🚀Get 3% off WAR THUNDER LOOT🚀 - goo.gl/4xJbSH o7o7 All while supporting my channel heavily! 📷Instagram📷 / phlygram 🔵Facebook Page / officialphly #planes #funnymoments #warthunder
Phirst of all, welcome back! We're always happy to receive detailed and constructed pheedback, especially from a veteran player. We'll look into your ideas and might include some of them as a time-limited event to test it out. Our top priority is to keep the majority of players happy.
@kinglone9720
20 күн бұрын
U gonna say that but it will not happen
@normal-potato05
20 күн бұрын
We’d hope so
@octo1235
20 күн бұрын
Hopefully you will try to make these changes as it will bring a huge amount of old players back and it will just improve the game in general where players can use things like the tiger 2 is2 M26 T29 ect without fighting heat shells or sabot rounds every match.
@kareemmohamed2327
20 күн бұрын
Economical updates NOW!!!!!!!!!; Sorry for starting a war can y'all now leave me alone? I get it already ok? Whoopsie😅
@NOOT_NOOT-_-
20 күн бұрын
FREE THE BAISMENT GUY!!!
@OddBawZ
20 күн бұрын
The Majority of new players don't even care about WW2 stuff, for the last 3 years Gaijin marketing is like WOWOWOWEEEE ABRAMS T-80 F-16 WOWOW! If they split it, then allow players to start a tech tree at Rank 5 starting Cold War. Let the players choose the era of gameplay. Someone who is interested in Modern Tanks doesn't want to grind 30 WW2 ones they're not interested in to get there.
@WeBeStronk
20 күн бұрын
That's not actually a bad idea to be fair... might increase player retention as well if there were era separation
@BugattiONE666
20 күн бұрын
iterally what thery did for Naval, almost as if if people stopped going "HEHE NOONE PLAYS NAVAL HEHE" theyd learn that
@user-tm9jd6pj6x
20 күн бұрын
its cause of Ukraine war see those thanks on line
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
This needs to happen as well. But I think too much $$$ in those high tier prems. I think the conventional cap idea could work and they would be okay with doing it because at this BR spread it doesn't really effect their bottom line, as much of the money coming into the game is from high tier (assuming)
@viscera9579
20 күн бұрын
@@WeBeStronk Yeah but the issue is Gaijin would be losing money if they did that, thats why they sell premiums so then you can speedrun your way to top tier. I wish it was the way Odd said but I highly doubt Gaijin will ever do this. As for Odds proposal, I say there should be an era cutoff, any vehicle post 1950 has no right fighting any vehicle that was produced pre 1950(or ww2 if thats what you want), tiger II's shouldn't face bmp-1s similar to what phly was saying.
@nilychkirilov
16 күн бұрын
They killed early jets with the "decompression". Me 262's fighting F86's every single game now. Beyond comedy.
@jefflee4527
15 күн бұрын
I just got into jets before the decompression it was nice playing my f2h without mig 15s while it lasted
@Gunboy122
15 күн бұрын
Throw some pity at the poor Me 163 B-0, WHO thought it needed to be up at 8.7???
@miloda_bess
15 күн бұрын
Just wish that they moved the br cap higher and had f86 fight at things closer to their era
@nilychkirilov
15 күн бұрын
@@jefflee4527 me too. Thank God I grinded Germany before they moved the G91 to tier VI and "decompressed" jets.
@nilychkirilov
15 күн бұрын
@@miloda_bess yeah, the way they do things is usually solving a problem by creating another one.
@Kenworth-by8wb
19 күн бұрын
I think the tech trees should be split into 1900-1946 and 1946+
@SimonLX
14 күн бұрын
I’d say to 1955 and then 1955-present. Basically at the point ATGMs start appearing. Keeping the early era exclusively conventional guns
@haroldotrotter9148
14 күн бұрын
i dont because things like the is4m would be stuck with cold war only when its design is 1947. imo i think the cap should be a korean war thing. 1933 to 1953-4 sounds good to me.
@CryBite
13 күн бұрын
So a Leopard 1 that fights M60A3 TTS is okay? I reckon you don't see that theres more technology difference between these two. Than there is between a Panzer III and Leopard 1..
@shronkler1994
12 күн бұрын
say goodbye to most of Sweden lowtier. for example, the strv 74. it's basically a ww2 vehicle, with a 75mm on par with the 76 or 85 and a chassis based off of a knockoff to the panzer 38t. however, it was designed in the 50s and used til the 80s. so i hope it'll have fun fighting against MBTs like the t54, leopard, pattons, centurions, etc.
@SimonLX
12 күн бұрын
@@shronkler1994 that's Sweden's issue. Most other nations would be fine.
@WindHaze10
19 күн бұрын
Biggest issues: - grind that requires a full time job investment to reach top tier - heavy compression - bad balancing - greed of Gaijin
@schizophrennicautist3858
16 күн бұрын
Playing 6.7 is pure pain
@kaisaplews1407
16 күн бұрын
Honestly that grind kills the interest, cuz sometimes I wanna play on weekends at least for 1 day and without premium account its doesn't make sense, I simply dont wanna play because I know if I wanna research new tank I should play for 2-3 days in a row with premium, but I have only 1 free day
@robertharris6092
15 күн бұрын
@@schizophrennicautist3858 what? Germanys 6.7 lineup is the biggest SL printer in human historyn its my go to lineup to grind out battlepass challenges.
@zacharytang3840
15 күн бұрын
@@robertharris6092i’d say the biggest SL printer is German 4.0 or Soviet 4.0
@kerotomas1
15 күн бұрын
@@robertharris6092 German 4.0-4.3 is a thousand times better than getting r.ped by heat shells in the huge target sluggish tiger 2.
@somebody5368
20 күн бұрын
The fact that a king tiger can get atgm hostiles, and that the type 75 sph can VT fuse a ww2 fighter is ridiculous
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
drives me insane
@ww32
20 күн бұрын
Only American and British AA should have VT fuses in WW2 gameplay
@dartawnasailo4449
20 күн бұрын
Exactly, I'm as scared as playing the King tiger like jm playing a light armored tank with no mobility... It gets killed so easily that you have to camp a spot and just sit there the whole game
@6old_YT
20 күн бұрын
@@dartawnasailo4449literally how it was used irl?
@dartawnasailo4449
20 күн бұрын
@@6old_YT not really, because there are so few of them there were not much engagements
@oriontaylor
19 күн бұрын
Couldn’t agree more. I started playing the game because of WWII and pre-war vehicles, not late Cold War and 21st century vehicles.
@rangerpyron
16 күн бұрын
Same here. for me its like why play something new that everyone knows when I can see what beasts our grandfathers used to operate and put my self in his position using his old machine
@KekusMagnus
16 күн бұрын
The game is also fundamentally designed for Korean-War and older vehicles, The objectives and maps simply make no sense with modern vehicles, and the game plays very poorly, with fast vehicles circling around the map like its call of duty, only limited by artificial map boundaries
@darkofthearmy
15 күн бұрын
I am the opposite, I think it would’ve been better if they made two seperate games, one for interwar and WWII, and one for Cold War and modern day.
