Mitsubishi is honestly one of the best out there. They've always had reliable solid vehicles, fatastic engines, and as you can see great performances! Mitsubishi all the way.
@LocoMe4u
3 жыл бұрын
I've the outlander 2.4L AWC and it's no slouch either ( more than enough power needed for everyday use)
@pkPr03d
3 жыл бұрын
Yea I agree. I’ve got the rogue. Both pretty similar.
@khmerbraveheart
3 жыл бұрын
haha... But they're using Nissans parts. Nissan owns them. So where you going with this? The Outlander is the Nissan Rogue. Look it up.
@db60615
3 жыл бұрын
@@khmerbraveheart if that's the case how does Mitsubishi manage to have a 10 yr 100,000 mile warranty on a Nissan part??? Nice try tho, dig deeper.
@khmerbraveheart
3 жыл бұрын
@@db60615 Well, I'm not saying completely. IF that was the case, they would of just been Nissan. I'll dig deeper when you start digging. 'Cause common sense wasn't that common on this one. For you to even choose Mits over this Infin, just shows you know nothing. I'm just saying. This comparison isn't even a match. And you chose Mits.
@jimmysobrino7881
5 жыл бұрын
Seem to me that there is some bias here. When showing the Mitsubishi they are purposely making it look bad. For example they where making fun of the back seat flipping to get in the 3rd row but in reality the seat can just slide forward and the back rest tilts forward so that you can get in the back. You only need to flip the back seat so that you can fold the backrest completely flat for more cargo space.
@Loudlevin
6 жыл бұрын
Actual outlander owner...infotainment system is just fine, steering wheel controls are intuitive , no it doesnt take 30 seconds to load, audio starts right away and the screen loads under 10 seconds, styling is subjective, me personally i find it looks pretty good for its type and visibility out is good. I classify the outlander as cheap and cheerfull, Ill gladly use it as my beater/rec vehicle while getting 32mpg combined till the wheels fall off.
@jtpfla3
4 жыл бұрын
Me too, I have the 4 cylinder in this test vehicle color.
@jasonk19xx17
3 жыл бұрын
Except you'll never get 32 MPGs in the version they tested here. Not even on the highway.
@cheez1012
Жыл бұрын
@@jasonk19xx17 Yeah, obviously the i4 outlander will get better gas mileage than the V6.
@greenfire919
5 жыл бұрын
Finally someone giving the Outlander v6 some credit.
@waynerhea6649
6 жыл бұрын
The mitubishi is very much worth the value for under 35 k you get alot of tech 4wd decent styling and even though the 3rd row is small you can think of it as a big 5 seater and just not use the seats or put kids in the back like it's intended. Best of all if you look on the used market you can get one fully loaded for around 20k with little miles.
@ALEX-sh3tx
6 жыл бұрын
I like Mitsubishi dynamic shield
@darwiniandude
5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, agree - the front of the Infinity looks very bland IMO, could be the front of a Chinese SUV.
@anthonycarreviews1528
6 жыл бұрын
i love infiniti but mitsubishi is a good car
@palebeachbum
6 жыл бұрын
Ok, so for some actual facts. The Infiniti is in a larger size class. It's also a luxury brand. Not the same class as the Outlander. The warranty is 1/3 that of the Mitsubishi's. It is a more luxurious vehicle with more space for twice the price. The Mitsubishi is an older design with a proven track record of reliability and quality. The Infiniti is based on the latest generation Pathfinder, which has a reputation for poor reliability. The loaded Outlander GT shown here can be purchased with rebates for around $25k. So, you can quite literally buy two loaded Outlander GTs for the price of one QX60. Side note: You still had no head room in the 3rd row of that QX60. So it's no more usable for adults than the more cramped Outlander 3rd row, unless you plan on riding with your face in your chest. I don't think any reasonable person would expect a 6'2" adult to fit comfortably in the third row of a compact CUV like the Outlander. Come on, guys. I think the fact you still had no head room in the third row of that much larger QX60 would have been more relevant to mention.
@thrillseekanz7874
6 жыл бұрын
palebeachbum calm your farm pal, you realise Nissan own Mitsubishi and actually don't care which you buy?
@mvkmvk4099
6 жыл бұрын
palebeachbum the qx60 design came out first originally the JX in 2012 before the 2013 pathfinder came out. I don't get why people don't understand that the Pathfinder got the design cues from infiniti since the JX came out first.
@ssjMaximum22Goku
6 жыл бұрын
The video is just trying to show you what you get for the price you pay.
