Leopard: Can work during a parade T-14: Can’t say the same
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
Жыл бұрын
T-14 works all the time and leopards are burning 😂
@vladimirputin3081
Жыл бұрын
@alexnderrrthewoke4479 are you from russia?
@RosaFlores-QQZ
Жыл бұрын
T-14: "Untouched in the battlefield" Leopard: (*Multiple destroyed in action*) "Can't say the same"
@vladimirputin3081
Жыл бұрын
@RosaFlores-QQZ only reason it is untouched is because it doesn't exist
@notaidan6083
Жыл бұрын
@@vladimirputin3081 putin das crazy 💀
@Sam.s777
Жыл бұрын
None of these are factors that would determine who would win in a fight though???
@taehyungshands
Жыл бұрын
you dumb? I would crap someone with bad armor lol
@qSeverity
Жыл бұрын
it wasn't specified directly in combat, but it's clearly rather in other aspects shown in the video
@mcdoublejumbo
Жыл бұрын
@@qSeveritythink he just wanted the leopard to lose, he is way more armored and has such a good firepower, in actual combat the leopard would win
@ELAOALA
Жыл бұрын
@@mcdoublejumbo a tank from the 80s beats a tank from 2015? 🤣🤣
@dislikebutton543
Жыл бұрын
@@mcdoublejumbo wrong
@aquajay
10 ай бұрын
Fun fact, the 14 in T 14 stands for how many tanks have been produced
@statera5854
10 ай бұрын
No. The 14 is the amount of millions corruption eaten from t14 budget
@ryanjones7
8 ай бұрын
💀💀
@TeslangDigi
8 ай бұрын
2300
@omaralhamzah5725
6 ай бұрын
The parede was in like 2014-2015 probably the t14 was build in 2014
@Epsilon11Fox
9 ай бұрын
I searched Challenger 2 Vs T-14 Armata not this ...
@guppiapfeljustleopardthing8756
11 ай бұрын
How about this: Mechanical reliability: leopard Ease of maintenance in the field : leopard Ability to repair a jammed breach in comvat: leopard Number produced:leopard Kills in battle: leopard Hardware =thermals, LRF, Optics :leopard Rrloadtime:
@ExpiredTunaSandwichYT
11 ай бұрын
Yet the T-14 is just a T-90 with a few upgrades. It honestly doesn’t exist if u really think abt it, they have only been seen in a parade, and never have been in battle. Yet the leapord has been in battle many times and is one of the strongest tanks made ever.
@NapoleanBlown-aparte
4 ай бұрын
Actually exists: Leopard
@Rexident97
Жыл бұрын
The Leopard is better because it’s actually being produced for combat lmao🐆
@Strongnurgling
11 ай бұрын
Dang like on which tank graveyard before it hit the Russian front lines we talking about
@MtaPlayerKillae
10 ай бұрын
@@Strongnurglingkamikaze drone can't destroy leopard but russian mine yes
@MtaPlayerKillae
10 ай бұрын
@@Strongnurglingif you think the russians badly damaged the leopard 2, that's because the chains were broken in the mines. all tanks have that weakness
@Strongnurgling
10 ай бұрын
@@MtaPlayerKillae the problem is the Leo 2 is the weakness the armour is so weak
@MtaPlayerKillae
10 ай бұрын
@@Strongnurgling do you see leopard 2 is completely destroyed by anti tank missiles?