@ERIK-457
15 күн бұрын
Me too, i wanted the Panther II so badly, and the GLORIOUS Tiger II 10,5CM! THE MAUS! THE E-100!! The Flakpanther!! Now that i finally reached those ranks i cant get them anymore because they were removed, AND I SEE PLAYERS WHO GOT THEM BACK THEN IN BATTLE! IN MY TEAM! Man i want to cry, it was my childhood dream tanks that they removed from my favourite game, they fucked up my favourite game
@racingraptor4758
13 күн бұрын
Same. Whille having that Leopard I is nice i came to play stuff like Tiger, Panther, ISU-152, T-34's, Spitfires and Stukas. Kinda sad they re purposefully made into an obstacle and not a cool part of the game
@rrg3740
11 күн бұрын
Angling a Tiger E against a 350mm sabo round, is called realistic battles.
@shronkler1994
6 күн бұрын
like a charioteer? something you can just as easily (if not easier) kill? but is it a problem when a US 90mm or Soviet 122/152 negates ur angling?
@CurryBury
2 күн бұрын
You can’t cry about the APDS because it’s balanced especially in UK with shit armour. I think I displays the turn of the war well as German tanks stopped being the best
@alexbarrett3529
20 күн бұрын
The biggest problem is that Gaijin approaches balance like a bunch of small, individual problems rather than one large, systemic issue. They keep putting bandaids on bullet wounds without wondering why the balance is shot in the first place.
@ollilaine6763
20 күн бұрын
Yeah. They tried to make spawn camping harder and give backups to premiums rather than trying to think why players leave early. Wouldn't unlimited respawns with a cooldown for the tank you just died in and allowing joining in progress fix that? Players could still leave because of bad maps but that's just another sign for Gaijin to do something.
@XMysticHerox
20 күн бұрын
Even then they balance according to win rate not anything reasonable.
@SilencedMi5
20 күн бұрын
I completely agree. They are losing the forest for the trees every time in their spreadsheet peeping. We want a total overhaul!
@Dakarn
20 күн бұрын
@@ollilaine6763 Or move spawns behind battlefield lines, so the opposing team can never fly/drive over enemy spawns? They also have never fixed the issue of bombers spawning only 1km above fighters, making it VERY easy for fighters to climb and shoot bombers before they have even a chance to drop bombs.
@ollilaine6763
19 күн бұрын
@@Dakarn Moving spawns further away causes more frustration for tank players since they have to spend more time doing nothing and potentially get killed on the way to the battle. That just encourages to quit or to spawn a plane.
@Add12pack
20 күн бұрын
"Fix the game? Why do that we would lose money 🤣"-gaijin not probably.
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
For real. but this is only at 6.7 and below, that's not where the big money is at. So hopefully they can let us have this.
@rozellgabriel6299
20 күн бұрын
@@PhlyDailyno you can’t balance war. Balance the map.
@ondravlcek9639
20 күн бұрын
We need propaganda of this on every social media as in ww2
@ExploringSitkaAlaskausin-wj4wu
20 күн бұрын
@@PhlyDaily I would prefer historical accuracy to balance.
@ThePavLow117
20 күн бұрын
Your totally right, I sick of being clipped by players in tanks, that as you said have no business looking at me at the br I’m playing. It’s so frustrating as I’m now a new player but have watched your videos for years and I never realised how much it’s changed over the years, that and you make it look so damn easy my friend
@Tankbeard
15 күн бұрын
Hear, hear! Gaijin, just add a "Classic" Realistic WW2 Game Mode without anachronistic vehicles and those stupid meme-y scouts with OP autocannons, recoilless rifles, and ATGMs, and Jets, and whatnot. Thank you.
@racingraptor4758
13 күн бұрын
Only jets that could be im this mode are all german early jets like Me-262, rocket powered planes (Me-163 and BI) and Gloster Meteor.
@ethanedwards422
12 күн бұрын
A proper ww2 mode as you say would be near impossible. With Germany only having like a single king tiger per team, with a few panzer 4s, maybe a panther or tiger here and there. While allied team would be able to have dozens of t34s or Sherman's. A proper ww2 mode would never work, as the axis team would always be at a disadvantage. The allied team would also have complete air superiority as well.
@kipkipper-lg9vl
8 күн бұрын
Ground combat WT should not involve any aircraft whatsoever
@gotohyoshihisa3971
3 күн бұрын
@@ethanedwards422 Of course WT won't reenact IRL WW2 fighting. The fact that there's no infantry already negates the point of being "hyper realistic", and nobody is asking for that. What he wants is a mode where there's exclusively conventional munitions(No ATGMs, Modern SPGs, Chemical rounds like HEAT-FS and other Cold-War era weapons) because HEAT-FS and ATGMs negate the point of armour, the one thing WW2 heavy tanks have. A mode where there can be some Tiger 2s, Mauses, IS-3s, etc. No Leopards, M48s, no MILANs and such.
@helevu9162
14 күн бұрын
more varied game modes, bomber formations in air rb, traction and torque reroll, grind mitigation, stock stat/shell adjustments, more non premium emblem slots and more detailed emblem adjustment controls, higher spawn cost for planes in ground rb and limitation to 3 per team
@leoromeli7611
5 күн бұрын
I think the trees should be split. Pre 45 and post 45. That was the End war tanks like the Tiger E or hell even some variants of the Sherman. IS line etcetera. Can duke it out conventional style, gun vs gun no ATGMs or Guided bombs (except the one German bomb that was radio controlled) and then the modern boyos can have their Post 45 battles as well. We can have our cake and eat it
@MrBadbaron
19 күн бұрын
FIX Traction and torque! Thats my biggerst problem with this game. Vehicles cant even go up a small slope its rediculous.
@br4ndy41
19 күн бұрын
agreed
@dominicjones3921
16 күн бұрын
It's their lazy answer to invisible wall
@pacocinco
16 күн бұрын
Literally add torque lmao, tanks should not be planes on the ground (in a physics sense)
@looke3392
14 күн бұрын
@@MrBadbaronme personally I don't like the sneaky spots people go to, because a large portion of them are outright bs. Looking into spawns or sitting in a spot nobody can do anything against
@gangbangmidnight841
14 күн бұрын
@@looke3392 Map makers can just block those places off via buildings or other man-made constructions like trenches, walls... If not, just an invisible wall
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
Let me know any ideas you have to add onto this. Share and like the video for the algo so we can reach as far as we can to try to get this changed.
@johnmosser6695
20 күн бұрын
Brs need to be spread out, sounds crazy, but perhaps even to 15.0 Modes and maps and their objectives need to make geographical and tactically progressive sense. Vehicles from other nations should not be in other tech trees. This just ends up with a homogeneous boring "balanced" mess. The point of different nations is to present what they have, not to make all the nations competitive on the same level.
@DarkStalker-us1mo
20 күн бұрын
They could split the ground tree into two like the navy but not have them fight each other.
@johnmosser6695
20 күн бұрын
I like your idea of a WW2 br cap. I would also like to see a gap between non stabilized cold war tanks/early mbts, and fully stabilized mbts. There is absolutely no competition between the 2.