@joshr961
5 жыл бұрын
Nissan does not own Mitsubishi. They have 33.4% of there share get ur facts straight, Nissan did this for parts sharing to bring production costs down. As for the op I agree. Seems tfl just bashes and bashes Mitsubishi. I bought my 18 sport 4x4 for 19k out the door with 3 miles on it and a proven reliability and thee best factory warranty. Least mitsu stands behind there vehicles.
@adrianparada2407
5 жыл бұрын
@@thrillseekanz7874 nissan do not own mitsubishi, do some research, they merge together like renault and nissan did, mitsubishi reliability is way better than crappy nissan..
@madjid0235
6 жыл бұрын
i like mitsubishi outlander
@chadharmon5716
6 жыл бұрын
Let me tell ya we have a Mitsubishi Outlander same drive train and very reliable had it for 3 years no problems other than maintenance great SUV
@jasonk19xx17
3 жыл бұрын
I sold mine after 10 years and 167k miles. I've seen other V6 owners hit 230k miles. They are good engines and paired well with the 6-speed. That said, this is a very old engine, and looks like it's being retired on the 2022 models.
@youtubeuser5005
6 жыл бұрын
What the hell kind of packages did they get? I got my wife an AWD 2018 QX60 for almost $20k less than the price as tested in this vid. She loves the thing. We didn’t buy it to drag race, but the vehicle is really comfortable, as a driver or passenger
@mcalebeb
6 жыл бұрын
That 3.0GT is still kicking ass 😂
@chrisylink
5 жыл бұрын
Right😂 been around forever it seems like lol
@aminnoosss4683
5 жыл бұрын
I have 2013 outlander 3.0L GT S-AWC . I like the engine : i did 0-100 km/h 7,3 Sec and the transmission is really smooth. Drifting on snow with this car is amazing.
@chinggop1
5 жыл бұрын
Very under stated, thats the same S-AWD from Lancer Evolution series though mated with V6 and true 6 speed auto transmission, not a cvt. I used to own the 4cyl SE but then got rid of it until i got a hard to find V6 GT with Touring package
@Alekspit1
4 жыл бұрын
Are you probably installed turbine? Otherwise it is very fast for the standard configuration of 3.0 L GT 🤷
@auburnko
3 жыл бұрын
how was the mpg?
@jasonk19xx17
3 жыл бұрын
@@auburnko Not good for the V6. Granted, I have a roof rack on mine, but there's usually nothing up there but the crossbars. Still, I'd average 19 city, 24 highway, maybe 25 with a tailwind.
@EdPMur
3 жыл бұрын
@@auburnko Not that great. It’s the biggest downside of that powertrain
@soiceyboy33
6 жыл бұрын
I have a 2010 Outlander GT with the same engine and its literally the most reliable car I’ve ever owned. I’ve driven it to the moon and back and it still drives like a brand new car. The other day, I raced a V6 mustang and beat it! That MIVEC engine doesn’t play....
@alright392
6 жыл бұрын
Race starts at 6:41
@timfox2344
6 жыл бұрын
3-row crossover for $25k isn’t too shabby... Mitsubishi & Suzuki are the two car companies you forget are still in the car business
@MrSlicer2424
6 жыл бұрын
Tim Fox Suzuki bowed out of the USA market. To bad I really enjoyed my little sx4.
@Sir......
6 жыл бұрын
i thought it was 35k ?
@philtripe
6 жыл бұрын
did you notice how the third row is just for photographic purposes only? kids with legs cant even sit back there
@Agent.K.
6 жыл бұрын
stickloaf Same for rouge. And the salesman looked at me like I insulted him when I said that...
@bhaskarasuneil
6 жыл бұрын
Suzuki is long gone lol
@kevinheckeler
6 жыл бұрын
Why didn't Roman get into the third row in the Infinity? Does TFLC not understand the very basic concept of a comparison?
@ssjMaximum22Goku
6 жыл бұрын
They were literally the same height.
@kevinheckeler
6 жыл бұрын
No, I think Roman's a bit taller, plus someone's height isn't the only factor (some of us have longer torsos vs legs, etc, even at the same total height).
@seana1665
5 жыл бұрын
Their videos suck. Not informative and very bias. They didn't even use the sport mode on the QX60 or even talk about it. Check out Redline for a better and honest review.
@yudhobaskoro8033
3 жыл бұрын
@@seana1665 i dont think it would make a big difference tho, and definitely not make the car's twice as fast as in a normal mode, its the whole point of the video
@YourMom-nl4uw
5 жыл бұрын
Horrible comparison. Not even in the same class. The Mitsubishi is intended as a economical family vehicle. The Infinity is a luxury brand for ppl with a bit more money. I'd take the Mitsubishi anyday.