@Idki5170
Жыл бұрын
When russia uses t 90 🤑 When russia uses t 14 💀
@nexlenx6844
Жыл бұрын
Т-14 топ
@nettxn
Жыл бұрын
I’m starting to think this guy is a Russian propagandist because of all videos pointing that the T-14 is better than the high leopard 2 being regarded as the best tank in the world cause of its combination of speed accuracy and its targeting system…..alright I’m done with my rant ima go watch more of this guys vids
@GracedBavaria
7 ай бұрын
So true
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
T-14 is legit better in every aspect
@GracedBavaria
7 ай бұрын
It is not. It can't even drive or be produced more than 14 times. It is weak, slow (actually it can't even move) and just a silly concept a poor country like Russia cannot continue with. The Leopard outmatches it in Gun power, Protection, Speed, Looks, and Optics/Imagery too.@@Mrhungern
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
@@GracedBavaria "it can't even drive" "(actually it can't even move)" Then how can it drive around in demonstration footage and on parades? The T-14 is faster and has better acceleration than the Leopard 2. T-14 weights about 50 tons and has 1500 hp, giving it 30 hp/ton. Leopard 2a7 on the other hand weights 68 tons and has 1500 hp, giving it 22 hp/ton. This would make the T-14 accelerate way faster than the Leopard 2 and reaching higher speeds much faster. T-14's 2a82 gun has 15% higher muzzle energy than the L55 on the Leopard 2. T-14 can also penetrate 1000mm at 2km at 0 degrees, while Leopard can only penetrate 850mm at 2km at 0 degrees. T-14 can also fire atgms through the gun. T-14 has therefor a way better gun with higher penetration. T-14 uses a composite armor with 4th generation monolith ERA while the 2a7 is still stuck with the same armor from leopard 2a5. T-14 also uses hardkill active protection system, that with the excellent armor making the protection way better on the T-14 than the leopard 2a7 T-14 and leopard 2a7 both use 3rd generation thermals. The T-14 is better than the leopard 2a7+.
@City1Tiger
6 ай бұрын
Wehraboo cope
@Jake1Ol2
8 ай бұрын
Lol the lepord 2a7 is the most advanced and powerful tank on the planet with PROVEN combat ability, meanwhile russia can hardly must 6 working t-14 tanks.
@ilonailona2850
Жыл бұрын
OH MY RUSSIAN BOT😢
@chongkheongsai1858
9 ай бұрын
win for the one who shot first and accurate
@American_Patriot1776__
Жыл бұрын
It’s funny that people think that the t14 is real and not just a museum piece with a visual mod. ( this is meant as somewhat of a joke but let’s be honest Russia is full of it)
@orwhynotrandom
Жыл бұрын
Basically just a ok we'll try after the whole t95 thing
@Gilder-von-Schattenkreuz
Жыл бұрын
Its less of a Joke than You think. Because lets Face it. So far the only time Russia even Shows this Tank to non Russian Government People is during Military Parades where it just Drives Slowly down a Road. All we know about the T14 Armata is what Russian Propaganda Says about it. And so far there is not a Single actual T14 Armata Tank. There is only some Prototypes and Test Vehicles.
@elliotyourarobot
11 ай бұрын
Plenty of leopards next to their ancestors.
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
The T 14 has been involved in battles in Ukraine for a while
@user-of2ee6te8s
7 ай бұрын
Most expensive mine clearance machine ever built - Leopard 2
@GracedBavaria
7 ай бұрын
Yup unlike Russia's tanks that use T-55 to clear mines 😂😂
@user-of2ee6te8s
7 ай бұрын
@@GracedBavaria First, you have no proof of it, second T-55 is cheaper than Leopard 2.
@Soviet77858
Жыл бұрын
Maybe if it actually had more then 20 tanks😅
@diegogaray3091
7 ай бұрын
La diferencia más grande es que Alemania tiene Leopard 2 de sobra, el t14 Armata Ruso sigue siendo prototipo desde el 2014
@Gilder-von-Schattenkreuz
Жыл бұрын
Thats Nice and All. Problem is just that this is basicly Comparing a Real Person with some Fantasy Character from a Cartoon. The Leopard 2 Tank is an Existing Main Battle Tank with several Thousand Pieces Build. It is used by Several Countries around the World which means its Capabilities have been Tested Independently and has been used in Active Combat. The T14 Armata meanwhile is a Fantasy Blueprint. Only Prototypes and Test Vehicles have been Build so far. None of which have been working reliably enough to start Serial Production. With all Data of Testing and Capabilities of the Tank being Solely from Russian Propaganda as the only time it is even Shown to People not working for the Russian Government is during Military Parades. And given Russian Track Record on how Accurate their Claims on their Militaries Capabilities and Equipments are. Yeah..... Likely the T14 Armata is Trash that cant even Compete with Leopard 2 at all.
@iamteddy.k8421
5 ай бұрын
Interior of armata looking like space ship 😂😂 leopards Interior looking like gun Smith work shop 😅😅
@MsLampalampa
Жыл бұрын
And how many t14 are there ?👀
@insertnamehereofficial
Жыл бұрын
Im not joking, there are 20
@user-bd4nj6ch3c
Жыл бұрын
since 2023 140+
@aymanalameh6012
Жыл бұрын
@@insertnamehereofficial 230
@Jack-Hands
Жыл бұрын
About 5.
