
@slacktoryrecords4193
26 күн бұрын
@@connorkianpour1077Connor, the dude you’re responding to isn’t *debating* Rebecca, so invoking the term ‘ad hominem’ is pointless. He’s just pointing out what is obvious to many of us.
@xelix5358
Ай бұрын
Ms Tuvel decided to claim that since Black inmates are overrepresented in prisons, a Black inmate is more dangerous than an inmate of any other race convicted of the same crime, and thus (get this causality!) sex 'inclusion' in women's prisons isn't as dangerous. As if one male murderer is more dangerous than another male murderer just by virtue of their skin color. They are both murderers jailed for murder! I can't believe someone employed as a college professor would take such an obviously nonsensical position.
@esizzle2005
Ай бұрын
You misunderstood Tuvel's example. The example is meant to challenge the principle Stock is (or seems to be) relying on, which is something like "If members of two groups A and B are housed in the same prison, and members of group A are on average more violent than members of group B, then members of A and B ought to be segregated in that prison (or have completely different prisons)." Stock employs this principle to derive the conclusion that trans women and natal women ought to be segregated in prisons (or have entirely different prisons). Tuvel points out (correctly) that, if Stock is indeed relying on that principle, it would equally justify segregating black and white men in prison (or having separate prisons) since violent crime rates among black men (in the U.S.) are significantly higher than violent crime rates among white men (in the U.S.). But it's silly to suggest that black and white men ought to be segregated in prisons. So, the principle Stock is (or seems to be) relying on is silly. Now, Stock can either argue that she's not relying on that principle or argue that she is but there's a relevant difference between the two cases so the principle doesn't really have the absurd consequences Tuvel suggests. In any case, the philosophical move Tuvel is making is totally standard, and you completely missed it. No doubt this explanation, too, will fly completely over your head, but I'm giving it for the benefit of sharper people scrolling through the comments, not you.
@collyernicholasjohn
Ай бұрын
@@esizzle2005 I suspect the black v white male offending difference is considerably less than offending differences between trans identified men v women. As Kathleen Stock pointed out in her 2019 submission to UK Parliament, 60% of UK ‘Trans women’ prisoners are sex offenders Including in 36 x rape; 10 x attempted rape. Since then we’ve learned 50% of US Federal ‘Trans women’ prisoners are sex offenders, and 50% of Canadian ‘Trans women’ prisoners are sex offenders. For male Prisoners generally the percentage is about 18% and women 3% . The risk for women from trans identifying men is greater than the risk for white men from black.
@xelix5358
Ай бұрын
@@esizzle2005 Let's see how far your snide patronizing gets you. If the race analogy held any water and Stock is wrong, Tuvel should be in favor of the reverse of her example - if we don't lock up people by race we shouldn't lock them up by sex or gender either - and gender ID proponents should not want segregated prisons either. But neither Tuvel nor the gender lDs do so which is a huge tell. It's fundamentally silly to suggest race-based segregation in prisons, especially for the 'reason' Tuvel offers (the erroneous equating of race and sex vis-a-vis crime, and the misuse of the notion of statistical rates). It's silly because: 1) The rate of criminality does not mean one group is more violent than the other, it means one group may offend more times than the other. 2) The prison population is like a self-selected sample- they are all convicted criminals, no matter the race, while crime rate stats are on the basis of the whole population including non-offenders. 3) Prisoners are locked up for specific offenses, and along with sex segregation there IS severity of crime segregation (e.g. violent offenders; minimum, medium and max security prisons, etc.). It is a causal error to extrapolate from a statistical rate of criminality that a black male inmate locked *in max security* is much more violent and dangerous for his fellow inmates than any of the non-black inmates there. They are in max security for one reason only - they are all violent dangerous criminals! 4) However, there is consistent evidence that male crime patterns and associated crime and incarceration rates are substantially higher and qualitatively different than the respective female rates. They don't change just because you start playing language gender games. 5) The 'gender self-ID' (sometimes miraculously emerging right at trial!) of a male criminal, especially if convicted of violent crimes, and especially if convicted of violent crimes against women, should have no consequence for the sex segregation rule in prisons. Interestingly, we hear no demands from transmen to be put in male prisons due to their self-ID, wonder why that is - oh wait, who's more likely to be subject of a crime in prison: a male 'woman' in women's prison or a female 'man' in men's prison? Where prisons and I would add sports are concerned, gender self-ID seems to work in mysteriously lopsided ways to the exclusive benefit of transwomen aka males.
@oliverhug3
Ай бұрын
But...but the white murderer wears a frock.
@oliverhug3
Ай бұрын
@@esizzle2005 "Stock employs this principle to derive the conclusion that trans women and natal women ought to be segregated in prisons" No she does not. She says that men, so called "transwomen" are men, and women ought to be segregated in prisons...something that was not controversial until queer theorists made you believe that subjective self-identifications are more importand than the very reason why women were put in seperate prisons in the first place.