@pbm7858
6 жыл бұрын
Graphic at 3:39, weird is spelled wrong. Also that third “strut” on the Mitsubishi isn’t a strut, it’s the power rear door mechanism. Most cars now incorporate it within a strut, but this execution was pretty common 15 years ago
@aquaboy1650
6 жыл бұрын
QX60 vs CX-9 would be more interesting!
@AYouTubeChannelwithNoName
3 жыл бұрын
Mazda is still kicking ass in 2020
@Guvb235
6 жыл бұрын
They're both pretty old and meh, but at least the Mitsubishi costs much less to buy in the first place, and will likely be much more reliable too.
@kylemas2005
5 жыл бұрын
Totally more reliable. They actually know how to program their ECU to their Jatco CVT8, unlike Nissan.
@glsracer
6 жыл бұрын
Thankfully Mitsubishis are usually offered with incentives. In either case though, I would totally take a Mitsubishi over a comparable Infinity. Infinitys are overpriced and look like the spawn of a car and a marine mammal. They're just not attractive.
@irama9520
6 жыл бұрын
glsracer thats your opinion but I think the mitsubishi looks ugly.
@seana1665
5 жыл бұрын
Says the guy who can't even get the name of the car right. It's "INFINITI"
@FabienTeulieres93
2 жыл бұрын
To each his own! I think Infiniti makes very attractive vehicles. Mitsubishi, not so much 😕
@glsracer
2 жыл бұрын
@@FabienTeulieres93 the Q60 isn't too bad but most of the SUVs are fugly, especially the QX80 which is the worst offender.
@EdPMur
3 жыл бұрын
We have a 2011 Outlander with the same drivetrain as that one. I looooove that engine. It’s reliable, the transmission shifts great and the engine sounds pretty nice. The AWD system is also great
@pauldaniel6208
3 жыл бұрын
Typical bias from reviewers against Mitsubishi. The video should have showed that alleged slow infotainment load time, because it is false. Styling is subjective, and hard facts are omitted from your summary of Pros and Cons of of each vehicle (especially the Mitsubishi 10 year powertrain warranty). Mitsubishi, Toyota and Subaru build the most solid Japanese vehicles, period.
@mrgreen8357
5 жыл бұрын
Also I believe the outlander has better safety scores. I just don't understand why some vehicles cost so much it's not like they have double to triple the costs to make them then cheaper model vehicles. This video is a perfect example. I would much rather have 2 outlanders then 1 infinity or have the outlander and another 25 thousand dollars car or just the outlander and 25 thousand dollars to do what I want with like buy a boat or small camper
@ThomasFG
6 жыл бұрын
Not a bad sounding V6 in the Outlander
@rogerbarrero
4 жыл бұрын
I love Mitsubishi, really realiable cars.
@TheJoeT81
6 жыл бұрын
We did nearly 3,000 miles in a rental QX60 around the Mid-West and I could not tell it was a CVT.
@guitarded78
3 жыл бұрын
I have a 2015 outlander SE AWC V6. I love it. Just right for me
@adrianparada2407
5 жыл бұрын
I take any mitsubishi over nissan Any day of the week, i hope renault and nissan don't ruin mitsubishi now that they are working together...nissan reliabity is the worst...#1 toyota #2 honda #3 mitsubishi #4 mazda #5 subaru...
@seana1665
5 жыл бұрын
hahaha you have no clue. All your comments suck yo
@waq2062
5 жыл бұрын
If i have to spend that much money on a suv i would be an idiot to buy QX60 instead of Volvo XC 90. If i don’t want to spend that much money then outlander is a very good choice.
@rudfil
3 жыл бұрын
I still would rather have the Mitsubishi over that Infinity.
@gavin6090
6 жыл бұрын
Outlander is much smaller than infinity
@charleswilliams3979
5 жыл бұрын
I brought an 2013 Outlander sport , reliable as hell! , not a problem, battery lasted 5 years, nothing but routine maintenance, with 80,000 miles on it , still runs like new!, gave it to my daughter, brought a18 Outlander! Loving it!