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
250-500
@Geskipt
Жыл бұрын
Leopards are, however, actually produced for decades and have proven combat capabilities.
@badgamer7593
Жыл бұрын
3 Leopard 2A6 and 1 2A4 were destroyed/abandoned in Ukraine recently.
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
Жыл бұрын
@@badgamer7593 and a big fail
@Qbsomil
Жыл бұрын
Y'all don't know how war works. There is nomore tank battles. Tanks cost too much to send them like in WW2 for battles tank vs tank. It much cheaper to send attack helicopter with for example WICHR rockets to destroy a tank. I mean generals are not sending tanks vs tanks but sometimes tank will fight with another one, but it shouldn't be common. (I'm polish and I'm not good in speaking english - sorry for bad grammar )
@vladimirputin3081
Жыл бұрын
@@badgamer7593 and how many t-90s lost? 2000.
@Gilder-von-Schattenkreuz
Жыл бұрын
@@badgamer7593 Yes and ? Its about 11 Leopard 2s Lost in the Offensive so far. So in about 2 Months of Offensive Assaults about 11 Leopard 2 Tanks out of about 100 used have been Lost. So about a 10% Loss Ratio. Thats actually Really Good. Because if You compare it to Russian Tanks. These have so far usually Suffered 20-30% Loss Ratios in such Offensive Actions. And thats Ukrainian Side. The Russian Side is even Worse thanks to their Failed Offensives at the Start of the War. And have so often Suffered 30-50% Loss Ratios of the Tanks used in Offensives. To begin with. I am always Impressed just how Scared Russia seems to be from the Leopard 2 which is getting ever closer to 50 Years of being in Service now. Each Leopard 2 Tank Destroyed or even Damaged is a Huge Fuss for Russia. As if it was something Super Special lol. But its nothing Special Really. Leopard 2 is a Strong Tank. But its not some sort of Invincible Wonderweapon lol. Its an MBT with over 3000 Pieces Build.
@pozhilojluberetskij1805
5 ай бұрын
So many leoperd fans, you can only dream of becoming alike to the Russian tank
@GrandZero361
Жыл бұрын
Cmon to be fair do now the modern panther.
@mariusc.schweer5638
11 ай бұрын
If you take the same points and use it in a "Battle" t-14 vs BT-7, the BT-7 would win. There for the BT-7 is better than the T-14
@Commander_Nathan
Жыл бұрын
Everything is wrong, armor goes to leopard, speed goes to leopard, mostly everything is on leopard, and if the t 14 is stronger than leopard, why aren't i seeing one in ukraine?
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx
Жыл бұрын
Limited numbers, we don’t know much about the armata since it isn’t battle tested
@shadelampsofficial
Жыл бұрын
all the leopards in ukraine are blown to pieces
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
The speed of the leopard is 70 km per hour . The speed of the t14 is 90 km per hour
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
Leopard armor 600 millimeters, armor 14 armata 950 millimeters
@stevee3
6 ай бұрын
@@shadelampsofficialcap
@Leg1oNnyy
5 ай бұрын
Ok, compare armata with kf51
@mariahansen6688
8 ай бұрын
Leopard is the strongest Tank in the world
@Cristiano-----
7 ай бұрын
nah T14 is best
@Damoney1111
5 ай бұрын
@@Cristiano----- well where is it?
@Cristiano-----
5 ай бұрын
@@Damoney1111 in Russia
@Bogdan_17
9 ай бұрын
KF51 panther?
@Boris19389
11 ай бұрын
What ya smoking I want that stuff XD the t 14 is a disappointing failure of Russian power kinda like Russia as a whole seeing its dissolved multiple times and probably will again
@jenclydelemosnero2529
10 ай бұрын
Lighter:"No armor, Best armor" Cheaper: Some parts were used way back to to the 1987 to 1943. Speed:*Light armor remember* Armor:*Fuel tanks* Miles per gallon:Why even put armor when instead you can just slap some fuel tanks at the sides.