@progreengaming
20 күн бұрын
the is-6 at 7.7 is dumb i feel like more of a medium light when playing it, and it can only pen for examle the Maus when it is flat on the side. i think it should go back to 7.3, or a way better round.
@exoticbutters9824
20 күн бұрын
maybe we can add a second gamemode called Historical and you can only play vehicle from that time periode so something like (1939-1940) and (1944-45) and you can even add (1950-1960) or so. it will probably break the game because the tiger and shermans but you can do something with a limit on those tanks in matches so a german team can have 5 tigers and a american team can have 10 shermans. idk just a idea
@matthewrikihana6818
17 күн бұрын
"I seen fire and I've seen rain. Sunny days I thought would never end". Oh Steve, bless 😂.
@WormwoodActual
14 күн бұрын
As a sim main I could not agree more. Sim anymore is about the closest thing to balanced and even then... There is some really rough balance issues in it! Anymore the only good balance you can see is like 1.0-4.3...
@csongordevai8613
9 сағат бұрын
How do you even play sim? Like, how do you join a battle? never could figure it out
@WormwoodActual
8 сағат бұрын
@@csongordevai8613 you have to go to the right side of the screen where it says events, pick that, and then choose the simulator mode you want.
@luka2625
20 күн бұрын
I remember how excited I was when your “Return of the King” video came out. You got me into War Thunder and it’s been a good time. I got my friends to play it and it became like how COD was in the 2000s. I’d come home being excited as hell to play with my friends every day and we would have a blast getting new vehicles every day just having fun. Thanks Phly!
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
Fuck yah dude! More than welcomed!
@Roof_Korean.
16 күн бұрын
@@PhlyDailyphly I don’t know but what do you think about just the mismatch in planes and tank at BR 8-9.7 like I’m not trying to have my m60 AOS be supported by f86 sabres like they need to space it out if you know what I mean I think it would also make that br more fun if the tanks and planes linned up realistily a bit.
@trstuhnn
20 күн бұрын
Phly propaganda post and I’m here for it
@bubby9175
20 күн бұрын
Oops, accidentally on purpose falling for propaganda!
@SilencedMi5
20 күн бұрын
Absolutely! We need more community action akin to the boycott and Steam review protest.
@mameyn9282
19 күн бұрын
What he's saying is dumb tho, the tiger 2 is still crazy good if you play it right even in an uptier. Heavy tanks should not be invulnerable and light vehicles are an obstacle you need to work with your team to deal with. It wouldn't be fun for anyone if nothing could pen you frontally
@-derby15-95
19 күн бұрын
@@mameyn9282 The whole idea behind "boss tanks" is especially fucking dumb You grinded the IS-4, which is a perfectly balanced tank on its BR? Well, tough shit fucko, now you need 1500 SP to even try to play it
@fassotre2520
19 күн бұрын
@@mameyn9282But for example before the BR changes I would sometimes see the Tiger 2 when playing 5.3 with the Strv m42 DT and I could not frontally pen him anywere but it was still fun cuz I was offen to the side of one cuz I could flank them easily
@Dcook85
11 күн бұрын
The "conventional times"... I was there, and it was great. 😥
@MarSaso
18 күн бұрын
Its not just your fight, its our fight and we are here with you! Lead us captain
@uqi1412
19 күн бұрын
Some of my suggestions would probably be, - improving the Volumetric mechanic (it still suck ass sometimes) - reducing the research points cost of all modifications especially for high tiers and top tiers - bringing back the Enduring Air RB and ground RB also - having a WWM event with vehicle rewards would be good - AND ANY NEW GAMEMODE IS ALWAYS BETTER, GAIJIN !!! (WHERE IS THE D POINT??) WHETHER IT'S FOR GROUND AIR OR EVEN NAVAL, BE CREATIVE !!
@billyherrington731
15 күн бұрын
Round mantlets suck ass all the time, just eating shell like mg bullets, like panter, m36 and t34 and the rest
@StarWarsExpert_
13 күн бұрын
what is enduring air RB and ground RB?
@uqi1412
13 күн бұрын
@@StarWarsExpert_ long bygone game mode when Gaijin still have some creativity outside April fool's. Basically : - Enduring Air RB is just like air SB but with RB mechanic and you win by completing it's many objectives to reduce enemy point to zero - Enduring ground RB is Battle mode (CMIIW) but with way more points Both have unlimited spawn, and it doesn't need back up to spawn another one. You just need to pay the repair cost of that particular vehicle. At some occasion there's just the naval version of it as right now
@catfunt5583
10 күн бұрын
Cannot agree with the last point more. Been Playing the same game mode (COD domination) for 12 years, but man, I just want some more scale. Give us battlefield like conquest or rush, where you have to push sector by sector. Gaijin pls
@raphaelg6865
20 күн бұрын
Remember the time when the IS4m was the USSR equivalent of the german Maus. They literally removed the Maus.
@cbev1249
20 күн бұрын
Wdym the is 4m is still the soviet equivalent to the maus, and it never wasn't?
@AmphiStuG
20 күн бұрын
@@cbev1249He means since the Maus is no longer in the tech tree the IS4M doesn’t really have an equivalent as it used to.
@cbev1249
20 күн бұрын
@@AmphiStuG i mean there's still the t32e1, although it's probably the worst of the trio
@vipvip-tf9rw
19 күн бұрын
@@cbev1249 It has weak sides
@jackrabbitslim6144
19 күн бұрын
I still have it. Just lord. You can't use it. It's just a meme now.
@RemyBowyer
2 күн бұрын
Bro could fit the entire tech tree In his crew slots😂
@Shimmerscale
13 күн бұрын
I have been saying this since 2020…. How come my 1944 vehicle fights 1980 produced tracked guns, ifv…. Wtf where is the immersion. Fighting light vehicles in ww2 with apfsds wtf… or bmp’s with atgm’s…
@homiespaghetti1522
20 күн бұрын
Playing WW2 in Warthunder right now feels like time traveling to the future every game
@whitefalcon630
16 күн бұрын
No its just a game where vehicle of different nations put against each other based on their battle rating. Historical Matchmaking as an optional new gamemade would die!
@konechno1
20 күн бұрын
I totally agree with you. Another problem is making it able to get a plane 20 seconds into the game. I love CAS, but it sucks when you get revenge bombed right after your first kill.
@iThink.probably
20 күн бұрын
Start in SPAA
@DatBoi_TheGudBIAS
20 күн бұрын
@@iThink.probablyare u ok? Do U have brain damage?
@iThink.probably
20 күн бұрын
@@DatBoi_TheGudBIAS some of the SPAA's are the most powerful Tank Destroyers for their BR lol
@dertal9575
20 күн бұрын
They simply should didable death camera of course this wouldnt help resolve problem but will have help to a degree
@JJishere09
20 күн бұрын
Revenge Bombing is such a NO SKILL GAMEPLAY
@orix3434
5 күн бұрын
This is shomething i have been thinking for a long long time myself never had the voice like you so im happy that one of the biggest warthunder content creators voiced about the issues
@generalbesenstiel
14 күн бұрын
being uptiered with germany on 6.7 is the biggest nightmare on earth
@aleksasarmes8160
3 күн бұрын
Think thats bad? Play the Soviets, i think im going to an mental asylum any day soon of how shit the Soviet tanks are
@krajt1999
Күн бұрын
@@aleksasarmes8160 sounds historically accurate lmao
@Dakarn
20 күн бұрын
My biggest problem with GrindThunder is the fact that once you get to the Jet era, Spading takes FOREVER, because you are always going to be flying a 7-8 BR jet with no missiles going against 9BR jets with 8+ missiles.
