Oh yes this is exactly what i needed rn. Learning UFR now
@Dagg361
6 жыл бұрын
When you don't even know how to solve 3x3 Blind, and see this, i just get scared
@alejrandom6592
6 жыл бұрын
Don't worry you dont need a lot of algs Learn OP, its just 5 pll algorithms
@GrahamSiggins
5 жыл бұрын
well to be fair, this is 21 algs, and a lot of them are much easier to learn than 3x3 PLL algs lol the rest of 3style is pretty much intuitive :) kinda like learning intuitive F2L
@jorian_meeuse
3 жыл бұрын
@@alejrandom6592 3 plls: tperm, r perm, y perm
@alejrandom6592
6 жыл бұрын
Switching from UB UBL to UF UFR Will need this
@thephysicistcuber175
5 жыл бұрын
Wait, you used UB?
@LEC1427
6 жыл бұрын
Just switched to UFR and I'm learning these lol Thanks :p
@LeonardoPranadyar
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vid Graham :)
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
Leonardo Pranadyar youre welcome :)
@benbaron8951
6 жыл бұрын
What's the 2e2e alg for DF-DB UF-UR? I remember seeing you had a great alg for that, can't find it
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
Ummmmmmmmm I don't think I ever found any alg specifically for that case, but I do have an alg for DF-DB UL-UB, so you could just U2 into that alg. That would give you this: U2 M2 U M2 U2 M' U2 M' U M2
@benbaron8951
6 жыл бұрын
I wanted this for DFDB +epll for when I mess up my cross(sometimes intentionally), all cases have good solutions except for this one, so this works. thanks!
@kennymiller5837
6 жыл бұрын
isn't the first one a y perm in the back? Why don't you just do U2 y perm U2?
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Miller because thats slower
@thephysicistcuber175
4 жыл бұрын
@@GrahamSiggins tbh I've timed both from home grip and U2 Y-perm is consistently faster than your alg
@GrahamSiggins
4 жыл бұрын
The Physicist Cuber then you should use U2 Y perm. I’ll keep using my alg cus it’s faster for me.
@TheVichu01
6 жыл бұрын
So it's basically setup to J-perm and cancel moves. Did you switch to UFR already? Also, isn't your orientation YO? I preferred that in the other vids as it's my orientation as well, lol.
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
Vishwanath Jeyaraman Less than half of them set up to J perms...
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
I’m currently working on switching, yes my orientation is YO but I did WG in this video cus that’s what the majority use.
@TheVichu01
6 жыл бұрын
Graham Siggins My bad, I saw the first few targets and assumed it to be so.
@jorian_meeuse
3 жыл бұрын
@@GrahamSiggins i counted and 12 of them are, which is more than 10.5
@Gabrieldrst
6 жыл бұрын
Debussy arabesque no 1 !!!
@vague67
6 жыл бұрын
Will you be switching to Ufr x-centers and Uf +-centers too? If so why? I'm thinking of learning 3style for x-centers and don't want to relearn 440 algs later on since I want to do BLD events seriously. From what I've seen Ufr algs are worse the Ubl ones. Thanks in advance!
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
No, not switching center buffers. I don't think there's really any point, from what I can tell all U face center buffers are equally good.
@vague67
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for answering!
@TheVichu01
6 жыл бұрын
For UFR UBL - UF UR : is this a good alg? R' B' R2 D ( cancel into j perm ) D ' R2 B R
@alejrandom6592
6 жыл бұрын
~21 movs 4gen Probably U2 (Y perm) U2 would be better
@tamquan124
5 жыл бұрын
Kenny Arias it’s actually 5 gen lol
@paultaylor7115
6 жыл бұрын
So with DF edges in mbld, when you have parity you do the last target with m2 and then do the parity alg or just use a 2e-2e alg, right? So are these algs how you deal with that parity when you use UF and UFR? I’m assuming that you don’t have to use this in 3bld, since you can just swap the two edges to always have an even number of edge targets. Sorry I know nothing about UF and UFR, I’m just curious haha
@GrahamSiggins
6 жыл бұрын
Ok a bit of what you said is wrong so I'll just explain it all haha With DF and UBL in 3bld I memorize corners first then edges, then solve edges and then corners. If I memorize corners and get parity, then I'll trace edges so that I pseudosolve the UL and UB edges swapped. This way I don't have to do the stupid D' L2 D M2 D' L2 D parity alg and this saves a significant amount of time. In multibld it's ideal to memorize in the same order that you are going to solve in, so I memorize edges and then corners. This means I can't do the UL/UB swap because I memorize edges before I know if I have parity or not. So if I get edge parity, I do a 2e2e alg that swaps my buffer with the parity edge target and swaps UL and UB (this is much faster than doing the M2 target alg + the D' L2 D...alg). However, with the UFR corner buffer, you get the best corner parity algs if you use the UF/UR swap instead of UL/UB. So when I make this switch from UBL to UFR, I'll now memorize edges in 3bld with UF and UR swapped instead of UL and UB when I have parity. This is the best part though: in multibld with UF/UFR, I no longer have to do 2e2e algs to solve the edge parity target and swap UL/UB when I get parity. All I have to do, since I am employing a swap that includes my edge buffer, is do a single comm. That comm is always UF-(edge parity target)-UR. I don't know if I really needed to explain all of this. But TL;DR: these algs I show in this video are basically the Old Pochmann corner parity algs, but for when your buffers are UF/UFR and you are swapping UF/UR on parity cubes. Hopefully I understood your question correctly lol
@paultaylor7115
6 жыл бұрын
Graham Siggins haha thanks for such a thorough response though! That makes so much more sense now, I’ve always been a little confused about other buffers before lol
@cubingsnail6178
5 жыл бұрын
Does this mean i have to solve UF and UR into swapped positions when i have parity?
Пікірлер: 38