@AlexAlex-tk3ow
11 ай бұрын
Bro leopard can slap the t14 aside
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
In order to write like this , you would better know the characteristics of these two tanks
@Damoney1111
5 ай бұрын
@@BRIKS512 simple Leopard is made for combat and the T14 is only for showing off your power
@tomasmisek5598
7 ай бұрын
T-14 is lighter, yea, but its engine doesnt work, its armor doesnt actually do that much, we have no co firmed reports of the armata being fast, it is WAY more expensive than the leopard and it has a reload about twice slower than the leopard. And thats just the factors you can google
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
It's lighter and the engine does indeed work because the tank can drive. The armor on the T-14 is better than the Leopard 2a7 and it can stop modern apfsds. The T-14 has the same horsepower as the Leopard and is lighter, meaning it would have a higher hp/ton ratio than the leopard. The T-14 reloads in about 8 seconds while the Leopard 2 can reload in about 6-7 seconds(not twice as slow) The T-14 armata costs 4 Million dollars while Leopard 2a7 costs 15 million dollars.
@tomasmisek5598
7 ай бұрын
@@Mrhungern and your source? lemme answer for ya, it is propaganda
@emmalouisejohn
10 ай бұрын
The leopard is one of the best tanks in the world against that Russian garbage, I haven’t even heard of like idk what to say…
@Lololololismell
9 ай бұрын
Bro I thought it was 1 short you got wrong bro all of your videos are all wrong😭💀
@guiderguy5210
10 ай бұрын
tell me you're russian without saying you're russian:
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
You 've tried to compare them yourself , there's a t 14 many times better than a leopard and
@Damoney1111
5 ай бұрын
@@BRIKS512 well where is it?
@siegmundheine4282
10 ай бұрын
КИС МАИ ЕС! 😂😂 Т 14=ШАИСЕ 😂😂
@Emanuel-BerA
Жыл бұрын
Cómo creen comparar , en todo caso sería más justo comparar el leopard 2 con el T 80 o T90
@novkorova2774
Жыл бұрын
No seria justo porque el T-14 no se fabrica y el T-80 y T-90 son vehículos mal equipados para esta década.
@Emanuel-BerA
Жыл бұрын
@@novkorova2774 no están mal equipados para esta época,almenos las versiones actualizadas que tienen en masa el ejército y sus aliados no.
@OLEGRO_GCO
Жыл бұрын
т-80 и т-90 есть тоже чем-то похвастаться 😊
@Mahsterch
Жыл бұрын
@@OLEGRO_GCO being a successful mobile spaceship?
@user-ly5px6jh2q
8 ай бұрын
Hang on 1940s Cold War 👀I mean there made really good tanks to beat what is soppesed to be a tank from russia
@Johnmcgivney
Жыл бұрын
Who would win the tank that’s been tested for 20+ years or the tank that broke down in it’s own parade
@zomba8189
Жыл бұрын
It didn't even break down, the driver activated the emergency brake on accident.
@elliotyourarobot
11 ай бұрын
Tested against what?
@ozaccTM
9 ай бұрын
How would miles per gallon, price, and weight help you in a real battle?
@MtaPlayerKillae
10 ай бұрын
Fun fact. the weakness of all tanks is mines
@arjunsarkart
11 ай бұрын
maybe if it could drive/move
@tendo_pain473
11 ай бұрын
Kf51 Panther joins the chat 🗿
@theottomans1438
Жыл бұрын
and none of the T-14 armatas have not been reported destroyed only T-90, 80 and 72
@matze11
11 ай бұрын
Because they aren't in combat
@KaIIenie
10 ай бұрын
Why not? Because they were not even there to be vulnerable of death
@theottomans1438
10 ай бұрын
@@KaIIenie meanwhile T-14 are stationed in ukraine
@TeaDrinker-tc1en
4 ай бұрын
man you're getting rich from the russian government paying you to say good things about a tank that cant even be in a parade without breaking
@Riquelme1yt
Жыл бұрын
Não não, tá errado
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
It was very strange that more American dogs came to the comments than the Germans.
@Mahsterch
Жыл бұрын
There tends to be more americans than germans in the world... though there seems to be more german parts than russian in the t14
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
@@Mahsterch The T-14 has all Russian parts. It has nothing to do with German or American, please don't talk about things you can't provide proof of.
@KV-1Enjoyer
Жыл бұрын
@@Canelo13241 My man, why don't you send them to Ukraine then? They'd have been useful from the get go. And certainly more than those T-62s you guys were using.
