and the Mickelson-Morley experiment conclusively demonstrated the Luminiferous Aether does not exist. Light can propagate in vacuum because it's an electromagnetic waveform consisting of photons, not a compression wave the way sound is.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
It did not! See the full video for details!
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@Inductica It did!! Your video proves it too!
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@Inductica I discovered your problem!!!! You don't understand wave interference!!! Let me teach you about standing waves and wave mechanics and we can fix this issue you have!
@MrZenmancer
Ай бұрын
You should read a textbook from this century.
@tommypritchard9064
Ай бұрын
I was to understand that light acted as a wave and a partical. Like photons and shit, no?
@sapolsaikrasun2270
Ай бұрын
You don't perceive light through compression and expansion. You perceive them through absorbing and reflecting the wave.
@UFO314159
Ай бұрын
This makes a good "teaser" video for those who haven't yet seen the complete presentation.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
Exactly. I’m finally learning marketing.
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
It doesn't count as a teaser when it is the whole video. There is nothing left of the core of the video to see. That was the climate of the video, and it doesn't go further than that. The rest of the video is just the same bad question over and over.
@joevignolor4u949
Ай бұрын
Unlike sound light doesn't require any medium to travel through. Light has a substance in an of itself so it can propagate through a vacuum.
@user-kk2pq9cb7u
Ай бұрын
Light is the propagation of energy via vibrations of Electric and Magnetic properties of a photon.
@George_Shonia
Ай бұрын
photons, photons are traveling with speed of light, because they're light
@calamitist
Ай бұрын
Light is not a wave, protons are basically quantum locked, they act as wave and particle depending on them being observed, thus, quantum locked
@thedamnyankee1
Ай бұрын
Fancy marketing. Zero Research.
@oligould8575
Ай бұрын
Instead of explaining why he’s wrong, I’m just going to be happy with the knowledge that Einstein is right 😂
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
Einstein *was* right. He thought there was an ether. Look it up.
@oligould8575
Ай бұрын
Well this guy is no Einstein 😂
@shadow0421
Ай бұрын
Light is a particle a photon that sometimes acts like a wave light is not a wave
@scrumbles
Ай бұрын
Hey, i got the recipe for the philosophers stone if you want to buy it. You MUST be aware the light is both a wave and a particle. Seriously?!😂
@BaseplateSRB
Ай бұрын
Bro missed the 21st century update
@mikel4879
Ай бұрын
Correct.
@jaydenwilson9522
Ай бұрын
Do waves wobble or do wobbles wave? Wobble-Bubble Duality > Wave-Particle Duality
@smilertoo
Ай бұрын
Isn't light photons that are only visible when they hit something?
@13Nader7
Ай бұрын
That's an 👁️ opening
@darkfoxxbunyip
Ай бұрын
LOL there apparently exists something stupider than flat earthers, even they agree the idea of 'aether' is outdated and silly 😂
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@darkfoxxbunyip Well to be fair, if the OP stopped to think for a second, he too would have to be a flat earther. He needs an aether which is stationary, and he needs a place in the universe that experiences absolute time and space, where everything else is relative to. This absolutely frame of reference obvious would be home on earth. Therefore earth cannot be an accelerating frame. So he must believe in the flat earth.
@vertigoz
Ай бұрын
Is sound light?
@mrslave41
Ай бұрын
the ether is just virtual particles (the quantum foam)
@poet.in.flight
Ай бұрын
Just virtual particles?!
@mrslave41
Ай бұрын
@@poet.in.flight maybe?!
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
I address this kind of response in the full video.
@RPG_Guy-fx8ns
Ай бұрын
@@poet.in.flight Always has been
@13blackandblue13
Ай бұрын
Ether (aether)
@KOSMIKFEADRECORDS
Ай бұрын
no shit. But crucial idea. Great vid.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
Haha. Thanks?
@ExistenceUniversity
2 ай бұрын
Light is not a "wave." But light does interfere with itself. Light is also not a "particle." But light does come in lumps. Your rationalism of the words is the problem. Imagine a being that has the properties of a mouse. But it also has the properties of a bird. Is it a mouse-bird? How can it be both a bird and a mouse? Impossible! Well its call a bat. Just because something has similar properties does not mean they are a new contradictory thing.
@Inductica
2 ай бұрын
Can you explain in more detail how this constitutes rationalism?
@ExistenceUniversity
2 ай бұрын
@Inductica You hear the word "wave" and "particle," and you think, "How can a wave also be a particle?" You are assuming that because a photon acts LIKE a wave that it IS a wave. Then you use the words NOT the experiments to argue that the physicists are wrong because the dictionary definition of a wave cannot also be a photon. That is rationalism. You are using the words as the concrete and ignoring experimental results because the words are wrong, according to your limited definitions.
@Inductica
2 ай бұрын
@@ExistenceUniversity Clearly these phenomena somehow have the properties of both particles and waves. What I talk about here should be confined only to the wave aspect. The wave aspect of these phenomena must be a wave of something.
@ExistenceUniversity
2 ай бұрын
@Inductica It is a "wave" of the electromagnetic field. The photon is itself the electromagnetic field oscillating as a physical amount of energy that exists independently.
@mr.bitches6263
2 ай бұрын
Light is a star's stream of piss. End of discussion.
Пікірлер: 76