@Luke1902
19 күн бұрын
Facts, i have gotten to 7.7 USA after YEARS and started looking through the early jets weaponry. Once you get to 7.7, you go against 8.7, and they have missiles. What the fuck should i do against those jets? They go faster, with better weapons and they have missiles.. like wtf?
@vmarek98
19 күн бұрын
@@Luke1902 There are some airplanes in which it is doable, but it is rare. The mig19 is a good example of a plane that beats early missiles quite easily. The guns are enough.
@_Mattz1nho
19 күн бұрын
name one jet thats 9.0 - 10.0 that has 8+ missiles.
@jojomaster7675
19 күн бұрын
That's a severe skill issue you'll get over in time. Early jets are fine. Early missiles are easy to beat and the performance difference isn't that huge. The problem is how compressed 11.0+ is and how quickly the meta changes. Just looking back, half a year ago the MiG-29 and F-16A were the best jets around and now they're basically worthless. Stock grinds are really bad, and the difference between jets with good IRCCM missiles and enough countermeasures and the ones without are huge, yet gaijin still fails to see it and puts planes that should be 2 whole brs apart into the same matchmaker.
@Turbopotato-fp9yd
19 күн бұрын
g91 YS 9.7 with no flares, 2 aim9b and it's subsonic
@Wilk_414
20 күн бұрын
4:27 The enemy is getting reinforced with a dreadnought
@Fear_Naught
20 күн бұрын
the good old bf1 days
@AtomickPhoenix
20 күн бұрын
Not sure if I’m super on board with that idea for WT as it has never been their style and also people would fight for that one vehicle
@learnmyname123
19 күн бұрын
@@AtomickPhoenix it does kinda feel more like an arcade-ey WoT kinda thing to me.
@BlueTurtleClips
19 күн бұрын
“The enemy is getting reinforced with a super heavy tank”
@AtomickPhoenix
19 күн бұрын
@@learnmyname123 yeah, I think it would work for arcade tho ngl
@MerudonWoW
15 күн бұрын
Nice to see you back man!!! Hope the fam is doing great 😊❤
@ProCrow36
16 күн бұрын
I completely agree with you, keep up the amazing work!!!
@pranjalmajumdar3326
19 күн бұрын
We need better game modes that are more dynamic and fun, not just domination and team death match
@TacticalTatorTot
19 күн бұрын
How about V.I.P. where one team has to defend a scout car as it makes its way to a specific point.
@pranjalmajumdar3326
19 күн бұрын
@@TacticalTatorTot dude I’m not even lying when I say this but I was thinking of a vip mode for wt in the shower this morning 😭
@Rainewhispers05
15 күн бұрын
I think something like one team has to defend while the other team has to attack I think it shouldn't be that hard and would switch the play style
@pranjalmajumdar3326
15 күн бұрын
@@Rainewhispers05 like a conquest game mode?
@Rainewhispers05
15 күн бұрын
@@pranjalmajumdar3326 yes. Sorry I was tired and forgot the name
@WeBeStronk
20 күн бұрын
Ooo this is going to be spicy... *grabs War Thunder branded popcorn* I love facing a BMP with an ATGM in my WW2 tank, what are you on about? 🤣
@J_v7101
20 күн бұрын
Watched your vid literally before Phlys, I would bet one pilot snipe that you two are in cahoots
@WeBeStronk
20 күн бұрын
@@J_v7101 I actually didn't know he was making this today, purely chance we covered a similar subject
@J_v7101
20 күн бұрын
@@WeBeStronk omg you actually replied, little starstruck, My exams/ GCSE's finish in 10 days. Something what i really wanted to do was write a report/ google doc on both your ideas and how each theory can work and other ideas, bit neeky but its something that lingers in that back of my mind whenever i play for the last 3 years. Furthermore as someone who has come to wt late just as im revising and doing other hobbies i dont have as much time F2p so im literrally so close to get the F80, the grind is tough mainly SL is hard for f2p players
@Exmiruz
20 күн бұрын
German tree be like
@coolenick0
20 күн бұрын
Me whenever I drive my M46 and suddenly need to deal with a VIDAR and it's laser range finder 2000m away
@MajorMayhem-cg9hf
16 күн бұрын
100% Phly. We are here with you!
@coolhandlukedubble99
9 күн бұрын
You are so right Phly
@Rexxie44
20 күн бұрын
FINALLY SOMEONE SAYS IT!!! Thank you Phly! I've been saying this for years and it's a constant negging problem. They put Cold War vehicles in our WW2 bracket and we get slapped by HEATFS rounds consequently. My Jadgtiger was not built in mind to account for HEATFS. Things like that is ridiculous, let alone the ATGMs we see in either forced uptiers or WITHIN the 6.7 bracket. It's obscene and Old Thunder was much more balanced. Ffs, the Maus was in Tier IV battles and was still balanced. They put a cap on it to be a limit of two per-match. "Boss tanks" aren't a problem insofar you cap how many are in the match or increase their SP. WW2 vehicles and too late to make WW2 vehicles should be stuck together. Maus, T-95, IS-3/IS-4, T-29, T-32, ect, they should be all together and not put around Korean War/Vietnam era tech. It's absolutely ridiculous and we need to push for this to be fixed. I'm stick of playing with a Tiger 1 and having to compete with a PT-76 that has HEATFS at 5.3. What kind of nonsense is that!?
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
PREEEEEEECCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
@6old_YT
20 күн бұрын
Complaining about heatfs at 5.3 when there's the German long 75 at the same br with what 8mm less pen and it does much more post pen and is a higher velocity fuck outa here
@FASIL_503
20 күн бұрын
I dont think putting maus with ww2 vehicles is good
@grandadmiralthrawn3054
20 күн бұрын
Like the Israeli ATGM carrier is even good...? Its not a historical sim ffs
@Rexxie44
20 күн бұрын
@@FASIL_503 It did fine back in the day. Take the tracks out and the barrel and you're good to go on the rest. Not to mention there are equal capability vehicles that can knock it out.
@johnmosser6695
20 күн бұрын
Glad to see this idea getting around!
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
We need to spread it! TY dude
@IZesty
16 күн бұрын
absolutely great idea about having groups of br's, it would be nice to see a bracket of every era's vehicles with no possibility of being uptiered after you get to the last vehicle in the bracket
@TARmeow
10 күн бұрын
loved this video phly, acutally made me want to play the game for a moment
@user-jt9eh3zb3i
20 күн бұрын
"The enemy has a heavy tank, scout it for an airstrike!" "The enemy is being reinforced with heavy armor!"
@ammonium4
19 күн бұрын
Maybe an arcade scouting purpose?