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
@@KV-1Enjoyer First the old tanks are melting, my friend, we are melting the old tanks, first the old ones will disappear, then the new ones will be entered.
@KV-1Enjoyer
Жыл бұрын
@@Canelo13241 Fair enough but it'd still have made more sense to use the best things in the initial push no? The T-90s, T-14s and whatnot
@WB_WT
7 ай бұрын
50 years diff
@user-ff4rb9bx7z
8 ай бұрын
Неееет леопард лучше
@tempist6970
7 ай бұрын
I am going to refer you to a man who explains everything you need to know about the T14 armata -Lazer pig- have a look at his T14 video he explains all the problems with it
@Russ538
10 ай бұрын
Yeahhh Russia: IM BETTER💀🇷🇺
@KV-1Enjoyer
Жыл бұрын
Keep coping lmaooo If it's so good why aren't they in Ukraine
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
T-14 is better than the leopard 2. And do you even know what cope means? You saying "Keep coping lmaooo" when your tank is worse than another tank kinda sounds like you're coping to the fact that your tank is worse than another tank, and you want to spin it around to the other end, that they're coping by lying and saying that the T-14 is better when it isn't, or you don't know what cope means. But they are not lying, the smallest bit of research proves that they are right and the T-14 is better. Warfare isn't tank-on-tank combat, tank-on-tank combat is very rare and the T-14 would excel in destroying any tank that ukraine fields. But tanks would be the least of any tank's worries. Artillery, Top-attack ATGM's, Suicide drones are way bigger threats to tanks than tanks are to tanks. If the tracks of the T-14 were destroyed by artillery, or if the powerplant was knocked out by a drone or atgm, then the tank might be captured or scuttled. If the tank was destroyed or captured, it would be a huge propaganda win for ukraine and a huge embarrassment for russia. Many Leopard 2a6's got destroyed in ukraine and since you think that its "way better than T-14" should prove that the T-14 would also get destroyed. basically: tanks get destroyed no matter how good they are.
@KV-1Enjoyer
7 ай бұрын
@@Mrhungern my guy. Does it not make sense to send the "best" tank as you call it to Ukraine? Afraid it'll end up like every other armored vehicle in this artillery slugfest? Yes you're right about arty being a bigger threat to tanks than other tanks, that has always been the case since the Great War. That still doesn't explain why they haven't sent the damn thing to Ukraine if it's as good as you claim. I don't think we're in a disagreement here? Anyone with a smallest bit of actual knowledge about tanks knows that they don't singlehandedly win wars. Any tank can be destroyed it's the tactics that determine how. T-72s and T-80s get blown up all the damn time, Turkish Leos and Saudi Abrams too.
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
@@KV-1Enjoyer "Does it not make sense to send the "best" tank as you call it to Ukraine? Afraid it'll end up like every other armored vehicle in this artillery slugfest?"-you As i said before: If the tank was destroyed or captured, it would be a huge propaganda win for ukraine and a huge embarrassment for russia. And yes, the t-14 is the best tank but it would get destroyed. "Yes you're right about arty being a bigger threat to tanks than other tanks, that has always been the case since the Great War. That still doesn't explain why they haven't sent the damn thing to Ukraine if it's as good as you claim."-you I don't think you know how to read lol. If you would actually read my previous comment then you would know that i don't think that it is invincible, just that it is much better than the leopard 2. You seem to think that the Leopard 2 is better than the T-14 so if leopard 2a6's were knocked out in combat and the 2a6 is so much better than the T-14 then the T-14 would also get knocked out. I also say in my previous comment that "If the tracks of the T-14 were destroyed by artillery, or if the powerplant was knocked out by a drone or atgm, then the tank might be captured or scuttled. If the tank was destroyed or captured, it would be a huge propaganda win for ukraine and a huge embarrassment for russia." "I don't think we're in a disagreement here? Anyone with a smallest bit of actual knowledge about tanks knows that they don't singlehandedly win wars. Any tank can be destroyed it's the tactics that determine how. T-72s and T-80s get blown up all the damn time, Turkish Leos and Saudi Abrams too."-you Yes both of us are saying that all tanks get destroyed, and just because the T-14 is a better tank, it won't do russia that much good even if they were able to mass produce the thing. But you were saying that the video creator was coping because he was saying that the T-14 is better than the Leopard 2. This makes it seem like you think that the Leopard 2 is better than the T-14 which it isn't. You think that the Leopard 2 is somehow better than the T-14 and i think that the T-14 is better than the Leopard 2 so it is a disagreement.