@JoseRodriguez-ts6no
4 жыл бұрын
Mitsubishi is the best 💪💪
@JVPERFORMANCE64
6 жыл бұрын
MIVEC KICK ON U BRO
@Trades46
6 жыл бұрын
Full disclosure I own an Outlander PHEV and prior that a Outlander V6 GT. The V6 GT version is great value for what you pay for but honestly there are nicer and better options out there. Still the V6 gets good power and is hooked to a 6spd auto - so no turbos or CVT which is great for long term reliability standpoint. I still pick the CRV, CX-5 and Equinox over the gas only Outlander, but for me the real standout is the PHEV as it remains the only one of its kind in North America. As for the Infiniti...do yourself a favor and get the Pathfinder Platinum instead. The car is fine but the QX60 isn't special enough to warrant the price difference. I take the MDX or XC90 instead at this price range.
@singularity70
5 жыл бұрын
Be-careful with a PHEV .. the battery/battery management is crap kzitem.info/rock/Cwvk634ZX1R1_qhfRyczOgvideos
@EdPMur
3 жыл бұрын
Now that there are other PHEV options like the RAV 4 Prime, what do you think about the Outlander PHEV?
@cheez1012
Жыл бұрын
@@EdPMur (All of this is regarding the pre 2022 Outlander) I would like to say that the Outlander PHev has been around since 2013 and had hybrid SUV's before that, just not plug in hybrid. The Rav-4 Phev came out in 2021. I'm not sure about the Rav 4 but the Outlander uses the engine as a generator and uses motors to move the car, but can still power the front wheels directly with the engine when necessary. Starting off with the prices, the Outlander has cheaper prices for the base models and for the top trims, they come out at about the same. They both have similar technologies when fully loaded, and me personally, I like the simpler interior of the Outlander though it is outdated compared to the RAV-4. The infotainment system of the Outlander is not the best, but it's still functional and comes with a 360 camera, as well as many detailed information displays regarding the cars performance such as monthly gas usage, ev usage, etc. etc (idk about the Rav-4). I would say they're both equally comfortable score similarly in reliability, towing capacity is higher in the Rav 4 though. Both cars are capable of powering houses which requires a unit, but the unit used for Mitsubishi is several thousand dollars cheaper than the one needed for the Rav-4. Both are full time (I believe) AWD, but the Mitsubishi has a more advanced AWD system with its super AWC. Also the Outlander comes with two engine choices, a 2.0 L and a 2.4 L inline 4, while I'm pretty sure the Rav-4 comes with only 1 choice. Overall, I would choose the Outlander because it comes with a longer warranty, and used ones come at much cheaper prices despite the Outlander being competent for what it is. (Just saying, some of my information may be wrong.) Summing up the 4 main benefits of each car: Outlander: 1.) Cheaper used, and lower markups compared to Toyota. 2.) Longer warranty 3.) More advanced AWD system. 4.) Has DC fast charging unlike Rav 4 Rav-4 1.) More updated interior. 2.) Slightly better gas mileage since the engine has gotten updated more recently. 3.) Better towing capacity. 4.) Has slightly more technology since it's a newer model.
@auststrayaman1817
6 жыл бұрын
Mitsubishi is no were near ugly
@Jabid21
6 жыл бұрын
Mitsubishi should bring back the Montero, possibly in the Nissan Patrol (Armada) platform, and make the next generation Outlander larger and more comparable to a Toyota Highlander. They can then slot in the next Eclipse Cross in the current Outlander size. I own a QX60 it has so many issues in build quality, a sluggish CVT that pretends to shift like an automatic. Honestly, I don't consider QX60 a true Infiniti like the other Infiniti models built in Japan, it's basically a well dressed Pathfinder.
@RomaneMaticaliseGordon
6 жыл бұрын
Even a Mitsubishi is faster than that piece a crap 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@RomaneMaticaliseGordon
6 жыл бұрын
Tyler S. Nissan of late are extremely crappy. Even though Mitsubishi disappointed us by discontinuing the Evo and naming a crossover an Eclipse, they are actually improving with their lineup.
@ALEX-sh3tx
6 жыл бұрын
Tyler S. Me too
@user-oq3lv6lv7x
6 жыл бұрын
Maticalise Music Master if they’re improving their lineup that mirage needs to go
@user-oq3lv6lv7x
6 жыл бұрын
Maticalise Music Master and also , the infiniti would take it when rolling . you can’t beat a cvt when it doesn’t need to shift .
@97I30T
6 жыл бұрын
Maticalise Music Master Just goes to show you how awful CVTs are. It smothers the power advantage it has over the Mitsubishi.