@smackdatmoney
19 күн бұрын
Bf1 type call outs
@EpicDonutDudeMemes
20 күн бұрын
I have not touched this game since 2020 and I have a feeling I played in the golden days hearing how bad it is now, never knew you could encounter much newer vehicles while you're just touring around in your happy little WW2 tank
@viejitaloca2810
20 күн бұрын
i still remember the golden days of air sim, that thing was gorgeous and they ruined it sooo badly its actually sad to see its current state....
@Ash.1774
20 күн бұрын
2020 - early 2021 was the golden age for it, you could grind half a tech tree in a couple days
@viejitaloca2810
20 күн бұрын
@@Ash.1774 i mean golden days in terms of gameplay, before the bot infestion and when many clans were still really into playing it, you could have beautiful dogfights back then
@Leadlobotamist
19 күн бұрын
@@viejitaloca2810 The bots ruin that BR range. When I finally get a full game it's great. Most of the time it's a 5v5 with 4 Ju288s and it sucks major ass.
@MikMoen
19 күн бұрын
You can be in a post war Pershing or M48 Patton and you'll be fighting Cold War vehicles. Actual decades in difference.
@MoosKarpfen
16 күн бұрын
sooooo important critic and ideas, love it
@user-uz5be4oy2e
19 күн бұрын
I’m all for this, I feel as though it would restore a part of the game’s long lost soul
@randominternetdenizen6399
20 күн бұрын
People don't talk about how bad naval has gotten at this point because the br introduces dreadnoughts rather abruptly so you have light cruisers fighting dreadnoughts.
@Dynioglowy1986
20 күн бұрын
and cruisers fighting gunboats .... if they add submarines and let me spawn in plane as first spawn i would play navy 1000% but now is meh !
@WholeMilkisBetter
20 күн бұрын
Naval is a mess. Dreadnoughts battling WW2 battle cruisers, incomplete navies, and the maps are ass.
@fidel-3470
20 күн бұрын
Even in the last Dev stream they got through the tech trees, 60+ minutes into the video, and they were like "Oh yeah, and there's uh, naval, too." Even the devs don't give a shit. I can't imagine anyone buys premiums for naval, especially when I've got like 5+ vehicles as event vehicles I don't ever touch.
@jianng7795
20 күн бұрын
I play a lot of 5.3 Royal Navy when I was shooting for the Renown, and I've never hated seeing a vehicle as much as I did with the Prinz Eugen. They can just park somewhere in full view of the enemy spawn and act like it's a shooting gallery, it's ridiculous.
@twandepan
20 күн бұрын
naval should be an enduring confrontation mode for people with patience. long battles but big rewards for objectives and naval kills. only then will they make any sense in rb and sb.
@kawaiicrusader
19 күн бұрын
As someone who is only really interested in playing WW2 tanks.... yeah... this would be amazing and probably bring me back to the game
@dillianwhyte443
15 күн бұрын
They also should consider a bomber game mode. Rught now in Air RB they are next to useless.
@x7xHawkx7x
15 күн бұрын
Only been playing for 3 weeks, and this rings so true. It's brutal trying to grind right now
@joshua41175
17 күн бұрын
It took years and phly making a comeback for warthunder to finally acknowledge this stance. He's absolutely right.
@flyingpizza7486
20 күн бұрын
Every 6.7 germany player been wanting this change for ages.
@rekka431
20 күн бұрын
Nah I love 7.7 uptiers driving across 10 km to get killed by a atgm or a 155 mm howi
@wallachia4797
20 күн бұрын
Umm no sweetie, german players dont deserve to talk Go get ATGMd kiddo
@PurpleSlurpy98
20 күн бұрын
Don't you love the warm nice hot shrapnell from a loveley atgm who shot you from 500+meters ? It makes me warm
@flyingpizza7486
20 күн бұрын
@@rekka431 same vibe brother
@maorys975
20 күн бұрын
Every 6.7 german tank is undertiered
@ThePoptardedtj
20 күн бұрын
the idea of a boss tank feels a lot how they do it in star wars battle front 2 with their "heroes"
@furu_2274
19 күн бұрын
Sounds like a world of tanks event thing
@victorsvictory0748
19 күн бұрын
I'd find it frustrating to spend weeks to research my phat 7.7 heavy tank (amx50, maus, conq, is4m) just for it to be stuck behind a 1500 SP cap
@sharkk127
19 күн бұрын
Sounds more like battlefield 1 honestly
@furu_2274
19 күн бұрын
@@victorsvictory0748 yeah same, you dont play to research the ground vehicles to be blocked out from using them.
@ThePoptardedtj
19 күн бұрын
@@sharkk127 no clue only played 2
@justkorhei
14 күн бұрын
This actually makes so much sense, that it's borderline ridicolous they didn't think of it before
@xholzerr
8 күн бұрын
Great video. You see a lot of people making videos complaining in general about the whole BR problem. You are picking a piece of the timeline to fix the quirks which is a very smart move. Would very much like to see this happen.
@MrIlovetogame
20 күн бұрын
I heard 3 words: war thunder classic
@gunmaster2652
20 күн бұрын
War thunder revolution 2.0
@notazombie...notatall8577
20 күн бұрын
Absolutely, i stand behind that!
@gunmaster2652
20 күн бұрын
Thank you 813 hr Help
@carterowens2956
20 күн бұрын
The strike starts now brothers
@SilencedMi5
20 күн бұрын
We the players need to band together and demand what we want like we did with the boycott campaign.
@carterowens2956
19 күн бұрын
@@SilencedMi5 well said
@Elaina_The_Ashen
15 күн бұрын
First vid I’ve watched of yours in years, not to be insulting but this by far the most worth vid of yours I’ve ever watched. You drive a very valid point and I agree.
@Koto8262
15 күн бұрын
The boss tank sounds like a cool idea, like imagine two boss tanks fighting with each team helping their side, sounds cool, I love it, and I want it
@loud88gt
20 күн бұрын
Remember long, long ago when you could have an epic battle between a Maus and an IS-4? It would go back and forth forever until someone got a lucky shot. I really miss those days...
@partisan3353
16 күн бұрын
sounds good, but really, just aim for barrel and then flank em and BAP
@rileys8741
20 күн бұрын
War, war never changes.
@playersniper4027
20 күн бұрын
Hey Nice fallout reference
@beemy.6923
15 күн бұрын
War kinda always changes.
@kaiavatar4204
15 күн бұрын
Man i remember grinding this game back during the early days especially when ground forces came out and participated during the beta.
@nicholasgaming597
11 сағат бұрын
Tech trees need to be seperated by era because the major nations producing vehicals changes by era.
@zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzznyf
20 күн бұрын
Not Phly starting a second war thunder revolution 😂
@thenorthwestohiorailfan3007
19 күн бұрын
What was the first revolution?
@MeatMarksman
19 күн бұрын
@@thenorthwestohiorailfan3007When War Thunder was review bombed extremely hard. Forced Gaijin to make major changes, and the “roadmap” we have today. Got us good things though; economy updates, free backups on premiums, stuff like that.
@Bheliar
19 күн бұрын
@@MeatMarksmanThings cooled off and it all started going backwards again. Their little “decompression” barely lasted 2 months before they went back to erroneously messing with the BRs again.