@cosmickilroy
24 күн бұрын
At my school, in my film studies, they introduced queer theory to me and we watched queer films including Soldiers Girl which was interpreted by the professor as violence due to a man dating a trans woman, NOT, as I think it was, a man being killed due to being perceived as gay.
@LeCerfMalade
Ай бұрын
Perhaps Tuvel's article should never have been published just for being too daft, but of course what happened around it was not right regardless. I doubt she learned anything from it though, judging by this conversation.
@darianbalcom8777
27 күн бұрын
She seems like an idiot. She doesn't understand the issue at all. Just for starters, anyone talking about "transwomen" - a deeply offensive phrase I really try to avoid - is granting the false premise that there is some type of woman who is male.
@Tawny593
28 күн бұрын
The audio is not great. Kathleen tends to speak softly and her sections need boosting.
@celiabarrett2107
Ай бұрын
Rebecca is very naive.
@56annieb
29 күн бұрын
But earnest, an earnest idiot.
@herlibrarianship
29 күн бұрын
Got a little, or a lot, tired of the sound of RT's voice. She goes on and on and on... Would have liked to hear more from Stock.
@ronderuiter3298
19 күн бұрын
You can identify as different sex, and probably soon a different species, but never race or ethnicity. Who gets to decide these thing? TikTok? I don't get the logic.
@Martin-jd3oc
29 күн бұрын
Stock is so grounded. Tuvel seems so much weaker and neurotic.
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
People are starting to say they have pre crime in Canada
@celeste1421
23 күн бұрын
Vocal fry-y-y-y-y-y. Why oh why ???
@jaijai5250
2 күн бұрын
OMG. Thank you for naming that awful sound some American women use when talking. It’s dreadful! I often turn the volume down to minimise the assault on my eardrums. In the UK we say they have a creaky, crackly voice. I’ve learned something new today. As always I turned the volume very low when Rebecca spoke.
@SUPER7X
29 күн бұрын
Terrible audio volume.
@Amy-ky5wr
25 күн бұрын
"Biolphobia": an irrational aversion to biological reality (as a concept), and/or to those for whom biological reality is important. Those for whom biological reality is important, can find biolphobic ideas troubling, distressing, or offensive. Many adherents of the new gender ideology are biolphobic. But by no means are all trans people biolphobic. Gender dysphoria and biolphobia are very different concepts. Gender dysphoria is when you feel very uncomfortable about your own body and if the condition persists you may feel better presenting as the opposite gender, even living that way full time. Society had over the last few decades started to become far more accepting of people like this. But that progress has been hampered more recently by confusion with a new idea far less worthy: Biolphobia. Biolphobes reject the very concept that everyone's body is either male or female, and/or that that is important in some situations.
@shvazego
29 күн бұрын
I❤️KS
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
2 wrongs don't make a right
@geekgurl2000
Ай бұрын
I'd really like to hear the whole discussion, but unfortunately, the microphone for Doctor Stock is about 1/3 the level of the other panelists, so she can barely be heard, and the others are inadvertently drowning her out. If you can possibly correct the audio and re-upload it, thanks in advance.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
OMG, I love your nametag user pic!! I saved that image to my computer!
@jaijai5250
2 күн бұрын
@@DonnaBrooksI love it too.
@trevorcook3129
24 күн бұрын
So can we start protecting men from being raped in prisons now instead of joking about it? Lose the drop the soap jokes etc ?
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
I agree
@evakatz6351
18 күн бұрын
Billy Colloney talks about this in his autobiography. That it should never be a joke.
@karenavey2183
26 күн бұрын
Vocal fry is nauseating! I cannot abide.
@catherinerobilliard7662
14 күн бұрын
Very off-putting
@Mir-wx5ui
Ай бұрын
I admire Kathleen Stock but just could not bear to listen to the other young woman speaking as the vocal fry was absolutely unbearable. As well as the unecessary question mark at the end of each sentence.
@vickicaravella4665
25 күн бұрын
Glad it wasn't just me who thought this😢
@gisellemagraibhaigh8342
24 күн бұрын
Just watched a great video this week analysing the development of female vocal fry in the media, then swiffly all proffessional arenas, that particularly affects American women. Truly a horrible affliction
@helendancelot
23 күн бұрын
What is vocal fry?
@jaijai5250
2 күн бұрын
@@helendancelotI had to Google it, as I wasn’t aware of that term. It’s the awful creaky voice that some American women have. I say some, but it seems proliferate over there.
@Martin-jd3oc
29 күн бұрын
I find myself struggling to take any professor who throws in casual ”like”s like some 14-year-old girl into every second sentence seriously.
