Igor: did you see the empty space on that ship? Ivan: yes. Igor: make sure I don't see it again.
@sharpstriker1559
2 жыл бұрын
US during WW2
@defus3080
2 жыл бұрын
1:47 this ship has recently been promoted to submarine
@stephencarlos9328
2 жыл бұрын
Imao.
@stephencarlos9328
2 жыл бұрын
Imao.
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
@@giacomogiacomo1194 Don't have kids
@ercapitanoderoma7411
2 жыл бұрын
No there are 3 of Moskova class
@specialman6004
2 жыл бұрын
ah yes, everybody in comment section are experts I see.
@arthas640
2 жыл бұрын
Most of the comments are memes and jokes though
@sdservin
2 жыл бұрын
As usual
@robandcheryls
2 жыл бұрын
Well, as a matter of a fact I…. 😂
@idk-oj5do
2 жыл бұрын
Ikr experts at being goofy
@bradolfpittler2875
2 жыл бұрын
The Moskva was able to destroy TWO Neptune missiles.
@tsmatthx2
2 жыл бұрын
And then ukraine sank it's best ship
@dragannaric7652
Жыл бұрын
you believe too much in the media and the internet and in what they market, and you are not smart enough to investigate exactly what happened to the cruiser, but be sure that the Ukrainians did not sink it, but that incident was very convenient for them to attribute it to themselves as their success, and of course you from the US you present it as the incompetence of the Russian army, but you yourself know that Russia can never lose a war, the sooner you understand it, the sooner it will be better for all of us
@jayvhoncalma3458
Жыл бұрын
@@tsmatthx2 it's aa wasn't able to work due to being cannibalized for parts
@QuicksilverVM
4 ай бұрын
@@tsmatthx2 best ship ^^ is what they tell you ? look up how old it was^^ btw did you see any footage ukraine sunk it? coz i did see a lil footage of how they tryed to pull it back to harbour and it took almost 24 hours to sink and everyone besides 7 dudes i think was evacuated . this 7 dudes fucked around with the old torpedos and sunk the ship. shit happens
@warszawa7157
2 жыл бұрын
Oh look the ill fated Moscova now a submarine
@Evilmidnightbomber2870
2 жыл бұрын
I always figured the Russian’s military doctrine assumed warships would probably get only one chance to use their weapons in an all out naval battle, so put them all up on deck where they could be fired immediately, and if the ship survives, great, rearm and send back out. Well, even if that's not the reason, it does make the ships look more intimidating.
@mayureshrasam1708
2 жыл бұрын
Russian be like " I paid for full deck I will use the full Deck"
@generalsirc2615
2 жыл бұрын
I could see a real issue with putting too many weapons on a ship, one hit could start a chain reaction destroying the entire ship.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
That sounds about right...
@theduke1654
2 жыл бұрын
Same goes for an aircraft carrier . If a Russian hypersonic missile hits the deck of the carrier its pretty much useless .Not to mention the fact that the russian hypersonic missiles are un-interceptable
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 • US carriers now have defenses to deal with incoming hypersonic missile threats Duke...
@153_21
2 жыл бұрын
Aged well
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 Russia isn't the only country with hypersonic missiles
@kleeblattchen38
2 жыл бұрын
Of course the effectiveness of a warship depends on more than just the amount of armament but the thing that really startles me is the lacking weaponry on the littoral combat ships... they were designed to replace the perry class frigates and tasked with defending the coastlines but to outsiders it almost seems like they don't have any offensive capabilities... since the naval strike missile etc. were only later additions, the naval gun and 1 single searam (or cwis) were technically all they had as armament... like, what kind of "warship" is that... there are mine sweepers with the same kind of armament...
@ashcarrier6606
2 жыл бұрын
They sound like the most powerful U.S. Coast Guard frigates ever made.
@surinderjitsingh8954
2 жыл бұрын
Maintenance would always remain an important issue
@ronemtae3468
2 жыл бұрын
Russian reliability is virtually half of almost every other country when it comes to weapons and defenses that’s why they carry twice as many because they’re not that effective
@tharblin
2 жыл бұрын
The difference between US and Russian equipment is that the US equipment works.