@MeatMarksman
19 күн бұрын
@@Bheliar Yeah you’re not wrong there
@petertolnai9369
20 күн бұрын
Damn feels kindof like Phly declared war on War Thunder
@johnsmith-jq1uc
19 күн бұрын
biggest beef since free abrams
@fireghost3829
15 күн бұрын
I get your point and i think it would be interesting to try but its funny how you complain about too much pen and then proceed to take 20 shots and still be alive😂❤️
@rommelmcdonneld8787
10 күн бұрын
one of the best ideas i've heard in a while
@NotSureWhyIDoThis
20 күн бұрын
But this doesn't give Mr Gaijoob a new summer home, so he won't do it
@SB-sbiscool
20 күн бұрын
as an Italy main I would agree if Gajin wasn't so bad about giving Italy balanced vehicles, they either suck, or are great. Making every nation unable to face any vehicles above ww2 if ww2 era is a death sentence for nations like France and Italy. Even the AUBL is bad, firing HEATFS at 6.7, as the Tiger 2 has barely any less pen and explosive filler
@Tako_Tank
20 күн бұрын
As an Italian main, I agree to, but I did 2v1 2 king tigers with the AUBL once
@L0rdskullz
19 күн бұрын
While I get where you’re coming from, Italian tanks have always just sucked IRL. Without going away from realism, they would unfortunately just be a bad nation in ww2.
@Luke1902
19 күн бұрын
Let’s be real here, italian vehicles have and will always suck until the 80’, and even then just the destroyers and light vehicles get saved, mbt still suck currently, as they wanna replace the ariete with the leopards cause they realised even the upgraded arietes cant do shit against modern tanks. That said, the only way to make italy great would be to boost the tanks unrealistically. Or, give italy a sub nation. If there was no hungary, italy would be played by you, me, and a few other italian fellas. Thats just the reality. Until modern times, italy has always sucked, so theres not really much you can do about it.
@bokoblinlogic1619
19 күн бұрын
As an Italian main I pretty much solely play high tier because there is a really strong 9.7 lineup that I really like. I play it because the quality of the tanks are really consistent and there aren’t really any bad ones except for maybe the VCC 80/60 but that’s still decent
@Tako_Tank
19 күн бұрын
@@bokoblinlogic1619 I feel like a lot of people dislike the VCC 80/60 but I like it a lot and think it really isn’t all that bad
@ollie___
17 күн бұрын
what a video phly. i appreciate u speakin out
@simplode7752
13 күн бұрын
having the WW2 mode seems really fun, having the heavy or good tanks be similar to how you spawn planes in seems like a good way to balance both the good tanks and airplanes because you wouldn't be able to bring your best tank out first, and so for your second spawn you would have to choose between the good tanks and CAS
@harryshuman9637
20 күн бұрын
Phly be like: Heavy tanks are useless in War Thunder Any bomber in WT: am I a joke to you?
@CoIdHeat
19 күн бұрын
I’ve been advocating a change of the bomber concept for a decade in WT as it apparently doesn’t work and reduce bombers to point piñatas for fighter planes. The sad reality is that there’s extremely little interest from Gaijin into changing ANYTHING no matter how broken it is. Adding a Ground RB spawn protection, everyone was constantly asking for, took them YEARS. And even then they only made like the slightest changes as if they feared that spawnraped tanks being able to defend themselves would somehow break the game. Meanwhile in Air RB they decided by some point to add a spawn protection no one asked for and which hurt the mode more than it did good - tons of posts against this mechanic but they cling to it to this day. The ways of the snail go in mysterious ways.. but no matter the direction it’s a given they move forward at a snails pace.
@commisaryarreck3974
19 күн бұрын
Bombers got nerfed into the dirt, their gunners were made useless, their structural integrity is that of wet tissue paper where a single 7.7mm bullet will rip both it's wings and tail off (that's barely even hyperbole) I have just for fun with a maxed crew tested how long it would take for gunners to aim, track and fire at a fighter near point blank flying a straight line Let's just say the AI is so incapable that making their fire purely cosmetic would likely lead to most players not even noticing
@CoIdHeat
18 күн бұрын
@@commisaryarreck3974 AI only start firing at around 600m - which make them entirely useless. It’s a mystery to me why Gaijin even allows to spend points into some gunners skills like accuracy. It’s effectively a waste of points.
@Drakunite
20 күн бұрын
i am ALL for this. Not sure how they would even implement this. 1. ... they would have to yank on their shoulders Very hard (heads stuck DEEP in there) , 2. They are only focused on ruining the game and making maps straight line , no flanking. no sniping... But yeah... id love to have these changes implemented.... plus we need CAS to be HIGHLY nerfed (double their spawn points, and nerf the bajeesus out of all of their armaments) and it would be nice if we could get a True Tank ONLY mode.. NO cancer.. (aka, planes)
@jambothejoyful2966
19 күн бұрын
Please planes are hardly an issue pre-jet
@mameyn9282
19 күн бұрын
Cas needs to be nerfed but heavy tanks are fine as is, they are even really good in certain circumstances. If you are constantly dying to light vehicles its a skill issue
@Drakunite
19 күн бұрын
@@jambothejoyful2966 dont talk unless you know what you are talking about.. (making a comment like this you clearly do not know, so dont talk)
@Drakunite
19 күн бұрын
@@mameyn9282 hmm, sorta (on heavy tanks fine as is/really good).. Basically heavy tanks are too good in a full down tier (which are extremely rare) and pretty useless in a full up tier, since everything can pen them in most of those instances.
@commisaryarreck3974
19 күн бұрын
@@jambothejoyful2966 Asshat that got a single spotting assist and an easy cap immediately gets to use a fighter with 2 2000lb bombs or 3 1000lb bombs I'm heavily biased since i still have PTSD from the old RP-3 era (remember, when a the SPLASH could kill tigers and panthers. People could spawn a plane capable of killing the entire team twice over and immediately j out for a new plane with the same armament. For the low low cost of, capping a single point...)
@colestock9980
7 күн бұрын
I blazed right through a t-95’s front plate with heatfs and i genuinely thought it was cheating… no aiming for weakspots, just boom, driver commander, boom, loader gunner dead. I dont even like playing my tigers anymore because they’re just slow with no gain because everything can just negate its one old benefit: the sheer amount of steel pointed at the enemy. I like 3.7-4.7 these days as they have my tanks, the shermans, the panzer 4’s and the T-34s. The KV’s actually work at that BR because combat relies on slinging a steel round at a steel target taking into account the round’s pen, the target’s armour, the angle of the target, the range of the target and so on, so it actually feels rewarding to see “target destroyed” rather than expected at higher BR’s because the overpowered rounds
@reib00n
16 күн бұрын
You are just right! Let's hope Gaijin sticks to their own commment here and brings some of the points you mentioned!
@astrayp01
20 күн бұрын
When BR5.7 floods with HEAT vehicles, the BR system already broken.
@Iden_in_the_Rain
16 күн бұрын
Average heavy tank user when HEAT and HEAT-FS rounds existed during WWII:
@pastadarasta8131
14 күн бұрын
Oh cry, counters exist to your shitty heavy tanks. Cope with it
@cryptobox128
20 күн бұрын
+1 for WW2 mode - they can make it an opt-in checkbox, like they're doing for night battles now.
