And u have it right more than most, which is the funny part. And lord, stop saying arising and all the orher non dual crowd pablum. This shit doesn't need a certain language. Just blatant truth.
@Rich-xq8df
21 күн бұрын
Inner Silence/stillness is what's left. Stop bullshitting peoole. That is impossible to have 24/7, even a little bit of it. Most people never taste it. Maybe on death bed. Stop having children. Thats the answer. Stop the nonsense!
@tutorialchief
3 ай бұрын
thats what about biblical "not my will, your will" loosing the ego will from wrong self identification, god is spirit, everything else is objects, not worshipping them is commanded/said. christianity practiced as the bible really teaches it, is the hardest but also most effective way to "enlightenment", it rips you fully off from everything the wrong "I" wants
@TheTruthKiwi
4 ай бұрын
What a load of bollocks.
@shawnosborn8887
7 ай бұрын
Much of this cannot be known. Nothing is left.
@spiritwarriorstudios
7 ай бұрын
AHA!
@Papasix
9 ай бұрын
Vedanta Advaita
@jjharvathh
9 ай бұрын
around 8:30 where is says "that is not symbolic it is literal, you had a face before your parents were born"....that is where he goes off the deep end, diving into nonsense.
@newcruiser
9 ай бұрын
Some religions say "I" is an illussion. Therefore there is no "I amness" or whatever. If you disolve the I or "ego" (not in the psychological sense) what is left?. Obviously not "you". That is when "you" o what is left "melt" with the ONE and become ONE. "I" is just a system to function in this world. IMHO.
@yunhendricks860
9 ай бұрын
This is beyond…amazing!
@rbizzle18
10 ай бұрын
'YOU' are nothing. hopefully, this is the best news anyone will ever hear.
@Patvin007
10 ай бұрын
I am beyond I am kzitem.info/news/bejne/yJ2gt2p-jJqSa20si=E0kwwF2fitvh9Thr
@danielboomers
10 ай бұрын
there is no one doing anything ...
@anadisattvasudeva6315
10 ай бұрын
how can he during the 30 years talking the same things)))) and making some topic videos )))) funny!!!
@mick6812
10 ай бұрын
Jidda Krishnamurti the only one who spoke the truth
@markrothery8719
10 ай бұрын
I have never heard this understanding portrayed in such a simple and beautiful way. A pure pleasure to listen to. Thank you
@DavidKolbSantosh
10 ай бұрын
Am-ness is an object
@georgesonm1774
10 ай бұрын
Ok.. but what does it matter except provide a 'place of respite' from the worldly self to rest in once in a while.. but what other practical applications does this recognition have? I see none. There will still be the need to 'defend' the worldly self as that is where the necessity arose in the first place... Is there a change in perception that occurs with that recognition? Some new blueprint for action? I can see it making very little difference, I'm afraid
@rachelrrb1111
10 ай бұрын
I think the change is that you are slightly more detached from the material world and take everything a bit more relaxed if you are aware of this. It‘s probably like what is said about Zen: it‘s pretty much like before, but a few centimetres above the ground.
@DavidAKZ
9 ай бұрын
Practising not being attached to sense objects helps :-)
@kerrydubord5273
10 ай бұрын
The subject of the meaning in all objects is awareness, the self same in everything is pure consciousness..... One without a second, of this whole body and mind is bliss..... The Upanishads.....
@OMEGALFA.
10 ай бұрын
The problem with Wilber is that his endless and repetitive descriptions of reality are nothing other than more objectifying and objectification. In the end, Wilber is really only talking to himself out loud and has convinced a certain number of people into watching him do just that.
@tylerwatson8067
6 ай бұрын
but isn’t that what we’re all doing?
@jimrich4192
10 ай бұрын
For me, words & terms can mess things up lke: no me, no thing/everything, there's no "I", no you, not two...on & on with concepts, teachings, practices, etc.
@jimrich4192
10 ай бұрын
I've had 2 selves all along. The little , troubled one is usually here while the big, happy one only occasionally appears to save the little me when in trouble but doesn't stay here for very long. I want to know how to remain as the big happy me & eliminate or reduce the little, troubled me. Ken's pointer is PRECIOUS for me- big or little!
@jimrich4192
10 ай бұрын
At least as good as Tony Parsons & radical nonduality, Eckhart Tolle, Advaita, Ramana, Gangaji, Mooji, Sadona Method, L.U. & many others. Thanx Ken..❤
@jimrich4192
10 ай бұрын
Now i know why some mysterious force sent me here to sit in my car & miraculously find Ken's videos. God works in mysterious ways...THANK GOD! ❤
@TheTruthKiwi
4 ай бұрын
Nah, it's the KZitem algorithm mate. No magical entities from other dimensions needed or shown to be involved whatsoever. 😊
@PuppetMasterdaath144
10 ай бұрын
I experienced this for over 2 weeks after saying mantra i love you to my gf over and over and i didn't identify with form was fearless etc. but now the things he says are just words I cant get to that state lol
@jmmanuelseale823
10 ай бұрын
there is no such thing as cultivating spiritual i am ness
@jimrich4192
10 ай бұрын
In your OPINION!
@jmmanuel4030
10 ай бұрын
@@jimrich4192 opinions are useless. I have none..if u had asked y i said so..that might have been a better move..
@amanitamuscaria7500
10 ай бұрын
drg drysha vivika
@spiritwarriorstudios
10 ай бұрын
Chase IT and you pass it by, Wait for IT and it never shows. What is IT?
@luciamarzi
10 ай бұрын
Beautiful way to reach God realization 😍✨
@ColtraneTaylor
Жыл бұрын
The Self is not God. And clearly this man operates on the mental level, he has not had the experiences which could lead to enlightenment. Also, this is very important. Read this: "A Critique of Ken Wilber" by Morten Tolboll.