@Huna98
6 жыл бұрын
Infiniti- twice as good looking, twice as luxurious, twice as everything. I despise CVT's but a family car isnt meant for sport driving so i wouldnt mind. QX60 all day
@adrianparada2407
5 жыл бұрын
Also twice less reliable than the mitsubishi, nissan reliability sucks, i take the mitsubishi over Any nissan product,, if you want luxury get a lexus which is made by toyota, a reliable car company..
@seana1665
5 жыл бұрын
@@adrianparada2407 And how many Mitsubishi do you see daily on the road. Zero. Thank you
@germanvillarroel2315
6 жыл бұрын
I don’t watch all your videos or comment super often, but when I click I’m rarely disappointed. Even though I’m not likely to be shopping in the 3-row segment anytime soon, this was fun and interesting. I think you guys have good chemistry as hosts, and it was a refreshing change-up from the usual. Hope to see more.
@pacificgazer
6 жыл бұрын
Only plus for Mitsubishi is the AWD system which is better than the Infiniti.
@chinggop1
5 жыл бұрын
I think that is the same all wheel drive system mitsubishi had in thier legendary Lancer Evolution. A bad ass rallye car that mitsu races offroad in the 80s, though mated with V6 now, that 6 speed non-cvt transmission very good. I could imagine an Evolution engine would be something awesome and insane in that Outlander GT
@minivanmaster
6 жыл бұрын
total insanity to spend $61,000 for a car with a CVT
@tonychau1983
5 жыл бұрын
The Fault in Our Cutie Marks after paying 60gs you'll need to save money on gas
@kylemas2005
5 жыл бұрын
Hardly dude, vast majority of owners dont even realize they drive a CVT operated vehicle. Internet effect of complainers posting much more often than satisfied owners. Mitsubishi Jatco CVT8 is the same as Nissan uses, but one huge difference, ECU programming! Nissan cant get it right with their Xtronic CVT programming agreed. But Mitsubishi's INVES III CVT programming has much less documentation of premature CVT failure. Bash Nissan, but Mitsubishi's drivetrain is venerable, proven, if a touch outdated.
@silentrefusal9911
6 жыл бұрын
Ask the same question from someone who is planning to buy a BMW 5 or a Mercedes S class, is it really better than a Toyota Camry or an Avalon?? You get my point.
@bdaddy8552
3 жыл бұрын
Maybe I'm just partial to Toyotas. Honestly, after riding in all three cars I would take an Avalon all day long over the Mercedes or BMW. Just my opinion. Toyotas have incredible build quality. Also, ( my experience and friends that own BMWs and Mercedes ) most people spend more time in the shop with BMW or Mercedes than a Toyota. JMO
@Alexscott100
6 жыл бұрын
Probably pay $10K for the Infiniti commercial in the headrest
@singularity70
5 жыл бұрын
Mitsubishi S-AWC would have easily destroyed the Infinity on a 4x4 track to.. You guys should have test that to, half the price but more than twice the traction. I don't even want to get in to the CVT issue in the Infinity, its infinitely sucks for twice the price.
@alinmatti786
6 жыл бұрын
That commerical on the start up 😂😂😂😂
@jakp8777
6 жыл бұрын
$60k for a gaudy Nissan is way too expensive and indicates you have so much money you are wasting it. I’ll take some of your money and you can buy something for $30k if you insist on buying Japanese.
@jakp8777
6 жыл бұрын
Ha! Very mature. I drive a new Wrangler and a new GTI, both cost more then a gaudy Nissan.
@thrillseekanz7874
6 жыл бұрын
If you own a Fiat and VW product you should lay off the gawdy Nissan comments, you will be having problems long before a Nissan owner in your gawdy Jeep. You realise that, dont you
@jakp8777
6 жыл бұрын
ThrillSeeka New Zealand you do realize that the Jeep I own was engineered in Sterling Heights Michigan USA before fiat bought Chrysler, right? How do I know that? Because of math, I personally worked in Sterling Heights USA not Italy for Jeep engineering and because all the parts on my Jeep have Chrysler logos, not fiat logos. If my Jeep is so gaudy then why does it have such good resale? It’s actually worth more as a trade in then I owe on the loan. You ricers are not really good with numbers or making up arguments.
@irama9520
6 жыл бұрын
jak p Jeeps are fine for having fun and going outside of the cities but its not great in the city and the interior is very cheap. The visibility is comparable to a hummer.
@johneason6540
6 жыл бұрын
Good review. Love the channel and All the staff. You guys are funny!