@mrP1N4ER
2 жыл бұрын
Lmao but true
@charlesburke2379
Жыл бұрын
Russian weapons were central to the US defeat in Vietnam. And they also brought Israel to the edge of defeat in the 1973 Mideast war. Mao used Russian weapons to defeat Chinese nationalists. US weapons are so incredibly expensive even the highest quality systems are rarely mass produced.
@MsNextgeneration12
2 жыл бұрын
After they break down and are being towed back to port they need to defend themselves and especially the tugboats.
@Jykobe491
2 жыл бұрын
Classic Americans underestimating their rivals
@theduke1654
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jykobe491yup. those muricans got wrecked by rice farmers and afghan herdsmen
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 So did the soviets
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jykobe491 Oh yeah like Moscow totally didn't sink
@j.m.youngquist419
2 жыл бұрын
They do make a beautiful looking ship.
@v12tommy
8 ай бұрын
Sticking all your weapons on one ship definitely makes that ship more of a formidable foe, but it is also putting all your eggs in 1 basket if something were to happen to that ship too. As Russia learned when the Moskva was promoted last year to submarine, third rate.
@Grogag684
2 жыл бұрын
So that it can easily sink....
@mekov1664
2 жыл бұрын
PLS make Russian subtitles, I'm from Russia and I love watching your videos.
@user-oy8nm2ri6y
2 жыл бұрын
Do russian support ukraine invasion ?
@lazypizzaship8911
2 жыл бұрын
From what I heard there are.protest in Russia for the invasion but whenever I try to click the article the site shuts down the page.
@user-oy8nm2ri6y
2 жыл бұрын
@@lazypizzaship8911 Protests mean nothing, even american protested Against USA invasion. Russia need revolution to decapitate Putin decision
@barbaragordon9079
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-oy8nm2ri6y did the US govn stop the war when there were protest about the war in Vietnam and Iraq? (edit: grammar)
@RasPutintheGreat
2 жыл бұрын
@@user-oy8nm2ri6y in your dreams mate.
@georgekalafatis7286
2 жыл бұрын
They're nice and heavy so when they hit the bottom they can hear them all the way back home
@SergeantEagle
2 жыл бұрын
everyone gangsta till russia makes the yamato but its modern
@RaptorRotorHead
2 жыл бұрын
Because their equipment routinely fails to work so they got to put a whole bunch extra on it to try to make it work
@duanepigden1337
2 жыл бұрын
Check out USA failure rate.
@RaptorRotorHead
2 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 USA test weapons first before going to war with them that's the difference that's the failure rate you're talkin about during test dose don't end up on the ship during a war
@duanepigden1337
2 жыл бұрын
@@RaptorRotorHead -- the Patriot missile system missed every intercept during the first gulf war for instance.
@thickboi4304
2 жыл бұрын
@@RaptorRotorHead ye ur really are an i d iot If u think Russian doesn’t test its weapons during development
@RaptorRotorHead
2 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 that's not apples to apples and oranges the oranges a patriot missile is a bullet trying to hit another bullet a Russian cruise missile is launched it from a boat and landing in the apartment building that's the difference now if you want to talk about our cruise missiles against Russian cruise missiles our cruise missiles don't land in apartment buildings
@andycheek766
2 жыл бұрын
It's two different philosophies about military equipment one is durable, cheap, easy to
@decentish8546
2 жыл бұрын
Why? So the ammunition can denote and destroy the ship when Ukrainian missiles hit them.
@Falcodevienna
2 жыл бұрын
How many do they have? Oh, one. OK.
@jjuanmarin
2 жыл бұрын
and is for defense not to attack and now you guys question why russia invaded ukraine the russians were being encircledyou always make fun of russian arms not working of not having money their budget is very low compared to the west the whole russian economy lower than the state of texas yet nato got closer and closer to the poor failed country of russia how come now the innocent people of ukraine are paying the price they believed the lies of the leaders of the west
@Falcodevienna
2 жыл бұрын
@@jjuanmarin Fun fact: Every country is encircled. These are your neighbors. If you behave like an a-hole, they are not your friends. Nobody believes Putin, and soon, nobody will like Russia anymore.
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
@@Falcodevienna encircled by enemy him missing a detail and you picking it out doesn’t make you right. And that’s bullshit, tons of people like Putin, not that I agree with them
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
@@Falcodevienna And uhm, you do realize that if you’re right, Russia has all the reason it needs to go to war with it’s enemies. It’s gonna die anyway, why go alone?