@Magik1369
Жыл бұрын
There is the "I" or the Psychic Being, which is the person, the Soul evolving and reincarnating. This is the personal aspect of Self. Then there is the Spirit or Universal aspect (often called Self) which consists of Universal qualities..light, bliss, joy, love etc. To omit one or the other is to make the grave error of Self rejection. Am I a consultant? Yes. "I" developed these qualities and skills, I worked hard, I went to school, I use my intelligence, knowledge, and experience to do my work. I am very real and my work is meant to be. Am I my arm? or my leg? No...but they are parts of my body, which is the vehicle my Self is currently using to incarnate in this temporal reality. Just because consciousness can identify its own characteristics does not mean these characteristics do not exist. The characteristics exist inside the Soul and are part of the Soul. There is no freedom or liberation in being a non person. One must embrace one's humanity and all that one is and has done. Otherwise, one Self rejects.
@jmsjms296
Жыл бұрын
You brought me tears tonight. Thank you!
@citizenenak
2 жыл бұрын
Seeing yourself/ourself ultimately is akin to experiencing nothing. It's a contradiction.
@jasonroberts2249
2 жыл бұрын
This is just basic Advaita Vedanta. Neti neti.
@psy-boparadox3416
2 жыл бұрын
Well KW, I'm a big Mac!
@alankuntz6494
3 жыл бұрын
Hey where is that Turiya video?
@yashshah5903
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for uploading this
@afterthesmash
3 жыл бұрын
When it comes to pinning time onto the dissection table, I prefer Julian Barbour's _Does Time Exist?_ In Barbour's philosophy, the ego-less world of iamness also lacks "ago".
@maximilianhubner4851
3 жыл бұрын
its 2020. Nothing has changed. I am
@originalmikestinson
3 жыл бұрын
Namaste
@ribeirojorge5064
3 жыл бұрын
I Love this Man...but I Prefer to Say... I am a Subject and a Object...!!!
@TheRaNetwork
4 жыл бұрын
If it cant be identified as a thing then it must be nothing. So, maybe there is no "absolute subjectivity" at all in the sense Ken speaks of, but rather the absolute subjectivity is the very objectification of things, for that is the only place where somethingness can be identified to exist. The first person perspective then would be infinitely reducible but never escapable from what it identifies with. To believe there is something without identification underlying all identifiable objects is to believe in a noumenal reality underlying a phenomenal reality. Rather than to believe in a self that is infinitely hard to find by removal of an infinite array of objects, and rather to believe in a noumenal reality that somehow transforms into phenomenal reality by way of crossing the noumenal-phenomenal gap, it is easier to dismiss the notion of noumenon and the "pure subject" altogether. It requires faith to believe in such things since there is no other way to surpass the infinite reduction. The use of faith is unscientific. Reality would be better understood as a mind with a first person perspective of things, identifiable as all things but to different degrees of relevancy, where the most relevant things are regarded as belonging to "self" and the less relevant things are regarded as "other". This is a relativistic solipsistic schema, nonetheless. The spectrum can still exist but with no ultimate transcendence. There is no absolute objective reality, everything is subjective and transcendence is relative.
@TheRaNetwork
4 жыл бұрын
Can the subject be equated with the noumenon?
@QED_
4 жыл бұрын
@Reese Archer: I don't think so -- they're two different systems of thought. "Noumenon" and "phenomenon" are both considered to be a kind of object . . . in which the latter is the limit of what can be known about the former. "Noumenon" is considered the unknown (and unknowable) ultimate reality of which known "phenomenon" is a subset. But here in this video . . . Subject is neither an object . . . nor the known . . . nor the unknown. It is, instead, the Knower of whatever is known . . . If you're maybe asking about the conceivable relationship between the two systems: the Subject described here could be considered to be a Knower that (can) transcend the (illusionary) limits of the Phenomenal and have access to additional knowledge of the Noumenal . . .
@TheRaNetwork
4 жыл бұрын
@@QED_ the noumenon is the thing in itself, without the phenomenal descriptors. If you could strip away the illusory phenomena, you will have direct access to the noumenon. But you would be one with everything and yet have no phenomenal knowledge of it. Could this be the state of "self" transcendental meditation aims to achieve? Is it the noumenon that is the knower? Or, is transcendence forever to be trapped in an infinite reduction of phenomenon, never to access the full noumenon? Or, is the self even beyond the noumenon?
@susanb5339
4 жыл бұрын
Soooooo helpful!
@zenman11
4 жыл бұрын
for the most part this is all very clear BUT,..there seems to be an almighty jump/assumption made on the feeling of I amness' 10minutes ago, 10 years ago,...[and heres the jump] 100years ago, and before your parents were born.? how is the assumption of I amness before parents were born take place? is it because you have heard all the pundits say it before? I have no proof of that
@QED_
4 жыл бұрын
@dan: It's combining (and playing with . . .) two different experiences of "before" -- one that is sequential/causal and one that is phenomenological. It goes something like the following. When and where do time and space arise for you (?) Doesn't any experience of time and space (including thinking about them) depend on YOU experiencing it (?) If so . . . then YOU have to be there for the experience to arise. YOU are the pre-condition necessary for any time and space to arise. And therefore YOU are there BEFORE the time and space in which your parents were born . . .
@StandardProceduree
4 жыл бұрын
'Suffering is the misidentification of I AMness with Objects.'
@samengelsman4139
4 жыл бұрын
Big Brain!!
@nasherbuenafe253
5 жыл бұрын
So he means by object as the ego
@guynoir3116
5 жыл бұрын
Hey Wilber , I bet you didn't know that in eleven years you would look twenty-five years older .
Пікірлер