great comparison! You just absolutely need to add a "weight" category!! It's so important to have a lightweight lens!!! Looking forward to more comparisons. I personally am looking for lightweight small lenses, and can't choose between Sigma 45mm F2.8 DG DN | C. and Samyang AF 35mm F2.8 FE
@mythicbone
17 күн бұрын
Sony 40 f2.5 G 🙃
@jay_petrol
2 ай бұрын
Excellent review and exactly what I was looking for. Very detailed and solid comparison. Thanks! I´m still undecided though ;-) I was expecting the Sigma to destroy the Samyang, but boy was I wrong.
@Moluminary
7 ай бұрын
Your reviews are always very detailed and to the point, thank you!
@agenericaccount3935
2 жыл бұрын
I'll generally bias to Sigma. Familiarity-and a good baseline for consistency/quality. You know what you are getting.
@VietNguyen-gn6fr
Жыл бұрын
Great video comparison
@uateva
Жыл бұрын
Great review, very useful. Thanks
@rdtstudios
Жыл бұрын
I returned my Samyang because of the nasty cool tones which i don't like
@travelbug_usa
Жыл бұрын
Plastic fantastic 😂 good one 😊
@cameraprepper7938
10 ай бұрын
I do not want any of those, I have the Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar 35mm 2.8 ZA which is light and small, to carry any where. ! also have the Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 35mm 2.0 Aspherical which have outstanding optical image quality - second to none !
@olivercurry2392
2 жыл бұрын
🔥 p̷r̷o̷m̷o̷s̷m̷
@GilbertTV
2 жыл бұрын
every sigma lens ive ever owned the autofocus sucked ... never gonna buy one of there lenses again.. I like the 16mm F1.4 apsc sigma lens but it lets me down bad on AF
Пікірлер: 12