@michaelpickering1009
6 жыл бұрын
I'm warming to this youmg man Mike
@damgoodballers
6 жыл бұрын
Bonkers to me why they would put a 3.5 liter engine instead of a 3.7 liter like they do in the Q50
@Trades46
6 жыл бұрын
damgoodballers the 3.7L V6 doesn't work on a transverse application. The 3.7 on the Q50 and Q60 were longitudinal RWD cars - this is based off a FWD Pathfinder platform.
@lfsracer79
6 жыл бұрын
and a CVT...
@blexy350
6 жыл бұрын
The 3.7 is only applied to the Q70 now.
@jerrycain6404
6 жыл бұрын
Different strokes for different folks. The cvt is more efficient. It’s more durable, and with the artificial shift points programmed in, difficult to distinguish for the average driver. I am amazed at all the test drivers that present all this faux indignance about the cvt.Only a gear head would know the difference. Rides smooth, decent power, simple controls. Mine is an 18, and I love it.I traded in a 17 rx350, engine hesitated, trans was haunted, rode rough, handled like a boat. And Lexus could not fix it. Traded for the qx at 3800 miles. I love the qx, more car than the rx350, the rx hesitation in the rx has produced the longest thread ever on club Lexus, starting in 2016. No, I am not a goofball, retired after 37 years running an independent shop, drag racing since 16, and owned enough street rods, muscle cars, and hot rods to fill up a parking lot.
@av8743
5 жыл бұрын
Jerry Cain so once the car is already in motion, in sport mode is this car fast? In the video the qx60 looked to be fast once it’s rolling, just only sluggish from off the line.
@jerrycain6404
5 жыл бұрын
My qx is not slow, it will spin the tires from a start. I think most people do not understand how a cvt works, If you let the vehicle move from a start before getting deep in the throttle, it will roll the pulleys for a taller gear. Takes practice, but you have to get deep into the torque before letting the trans start changing ratios. Once you learn the technique, it hauls. It’s like drag racing on slicks, keep them spinning while moving, stop spinning to soon, you bog it down, and lose momentum.
@thatperson1979
6 жыл бұрын
You compare the two on size? You admitted the Infinity is based on the Pathfinder, but yet forgot that that vehicle is larger in class than the Mitsubishi. The Mitsubishi is competing against the Rouge. Try comparing the back seats in those and let us know.
@josemanuelruiz2036
6 жыл бұрын
Do more videos like these. That’s a question that I do often.
@robertstewart1254
2 жыл бұрын
Interesting how rear seat room is compared--not with comparable sized cars--but with one with a much longer body and wheel base.
@JH-go8zd
3 жыл бұрын
My 2010 4 cly Mitsubishi has been awesome , 215,000 no problems. The only thing Mitsubishi have made a mistake on is that they dropped the rear tailgate. My wife loves skiing. It’s so handy . And when I take it for work . I can haul a ton of tools and work out of of the back. We will never sell it !
@joshuaflores5992
2 ай бұрын
You guys are funny. Made me laugh at my child ejecter seats
@hemipowersrt6773
3 жыл бұрын
The one thing I don't want in a $60,000 vehicle is a CVT
@EdPMur
3 жыл бұрын
Especially a CVT from Nissan
@MadeOfCrazyWood
6 жыл бұрын
The qx60 looks like the old Outlandrt
@mrxklusive2267
6 жыл бұрын
Yall should review a 2018 traverse and a 2018 dodge durango
@davidn5861
6 жыл бұрын
Joshua Stanley Perferably the SRT.
@XxDrEvilxX
3 жыл бұрын
I'm sick of Honda, Mazda and Toyota known for reliability. It's time for Mitsubishi to tighten the belt and actually be competitive in reliability.
@chinggop1
5 жыл бұрын
Just a thought...Outlander is still one of the very few vehicles thats entirely Japanese made, and that QX60 is a generic nissan pathfinder and worst generically rebadge as wanna be luxury infinity. They dont make that where originally nissan come from. Just like lexus and acura rebadged marquis, wanna spend $60k of your hard earned $$, look elsewhere and go for real luxury straight up, and not the rebadged generics. its your hard earned $$$.
@KirkKreifels
6 жыл бұрын
Never been a fan of either of these carmakers. I'd take a used GX 460 or a used Honda pilot over either of these new
@AHMEDMOOSAJI
6 жыл бұрын
LEXUriouS Kirk lol
@kristianchurchill5017
4 жыл бұрын
Honda pilots are ugly as hell!!!
@teddysliftworld
6 жыл бұрын
I am not a fan of either car. If you want practicality just get a minivan. They both feel a little outdated and cheap to me.