@KV-1Enjoyer
7 ай бұрын
@@Mrhungern See here's where my problem with your point lies You can't really prove that the T-14 is better than the Leo just by what's on paper. Field tests are needed. The Porsche Tiger sounded good on paper but realistically on the field it'd have been a piece of hot shit. The AbramsX sounds and looks good. But it needs to be in the field to actually prove that it is good. Right now, unless I'm out of the loop here which ye that could be true, the T-14 has only been on parades and a handful of videos. So I can't buy the whole "it's better than the Leo" until it sees some combat. I don't think propaganda should be a factor to consider. It sounds stupid to not send in your best equipment for fear of it being used in propaganda against you. Just scuttle the damn thing like the US did with that one Abrams
@Mrhungern
7 ай бұрын
@@KV-1Enjoyer Well i think that the T-14 is better that the Leopard 2a7 because T-14 weights about 50 tons and has 1500 hp, giving it 30 hp/ton. Leopard 2a7 on the other hand weights 68 tons and has 1500 hp, giving it 22 hp/ton. This would make the T-14 accelerate way faster than the Leopard 2 and reaching higher speeds much faster. (metric tons) T-14's 2a82 gun has 15% higher muzzle energy than the L55 on the Leopard 2. T-14 can also penetrate 1000mm at 2km at 0 degrees, while Leopard can only penetrate 850mm at 2km at 0 degrees. T-14 can also fire atgms through the gun. T-14 has therefor a way better gun with higher penetration. T-14 uses a composite armor with 4th generation monolith ERA while the 2a7 is still stuck with the same base armor from leopard 2a4 with large composite screens. T-14 also uses hardkill active protection system, that with the excellent armor making the protection way better on the T-14 than the leopard 2a7 T-14 and leopard 2a7 both use 3rd generation thermals. The T-14 is better than the leopard 2a7+. The porsche tiger used a petrol-electric engine which was the main reason why the porsche tiger sucked. The T-14 uses a diesel engine tho. A T-14 being destroyed would be a huge deal to russia because they have this "super tank" that they want every russian to believe is "unstopable" and "way better than any nato tank" Ukraine would exploit the destruction of the T-14 just like they did with the first destroyed T-90M. Russia also has a very hard time producing the compact engine making it hard to replace the loss.
@tankmanbruh
Жыл бұрын
bruh you only let t14 win by making the features of t14
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
Yes, I agree, but 14 is in principle better than a leopard
@tristanrabier8608
5 ай бұрын
Source : me
@JakeZnotFake
6 ай бұрын
leopard have better armor
@kendekorcsmaros8730
Жыл бұрын
A7+ has far better armor and L55 is superior to 2A82-1M (what a name xd). Its unfair to compare an 1979s tank to a 2014s one... A7+ is a very different one to the base Leo 2 but even the basic Leo 2 has a chance against todays modern western/eastern tanks(Except Type 10 and K2 ) So Armata is a good, better than AMX 56 or Challenger 1, finally like 50s Russia made an exellent MBT but its not a counter todays german technology and also they arent ready to mass produce such a thing
@hetzer5926
11 ай бұрын
Leopard: You may be faster and lighter than I am. But there’s more of me than ammo in all of you combined. T-14: “Wait……..that’s supposed to be my thing. How are you better than me at my thing?”