@Mucky_Muck
18 күн бұрын
You'd get 1 in gazillion ww2 battles then, like we get night battles once every 34 million years
@TheSirston
4 күн бұрын
the game rubberbanding at 4:00 was a flash from the past, I've always thought a WW2 cap would be a good way to implement there idea of having all three parts of there game play together. patrol boats and tanks and WW2 aircraft in the same match is legit a dream I had.
@farangkhamen8617
18 күн бұрын
I totally approve your video and your intention! Well done! 👍
@Sadly_Stoic
20 күн бұрын
its funny because ive said this exact thing before, that WW2 shouldnt be facing cold war era vehicles etc. but the WT community as usual just tells me "skill issue" and "it isnt a real game get over it" when it breaks the immersion and diminishes the gameplay of the era
@deathringer1003
20 күн бұрын
Ive noticed plenty in the community get pretty toxic when you call out stuff like that, it's mostly the players who enjoy bullying low tire players with their modern tanks an planes so when people say ww2 an modern shouldn't mix it pisses them off
@XMysticHerox
20 күн бұрын
I mean as much as I agree that the BR system is terrible especially in it's current state. If you think something like the KT is underpowered that actually is a skill issue. I think seperating different "ages" or whatever would be more fun. But I have a feeling you said more than just that.
@Sadly_Stoic
20 күн бұрын
@@XMysticHerox where in any of my statement did i mention a KT, it clearly states WW2 vs Cold War
@XMysticHerox
20 күн бұрын
@@Sadly_Stoic Ah yes the KT. Famously not a WW2 tank.
@titan_tanker
20 күн бұрын
Name me one cold war era vehicles that a WW2 tank cannot destroy at the same BR, I'll wait
@Bulka_z.maslem
20 күн бұрын
I think all planes in ground RB should take off from airfield not air spawn. Not only it would nerf all planes it would make less revenge bombing(give more time to change position), and heavy bombers would take off much slower, have lower altitude making it easier for SPAA. I like playing SPAA but some have too long reload(13s or more) because of that I become useless and many of my teammates die from CAS. (I mean its ground battles not CAS bombing simulator)
@trevorwhitham6742
20 күн бұрын
And maybe only two planes up per team so half of your team isn’t in aircraft not helping you on the ground cap points
@jcgamer892
20 күн бұрын
@@trevorwhitham6742 4 would be best with a special exception given to Nuke bomber as a special 5th. 4 allows your team to mix and match with different fighters, attackers, & bombers while not limiting your team.
@martinmethod427
20 күн бұрын
Isn't that exception made for planes like the PBY-5 Catalina and other hydroplanes that physically doesn't have landing gear for ground? PBY-5A rectified that, but still.
@bokoblinlogic1619
19 күн бұрын
At top tier this would make planes worse because they already get spawncamped by pantsir without doing anything, this would make that happen way more often
@rosshughes7977
18 күн бұрын
Best way to balance tech tree would be to use historical years of service and fine tune the balancing with higher sp depending on how new the tank is compared to the year your fighting in
@chronicmaster7689
15 күн бұрын
I wholeheartedly yearn for this to be a reality, but it just breaks me knowing it’ll never happen
@OliveClover5855
20 күн бұрын
We missed you phly. And I agree with this, I miss when it was is-2 vs tiger 2
@Kaus5221
20 күн бұрын
It's so annoying to get killed in a prop plane with some radar from half a map away
@francoisvandermerwe5103
19 күн бұрын
That happens to exactly 2 prop planes, and only in full uptiers.
@Kaus5221
19 күн бұрын
@@francoisvandermerwe5103 And anyone who's just starting in RB is going to have their planes at least one BR below their tanks. Also let's be honest early jets are not that much better than late props.
@magscorch7706
19 күн бұрын
@@francoisvandermerwe5103 not even, the jets they see dont have good radar
@Kaus5221
19 күн бұрын
Also anything above a certain BR Mavericks and Sam's or not fun to play anyway. All it is is bridging the unfun gameplay into the fun gameplay. From push radar button push launch watch splash to actually having to f****** try.
@francoisvandermerwe5103
19 күн бұрын
@@magscorch7706 what does jets having radar have to do with anything in my comment?
@sftf557
6 күн бұрын
Historical accuracy is just more fun man, I totally agree with you
@abwehr509
6 күн бұрын
Problem is gaijin never fixes anything when they get feedback they ignore it until it blows up on them then they do good enough to silence us. It never fixes shite
@vypergaming117
20 күн бұрын
"Gandor calls for aid..." *Horn intensifies*
@davemiii
18 күн бұрын
Totally agree. I am so happy playing my quirky
@XMysticHerox
20 күн бұрын
As someone who works with AI. Warthunder balance is just a failure. It would only work under the assumption that their dataset (eg the winrates of different vehicles) is not biased. But it very obviously is. New players are going into certain factions and grinding certain vehicles. More experienced players will have already played those factions and vehicles extensively on average and are more likely to try others. You can't just throw AI at something like that and expect it to lead to a good result. The AI is not being trained to balance the game in a sensible fashion. it is being trained to create some absurd hodgepodge balance where vehicles popular among new players are completely OP and some factions just get shafted. There are ways to combat that. Maybe they even apply some of them. You could take player experience and overall winrate into account for instance. But whatever they are doing is clearly not enough. if they are even doing any of that which I am not confidant in. And really there is no reason to use AI here. Just have a human use their brain. Sure look at winrates. But also player feedback. Which faction it is in. And most important of all. What the vehicle *actually* is and what stats it has. I do think an entirely new mode that drops BR would be good. I always thought it was kinda uninspired. You could have different eras of vehicles that were around at a similar time. Rather than have everything on the battlefield be vaguely the same strength (but not actually) you could give "weaker" vehicles a much lower spawn point cost for instance. And boss vehicles seem like a good idea for those extremely powerful vehicles yeah.
@Mike-hy9wy
19 күн бұрын
I always thought an era based game vs a tier based system would be better. Time for companies to think out of the box
@vx3839
19 күн бұрын
agree,your ideas should be spread ❤
@Nick-tm2sw
19 күн бұрын
First off, I hate the term AI. What is called "AI" these days is mostly just machine learning, not real AI. Second, is there any proof that they are actually using machine learning of any sort to balance the vehicles? I was assuming they just had some automated spreadsheets that did some simple calculations based on game data. Regardless of these previous thoughts you are correct. Garbage in, garbage out.
@alexbarrett3529
20 күн бұрын
Calling in boss tanks above the top tier honestly sounds so cool! The enemy team knows that you have a very powerful vehicle, and it's on them to adapt and react with the vehicles and strategies needed to defeat a tank with stronger armor and firepower than them. But a boss tank wouldn't be so far above the rest as to be unkillable. Plus, those "clash of the titans" moments when two boss tanks run into each other would be awesome.