@Trades46
6 жыл бұрын
A minivan is the ultimate in practicality - just Americans are too infatuated with SUV to see otherwise. I recently took a trip to Shanghai for a month back in May. Very few people in China drives SUV - they prefer either a sedan or a minivan. One of Buick's best sellers there is not an Enclave, Envision or Encore, but the GL8. Had a chance to be driven in one from the Pudong International airport to my hotel - it was EXTREMELY comfortable & more spacious than any 3 row SUV in existence.
@jjgreek1
5 жыл бұрын
Teddy's Lift World I would rather die
@sz8204
6 жыл бұрын
Qx60 is perhaps the worst suv I have sat and drove... not sure if it’s just me but in the second row the floor is pretty high so ur knees are raised... think about sitting like that for hours on road trips!!!
@quentinwooten30
6 жыл бұрын
I find it weird how many ppl spell infiniti wrong (infinity)
@XV40_MATEO
4 жыл бұрын
We've got the 07' outlander the first year it came out with a V6 the transmission is awesome for that car if you shift the gears yourself and let it come almost to redline it pulls pretty hard to have only 220Hp very fun and reliable car only thing is I wish they would make the new ones with a new 3.5L V6 it would be even quicker
@getnbigger29
6 жыл бұрын
The pathfinder would be much closer in price
@jd5179
6 жыл бұрын
60k and has CVT . Lmao
@97I30T
6 жыл бұрын
jd5179 That’s Nissan for you. They sell absolute trash these days.
@blexy350
6 жыл бұрын
It’s a family vehicle, buyers for this want smooth hence the CVT.
@tonychau1983
5 жыл бұрын
Kent wasn't that great back then too
@tonychau1983
5 жыл бұрын
and I thought cvt was for cheap cars
@SSwell87
5 жыл бұрын
fun video, thanks guys!
@JasnoGT
4 жыл бұрын
I've always had a American or German cars. I think my first Japanese vehicle will be a mitsubishi. Everyone has toyota or honda. Plus they are priced very well. Its good to be different. I like the Outlander Sport.
@tritchie6272
5 жыл бұрын
Which is better offroad? While the Infinity to me looks like it has a much nicer interior that's also a big price difference.
@GraveUypo
4 жыл бұрын
they say the outlander has 240hp here in brazil. i'm inclined to believe it, because it handily beats a 270hp santa fe, and even inches the the older 285hp santa fe. all the way through, even top speed, because it's a bit more aerodynamic.
@DazdnCofuzd
6 жыл бұрын
Roman should of gotten in the back seat of the Infinity as well, would of been a more comparable test. Probably in a 1/4 mile the Infinity would win. Mitsubishi has been doing better with their suv's, but still need to get better MPG and interior design.
@e70_x5_guy4
3 жыл бұрын
My aunt has an Infiniti QX60 just like the one you reviewed!
@medellon
6 жыл бұрын
God review, I'm curious if the premium brands are worth the extra money. An interesting comparison would be the Infiniti QX60 and a Nissan Pathfinder.
@donzacole
Жыл бұрын
Give me the Mitsubishi Outlander any day of the week!!!
@jakethesnake1503
6 жыл бұрын
Have you met the Leglesses
@webalam.odindo9781
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Roman. Great review.
@benpitt3012
5 жыл бұрын
compare the mitsu with the pathfinder!
@RealWorldCarReviews
6 жыл бұрын
Good comparison review, but easy on the background track volume there boys! Way too loud, and alongside the presenters at the same volume level to all a bit chaotic sound-wise.
@gp2040
6 жыл бұрын
My saturn outlook has 3 springs on the trunk too. Maybe has to do with the power liftgate
@crimson49er
6 жыл бұрын
as someone who's owned 2 mitsubishi's, i can say they are absolute trash. plastic rattleboxes & worst thing is Mitsu doesnt honor their warranty at all. PSA to anyone considering one, just dont. get anything else. With that said, i 'm shocked there's a $60k car with a CVT. absolute deal breaker on what would otherwise be an SUV i'd consider
@JAYBud88
6 жыл бұрын
Maui Chris what models did you own I have a soft spot for Mitsubishi I always wanted a Montero
@Trades46
6 жыл бұрын
Tyler S. I can attest to this. Had a 2009 Outlander V6 and it was solid vehicle. Did great in the winter and the V6 had ample power. The only detriments were its thirst for gas and it was rather loud at freeway speeds. Traded it in for a 2018 Outlander PHEV. Even more brilliant in the fact now you only have to visit a gas station once in a blue moon if you have a short commute and charge the battery at home, work and public locations. Maul probably got some bad examples, but Mitsubishi builds reliable cars that are more utilitarian. There's a reason many countries in Africa and Asia Mitsubishi still dominate.