@user-rv7ph1jl5y
27 күн бұрын
Complete change of topic mid run by the mod. Broke the flow of thought and exchange, tho perhaps needed as RT adds not much content to the conversation.
@meshzzizk
29 күн бұрын
1:27:58 rebecca is so cute i can’t take it
@karenavey2183
26 күн бұрын
‘Academic article’. Lmfao
@juliethompson110
6 күн бұрын
So sad to see Ms T's deficiencies so exposed, so easily. What is SHE on about it!! And why?
@lavienestpasunlongfleuvetr2559
22 күн бұрын
If Tuvel has the ability to be rational and think critically, she certainly doesn't display it here. She's trying desperately to make stupid ideas sound intelligent, and she fails, miserably. She is clearly not a smart person.
@elproject3343
Ай бұрын
Duvet brings a good point, a realistic one that’s to say.
@realyzze
29 күн бұрын
people who believe men can be women if they say so do not have “good points”
@user-hv5wi6nd4i
Ай бұрын
Regarding the American woman theoretical counter argument of controlling testosterone in trans women would be a solution? Testosterone has nothing to do with violent crime as there are many examples of dangerous females that void this reasoning.
@ribbonsofnight
Ай бұрын
Testosterone may well have something to do with violent crime and there would need to be a lot more violent women to prove this isn't so. In fact many think there is a link. The problem is that it isn't the only or even primary factor and that reducing it doesn't have any guarantee of preventing violence or even significantly reducing it.
@user-hv5wi6nd4i
Ай бұрын
@@ribbonsofnight Fair point I overreached, yes testosterone is a factor in the level of violence and the level of violence corresponds to more men being in prison, but most men [alpha] who have high testosterone levels do not commit violent crime? Psychotic Disorders, personal trauma and other uncontrolled chemical imbalances appear more evident.
@L_Martin
Ай бұрын
@@ribbonsofnight Not to mention females are not in a body that can do as much damage as a male body can inflict, in terms of violence against women and kids and men. Even if she is dosed up on T. The "trans men" in sports situation shows us that disparity clearly. They do not become as strong as men.
@xelix5358
Ай бұрын
@@user-hv5wi6nd4i There is marked difference in crime patterns of men and women, with men consistently responsible for most violent crime, and virtually all (96+%) rape. The share evens out more in categories like 'larceny-theft', 'property crime', 'fraud', 'embezzlement'. The only category where women dominate (60%+) as perpetrators is 'prostitution and commercialized vice'. Looking at victims by sex is also educational. Whatever the reasons, sex differences matter greatly in crime, and should matter in incarceration. No wonder the prison system has two types of segregation, by sex and by severity of crime (level of security prisons).
@randomcommenteronyoutube1055
Ай бұрын
She appears to be a Canadian living in America. We do not claim her.
@user-ch4mm7dy3g
Ай бұрын
Rebecca is saying we should be less politically divided,but i bet in her class she discriminates against white males and she encourages DEI pleadges by the way she talks
@xelix5358
Ай бұрын
She seems to think DEI and academic freedom can peacefully coexist if only people didn't "misguidedly" apply DEI (at ~ 53:11). Despite her own 'lived experience' with the article and mounting evidence from numerous academic and other institutions, she doesn't realize DEI at its core is a rejection of academic freedom. Talk about cognitive dissonance.
@connorkianpour1077
Ай бұрын
What a nasty thing to say about an educator without a shred of actual evidence to substantiate the accusation.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
@@connorkianpour1077 What was said that was so nasty?? You make it sound like someone accused her of something heinous.
@Phoneybeetlemaniacxs
29 күн бұрын
I find Kathleen stock fascinating. Here is an out lesbian using the sane arguments used against people like her 40 years ago
@sugahoney89
28 күн бұрын
You sound insane. Her sexuality has nothing to do with using the bathroom and she doesn't take any space that is not already hers.
@dra2033
27 күн бұрын
none of these arguments were ever used against lesbians - after all, 40 years ago precisely everyone understood that a lesbian doesn’t have a penis.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
But this is different. Women are not a threat to women the way men are a threat to women. Segregating gay people is like the argument for racial segregation. A black woman has MUCH more in common with a white woman physiologically than she does with a black man (skin color). Men as a class are larger, stronger, faster, and have countless other physical advantages over women & that makes them dangerous! That's why we have sex segregated spaces in the first place! We didn't always have them & women were virtually tied to their homes because they didn't want to use public toilets with men.