@Falcodevienna
2 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 Re to your statements: Approval rates for Putin are that low that people dare open protest in the cities of Russia. And yeah, if you are a maniac, you may want to „take people with you“. But I guess between him and this suicide mission, there are many brave Russian soldiers that would intervene.
@garethhahahah2037
2 жыл бұрын
Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US? Giving the amount of missile landing in Ukraine and not exploding, I think that might be the reason why.
@henrytorres6523
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe because it's a piece of junk..
@duanepigden1337
2 жыл бұрын
What is your source of info?
@titanproductions3628
2 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 his Source came from his ass and CNN propaganda 😂
@RunPJs
2 жыл бұрын
Whilst I don't like Russia....there technology is as good and sometimes better than anyone elses. Go look up some I'd their greatest kit
@TooTallDean
2 жыл бұрын
gareth hahahah Are you maybe mistaking the empty canister from a cluster munitions rocket for a failed missle ?
@direpetto
2 жыл бұрын
4.38 «fortunately»❓
@davidguy9197
2 жыл бұрын
belle analyse et bonne explication des besoin et attentes ayant présidés à la conception de ces navires
@AlejandroGarcia-fy8qr
2 жыл бұрын
What a ship wow awesome
@ThatCarGuy
2 жыл бұрын
To big and slow. It would need it's own strike group. Russia is a poor nation and can't afford many ships hence needing to fill the ships they have to the top with weapons.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
This vid isn't 100% accurate...
@ThatCarGuy
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 No video is, but it doesnt change the fact this ship is 252 meters long/ 827 feet, and turns so slow, and is just a slow ship overall do to it's size. Nothing is perfect, everything has it's pros and cons, and this ship is just weighted down with a lot of weaponry.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@ThatCarGuy • True...
@panzerkampfwagenviiimaus3976
2 жыл бұрын
Heavier but not superior
@fredblogs
2 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧 The more weapon’s they carry allows them to sink faster.
@musangtvetcetera7779
2 жыл бұрын
Vulnerable to blast Russian ship
@readynow12345
2 жыл бұрын
Just like the Yamamoto was, yet it was sunk so fast, aircraft carriers rule period.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
US has ships targeted for invasion (air carriers). Russia has ships targeted for defense (rocket warships).
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Oh boy..!
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 what "oboy". Missile warship can destroy radar defenses, selective large targets, but it can't establish dominance over a territory over prolonged time until main forces arrive.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH • First you said "Russia has ships targeted for defense: rocket warships" now you're saying "it can't establish dominance over territories for prolonged periods until main forces arrives" just get to the point...
@abrahamdozer6273
2 жыл бұрын
"Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US" You mean "apparently " more heavily armed. The Kirov Class Is a great, big obsolete piece of Cold War theatre. Those massive, useless missiles up there on the desk weathering away look HUGE, like they've unzipped their fly and are swinging their appendage around for all to see. FEARSOME! ... and so 1975. An American Ardleigh destroyer outguns this sea-borne dinosaur but hey ... you can't see the missiles so it's less manly.
@apsgeneralstudies5673
2 жыл бұрын
How do u think , Ur lame arleigh burke can outgun a kirov plz explain .
@Kane-ib5sn
2 жыл бұрын
different design philosophy. American warships travel a greater distance, require space to be used for stores, anti-air, and anti-sub, with anti-surface (ship to ship) being the least important aspect. speed and endurance being prime considerations. Russian warships expect to have less air-cover (Russia having few allies - being authoritarian in nature) - but possessing superior, long-range anti-aircraft missiles. however, American warships can shoot more anti-air-missiles as a result of reduced range-of-missiles. Russian warships having par anti-sub protection.
@nquggg6971
2 жыл бұрын
that's is . The US is stationed all around the world , Russia and China are in their own bubble and bc of that fact , they need to worry about themselves and bordering allies . So frankly said , US is on the attack side and vice versa
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
@@nquggg6971 us are invaders and have puppet allies, russian are defensive.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
why do you need to travel far, authoritarian do that. They install their will on surroundings, make colonies.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Oh boy___here you go again..!
@totenkult0
Жыл бұрын
A 130mm gun isn't massive...