@user-lf8wu5ri8n
6 жыл бұрын
CVT's are getting better and better. Why so much hate?
@ssjMaximum22Goku
6 жыл бұрын
I agree. I've driven the newer Eclipse, Lancer, and Outlander and they're plasticky pieces of crap that are flimsier than a bendy straw. And don't even talk about the ride quality. Mitsubishi is literally the bottom of the barrel for Japanese vehicles.
@AladdinSaneNYC
6 жыл бұрын
Tyler S.: Why do you believe the Mirage "family" as you call it is out of the question, so to speak? It serves its purpose as minimal economy vehicles, no more, no less. There IS a market here in the USA for it and sales have been decent for Mitsu. Some truly dig it. Others don't.That's subjective. You dont care for it obviously and that's ok. But others DO. Peace...
@EricFortuneJr.
6 жыл бұрын
That CVT doesn't exactly help.
@7411159
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video
@97I30T
6 жыл бұрын
Aside from the weight difference between the cars, the drag race also is proof that CVTs waste a ton of power.
@soiceyboy33
6 жыл бұрын
KentB27 especially the newer CVTs with simulated shift points...such a waste
@jamesharris5185
3 жыл бұрын
Which drive mode did he have it in
@rungsarnsuthithanin8415
Жыл бұрын
I am confident the mitsubishi will be more reliable than the infiniti.
@garrett1144
6 жыл бұрын
I've always been interested in that outlander for the price, but do look at the depreciation from new to used, they drop VERY fast so I would never buy one new. Those top trim mitsu go for mid 30s then sell for mid 20s a year later.
@kskwk
5 жыл бұрын
Both are not the same size segment vehicle. Try to compare it with pajero aka montero
@kristianchurchill5017
4 жыл бұрын
Ummm you do realize that the Montero was discontinued in the US back in 2006 over a decade ago right??? Why on Earth would they compare a modern day vehicle to a vehicle that was last made 13 years ago?
@Blank00
4 жыл бұрын
Really interesting to see what Mitsubishi's future will be, because Nissan recently purchased Mitsu and people predict that future Mitsubishis will be a Nissans with a different badge, similar to how the newest Diahatsus are really Toyotas
@jasonk19xx17
3 жыл бұрын
It's actually an alliance with Nissan and Renault. Mitsubishi has one third ownership, and the other two brands have a third each. Currently, they are sharing technology. The 2022 Outlander is based on the Nissan Rogue, built in Japan. But Mitsubishi's Eclipse Cross, Mirage and Outlander Sport are still their own design and build.
@Blank00
3 жыл бұрын
@@jasonk19xx17 Outlander Sport (ASX or RVR) is due for a redesign soon, as is the Rogue Sport (Qashqai)
@KirDbDy
6 жыл бұрын
...so we’re comparing Mitsubishi to Infinity now? This has to be some sort of troll aimed at Mitsubishi for being trash.
@interceptor-ss8kb
6 жыл бұрын
Outlander shouts I'm a coffin dodger
@avlisk
6 жыл бұрын
If you ever forget how to spell "weird", just think "we are weird".
@tomaracic1492
5 жыл бұрын
what a waste of time comparison.. Cvt came a long way from the time it was introduced in Nissan cars on 2004 .. I own the qx60 and it great . Comfort and reliable ,and it is still a great vehicle compared to Mitsubishi or mazda qx9.
@tac836
4 жыл бұрын
@thefastlanecar how long was the drag race?
@jtomtl
4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha, two giant dudes in a compact SUV, so cute
@lucky1206
5 жыл бұрын
I'm not too sure about this video. These guys do know the second row and first can move forward and back right? They don't need to flip the seat the way they did many times, also I seen this type of seat tech in older cars so I'm not sure what the big deal is. The seat has to be stored away to have more cargo room. I rather choose function and practicality with the Outlander to handle more through the years than to buy a luxury SUV that can't handle too much and where it looks too pretty to do the simplest of any situation. Also people have to remember a vehicle is a utilitarian object that gets you from point A to point B and it never raises in value like a house, so buying an expensive vehicle should be really worth to keep for the long run because it will depreciate a lot faster than other vehicles.
@seana1665
5 жыл бұрын
These guys are a dad and son team and they do not give honest reviews.
@Michael-uo4jj
5 жыл бұрын
What? That's not a strut that's the motor arm for automatic hatch open It's like that for easy repair
Пікірлер: 320