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
Women are not a threat to women the way men are a threat to women. Segregating gay people is like racial segregation. A black woman has MUCH more in common with a white woman physiologically than she does with a black man (skin color). Men as a class are larger, stronger, faster, & have countless other physical advantages over women & that makes them dangerous! Men who care about women know this & are happy to "stay in their lane" & not "colonize" women's spaces. Ironically, the kind of men who would demand access to women's spaces are exactly the kind of men who don't respect women's boundaries & the kind of men that needed to be kept out of women's spaces in the first place! That's why we have sex segregated spaces! We didn't always have them & women were virtually tied to their homes because they didn't want to use public toilets with men. This is entirely different from lesbians & hetero women using the same facilities. Something like 95% of sexual crimes are committed by men & women are the targets of sexual crimes in 90% of cases. That alone tells you that women need protection from biological men, not from biological women (including lesbians). We are dealing in reality, not prejudice against a group of people. All we have to do is look around the world & throughout history to see the pervasiveness of male violence against women. That's why we HAD a "Violence Against Women Act," (although that's been gutted because now men can just say they are women so the world woman is meaningless).
@slacktoryrecords4193
26 күн бұрын
Can you explain what you mean by that specifically?
@meanbugappreciationclub4460
29 күн бұрын
Seems like a less-than-useful panel to discuss an entire population of people without actually including those people in the discussion.
@SlickSimulacrum
29 күн бұрын
That's what free speech is, didn'cha know?
@meanbugappreciationclub4460
29 күн бұрын
@@SlickSimulacrum yes exactly, free speech is the constitutional right to be paid by universities to launder right wing talking points as intellectual pursuits rather than distractions from class warfare
@esizzle2005
29 күн бұрын
They asked multiple trans people and trans advocates to participate and they all refused on the grounds that they did not wish to be co-platformed with Kathleen Stock. Rebecca Tuvel was the only one who accepted the invitation and she should be applauded for doing so.
@SlickSimulacrum
28 күн бұрын
@@meanbugappreciationclub4460 , Well, yeah, that's certainly a strategic reasoning for platforming human garbage.
@xelix5358
28 күн бұрын
@@SlickSimulacrum Your side had a choice to defend the claim to the uber right to invalidate the rights of other protected classes They hid. It's not our fault they can't muster a normal debate and instead resort only to invectives as you amply demonstrate.
@vekkstar
Ай бұрын
There's no witchhunt. Both these academics are platformed everywhere and Kathleen Stock in particular is constantly in the limelight.
@Mr.JoeBangles
Ай бұрын
@@DexterDexter123 he didn't miss it, he purposely ignored it because it doesn't fit the trans cult's narrative
@unowen-nh9ov
Ай бұрын
How many feminist lives are regularly being threatened online? terfisaslur
@vekkstar
Ай бұрын
The online environment can be very much like that. I recognise this. However, I don't think Stock is being non-platformed in the least. How is it a witch-hunt? Stock has a huge audience and a lot of support.
@eileenhall4918
Ай бұрын
She should be. She’s a genius.
@meanbugappreciationclub4460
29 күн бұрын
Right? I wonder how much more she's paid now relatively to her work as a professor. Nowadays getting canceled just means receiving criticism and then fat paychecks doing press tours about your feelings after receiving criticism.
@tracygeddes5867
29 күн бұрын
I have not listened to any of this but I can tell that woman in the middle is mega anti trans.
@user-jf3lo6ss2i
29 күн бұрын
No, she is pro women and children and if you actually took the time to listen to it you would know that.
@angela3900
29 күн бұрын
"I have not listened to any of this but I can tell that woman in the middle is mega anti trans." No, she's pro-women's rights!
@ninakamenic3679
29 күн бұрын
Thanks for letting us know that you're a typical brainwashed wokie who makes conclusions before actually even listening to what a person has to say. Nothing new here. Your statement is literally the caricature of your ideology.😅
@DonnaBrooks
26 күн бұрын
She's not anti-trans. She is for biological reality & the protection of women & girls from men who will use self-ID to get access to women & girls. You will even call actual transexuals anti-trans if they disagree with your dogma in any way. You sound like a True Believer in a cult. You haven't listened, but you know someone is "mega anti trans" w/o hearing a word they say. You've been indoctrinated to not listen to anyone who disagrees with you by the cult, who calls dissenters bigots & transphobes so they can dismiss the points they make without even hearing them. Cults don't like people hearing the insights of people outside the cult.
@JoanneBartone
25 күн бұрын
😂😂😂 no, she is pro-women. No need to be paranoid, dear.
@randomcommenteronyoutube1055
Ай бұрын
Rebecca Tuvel is a good caricature of everything classist, reality-divorced, and spineless in academia.
@nadinechandler8879
Ай бұрын
Come on, at least she showed up, we gotta give her that.
@ewajustka
Ай бұрын
100%
@Mr.JoeBangles
Ай бұрын
@@nadinechandler8879 no we don't. we don't have to give a single inch to the trans cult
@ponny2948
Ай бұрын
@@nadinechandler8879yes, but its sad the bar is so so low
@howigotover798
Ай бұрын
Love love love Kathleen Stock!! Can't even listen to the other one.She's unbearable with a voice to match.
Пікірлер: 252