@drbendover7467
2 жыл бұрын
No, they are not, for each equivalent size, Russian ships have a lot fewer missiles:)
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
….why you’re counting meer missiles number? It’s like saying a pubg squad is more heavily armed than a tank. A tank has 3 guns, the squad has 12 and use 4 at a time
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
The chinese is using this logic to say they have a bigger fleet than the US
@varunghosh2384
Жыл бұрын
U gave more reasons why the us doesn't keep more weapons than the Russians
@davedisinger1245
Ай бұрын
Repairments???
@mausypanzer5142
2 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine if that thing join the Carrier Strike force.
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
Too late it sunk
@PETE4955
Жыл бұрын
Primary due to Russian Goverment paranoia, which makes it ineffective as a military machine.
@fepasarussa8642
2 жыл бұрын
I can tell, sending a cruiser made totally to atack carriers at open sea to do the job a few frigates could do is a dumb idea
@j.m.youngquist419
2 жыл бұрын
They have less so they need more on what they have.
@surinderjitsingh8954
2 жыл бұрын
I guess they are good at packing ammo
@Cameraman148
2 жыл бұрын
Simple we have more ships....
@mrliberty8468
2 жыл бұрын
Why? Because it weapons only work half of the time.
@RadicalCluster
Жыл бұрын
me when building ships in a game:
@specs_u
2 жыл бұрын
Big mistake, making more heavily armored ships makes it so you cant make a lot of them. You need a lot of resources. 2 not so heavily armored ships are better than 1 heavily armored ship.
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec
2 жыл бұрын
i disagree
@ragey666
2 жыл бұрын
Lmao you need to go and have a look at some of the WW2 battles at sea.
@TheAknativeboy
2 жыл бұрын
@@ragey666 midway and guatecanal were actually insane battles
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec
2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAknativeboy guadalcanal was mostly land battle, there were few naval battles mostly destroyers. Midway was carrier battle
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
Wrong, because they don’t have enough resource for more ships, they stack more onto fewer ships to fit their needs
@davidswink6653
2 жыл бұрын
Comparing one outdated warship limited to the black sea to a integrated fleet of frigates ans destroyers Oh and death from aircraft carriers Aircraft carrier on board weapons are for crap that can get past the defensive shield around it
@DayneJAH333
2 жыл бұрын
America like to work hard not easy. 5 Sherman tank vs. 1 Tiger tank
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Not no more...
@DayneJAH333
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 Russian tanks have more armor Guns have longer range More fire power.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@DayneJAH333 • That's your opinion...
@coolsquad7428
2 жыл бұрын
Usa supposed to get the lazer guns as of 2021 and 2022
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
and light swords.
@zzlhaiqal
2 жыл бұрын
i think i heard that caption before...but where huh??
@mathewferstl7042
2 жыл бұрын
wonder where from...
@RasPutintheGreat
2 жыл бұрын
Here, same
@jefftukangjeff
Жыл бұрын
slava class = Moskva. needs only 2 Neptuns to sink it.... think about it !
@davidswink6653
2 жыл бұрын
This totally insane analysis ...you miss the gazillion frigates in multiple configurations and destroyers Really did you do any research before making this
@ronemtae3468
2 жыл бұрын
Do USA is planning on launching 200 submarines over the next 36 months more reliable more difficult to find far more difficult to defend against and of course proven to be much more effective
@charlesburke2379
Жыл бұрын
Your correct. However, the US fleet retires a ship for each new ship produced. Making it near impossible to create a larger US fleet.
@wilomica
2 жыл бұрын
When many of your weapons won't work like they're Hammer tech from Iron Man, you compensate by making a ton of them & hope some go bang when you try to fight?
@Villain1874
2 жыл бұрын
Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US - it’s so they make a bigger bang when they are hit and sunk by Nato 🇺🇦🇬🇧
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
The NATO that promised UKR they’ll let it join even though they never will, even when they could have done that to prevent the war
@michaelwong4303
Жыл бұрын
The 🇺🇸 destroyers have 96 VLS, cruisers 112 VLS. All in a ship of. 9000`to 10000 tons. Ton for ton wise 🇺🇸 ships have 1 VLS to every 100 tons. Do 🇷🇺 war ships have the same ratio?
@mamba4live564
2 жыл бұрын
and today is gone no more 👍🏾
@laurynasragickas1643
2 жыл бұрын
Russian warship went to... :)
@Maddythebaddy
2 жыл бұрын
us navy would destroy that ship in seconds
@Falcodevienna
2 жыл бұрын
Wait and it will sink by itself like the Kursk.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Are you sure? I think you better fax check that...