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
STOP GETTING MY EXCITED
@fidel-3470
20 күн бұрын
I feel like this is what I deal with in my Sherman Jumbo 75mm and I see Tiger II H, there's like nothing, absolutely nothing, I can do to the enemy unless I'm at point blank range and shooting it from the rear. Even then, you can't reliably shoot the ammo. The American 75mm is just broken above 6.0. Though it could be a fun mechanic, because sometimes being mostly helpless and having to run away is the gameplay - like back when the B2 BIS would terrorize low tier and nothing would pen it, that was the "boss battle". It was glorious fighting against it, you'd just have to keep immobilizing it until someone with a heavy cannon or bomb showed up.
@oofdotcom
20 күн бұрын
yea gives me BF1 vibes "the enemy has been reinforced with a dreadnought"
@jerrydickerson1111
20 күн бұрын
It’s not going to work people payed a lot of good money for tanks like T29,T14 E100 and so on it’s been said that the top premium is where the money is made but iv got more mid tier premiums then high I’ll buy 1 high tier ever few months then sprinkle in a few low tier’s here and their
@Shatterfish
19 күн бұрын
Yea it sounds cool but I just don’t think it’ll work without a total overhaul of how the game progresses. The grind for modules really starts to ramp up at that BR so locking vehicles behind huge SP requirements will only exacerbate stock and near stock syndrome. Also doesn’t address how premium vehicles would work in that, because honestly it would be total bullshit to pay for a vehicle and then not be able to use it. If they don’t make premium tanks “boss” tanks then it’s literally just pay to avoid spawn costs for powerful “top” tier vehicles. I like the other aspects of these potential changes, but I don’t think the “boss tanks” can work with the game how it is currently.
@doknezdoknez1678
14 күн бұрын
"IS-4M has entered the battlefield" Gets bombed imiedataly
@RickyOHD
16 күн бұрын
Dude this brought back so many memories lol remember when RP3’s would kill tanks without even hitting them!?? 😂
@cainthegreat3056
20 күн бұрын
Hear me out, doesn't general BR decompression make more sense than this? I'm thinking we can move the Max BR to like 15.0 or even higher and then just balance everything else in between. Especially for Jets and ground realistic around 7:0 or 8.0.
@PhlyDaily
20 күн бұрын
dude i know what you're saying. but I've lost so uch faith in the br system that this just needs to be a human balanced
@Masonjar94
20 күн бұрын
No because that could still intermingle
@randomdeath9207
20 күн бұрын
EXACTLY! spread out the herd a little bit. Widen the highway to allow more cars to go to the lanes they actually want
@cainthegreat3056
20 күн бұрын
@@PhlyDaily I think one of the problems with moving those Vietnam and cold war-era tanks up to a higher battle rating is the inconsistency of heat rounds. For example, the m56 scorpion can definitely be frustrating to play against in a heavy tank because of how easily it can use its heat round to penetrate your armor, but it sucks to use the m56 scorpions heat because of how unreliable it is. Yes, occasionally you will get those one shot ammo hits, but most of the time you just hit their driver and Gunner and they kill you with their Commander MG. I think if they buff The post penetration damage of sabot and heat, and then move tanks with those rounds up to a higher battle rating, the system will fix itself. Those tanks will be fun to play again because the round is actually reliable, and heavy tanks are fun to play again because they don't have to face sabot and heat anymore.
@notcatana2442
20 күн бұрын
@@PhlyDailyyou mean like depending on their skill, each user gets a br?
@benmarki
19 күн бұрын
Like the ideas ! It would bring me back to War Thunder for real. I uninstalled for a year and a half now but kind off miss playing... Thanks Phly
@yigitpar6492
16 күн бұрын
Can't agree more. And I am also glad Warthunder seen it, hope they are sincere with this message and this request won't get bypassed by upper management
@archer1681
20 күн бұрын
Decompression.
@CertifiedWarCriminal...
20 күн бұрын
decompression? what is that comrade, no such thing as that in warthunder
@Knispel_Kurt
20 күн бұрын
No matter how much you decompress there will be pt76 and concept 3 for your armor
@wallachia4797
20 күн бұрын
@@Knispel_Kurtthe PT76 is a subpar vehicle.
@nattly6340
20 күн бұрын
@@wallachia4797 its a great tank, but it is where it belongs
@archer1681
19 күн бұрын
There will always be fast vehicles or glass cannons to kill armor but I always liked the BR system I'm just not sure 1.0 up and down is the right way anymore while also having everything so compressed and saturated in some places. Playing 6.7 and getting put at 7.7 is a death sentence, same with 5.7 and facing a whole team of Tiger 2's so on and so on till about 8.7 where most vehicles have APFSDS or HEAT and nothing but skill and knowledge matter anymore. Everyone has been saying similar for years now, in the end it comes down to Queue time and Money like always. How do you fix it? In opinion pull a slight Enlisted and add more bots to GRB, still have even players so 8v8 but add 2 bots to each side.
@Daggz63
19 күн бұрын
Hey Phly welcome back :) I've been playing WT since 2014 and it has helped me during some tough times, the ability to forget life's garbage and enjoy some time out playing was a relief. However, in the last three (3) years it has not been enjoyable at all with the focus on the post WWII vehicles, I now only play once a week (if that), I only play WWII vehicles and being donked from the other side of the map by the 'future' is incredibly frustrating, leading to a lack of desire to play. I would love to see a WWII only mode or some kind of tech restriction, I even contacted Gajin about it and was told, "there are WWII only events". :( I would love to have the fun I once had, now it feels like work (and that's at once a week), let those who like the modern vehicles have their fun with those who also like them, or perhaps it wouldn't be as much fun for them if they didn't have the WWII players to seal club on. I have unlocked the majority of modern vehicles and have never used them because I am not interested, and I never will be, for me it is about emersion and that has been sorely lacking in the last few years, a prominent content creator who releases regular content believes emersion is not a valid reason for wanting a WWII only mode, emersion is the only reason I play, and that has been shot to shit. I love your ideas, and I hope Gajin has the foresight to listen, because after all these years playing I am considering quitting, less stress for me and less money for Gajin. It was fun once, it'd be nice for it to be fun again. Again welcome back Phly :)
@AslanKafasiTR
18 күн бұрын
I agree with what you said, maybe it is not in the form of a boss tank, but I think it would be better if all the BRs from 0 to the end were reworked one by one and that necessary gap was added in between.
@hellfox7777
7 күн бұрын
to be honest I stoped playing WarThunder just because I didn't want to grind to the top levels of planes and tanks. I wanted to play just WW2 era technology.. so I lost the interest of playing this game some years ago.. And I loved playing top tier WW2 planes..
@Roeper437
20 күн бұрын
Yes! Like JagdTiger when top tier just feels like final boss but when slightly uptiered... damn butter
@emilzamasz4632
16 күн бұрын
The only problem i see is that some players would grind for tanks like the is-4 to have fun and if they are not as skilled as veteran players they would not get a chance to use the tank due to it costing too much sp to spawn which would lead to some players not wanting to grind certain tech-trees.
@travisbout9494
11 күн бұрын
I remember the first time i played the tiger 1 and maus were the biggest tanks in the game, it was fun trying to kill a maus knowing most your team would have yo work togethee to make it happen (enemies would be popping smoke and helping repair tracks and barrels know it was their best chance at winning)
Пікірлер: 4,3 М.