ജീവിതത്തിൽ ഇനിയും സൂര്യനുദിക്കാത്തവർ പലതും പറയും, ബ:അച്ചൻ ധൈര്യമായി മുമ്പോട്ടു പോകുക. ആശംസകൾ!
@joythomasvallianeth6013
6 күн бұрын
Dear Achen, I have gone through all the 3 parts of your video claiming that St. Thomas came to Kerala. But I am sorry to say that you have failed miserably to establish that St. Thomas ever came to Kerala, leave alone in 52 AD. None of the evidences give any , I repeat any indication for the St. Thomas's visit to Kerala. Acta Thoma only can be used to say that St. Thomas came to the then undivided Indian region bordering Persia - the region beyond river Indus to the country of Gondophoris in the then Noth west India or the present day Pakistan region. Hence we can claim to some extent that St. Thomas as a patron apostle of India. India does not mean Kerala or South India, Achen ! No wonder , people say catholic priests and bishops are No. 1 liars. See how you introduced the lie, quoting John chrysostom, that the ancient Kerala christian community were under the bishop of Rome ! The catholic church historians need to somehow bring the ancient Kerala under the Latin church for satisfying their ego. We all understand your inferiority complex ! The truth is that Kerala coast had trade relations with the Mediterranean coast from the early centuries. First came the jewish traders and then from first century onwards, christian spice traders and from the 7th century onwards muslim traders came for the spices of Kerala mainly. These people married the local women and their descendants are called as "Mappillas". Thus we had Jootha mappillas, christian mappillas and Jonaka ( or muslim) mappillas. These mappilla christians were met by the few early travellers from abroad and are mentioned in their travelogue. All the other mention about christians in India pertain to the North western part of ancient india or the present day Pakistan, Afganistan regions only . Again the migration under Knai Thomman also is a cooked up story by the catholic community. It is a mistaken identity with that of the 9th century ( 823 AD) migration of West Asian christians to Kollam. These christians are called as " Nasranies". Simultaneously there were settlements of Nestorian christians on the Eastern coast of India and they fled enmass to the Kodungalloor region due to the persecution by the fanatic hindu community belonging to the Manickavasgar group. Then we have christians who were converted from the local population of Kerala by both the eastern and western missionaries over the centuries who can be called as Marthoma christians for want of a better word. So we have 3 types of Kerala christians- Mappilla christians , Nasrani christians and Marthoma christians . Of course, most of the Kerala Christian's do not know the subtle difference between the 3 terms and hence they use these terms interchangeably. Another reason is that they intermarry among the 3 groups and hence one cannot distinguish in general between the 3 groups. The early christian spice traders of the West coast belonged to the Jacobite or the Antiochene church where as the Eastern coast or Coromandel coast christians were Nestorians who then migrated to Kodungalloor ! So how can the early christians of Kerala be under the latin bishop of Rome Achen ?
Пікірлер: 6