@soldierboy8326
2 жыл бұрын
Somalian fleet is the strongest
@shanebraaten9553
2 жыл бұрын
Unless they're going up against Tom Hanks... Lmao 🤣
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Or Chuck Norris...
@andycheek766
2 жыл бұрын
Manufacturer, doesn't require a lot of sophisticated maintenance support. This is how they beat the Germans. Well we on the other hand are relying on our technology and heavily engineered equipment that requires continuous maintenance and upkeep and we'll all find out on the battlefield one day I'm afraid which philosophy works. I suspect that it's dependent on the duration of the conflict
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
I dislike the US more than Russia, but you’re fine bro, the US Navy is doing fine :))))
@darthsidious6167
2 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 No it isn't, the navy is getting rid of more ships than its building. Leaving the US vulnerable if China ever attacks.
@guillermorojas5424
Жыл бұрын
No su eres estadounidense, debes saber que los Sovieticos fueron los que derrotaron a la Alemania Nazi, enterate de la verdadera historia
@esecallum
2 жыл бұрын
because 70% failure rate
@legobuildingsrewiew7538
2 жыл бұрын
Russian propaganda channel back at it again.
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec
2 жыл бұрын
no offence but i perfer to see a ship with guns then one whit a pea shhoter, like in us and european navies.
@jjuanmarin
2 жыл бұрын
i agree
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec
2 жыл бұрын
@@jjuanmarin and me thinking I was the only one
@trevorle7382
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly what is the peashooter?? The missiles?
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec
2 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 yes the missiles, but in this case I was referring to the very small guns on the ships,
@PedroSanchez300
2 жыл бұрын
Before a Russian ship launches a torpedo boat or a missile, it is already at the bottom of the ocean.
@theduke1654
2 жыл бұрын
typical american ,underestimating a rival
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 • Russia already lost, guess Putin underestimated Ukraine...
@QuicksilverVM
4 ай бұрын
better have it and not need it , its what the meris usualy say^^
@unknownsourceofficial6215
2 жыл бұрын
Why rassian warships heavy compered us warsgip Becouse rassain Warships Are very advanced armerod technolgies
@mohit4387
2 жыл бұрын
D O C T R I N E TO BE ACCURATE !
@qwill8254
2 жыл бұрын
It's economic, Russi wants more bang for its bucks , in America cooperation have taken over so more vessel means more profitable.
@celsorvl9086
2 жыл бұрын
Glory to the Russian people!!!Long live President PUTIN!!!🐻🐻❄🐻
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Jabrone...
@uniquefriendship6777
2 жыл бұрын
Good luck Russia 🔝🔝🔝
@MrDrawBricks
2 жыл бұрын
I support Russia
@MrDrawBricks
2 жыл бұрын
Long live rusia
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Ahh you marionettes... ;-)
@Nekminute
2 жыл бұрын
Russia is just better at everything it does
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
Nope...
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 not good at invading, not good at misinformation, not good at making puppets.
@franktank4360
2 жыл бұрын
@@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH • Putin's your liege and you're his marionette and he made the biggest mistake, can you figure that out or guess what it is? 1nce you've figured that out___let me know...
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 Slogan, slogan, slogan as Johnson said "Russia blablabla" during hard shelling of east ukraine. Russia no more blablabla.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH
2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 reference to "Russia blablabla" - Boris Johnson Press conference with NATO, on Pupia News channel, timecode 11:19
@ragey666
2 жыл бұрын
here we go begging for views
@yrsrig7607
2 жыл бұрын
.
@li7146
2 жыл бұрын
Sub indo please
@faqihaqil9044
2 жыл бұрын
kenapa?? nggak faham bahasa inggeris ya??😂😂.. nggak hairan lah kenapa begitu byk hoax dan cerita bohong di Indon😁😁
@li7146
2 жыл бұрын
@@faqihaqil9044 makanya gw minta sub lol
@ryansarwidyanto3881
2 жыл бұрын
@@li7146 Install duolingo bang klo mo belajar bahasa inggris dgn cepat dan murah (btw saya bukan sales nya duolingo yak wkwkwkwk)
Пікірлер: 250