@MotMatzur
7 ай бұрын
Not made in china leopard yesxsir
@Roliliptak01
6 ай бұрын
I think t14 armata is not good
@ninjaliam
9 ай бұрын
Bro is basically Russian propaganda at this point
@foxtzy8537
Жыл бұрын
T14 Armata has week sport at crew positions it can easily kill by normal hight explosive round
@Signa_haitianBulldoggaming
Жыл бұрын
German tank vs Russian tonk
@K.Pershing
Жыл бұрын
German Tank vs Russian Tractor engine
@K.Pershing
Жыл бұрын
@Serious Steak it uses a ww2 tractor engine
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx
Жыл бұрын
@@K.Pershing false information
@K.Pershing
Жыл бұрын
@@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx true information Source: (I made it the fuck up because I hate russia)
@lenparfan4486
11 ай бұрын
Say all you want
@mccraze1193
Жыл бұрын
Not even close, Leopard solos no stress
@field.556x45
Жыл бұрын
uhhh which leo 2? Edit: its because The 2a7 if im correct has around 900mm Of armor. (HULL)
@Patriotic-British-Lad
Жыл бұрын
900mm of armor will weigh that much that it wouldn’t be able to cross bridges 💀
@field.556x45
Жыл бұрын
@@Patriotic-British-Lad yeah i cant remember which RHA and angle of it all i remember it could get around to 900
@Patriotic-British-Lad
Жыл бұрын
@@field.556x45 no, it can’t get around to 900mm of armor, average modern tank armor is around 300-400mm metal plate, they use some sort of plates to protect the armor and sum tanks also have defense systems, 900mm thickness of armor is way too heavy for the tank to operate
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
T-14 body armor is more powerful 1500 mm
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 2 A7 700 mm
@user-qf2cn2yl5k
5 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂🇩🇪🥶🥶🇷🇺😭😭😭😭😭
@Riquelme1yt
Жыл бұрын
Muito lendo t14
@Voi_dude
9 ай бұрын
the biggest weakness of the T14 is Russia can't afford it
@BRIKS512
7 ай бұрын
And that's why Russia didn't make 100 tons of 14?
@user-pd8wp7vg1x
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 💪💪💪🥇
@fl1cker78
Жыл бұрын
Да, горят на украине они классно
@youtubeisasshoe8153
10 ай бұрын
If they could only keep a steady supply of them to the nazis because they all keep getting destroyed just a fast a they get them 😂😂😂
@KyleChiu82
Жыл бұрын
T14 💪💪💪🥇🏆🎖️🏅
@cbmaengi2881
9 ай бұрын
Both tanks are great on their own way
@user-mn8lz7gf6d
8 ай бұрын
The T-14 isn't even better on paper. The only thing that is not actively worse is the crewless turret.
@cbmaengi2881
8 ай бұрын
@@user-mn8lz7gf6d Dude do you even have proof? + I said that both tanks are great in their own way
@barocodrama8122
Жыл бұрын
All I gotta say is German tanks 😅 that’s some spooky stuff right there just research their combat record against many other tanks of their time others have been “superior” but the Germans always find a way
@RosaFlores-QQZ
Жыл бұрын
Not that spooky, especially after WW2.
@elliotyourarobot
11 ай бұрын
Ali and his brother in a cardboard box and rpg took these things out.
@gaddielsantillan5247
Жыл бұрын
Power leapord More powerdul leapord
@Frankenstein_177
8 ай бұрын
The t-14 sucks.
@acegames2995
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 2 cheaper
@user-bd4nj6ch3c
Жыл бұрын
13 million euros .., people buy eyes from the mother
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
T 14 5,71 million dolars Leopard 2 13-15 million dolars (A6 and A7)
@Edgar_89
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 🫡🦾
@shadelampsofficial
Жыл бұрын
blown to pieces in ukraine
@Johnmcgivney
Жыл бұрын
@@shadelampsofficialstfu no it wasn’t only one was lost
@shadelampsofficial
Жыл бұрын
@@Johnmcgivney yea more like 5-6
@shadelampsofficial
Жыл бұрын
not to mention the m2 bradleys and all the nato supplied weaponry
@weeikbeanil1299
Жыл бұрын
cap cap cope cope
@steffilowe4727
7 ай бұрын
Stimmt nich leo ist besser
@NAVINIKIT
7 ай бұрын
У Т-14 броня лучше У Т-14 пробитие больше И Т-14 современнее
@Edgar_89
Жыл бұрын
🇺🇦🫡
@arnavsharma9614
Жыл бұрын
Love seeing American getting jealous in this comment section lol 😂😂😂😂
@K.Pershing
Жыл бұрын
It broke down in the middle of a parade. Don't think burgerlanders are jealous besides its a German Tank
@ggez8117
9 ай бұрын
@seriouslysteaked the transmission fucking blew itself, engineers were on site, if it were the parking break they would've known how to disengage it
@ggez8117
9 ай бұрын
@seriouslysteaked it did not drove itself off lmao? it had to be towed by another vehicle
Пікірлер: 306